dc.contributor.author | Badio, Janusz | |
dc.contributor.editor | Badio, Janusz | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-01T10:15:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-01T10:15:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Badio, J. (2020). A fictional dialogue against selected linguistic outlooks on spoken language and conversation. In. J. Badio (Ed.),Focus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice, (pp. 9-26). Łódź: WUŁ, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8220-051-5.02 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8220-051-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33248 | |
dc.description.abstract | This work provides an analysis of the fictional dialogue of the first chapter of Faith, a novel by the British writer and novelist, Lesley Pearse. The choice of the novel itself is not considered key. It is most important though that it is a recent novel, with up-to-date topics relevant to an ordinary person. The research question that this author attempts to answer is the extent to which the FD (fictional dialogue) of the first chapter of the novel is similar to real talk and conversation. To this end the FD as a mimetic camouflage is discussed against selected cognitive, processing and pragmatic models of speech, talk and discourse. The analysis suggests that in many respects the FD of the first chapter of Faith is indeed a gross simplification of the processes that real talk involves. However, this is only to be expected given the contention that it only constitutes the writer’s construal of a prison conversation between women inmates. The FD contains only selected features of real talk. These, however, suffice for the reader to mentally simulate an entire scene. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Focus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice; | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Łódzkie Studia z Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego;9 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | fictional dialogue | pl_PL |
dc.subject | conversational move | pl_PL |
dc.subject | intonation unit | pl_PL |
dc.subject | mimetic camouflage | pl_PL |
dc.subject | mental simulation | pl_PL |
dc.title | A fictional dialogue against selected linguistic outlooks on spoken language and conversation | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 9-26 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filologiczny, Katedra Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8220-052-2 | |
dc.references | Arbib, M. A. (1992). Schema theory. In S. Shapiro (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 1427–1443). John. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Badio, J. (2004). Analysis of Conceptual and Phonetic Chunking Procedures in English Speech. An unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Łódź, Poland. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder Than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books (AZ). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1997). Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chafe, W. (1997). Polyphonic topic development. Typological Studies in Language, 34, 41–54. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chafe, W. (2000). A linguist’s perspective on William James and the stream of thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 618–628. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ervin-Tripp, S. & Küntay, A. (1997). Conversational stories. In T. Givon (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspective, (pp. 136–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fillmore, C. J. (2006). Frame semantics. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 34, 373– 400. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fludernik, M. (1993). The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Givón, T. (Ed.). (1997). Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives, (Vol. 34). Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, (pp. 41–58). Leiden: Brill. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Iser, W. (1974). The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lambert, M. (1981). Dickens and the Suspended Quotation. New Haven: Yale University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2, Descriptive Applications. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nordquist, R. F. (2010). Crossing Boundaries: Studies in English Language, Literature, and Culture in a Global Environment. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Phelan, J. (2005). Living to Tell About It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. New York: Cornell University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rimmon-Kenan, S. (1986). Doubles and Counterparts: The Garden of Forking Paths. Jorge Luis Borges, Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 185–192. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sato, M., Sakai, H., Wu, J., & Bergen, B. (2012). Towards a cognitive science of literary style: Perspective-taking in processing omniscient versus objective voice. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (Vol. 34, No. 34). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Searle, J. R. (1985). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (2013). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Milton Park, Abington-on-Thames: Psychology Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sternberg, M. (1986). The world from the addressee’s viewpoint: reception as representation, dialogue as monologue. Style, 20(3), 295–318. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tannen, D. (1986). That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others. New York: Morrow. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Thomas, B. (2012). Fictional Dialogue: Speech and Conversation in the Modern and Postmodern Novel. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Weiner, S. L. & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). A move toward a psychology of conversation. Discourse Production and Comprehension, 1, 213–224. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wikipedia contributors (2019, August 15). Realism. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 10:45, August 15, 2018. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8220-051-5.02 | |