Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorMnich, Ludmiła
dc.contributor.authorMnich, Roman
dc.contributor.editorPospíšil, Ivo
dc.contributor.editorZatora, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T13:50:34Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T13:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0084-4446
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/47892
dc.description.abstractThe article is devoted to the novel genre in Ukrainian literature. The authors offer an answer to the question of why the genre of the novel appeared so late in Ukrainian literature and what genre features the Ukrainian classic novel has. The article examines the historical background of the genre development in 19th-century Ukrainian literature, which developed in the Austro-Hungarian and Russian empires. In these empires, there were different conditions for the development of Ukrainian literature: quite liberal in Austria-Hungary and very limited in Russia due to the ban on the Ukrainian language. The article examines and analyzes in more detail three reasons explaining the late emergence and establishment of the Ukrainian novel: 1) language, 2) subject matter, and 3) literary terminology. The novel as a “non-canonical genre” (Bakhtin) requires a direct dialogue with contemporariness, and such a dialogue was impossible in the case of the 19th-century Ukrainian novel because the language of Ukrainian intellectuals at that time was not Ukrainian. In the Russian Empire, it was French or Russian, and in Austria-Hungary, it was German or Polish. Similarly, the subject of both the new Ukrainian literature in general (Ivan Kotlyarevskyi) and the first Ukrainian novels was connected not with contemporariness, but with the heroic past, that is, with the Cossack era of the 17th century (Panteleimon Kulish, Vasyl Doroshenko). The issue of literary terminology is also problematic because Ukrainian authors defined their large prose works not novels, but “opowidannia” or “powisť,” using in this case the meaning of these terms in the German tradition (Erzählung) or Polish (powieść), respectively.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherŁódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich;1
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectUkrainian literaturepl_PL
dc.subjectnovelpl_PL
dc.subjectsystem of genres in Ukrainian literaturepl_PL
dc.titleThe Genre of Ukrainian Classical Novel as a Problempl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number85-95pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSiedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Linguistics and Literary Studies ul. Żytnia 39, 08-110 Siedlcepl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Warsaw, Faculty of Applied Linguistics ul. Dobra 55, 00-312 Warszawapl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2451-0335
dc.referencesBakhtin Michaił M. (2012), Sobranije sočinienij, vol. 3: Teorija romana (1930–1961 hh.), Jazyki słavianskoj kultury, Moskva.pl_PL
dc.referencesChyzhevsky Dmitrij (1929), K problemie dvojnika. (Iz knihi o formaliźmie v etikie) [in:] O Dostojevskom. Sbornik statjej, ed. A.L. Bem, Praha, p. 9–38.pl_PL
dc.referencesDoroshenko Vołodymyr (1928), Najnoviša literatura pro P. Kuliša, “Zapysky Naukovoho tovarystva imeni Ševčenka” CXLVIII: “Praci istoryko–fiłołohičnoji sekciji”, Lviv, p. 307–334.pl_PL
dc.referencesHandbuch Gattungstheorie (2010), ed. R. Zymner, Verlag J.V. Metzler, Stuttgart.pl_PL
dc.referencesFranko Ivan (1984), Zibrańnia tvoriv u pjatdjesiaty tomach, vol. 41: Literaturno–krytični praci (1890–1910), Naukova dumka, Kyjiv.pl_PL
dc.referencesIzdebska Agnieszka, Szajnert Danuta (2006), Powieść [in:] Słownik rodzajów i gatunków literackich, eds. G. Gazda, S. Tynecka-Makowska, TAiWPN Universitas, Kraków, p. 554–560.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoshelivets Ivan (1947), Notatki pro ukrajinśkij roman, “Litavri. Litjeraturno-mistjećkij i naukovo- popularnij misiačnik” čysło 1 (kvitjeń), p. 45–56.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrymsky Ahatanheł (1972), Tvory v pjaty tomach. Tom druhyj: Chudožnia proza. Literaturoznavstvo i krytyka, Naukova dumka, Kyïv.pl_PL
dc.referencesMann Jurij (1998), Russkaja fiłosofskaja estetika, MAŁP, Moskva.pl_PL
dc.referencesNakhlik Jevhien (2015), Pereliciovanyj śvit Ivana Kotlarevśkoho: tekst — intertekst — kontekst, NAN Ukrajiny, Lviv.pl_PL
dc.referencesNalyvaiko Dmytro (1993), Ukrajinśka realistična literatura v porivnialno-typołohičnomu zrizi, „Chronika 2000. Naš kraj” no. 5(7), p. 81–96.pl_PL
dc.referencesPavlyčko Sołomija (2002), Teorija literatury, Osnovy, Kyïv.pl_PL
dc.referencesPelenskyj Jevhien (1942), Olha Kobylanśka, “Krakivśki visti” čysło 73(520), p. 3–4.pl_PL
dc.referencesPospíšil Ivo (2005), Ruský román znovu navštívený, Nadace Universitas w Brnĕ, Brno.pl_PL
dc.referencesShevelov Jurij (1987), Ukrajinśka mova u pieršij połovyni dvadciatoho stolittja (1900–1941), Sučasnisť, Nju-Jork.pl_PL
dc.referencesŠtevćek Ján (1989), Dejiny slovenského románu, Tatran, Bratislava.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.26485/ZRL/2023/66.1/8
dc.relation.volume66pl_PL
dc.disciplineliteraturoznawstwopl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe