Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBłaszczyk, Mateusz
dc.contributor.authorKrysiński, Dawid
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-17T07:30:54Z
dc.date.available2025-04-17T07:30:54Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-30
dc.identifier.issn2543-9421
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/55363
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of the theory of the social production of space and reflect on its relevance and application in contemporary urban studies. We present the development of this concept from Henri Lefebvre’s fundamental ideas, through their extensions and reinterpretations, to the latest approaches that address the challenges of the digital era. In our discussion, we highlight the theory’s potential in analyzing contemporary urban phenomena, while simultaneously identifying the challenges it faces. We conclude that despite the challenges associated with operationalizing some concepts, the theory of the social production of space remains not only relevant but also a valuable analytical tool, capable of capturing the complexity of contemporary urban processes, provided it is continuously updated and its methodology is critically reflected upon.en
dc.description.abstractCelem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza ewolucji teorii społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni oraz refleksja nad jej aktualnością i zastosowaniem we współczesnych studiach miejskich. Prezentujemy rozwój tej koncepcji od fundamentalnych idei Henriego Lefebvre’a, poprzez ich rozwinięcia i reinterpretacje, aż po najnowsze ujęcia uwzględniające wyzwania ery cyfrowej. W naszych rozważaniach wskazujemy na potencjał teorii w analizie współczesnych zjawisk urbanistycznych, jednocześnie identyfikując wyzwania, przed którymi stoi. Konkludujemy, że pomimo wyzwań związanych z operacjonalizacją niektórych koncepcji, teoria społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni pozostaje nie tylko aktualnym, ale i cennym narzędziem analitycznym, zdolnym do uchwycenia złożoności współczesnych procesów miejskich, pod warunkiem jej ciągłej aktualizacji i krytycznej refleksji nad jej metodologią.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKonwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście;9pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectsocial production of spaceen
dc.subjecturban theoryen
dc.subjectright to the cityen
dc.subjectdigital urbanismen
dc.subjectspatial practicesen
dc.subjectspołeczne wytwarzanie przestrzenipl
dc.subjectteoria miejskapl
dc.subjectprawo do miastapl
dc.subjecturbanizm cyfrowypl
dc.subjectpraktyki przestrzennepl
dc.titleNowe spojrzenia na starą teorię. Kilka uwag o koncepcji społecznego wytwarzania przestrzenipl
dc.title.alternativeNew perspectives on an old theory: some remarks on the concept of social production of spaceen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number7-23
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBłaszczyk, Mateusz - Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Socjologiipl
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKrysiński, Dawid - Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Socjologiipl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-1221
dc.referencesAgrawal, S. (red.). (2022). Rights and the city: Problems, progress, and practice. University of Alberta Press.pl
dc.referencesAlizadeh, T., Prasad, D. (2024). The right to the smart city in the Global South: A research agenda. Urban Studies, 61(3), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231183167pl
dc.referencesAlthorpe, C., Horak, M. (2023). The end of the right to the city: A radical-cooperative view. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815pl
dc.referencesAsh, J., Kitchin, R., Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800pl
dc.referencesAstuti, W.K., Herlambang, S. (2021). Ordinary fragmentation: Network secession of urban centers in Jakarta. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 32(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/ 10.5614/JPWK.2021.32.3.4pl
dc.referencesBannister, J., O’Sullivan, A. (2021). Big Data in the city. Urban Studies, 58(15), 3061–3070. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980 211014124pl
dc.referencesBarns, S. (2020). Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Springer.pl
dc.referencesBlokland, T., Schultze, H. (2017). Belonging, conviviality or public familiarity? Making sense of urbanity in rapidly transforming neighbourhoods through the lens of Berlin and Rotterdam. W: M. Smagacz-Poziemska, K. Frysztacki i A. Bukowski (red.), Re-imagining the city: Municipality and urbanity today from a sociological perspective (s. 243–264). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. https://doi.org/10.4467/K9748.40/E/17.7265pl
dc.referencesBorch, C., Kornberger, M. (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. Routledge.pl
dc.referencesBorsekova, K., Koróny, S., Vaňová, A., Vitálišová, K. (2018). Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: A research challenge with policy implications. Cities, 78, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.010pl
dc.referencesBrenner, N. (2019). New urban spaces: Urban theory and the scale question. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190627188.001.0001pl
