• polski
    • English
  • English 
    • polski
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Czasopisma naukowe | Scientific Journals
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 2014/73
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Czasopisma naukowe | Scientific Journals
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 2014/73
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Prawda arystotelesowska w procesie administracyjnym i sądowoadministracyjnym

No Thumbnail [100%x80]
View/Open
06-gontarski.pdf (329.0Kb)
Date
2014
Author
Gontarski, Waldemar
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The contemporary truth reconstructed in a trial reflects differences between the Aristotelian truth in terms of its essence and criterion (material truth – veritas est adaequatio rei et intellectus – ad Aristotle, The Metaphysics IV.7.[1011b 26-27])- and its practical realisation (objective truth – in medio stat veritas – ad Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics II.7.[1108a 19–20]). In a non-adversarial processes – such as the Polish criminal trial - as opposed to the Anglo-Saxon one - the Polish administrative procedure (an administrative court has only a controlling function, not a reformative one and does not ascertain facts on its own) or separate proceedings in the Polish civil procedure – the court is expressis verbis obliged to reconstruct the objective truth (i.e. the truth which can be ascertained by a man meeting the diligentia boni patris familias standard) and not the material truth. Nonetheless, if the judicial truth understood in this way (the truth ascertained by the court; if the court does not demonstrate an evidential initiative, then it will not ascertain the truth, but it will merely assess the reliability of the evidence submitted as in the Anglo-American criminal trial) will differ from the material truth, it can act as a statutory premise to resume the proceedings. That is, generally speaking, the main difference between the inquisitorial and the adversarial models.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4753
Collections
  • Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 2014/73 [10]

University of Lodz Repository

Contact Us | Send Feedback | Accessibility
 

 


University of Lodz Repository

Contact Us | Send Feedback | Accessibility
 

 

NoThumbnail