dc.contributor.author | Błaszczyk, Mateusz | |
dc.contributor.author | Krysiński, Dawid | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-17T07:30:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-17T07:30:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-30 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2543-9421 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/55363 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of the theory of the social production of space and reflect on its relevance and application in contemporary urban studies. We present the development of this concept from Henri Lefebvre’s fundamental ideas, through their extensions and reinterpretations, to the latest approaches that address the challenges of the digital era. In our discussion, we highlight the theory’s potential in analyzing contemporary urban phenomena, while simultaneously identifying the challenges it faces. We conclude that despite the challenges associated with operationalizing some concepts, the theory of the social production of space remains not only relevant but also a valuable analytical tool, capable of capturing the complexity of contemporary urban processes, provided it is continuously updated and its methodology is critically reflected upon. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza ewolucji teorii społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni oraz refleksja nad jej aktualnością i zastosowaniem we współczesnych studiach miejskich. Prezentujemy rozwój tej koncepcji od fundamentalnych idei Henriego Lefebvre’a, poprzez ich rozwinięcia i reinterpretacje, aż po najnowsze ujęcia uwzględniające wyzwania ery cyfrowej. W naszych rozważaniach wskazujemy na potencjał teorii w analizie współczesnych zjawisk urbanistycznych, jednocześnie identyfikując wyzwania, przed którymi stoi. Konkludujemy, że pomimo wyzwań związanych z operacjonalizacją niektórych koncepcji, teoria społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni pozostaje nie tylko aktualnym, ale i cennym narzędziem analitycznym, zdolnym do uchwycenia złożoności współczesnych procesów miejskich, pod warunkiem jej ciągłej aktualizacji i krytycznej refleksji nad jej metodologią. | pl |
dc.language.iso | pl | |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście;9 | pl |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
dc.subject | social production of space | en |
dc.subject | urban theory | en |
dc.subject | right to the city | en |
dc.subject | digital urbanism | en |
dc.subject | spatial practices | en |
dc.subject | społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni | pl |
dc.subject | teoria miejska | pl |
dc.subject | prawo do miasta | pl |
dc.subject | urbanizm cyfrowy | pl |
dc.subject | praktyki przestrzenne | pl |
dc.title | Nowe spojrzenia na starą teorię. Kilka uwag o koncepcji społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni | pl |
dc.title.alternative | New perspectives on an old theory: some remarks on the concept of social production of space | en |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.page.number | 7-23 | |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Błaszczyk, Mateusz - Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Socjologii | pl |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Krysiński, Dawid - Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Socjologii | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2544-1221 | |
dc.references | Agrawal, S. (red.). (2022). Rights and the city: Problems, progress, and practice. University of Alberta Press. | pl |
dc.references | Alizadeh, T., Prasad, D. (2024). The right to the smart city in the Global South: A research agenda. Urban Studies, 61(3), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231183167 | pl |
dc.references | Althorpe, C., Horak, M. (2023). The end of the right to the city: A radical-cooperative view. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815 | pl |
dc.references | Ash, J., Kitchin, R., Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800 | pl |
dc.references | Astuti, W.K., Herlambang, S. (2021). Ordinary fragmentation: Network secession of urban centers in Jakarta. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 32(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/ 10.5614/JPWK.2021.32.3.4 | pl |
dc.references | Bannister, J., O’Sullivan, A. (2021). Big Data in the city. Urban Studies, 58(15), 3061–3070. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980 211014124 | pl |
dc.references | Barns, S. (2020). Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Springer. | pl |
dc.references | Blokland, T., Schultze, H. (2017). Belonging, conviviality or public familiarity? Making sense of urbanity in rapidly transforming neighbourhoods through the lens of Berlin and Rotterdam. W: M. Smagacz-Poziemska, K. Frysztacki i A. Bukowski (red.), Re-imagining the city: Municipality and urbanity today from a sociological perspective (s. 243–264). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. https://doi.org/10.4467/K9748.40/E/17.7265 | pl |
dc.references | Borch, C., Kornberger, M. (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. Routledge. | pl |
dc.references | Borsekova, K., Koróny, S., Vaňová, A., Vitálišová, K. (2018). Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: A research challenge with policy implications. Cities, 78, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.010 | pl |
dc.references | Brenner, N. (2019). New urban spaces: Urban theory and the scale question. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190627188.001.0001 | pl |
dc.references | Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., Mayer, M. (red.). (2011). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge. | pl |
dc.references | Brenner, N., Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712 | pl |
dc.references | Brighenti, A.M., Pavoni, A. (2023). On urban trajectology: Algorithmic mobilities and atmocultural navigation. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 24(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2020.1861044 | pl |
dc.references | Bronsvoort, I., Uitermark, J.L. (2022). Seeing the street through Instagram: Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification. Urban Studies, 59(14), 2857–2874. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211046539 | pl |
dc.references | Caprotti, F., Chang, I.-C.C., Joss, S. (2022). Beyond the smart city: A typology of platform urbanism. Urban Transformations, 4, artykuł 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00033-9 | pl |
dc.references | Cardullo, P., Di Feliciantonio, C., Kitchin, R. (red.). (2019). The right to the smart city. Emerald Group Publishing. | pl |
dc.references | Clark, T.N. (red.). (2004). Research in urban policy: T. 9: The city as an entertainment machine. Elsevier/JAI. | pl |
dc.references | de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022 | pl |
dc.references | Domaradzka, A. (2018). Urban social movements and the right to the city: An introduction to the special issue on urban mobilization. Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11266-018-0030-Y | pl |
dc.references | Evans, G. (2024). Cultural spaces, production and consumption. Routledge. | pl |
dc.references | Fainstein, S.S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643 | pl |
dc.references | Ferreri, M., Sanyal, R. (2018). Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London. Urban Studies, 55(15), 3353–3368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017751982 | pl |
dc.references | Fields, D. (2022). Automated landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 160–181. https://doi. org/10.1177/0308518X19846514 | pl |
dc.references | Frith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631815 | pl |
dc.references | Gordon, E., de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Wiley-Blackwell. | pl |
dc.references | Gottdiener, M. (1985). The social production of urban space. University of Texas Press. | pl |
dc.references | Graham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2013). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x | pl |
dc.references | Graham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2022). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. W: S. Carta (red.), Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design (s. 341–366). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.CH27 | pl |
dc.references | Graham, S. (2000). Constructing premium network spaces: Reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00242 | pl |
dc.references | Graham, S., Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge. | pl |
dc.references | Graham, S., Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing surveillance: Categorization, space, inequality. Critical Social Policy, 23(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006 | pl |
dc.references | Guttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1192–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159 | pl |
dc.references | Harvey, D. (2013). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso. | pl |
dc.references | Hubbard, P. (2018). City (wyd. 2). Routledge. | pl |
dc.references | Iveson, K. (2017). Digital labourers of the city, unite! W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 20–23). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rightsto-the-city/ | pl |
dc.references | Jałowiecki, B. (2010). Społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni. Wydanie nowe poprawione. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. | pl |
dc.references | Kitchin, R. (2011). The programmable city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(6), 945–951. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3806com | pl |
dc.references | Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. SAGE Publications. | pl |
dc.references | Kitchin, R., Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. The MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5039/Code-SpaceSoftware-and-Everyday-Life | pl |
dc.references | Leary-Owhin, M.E. (2016). Exploring the production of urban space: Differential space in three post-industrial cities. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447305750 | pl |
dc.references | Lees, L., Shin, H.B. López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Polity Press. | pl |
dc.references | Lefebvre, H. (1967). Le droit à la ville. L’Homme et la société, 6, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063 | pl |
dc.references | Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell. | pl |
dc.references | Lemos, A. (2008). Mobile communication and new sense of places: A critique of spatialization in cyberculture. Revista Galáxia 16, 91–108. | pl |
dc.references | Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(9), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445 | pl |
dc.references | Löw, M. (2008). The constitution of space: The structuration of spaces through the simultaneity of effect and perception. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286 | pl |
dc.references | Löw, M. (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Palgrave Macmillan. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-8096072-bf5130e0f8.pdf | pl |