dc.referencesBrenner, N., Marcuse, P., Mayer, M. (red.). (2011). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge.pl
dc.referencesBrenner, N., Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712pl
dc.referencesBrighenti, A.M., Pavoni, A. (2023). On urban trajectology: Algorithmic mobilities and atmocultural navigation. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 24(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2020.1861044pl
dc.referencesBronsvoort, I., Uitermark, J.L. (2022). Seeing the street through Instagram: Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification. Urban Studies, 59(14), 2857–2874. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211046539pl
dc.referencesCaprotti, F., Chang, I.-C.C., Joss, S. (2022). Beyond the smart city: A typology of platform urbanism. Urban Transformations, 4, artykuł 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00033-9pl
dc.referencesCardullo, P., Di Feliciantonio, C., Kitchin, R. (red.). (2019). The right to the smart city. Emerald Group Publishing.pl
dc.referencesClark, T.N. (red.). (2004). Research in urban policy: T. 9: The city as an entertainment machine. Elsevier/JAI.pl
dc.referencesde Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022pl
dc.referencesDomaradzka, A. (2018). Urban social movements and the right to the city: An introduction to the special issue on urban mobilization. Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11266-018-0030-Ypl
dc.referencesEvans, G. (2024). Cultural spaces, production and consumption. Routledge.pl
dc.referencesFainstein, S.S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643pl
dc.referencesFerreri, M., Sanyal, R. (2018). Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London. Urban Studies, 55(15), 3353–3368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017751982pl
dc.referencesFields, D. (2022). Automated landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 160–181. https://doi. org/10.1177/0308518X19846514pl
dc.referencesFrith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631815pl
dc.referencesGordon, E., de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Wiley-Blackwell.pl
dc.referencesGottdiener, M. (1985). The social production of urban space. University of Texas Press.pl
dc.referencesGraham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2013). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.xpl
dc.referencesGraham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2022). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. W: S. Carta (red.), Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design (s. 341–366). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.CH27pl
dc.referencesGraham, S. (2000). Constructing premium network spaces: Reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00242pl
dc.referencesGraham, S., Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.pl
dc.referencesGraham, S., Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing surveillance: Categorization, space, inequality. Critical Social Policy, 23(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006pl
dc.referencesGuttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1192–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159pl
dc.referencesHarvey, D. (2013). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso.pl
dc.referencesHubbard, P. (2018). City (wyd. 2). Routledge.pl
dc.referencesIveson, K. (2017). Digital labourers of the city, unite! W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 20–23). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rightsto-the-city/pl
dc.referencesJałowiecki, B. (2010). Społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni. Wydanie nowe poprawione. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.pl
dc.referencesKitchin, R. (2011). The programmable city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(6), 945–951. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3806compl
dc.referencesKitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. SAGE Publications.pl
dc.referencesKitchin, R., Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. The MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5039/Code-SpaceSoftware-and-Everyday-Lifepl
dc.referencesLeary-Owhin, M.E. (2016). Exploring the production of urban space: Differential space in three post-industrial cities. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447305750pl
dc.referencesLees, L., Shin, H.B. López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Polity Press.pl
dc.referencesLefebvre, H. (1967). Le droit à la ville. L’Homme et la société, 6, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063pl
dc.referencesLefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.pl
dc.referencesLemos, A. (2008). Mobile communication and new sense of places: A critique of spatialization in cyberculture. Revista Galáxia 16, 91–108.pl
dc.referencesLeszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(9), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445pl
dc.referencesLöw, M. (2008). The constitution of space: The structuration of spaces through the simultaneity of effect and perception. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286pl
dc.referencesLöw, M. (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Palgrave Macmillan. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-8096072-bf5130e0f8.pdfpl
