| dc.contributor.author | Cap, Piotr | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wieczorek, Anna Ewa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-23T13:31:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-23T13:31:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-03-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Cap P., Wieczorek A., Exploring Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2026, https://doi.org/10.18778/8445-013-0 | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8445-012-3 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/57778 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The present textbook outlines the main theories, concepts and domains of linguistic pragmatics, illustrating the key issues with authentic discourse data and providing tools for the reader’s own study of pragmatic phenomena in language. Structured in 6 chapters, it deals with the main areas and frameworks, such as speech acts, implicature, presupposition and others, discussing their theoretical features and practical applications, and eventually describing their individual as well as collective input in the analysis of language and discourse. Each chapter contains an overview of central issues, approaches and debates within the field of pragmatics, followed by a corresponding practice pack that offers structured opportunities for applied learning through varied exercises and analytical tasks. The tasks often engage with current real-world data, such as in the form of short utterances, simulated dialogues and excerpts from political, media, journalistic, institutional, advertising, coaching, and other discourses. Through these exercises, students connect theoretical understanding with authentic communicative strategies, observing and analyzing the ways in which pragmatic choices serve specific interactional and rhetorical goals. Comprehensive answer keys at the end of the chapters make the book suitable for self-study, while more open-ended and research-oriented activities can be pursued under tutor guidance. Finally, the textbook offers a concluding self-assessment quiz that allows learners to consolidate both theoretical and practical knowledge gained throughout the consecutive chapters. Altogether, the book is meant to serve the needs of students at BA, MA, as well as PhD levels, depending on their starting expertise and the amount of support from the tutor. | pl_PL |
| dc.description.abstract | Niniejszy podręcznik opisuje główne teorie, pojęcia i dziedziny badawcze pragmatyki językowej, ilustrując poszczególne zagadnienia przykładami rzeczywistego dyskursu i dostarczając czytelnikowi narzędzi do własnych studiów nad zjawiskami pragmatycznymi w języku. Na przestrzeni 6 rozdziałów omówiono modele i obszary pragmalingwistyki, takie jak akty mowy, implikatura, presupozycja i inne, definiując ich cechy formalne z perspektywy teoretycznej, a także określając ich indywidualny oraz zbiorowy potencjał analityczny w studiach nad językiem i dyskursem. Każdy rozdział rozpoczyna się od opisu danego pojęcia pragmatycznego oraz podejść badawczych z nim związanych, przedstawiając następnie serię zadań i ćwiczeń, mających na celu utrwalenie i praktyczne zastosowanie nabytej wiedzy. Zaproponowane ćwiczenia opierają się na przykładach rzeczywistego użycia języka, w takich dziedzinach jak dyskurs polityczny, medialny i dziennikarski, komunikacja instytucjonalna, język reklamy, coachingu, itp. W trakcie wykonywania zadań, studenci mają okazję by wykorzystać przyswojone informacje i wykształcone umiejętności, na rzecz obserwacji i analizy konkretnych zjawisk retorycznych zachodzących w żywej interakcji językowej. Każdy z rozdziałów zawiera klucz do ćwiczeń zamkniętych, co umożliwia pracę własną studenta, w odróżnieniu od zadań o charakterze otwartym, które zaleca się wykonywać przy wsparciu instruktora. Ostatnią część podręcznika stanowi obszerny test podsumowujący, pozwalający na samoocenę całości wiedzy i umiejętności uzyskanych podczas pracy. Podręcznik może być wykorzystywany na poziomie licencjackim i magisterskim, a także na poziomie studiów doktoranckich, przy założeniu odpowiedniej pomocy ze strony opiekuna naukowego. | pl_PL |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | linguistic pragmatics | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | language function | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | speech acts | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | indirect meaning | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | discourse analysis | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | pragmatyka językowa | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | funkcja języka | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | akty mowy | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | znaczenie niebezpośrednie | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | analiza dyskursu | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Exploring Pragmatics: Theory and Practice | pl_PL |
| dc.title.alternative | Poznać pragmatykę: teoria i praktyka | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Book | pl_PL |
| dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Piotr Cap & Anna Ewa Wieczorek, Łódź 2026, © Copyright for this edition by University of Łódź, Łódź 2026 | pl_PL |
| dc.page.number | 297 | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Cap, Piotr - University of Łódź, Faculty of Philology, Institute of English Studies, Department of Pragmatics | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Wieczorek, Anna Ewa - University of Łódź, Faculty of Philology, Institute of English Studies, Department of Pragmatics | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8445-013-0 | |
