• polski
    • English
  • English 
    • polski
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Czasopisma naukowe | Scientific Journals
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Tom 047 (2013)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Czasopisma naukowe | Scientific Journals
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Tom 047 (2013)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Obraz nadawcy w recenzjach Henryka Sienkiewicza

No Thumbnail [100%x80]
View/Open
4. Pietrzak_AUL FL_47_(2013).pdf (6.789Mb)
Date
2013
Author
Pietrzak, Magdalena
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The Image of the Speaker in the Reviews by Henryk Sienkiewicz The aim of the article is to investigate the ways in which the speaker in the reviews by Henryk Sienkiewicz presents himself to the reader and to describe the roles he performs. The present analysis indicates that there is a correspondence between the image of the speaker and the type of the review. On the one hand, in case of reviews with a complex structure and a diverse illocutionary potential, i.e. academic reviews, polemical reviews which discuss and assess various aspects of the literary work, the speaker frequently assumes the roles of an expert, a connoisseur or a teacher, which often permeate and complement one another. On the other hand, reviews in the form of an overview or a summary usually feature a speaker-informer. Regardless of the genre, the speaker manifests his presence in the first-person plural forms and pronouns (my, nasz; Eng. we, our) and uses surprisingly few singular forms. What may explain the employment of the “my” (“we”) form as the plural of modesty is an attempt to make the text of the review seem more objective, while the inclusive “my” (“we”) serves persuasive purposes.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/9980
Collections
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Tom 047 (2013) [8]

University of Lodz Repository

Contact Us | Send Feedback | Accessibility
 

 


University of Lodz Repository

Contact Us | Send Feedback | Accessibility
 

 

NoThumbnail