Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKardela, Henryk
dc.contributor.editorBadio, Janusz
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T14:38:05Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T14:38:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationKardela, H. (2020). Form and meaning in cognitive morphology. In. J. Badio (Ed.), Categories and Units in Language and Linguistics, (pp. 67-81). Łódź–Kraków–Wałbrzych: WUŁ–Agent PR–Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Angelusa Silesiusa, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8142-988-7.07pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8142-988-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/33271
dc.description.abstractThe paper applies Ronald Langacker’s conception of Baseline/Elaboration (B/E-organisation) to derivative morphology. It is claimed that the B/E approach to linguistic structure, according to which “structure and function are indissociable like the two sides of a coin” (Langacker, 2016, p. 24), offers a viable, theoretically interesting account of the dynamic relationship between the form and meaning of morphological units.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofCategories and Units in Language and Linguistics;
dc.relation.ispartofseriesŁódzkie Studia z Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego;10
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCognitive Grammarpl_PL
dc.subjectsemasiologypl_PL
dc.subjectonomasiologypl_PL
dc.subjectB/E organisationpl_PL
dc.titleForm and meaning in cognitive morphologypl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number67-81pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Maria Skłodowska-Curie, Lublin, Polandpl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8142-989-4
dc.referencesDirven, R., and Verspoor, M. (2004). Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesDokulíl, M. (1962/1979). Teoria derywacji [Theory of Derivation]. Wrocław: Ossolineum.pl_PL
dc.referencesFromkin, V., Rodman, R. and Hyams, N. (2014). Introduction to Language. 10th Edition. Boston: Wadsworth.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrzegorczykowa, R. & Szymanek, B. (2001). Kategorie słowotwórcze w perspektywie kognitywnej [Word formation categories in cognitive linguistics]. In J. Bartmiński (ed.), Współczesny Język Polski, (pp. 469–484). Lublin: The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJanda, L. (2011). Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 359–392.pl_PL
dc.referencesKardela, H. 2000. Dimensions and Parameters in Grammar. Studies on A/D Asymmetries and Subjectivity Relations in Polish. Lublin: The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKardela, H. (2019). On the dynamic nature of cognitive morphology. In A. Bondaruk and K. Jaskuła (eds.), All Around the Word. Papers in Honour of Bogdan Szymanek on His 65th Birthday, (pp. 237–257). Lublin: Catholic University of Lublin Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. (2016). Nominal Structure in Cognitive Grammar. The Lublin Lectures. Lublin: The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesOnysko, A. & Sascha, M. (2010). Introduction: Unravelling the Cognitive in Word Formation. In A. Onysko & M. Sascha (eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, (pp. 1–25). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesPanther, K., & Thornburg, L. (2003). The Roles of Metaphor and Metonymy in –er Nominals. In R. Dirven and R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, (pp. 279–319). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesŠtekauer, P. (2005). Onomasiological Approach to Word Formation. In Handbook of Word Formation, 203–232. Dordrecht: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzymanek, B. (1988). Categories and Categorization in Morphology. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber, (pp. 34–78). Lublin: Catholic University of Lublin Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaylor, J. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTuggy, D. (2002). The Affix-stem distinction. A cognitive grammar analysis of data from Orizaba Nahuatl. Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 237–300.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8142-988-7.07


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe