Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBadio, Janusz
dc.contributor.editorBadio, Janusz
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T10:15:13Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T10:15:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBadio, J. (2020). A fictional dialogue against selected linguistic outlooks on spoken language and conversation. In. J. Badio (Ed.),Focus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice, (pp. 9-26). Łódź: WUŁ, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8220-051-5.02pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8220-051-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/33248
dc.description.abstractThis work provides an analysis of the fictional dialogue of the first chapter of Faith, a novel by the British writer and novelist, Lesley Pearse. The choice of the novel itself is not considered key. It is most important though that it is a recent novel, with up-to-date topics relevant to an ordinary person. The research question that this author attempts to answer is the extent to which the FD (fictional dialogue) of the first chapter of the novel is similar to real talk and conversation. To this end the FD as a mimetic camouflage is discussed against selected cognitive, processing and pragmatic models of speech, talk and discourse. The analysis suggests that in many respects the FD of the first chapter of Faith is indeed a gross simplification of the processes that real talk involves. However, this is only to be expected given the contention that it only constitutes the writer’s construal of a prison conversation between women inmates. The FD contains only selected features of real talk. These, however, suffice for the reader to mentally simulate an entire scene.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofFocus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice;
dc.relation.ispartofseriesŁódzkie Studia z Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego;9
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectfictional dialoguepl_PL
dc.subjectconversational movepl_PL
dc.subjectintonation unitpl_PL
dc.subjectmimetic camouflagepl_PL
dc.subjectmental simulationpl_PL
dc.titleA fictional dialogue against selected linguistic outlooks on spoken language and conversationpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number9-26pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filologiczny, Katedra Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnegopl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8220-052-2
dc.referencesArbib, M. A. (1992). Schema theory. In S. Shapiro (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 1427–1443). John.pl_PL
dc.referencesAustin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBadio, J. (2004). Analysis of Conceptual and Phonetic Chunking Procedures in English Speech. An unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Łódź, Poland.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.pl_PL
dc.referencesBergen, B. K. (2012). Louder Than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books (AZ).pl_PL
dc.referencesCarter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1997). Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesChafe, W. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesChafe, W. (1997). Polyphonic topic development. Typological Studies in Language, 34, 41–54.pl_PL
dc.referencesChafe, W. (2000). A linguist’s perspective on William James and the stream of thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 618–628.pl_PL
dc.referencesErvin-Tripp, S. & Küntay, A. (1997). Conversational stories. In T. Givon (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspective, (pp. 136–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, C. J. (2006). Frame semantics. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 34, 373– 400.pl_PL
dc.referencesFludernik, M. (1993). The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesGivón, T. (Ed.). (1997). Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives, (Vol. 34). Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, (pp. 41–58). Leiden: Brill.pl_PL
dc.referencesIser, W. (1974). The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLabov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLambert, M. (1981). Dickens and the Suspended Quotation. New Haven: Yale University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2, Descriptive Applications. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesNordquist, R. F. (2010). Crossing Boundaries: Studies in English Language, Literature, and Culture in a Global Environment. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesPhelan, J. (2005). Living to Tell About It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. New York: Cornell University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRimmon-Kenan, S. (1986). Doubles and Counterparts: The Garden of Forking Paths. Jorge Luis Borges, Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 185–192.pl_PL
dc.referencesSato, M., Sakai, H., Wu, J., & Bergen, B. (2012). Towards a cognitive science of literary style: Perspective-taking in processing omniscient versus objective voice. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (Vol. 34, No. 34).pl_PL
dc.referencesSearle, J. R. (1985). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (2013). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Milton Park, Abington-on-Thames: Psychology Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSternberg, M. (1986). The world from the addressee’s viewpoint: reception as representation, dialogue as monologue. Style, 20(3), 295–318.pl_PL
dc.referencesTannen, D. (1986). That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others. New York: Morrow.pl_PL
dc.referencesThomas, B. (2012). Fictional Dialogue: Speech and Conversation in the Modern and Postmodern Novel. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeiner, S. L. & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). A move toward a psychology of conversation. Discourse Production and Comprehension, 1, 213–224.pl_PL
dc.referencesWikipedia contributors (2019, August 15). Realism. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 10:45, August 15, 2018.pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8220-051-5.02


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe