Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGoźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
dc.contributor.authorFronczak, Katarzyna
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T15:29:21Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T15:29:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-30
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38338
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates recurrent language resources employed in corporate blogs to connect with readers and (to a lesser extent) express authorial positions. It is based on the premise that constructing identity and enhancing image underpins most, if not all, corporate discourse and blogs are no exception. Based on a corpus of 500 different posts (totalling 318,296 words) from the Business Process Outsourcing and Information Technology sectors, we use standard Corpus Linguistics (Partington et al. 2013) techniques (keywords, cluster analysis, concordancing) to identify linguistic features associated with the expression of engagement: reader pronouns and their co-occurrence with selected modal verbs, questions, adverbs marking shared knowledge and directives. These are then interpreted in in terms of a model of textual interactions proposed in Hyland (2005). We argue that the communication found in this relatively new and underresearched genre is essentially effected one-way establishing a pseudo-dialogue, with virtually no or very low level of interactivity between blog writers and blog readers.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectcorporate blogsen
dc.subjectcorporate communicationen
dc.subjectcorporate discourseen
dc.subjectcorpus linguisticsen
dc.subjectengagementen
dc.title"You Don't Have Time to Think Up There. If You Think You're Dead" – A Corpus-assisted Study of Discursive Strategies to Engage Readers in Corporate Blogsen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number69-87
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGoźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław - University of Lodz, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFronczak, Katarzyna - University of Lodz, Polanden
dc.referencesAhuja, Vandana and Medury, Yajulu. 2010. Corporate blogs as e-CRM tools–Building consumer engagement through content management. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 17(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1057/dbm.2010.8en
dc.referencesBiber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.en
dc.referencesBhatia, Vijak, K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: a Genre-Based View. London: Continuum International.en
dc.referencesBreeze, Ruth. 2013. Corporate discourse. London: Bloomsbury Discourse Series.en
dc.referencesConrad, Susan and Biber, Douglas. 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 56-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesEfimova, Lilia and Jonathan Grudin. 2007. January. Crossing boundaries: A case study of employee blogging. In Proceedings of the fortieth Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-40), 86-96. IEEE Press: Los Alamitos. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.159en
dc.referencesFieseler, Christian, Fleck, Matthes and Meckelm Miriam. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Blogosphere. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 599-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0135-8en
dc.referencesFronczak, Katarzyna 2019. Blogs as a new form of corporate communication. A genre-based analysis of selected English-language corporate blogs. (unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Lodz.en
dc.referencesGoźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław and Hunstos Susan. 2016. Corpora and beyond – investgating evaluation in discourse: introduction to the special issue on corpus approaches to evaluation. Corpora, 11(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0089en
dc.referencesHyland, Ken. 2005. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365en
dc.referencesHyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.en
dc.referencesHyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54en
dc.referencesKelleher, Tom and Miller, Barbara M. 2006. Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.xen
dc.referencesMartin, James. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. In Hunston and Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 142-145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesMcEnery, Tony and Wilson, Andrew. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.en
dc.referencesPartington, Alan, Duguid, Alison and Taylor, Charlotte. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55en
dc.referencesPuschmann, Cornelius. 2010. The corporate blog as an emerging genre of computer-mediated communication: features, constraints, discourse situation. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen. https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2010-520en
dc.referencesRayson, Paul. 2003. Matrix: A Statistical Method and Software Tool for Linguistic Analysis through Corpus Comparison. Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University.en
dc.referencesScott, Mike, R. 1996. Wordsmith Tools 4. Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesSinha, Nidhi, Vandana, Ahuja, and Yajulu Medury. 201). Corporate blogs and internet marketing–Using consumer knowledge and emotion as strategic variables to develop Consumer engagement. Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 18(3), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1057/dbm.2011.24en
dc.referencesSinclair, John, McHardy. 2004. (edited with R. Carter) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesWhite, Peter. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. TEXT, 23(2), 2594-2598. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.011en
dc.referencesWood, Wallace, Behling, Robert and Haugen, Susan. 2006. Blogs and business: Opportunities and headaches. Issues in information systems, 7(2), 312-316.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailGoźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław - stanislaw.gozdz@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailFronczak, Katarzyna - katarzyna.fronczak@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.18.1.05
dc.relation.volume18


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0