| dc.references | Allan, Keith & Kasia Jaszczołt (eds). 2012. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Anscombe, Gertrude. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1954. Indexical expressions. Mind 63: 359-379. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bazzanella, Carla. 2002. The significance of context in interpretation: The we case. Foundations of Science 7: 239-254. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bublitz, Wolfram. 2003. Emotive prosody: How attitudinal frames help construct context. In E. Mengel, H.-J. Schmid & M. Steppat (eds), Anglistentag 2002 Bayreuth, Proceedings, 381-391. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Buehler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cap, Piotr. 2017. Studying ideological worldviews in political discourse space: Critical-cognitive advances in the analysis of conflict and coercion. Journal of Pragmatics 108: 17-27. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cap, Piotr. 2021. Alternative futures in political discourse. Discourse & Society 32: 328-345. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Chilton, Paul. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Culpeper, Jonathan & Michael Haugh. 2021. (Im)politeness and sociopragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Kádár & M. Terkourafi (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, 315-339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cutting, Joan & Kenneth Fordyce. 2021. Pragmatics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Dynel, Marta. 2015. The landscape of impoliteness research. Journal of Politeness Research 11: 329-354. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fetzer, Anita. 2010. Contexts in context. In S.-K. Tanskanen, M.-L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson & M. Raitaniemi (eds), Discourses in Interaction, 13-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fetzer, Anita. 2018. Discourse pragmatics: Communicative action meets discourse analysis. In C. Ilie & N. Norrick (eds), Pragmatics and its Interfaces, 33-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fetzer, Anita & Augustin Speyer. 2012. Discourse relations in English and German discourse. Local and not-so-local constraints. Intercultural Pragmatics 9: 413-452. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Flowerdew, John & John Richardson (eds). 2018. Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fraser, Bruce. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219-236. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik C: 25-50. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York, NY: Academic Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Giltrow, Janet & Dieter Stein (eds). 2009. Genres in the Internet. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York, NY: Anchor Books. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, 41-58. New York, NY: Academic Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Halliday, Michael A. K. 2000. Introduction to Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hanks, William F. 2011. Deixis and indexicality. In W. Bublitz & Neal R. Norrick (eds), Foundations of Pragmatics, 315-346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Harnish, Robert M. 2009. Internalism and externalism in speech act theory. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 9-31. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hart, Christopher. 2017. Cognitive Linguistic Critical Discourse Studies: Connecting language and image. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 187-201. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hart, Christopher & Piotr Cap. 2014. Introduction. In C. Hart & P. Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 1-14. London: Bloomsbury. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Horn, Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | House, Juliane & Daniel Z. Kadar. 2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Huang, Yan (ed.). 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kaal, Bertie. 2015. How ‘real’ are time and space in politically motivated worldviews? Critical Discourse Studies 12: 330-346. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Karttunen, Lauri. 2016. Presupposition: What went wrong? Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26: 705-731. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2889-2897. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kempson, Ruth. 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Koteyko, Nelya. 2014. Critical studies of health and illness discourses. In C. Hart & P. Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 543-558. London: Bloomsbury. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Lakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 1: 45-80. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Levinson, Stephen C. 2017. Speech acts. In Y. Huang (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, 199-216. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Lischinsky, Alon. 2018. Critical discourse studies and branding. In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (eds), Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, 540-552. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | O’Halloran, Kieran. 2010. How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 563-576. Abingdon: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Rajah, Jothie. 2011. Punishing bodies, securing the nation: How rule of law can legitimate the urbane authoritarian state. Law & Social Inquiry 36: 945-970 | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Rhodes, R. A. W. & Paul ‘t Hart (eds). 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479-493. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Sbisa, Marina. 2007. How to read Austin. Pragmatics 17: 461-473. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts – An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Senft, Gunter. 2014. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. Munitz & P. Unger (eds), Semantics and Philosophy, 197-214. New York, NY: New York University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Strawson, Peter. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Terkourafi, Marina (ed.). 2015. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Thomas, Jenny. 2015. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Tsohatzidis, Savas (ed.). 1999. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2015. ‘Look who’s talking now’: A taxonomy of speakers in single-turn political discourse. Discourse Studies 17: 343-359. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2019. The (de)legitimising power of narrative reports: A case study of covert sayers. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 15: 23-44. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2020. Embedded discourse spaces in narrative reports. Discourse Studies 22: 221-240. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer (eds). 2016. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Yule, George. 1996/2008. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8445-013-0 | |