dc.contributor.author | Buda, Stanisław | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-12T08:31:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-12T08:31:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-4286 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35088 | |
dc.description.abstract | I would like to share a few reflections on the broader nature of the Universe, including also the nature of our research over it. This subject requires a philosophical approach that goes far beyond cosmology, or
even the philosophy of nature. On the other hand, the traditional ontological considerations are too general — concern for the rules and the
structure of reality. I start from definition of terminology, distinguishing: cosmos, the Universe, Meta-Universe, world, reality. Then I discussing some ontological conditions of being real at all. A reflection of this
type enables and set a formal paradigm of inquiry on the nature of the
Universe, which I understand as a whole, which consists of everything
actually is. Then considering the formal status of that total, which turns
out to be a dynamic system constantly generates its own “lack of coherence” and also “overcoming” it. It confronts us with the problem of generating and assimilating of Otherness. Therefore, I consider the universe as an Act, which, in a very sophisticated way, refer to its source
and its reason. Calling for the need for more detailed considerations
concerning the nature of the universe, speak a few comments with regard to the distinctive style of expression taking up the issue of physical
Theory of Everything. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS;22 | |
dc.title | Natura uniwersum | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | The Nature of the Universe | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 89-103 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Akademia Ignatianum, Kraków | pl_PL |
dc.references | Barrow, J. D., 1995, Teorie Wszystkiego, przeł. J. Czerniawski, T. Placek, Kraków: Znak. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Heidegger, M., 1995, O istocie podstawy, przeł. J. Nowotniak, [w:] tenże, Znaki drogi, Warszawa: Czytelnik. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Heller, M., 2006, Filozofia i wszechświat. Wybór pism, Kraków: Universitas. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ingarden, R., 1987, Spór o istnienie świata, t. II, cz. 2, Warszawa: PWN. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Narlikar, J., 1985, Struktura Wszechświata, przeł. A. Mazurkiewicz, Warszawa: PWN. | pl_PL |
dc.references | ietzsche, F., 1988, Kritische Studienausgabe, München, Bd. 12; cyt. za: Waldenfels, B., 2009, Podstawowe motywy fenomenologii obcego, przeł. J. Sidorek, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Platon, 2003, Państwo, przeł. W. Witwicki, Kęty: Antyk | pl_PL |
dc.references | Reale, G., 2001, Historia filozofii starożytnej, t. II, przeł. I. Zieliński, Lublin: RW KUL. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Skarga, B., 2005, Kwintet metafizyczny, Kraków: Universitas | pl_PL |
dc.references | Such, J., Szcześniak, M., Szczuciński, A., 2000, Filozofia kosmologii, Poznań: Wyd. Nauk. Uniw. im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 3 | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | filozofia | pl_PL |