dc.references | Low, S.M. (2003). Embodied space(s): Anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and Culture, 6(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238959 | pl |
dc.references | Low, S.M. (2017). Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group. | pl |
dc.references | Luque-Ayala, A., Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319 | pl |
dc.references | Massey, D.B. (2005). For space. SAGE Publications. | pl |
dc.references | McFarlane, C., Silver, J. (2017). Navigating the city: Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(3), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12175 | pl |
dc.references | Middha, B., McShane, I. (2022). E-gentrification: Digital community engagement, urban change and digital rights to the city. W: S. Hovik, G.A. Giannoumis, K. Reichborn-Kjennerud, J.M. Ruano, I. McShane i S. Legard (red.), Citizen participation in the information society: Comparing participatory channels in urban development (s. 141–165). Palgrave Macmillan; Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7_7 | pl |
dc.references | Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. The Guilford Press. | pl |
dc.references | Mörtenböck, P., Mooshammer, H. (2020). Platform urbanism: City-making in the age of platforms. W: P. Mörtenböck i H. Mooshammer (red.), Data publics: Public plurality in an era of data determinacy (s. 169–191). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196515-12 | pl |
dc.references | Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006 | pl |
dc.references | O’Sullivan, D., Manson, S.M. (2015). Do physicists have geography envy? And what can geographers learn from it? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105 | pl |
dc.references | Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P.N., Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553 | pl |
dc.references | Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034 | pl |
dc.references | Purcell, M. (2017). The city is ours (if we decide it is). W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 30–33). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/ourdigitalrights-to-the-city/ | pl |
dc.references | Purcell, M. (2022). Everyday code: The project for democracy on our ‘desktop’. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 1–9, artykuł 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100035 | pl |
dc.references | Robinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025 | pl |
dc.references | Romanelli, M. (2021). Driving smart cities through smart projects. W: D. Cagáňová, N. Horňáková, J. Papula, K. Stachová i L. Kohnová (red.), Management trends in the context of industry 4.0. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-12-2020.2303264 | pl |
dc.references | Rossi, U., Di Bella, A. (2017). Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(5), 999–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17690153 | pl |
dc.references | Salemink, K., Strijker, D., Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001 | pl |
dc.references | Schmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N.C., Kallenberger, P., Kockelkorn, A., Sawyer, L., Streule, M., Wong, K.P. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. Urban Studies, 55(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750 | pl |
dc.references | Schwanen, T., Kwan, M.-P. (2008). The Internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum, 39(3), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.005 | pl |
dc.references | Shaw, J., Graham, M. (2017). An informational right to the city? Code, content, control, and the urbanization of information. Antipode, 49(4), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12312 | pl |
dc.references | Shaw, J., Graham, M. (red.). (2017). Our digital rights to the city. Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digitalrights-to-the-city/ | pl |
dc.references | Shelton, T. (2017). Re-politicizing data. W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 24–27). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rights-to-the-city/ | pl |
dc.references | Shields, R. (1991). Places on the margin: Alternative geographies of modernity. Routledge. | pl |
dc.references | Soja, E.W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x | pl |
dc.references | Soja, E.W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell. | pl |
dc.references | Soja, E.W. (2011). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory (wyd. 2). Verso. | pl |
dc.references | Staeheli, L.A., Mitchell, D. (2007). The people’s property? Power, politics, and the public. Routledge. | pl |
dc.references | Townsend, A.M. (2014). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W.W. Norton & Company. | pl |
dc.references | Wachsmuth, D., Weisler, A. (2018). Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1147–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038 | pl |
dc.references | Yigitcanlar, T. (2015). Smart cities: An effective urban development and management model? Australian Planner, 52(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1019752 | pl |
dc.references | Zook, M.A., Graham, M. (2007). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 34(3), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1068/B3311 | pl |
dc.references | Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs. | pl |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | Błaszczyk, Mateusz - mateusz.blaszczyk@uwr.edu.pl | |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | Krysiński, Dawid - dawid.krysinski@uwr.edu.pl | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/2543-9421.09.05 | |
dc.relation.volume | 37 | |