Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorCap, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorWieczorek, Anna Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-23T13:31:09Z
dc.date.available2026-03-23T13:31:09Z
dc.date.issued2026-03-23
dc.identifier.citationCap P., Wieczorek A., Exploring Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2026, https://doi.org/10.18778/8445-013-0pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8445-012-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/57778
dc.description.abstractThe present textbook outlines the main theories, concepts and domains of linguistic pragmatics, illustrating the key issues with authentic discourse data and providing tools for the reader’s own study of pragmatic phenomena in language. Structured in 6 chapters, it deals with the main areas and frameworks, such as speech acts, implicature, presupposition and others, discussing their theoretical features and practical applications, and eventually describing their individual as well as collective input in the analysis of language and discourse. Each chapter contains an overview of central issues, approaches and debates within the field of pragmatics, followed by a corresponding practice pack that offers structured opportunities for applied learning through varied exercises and analytical tasks. The tasks often engage with current real-world data, such as in the form of short utterances, simulated dialogues and excerpts from political, media, journalistic, institutional, advertising, coaching, and other discourses. Through these exercises, students connect theoretical understanding with authentic communicative strategies, observing and analyzing the ways in which pragmatic choices serve specific interactional and rhetorical goals. Comprehensive answer keys at the end of the chapters make the book suitable for self-study, while more open-ended and research-oriented activities can be pursued under tutor guidance. Finally, the textbook offers a concluding self-assessment quiz that allows learners to consolidate both theoretical and practical knowledge gained throughout the consecutive chapters. Altogether, the book is meant to serve the needs of students at BA, MA, as well as PhD levels, depending on their starting expertise and the amount of support from the tutor.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractNiniejszy podręcznik opisuje główne teorie, pojęcia i dziedziny badawcze pragmatyki językowej, ilustrując poszczególne zagadnienia przykładami rzeczywistego dyskursu i dostarczając czytelnikowi narzędzi do własnych studiów nad zjawiskami pragmatycznymi w języku. Na przestrzeni 6 rozdziałów omówiono modele i obszary pragmalingwistyki, takie jak akty mowy, implikatura, presupozycja i inne, definiując ich cechy formalne z perspektywy teoretycznej, a także określając ich indywidualny oraz zbiorowy potencjał analityczny w studiach nad językiem i dyskursem. Każdy rozdział rozpoczyna się od opisu danego pojęcia pragmatycznego oraz podejść badawczych z nim związanych, przedstawiając następnie serię zadań i ćwiczeń, mających na celu utrwalenie i praktyczne zastosowanie nabytej wiedzy. Zaproponowane ćwiczenia opierają się na przykładach rzeczywistego użycia języka, w takich dziedzinach jak dyskurs polityczny, medialny i dziennikarski, komunikacja instytucjonalna, język reklamy, coachingu, itp. W trakcie wykonywania zadań, studenci mają okazję by wykorzystać przyswojone informacje i wykształcone umiejętności, na rzecz obserwacji i analizy konkretnych zjawisk retorycznych zachodzących w żywej interakcji językowej. Każdy z rozdziałów zawiera klucz do ćwiczeń zamkniętych, co umożliwia pracę własną studenta, w odróżnieniu od zadań o charakterze otwartym, które zaleca się wykonywać przy wsparciu instruktora. Ostatnią część podręcznika stanowi obszerny test podsumowujący, pozwalający na samoocenę całości wiedzy i umiejętności uzyskanych podczas pracy. Podręcznik może być wykorzystywany na poziomie licencjackim i magisterskim, a także na poziomie studiów doktoranckich, przy założeniu odpowiedniej pomocy ze strony opiekuna naukowego.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectlinguistic pragmaticspl_PL
dc.subjectlanguage functionpl_PL
dc.subjectspeech actspl_PL
dc.subjectindirect meaningpl_PL
dc.subjectdiscourse analysispl_PL
dc.subjectpragmatyka językowapl_PL
dc.subjectfunkcja językapl_PL
dc.subjectakty mowypl_PL
dc.subjectznaczenie niebezpośredniepl_PL
dc.subjectanaliza dyskursupl_PL
dc.titleExploring Pragmatics: Theory and Practicepl_PL
dc.title.alternativePoznać pragmatykę: teoria i praktykapl_PL
dc.typeBookpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Piotr Cap & Anna Ewa Wieczorek, Łódź 2026, © Copyright for this edition by University of Łódź, Łódź 2026pl_PL
dc.page.number297pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationCap, Piotr - University of Łódź, Faculty of Philology, Institute of English Studies, Department of Pragmaticspl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWieczorek, Anna Ewa - University of Łódź, Faculty of Philology, Institute of English Studies, Department of Pragmaticspl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8445-013-0
dc.referencesAllan, Keith & Kasia Jaszczołt (eds). 2012. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAnscombe, Gertrude. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesAustin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1954. Indexical expressions. Mind 63: 359-379.pl_PL
dc.referencesBazzanella, Carla. 2002. The significance of context in interpretation: The we case. Foundations of Science 7: 239-254.pl_PL
dc.referencesBousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBublitz, Wolfram. 2003. Emotive prosody: How attitudinal frames help construct context. In E. Mengel, H.-J. Schmid & M. Steppat (eds), Anglistentag 2002 Bayreuth, Proceedings, 381-391. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.pl_PL
dc.referencesBuehler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.pl_PL
dc.referencesCap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesCap, Piotr. 2017. Studying ideological worldviews in political discourse space: Critical-cognitive advances in the analysis of conflict and coercion. Journal of Pragmatics 108: 17-27.pl_PL
dc.referencesCap, Piotr. 2021. Alternative futures in political discourse. Discourse & Society 32: 328-345.pl_PL
dc.referencesChilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesChilton, Paul. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCulpeper, Jonathan & Michael Haugh. 2021. (Im)politeness and sociopragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Kádár & M. Terkourafi (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, 315-339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCutting, Joan & Kenneth Fordyce. 2021. Pragmatics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesDunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesDynel, Marta. 2015. The landscape of impoliteness research. Journal of Politeness Research 11: 329-354.pl_PL
dc.referencesEelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesFetzer, Anita. 2010. Contexts in context. In S.-K. Tanskanen, M.-L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson & M. Raitaniemi (eds), Discourses in Interaction, 13-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFetzer, Anita. 2018. Discourse pragmatics: Communicative action meets discourse analysis. In C. Ilie & N. Norrick (eds), Pragmatics and its Interfaces, 33-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFetzer, Anita & Augustin Speyer. 2012. Discourse relations in English and German discourse. Local and not-so-local constraints. Intercultural Pragmatics 9: 413-452.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, Charles J. 1971. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlowerdew, John & John Richardson (eds). 2018. Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraser, Bruce. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219-236.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrege, Gottlob. 1892. Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik C: 25-50.pl_PL
dc.referencesGazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York, NY: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiltrow, Janet & Dieter Stein (eds). 2009. Genres in the Internet. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York, NY: Anchor Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, 41-58. New York, NY: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHalliday, Michael A. K. 2000. Introduction to Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHanks, William F. 2011. Deixis and indexicality. In W. Bublitz & Neal R. Norrick (eds), Foundations of Pragmatics, 315-346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnish, Robert M. 2009. Internalism and externalism in speech act theory. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 9-31.pl_PL
dc.referencesHart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.pl_PL
dc.referencesHart, Christopher. 2017. Cognitive Linguistic Critical Discourse Studies: Connecting language and image. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 187-201. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesHart, Christopher & Piotr Cap. 2014. Introduction. In C. Hart & P. Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 1-14. London: Bloomsbury.pl_PL
dc.referencesHorn, Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHouse, Juliane & Daniel Z. Kadar. 2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuang, Yan (ed.). 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKaal, Bertie. 2015. How ‘real’ are time and space in politically motivated worldviews? Critical Discourse Studies 12: 330-346.pl_PL
dc.referencesKarttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194.pl_PL
dc.referencesKarttunen, Lauri. 2016. Presupposition: What went wrong? Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26: 705-731.pl_PL
dc.referencesKecskes, Istvan. 2010. Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2889-2897.pl_PL
dc.referencesKempson, Ruth. 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoteyko, Nelya. 2014. Critical studies of health and illness discourses. In C. Hart & P. Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 543-558. London: Bloomsbury.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 1: 45-80.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen C. 2017. Speech acts. In Y. Huang (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, 199-216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLischinsky, Alon. 2018. Critical discourse studies and branding. In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (eds), Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, 540-552. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesMusolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.pl_PL
dc.referencesO’Halloran, Kieran. 2010. How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 563-576. Abingdon: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesPotts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRajah, Jothie. 2011. Punishing bodies, securing the nation: How rule of law can legitimate the urbane authoritarian state. Law & Social Inquiry 36: 945-970pl_PL
dc.referencesRhodes, R. A. W. & Paul ‘t Hart (eds). 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRussell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479-493.pl_PL
dc.referencesSbisa, Marina. 2007. How to read Austin. Pragmatics 17: 461-473.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts – An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSenft, Gunter. 2014. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesStalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. Munitz & P. Unger (eds), Semantics and Philosophy, 197-214. New York, NY: New York University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesStrawson, Peter. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen.pl_PL
dc.referencesTerkourafi, Marina (ed.). 2015. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesThomas, Jenny. 2015. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesTsohatzidis, Savas (ed.). 1999. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.pl_PL
dc.referencesWieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2015. ‘Look who’s talking now’: A taxonomy of speakers in single-turn political discourse. Discourse Studies 17: 343-359.pl_PL
dc.referencesWieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2019. The (de)legitimising power of narrative reports: A case study of covert sayers. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 15: 23-44.pl_PL
dc.referencesWieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2020. Embedded discourse spaces in narrative reports. Discourse Studies 22: 221-240.pl_PL
dc.referencesWodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer (eds). 2016. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesYule, George. 1996/2008. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8445-013-0


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/