dc.referencesLow, S.M. (2003). Embodied space(s): Anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and Culture, 6(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238959pl
dc.referencesLow, S.M. (2017). Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.pl
dc.referencesLuque-Ayala, A., Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319pl
dc.referencesMassey, D.B. (2005). For space. SAGE Publications.pl
dc.referencesMcFarlane, C., Silver, J. (2017). Navigating the city: Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(3), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12175pl
dc.referencesMiddha, B., McShane, I. (2022). E-gentrification: Digital community engagement, urban change and digital rights to the city. W: S. Hovik, G.A. Giannoumis, K. Reichborn-Kjennerud, J.M. Ruano, I. McShane i S. Legard (red.), Citizen participation in the information society: Comparing participatory channels in urban development (s. 141–165). Palgrave Macmillan; Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7_7pl
dc.referencesMitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. The Guilford Press.pl
dc.referencesMörtenböck, P., Mooshammer, H. (2020). Platform urbanism: City-making in the age of platforms. W: P. Mörtenböck i H. Mooshammer (red.), Data publics: Public plurality in an era of data determinacy (s. 169–191). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196515-12pl
dc.referencesNaldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006pl
dc.referencesO’Sullivan, D., Manson, S.M. (2015). Do physicists have geography envy? And what can geographers learn from it? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105pl
dc.referencesPlantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P.N., Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553pl
dc.referencesPurcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034pl
dc.referencesPurcell, M. (2017). The city is ours (if we decide it is). W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 30–33). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/ourdigitalrights-to-the-city/pl
dc.referencesPurcell, M. (2022). Everyday code: The project for democracy on our ‘desktop’. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 1–9, artykuł 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100035pl
dc.referencesRobinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025pl
dc.referencesRomanelli, M. (2021). Driving smart cities through smart projects. W: D. Cagáňová, N. Horňáková, J. Papula, K. Stachová i L. Kohnová (red.), Management trends in the context of industry 4.0. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-12-2020.2303264pl
dc.referencesRossi, U., Di Bella, A. (2017). Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(5), 999–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17690153pl
dc.referencesSalemink, K., Strijker, D., Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001pl
dc.referencesSchmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N.C., Kallenberger, P., Kockelkorn, A., Sawyer, L., Streule, M., Wong, K.P. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. Urban Studies, 55(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750pl
dc.referencesSchwanen, T., Kwan, M.-P. (2008). The Internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum, 39(3), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.005pl
dc.referencesShaw, J., Graham, M. (2017). An informational right to the city? Code, content, control, and the urbanization of information. Antipode, 49(4), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12312pl
dc.referencesShaw, J., Graham, M. (red.). (2017). Our digital rights to the city. Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digitalrights-to-the-city/pl
dc.referencesShelton, T. (2017). Re-politicizing data. W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 24–27). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rights-to-the-city/pl
dc.referencesShields, R. (1991). Places on the margin: Alternative geographies of modernity. Routledge.pl
dc.referencesSoja, E.W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.xpl
dc.referencesSoja, E.W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.pl
dc.referencesSoja, E.W. (2011). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory (wyd. 2). Verso.pl
dc.referencesStaeheli, L.A., Mitchell, D. (2007). The people’s property? Power, politics, and the public. Routledge.pl
dc.referencesTownsend, A.M. (2014). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W.W. Norton & Company.pl
dc.referencesWachsmuth, D., Weisler, A. (2018). Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1147–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038pl
dc.referencesYigitcanlar, T. (2015). Smart cities: An effective urban development and management model? Australian Planner, 52(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1019752pl
dc.referencesZook, M.A., Graham, M. (2007). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 34(3), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1068/B3311pl
dc.referencesZuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailBłaszczyk, Mateusz - mateusz.blaszczyk@uwr.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailKrysiński, Dawid - dawid.krysinski@uwr.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2543-9421.09.05
dc.relation.volume37


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0