Similarity as distance: Three models for scientific conceptual knowledge

Zenker, Frank

dc.contributor.author	Zenker, Frank
dc.contributor.editor	Łukowski, Piotr
dc.contributor.editor	Gemel, Aleksander
dc.contributor.editor	Żukowski, Bartosz
dc.date.accessioned	2020-10-08T12:34:22Z
dc.date.available	2020-10-08T12:34:22Z
dc.date.issued	2015
dc.identifier.citation	Zenker F., Similarity as distance: Three models for scientific conceptual knowledge, [w:] Cognition, Meaning and Action. Lodz-Lund Studies in Cognitive Science, Łukowski P., Gemel A., Żukowski B. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Łódź-Kraków 2015, s. 63-86, doi: 10.18778/7969-759-5.05	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-7969-759-5
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/32314
dc.description.sponsorship	Udostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Łukowski P., Gemel A., Żukowski B. (red.), Cognition, Meaning and Action. Lodz-Lund Studies in Cognitive Science, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Łódź-Kraków 2015;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	scientific conceptual knowledge	pl_PL
dc.title	Similarity as distance: Three models for scientific conceptual knowledge	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	63-86	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Lund University, Departament of Cognitive Science	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-7969-760-1
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote	Frank Zenker is researcher at the Departments of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Lund University, and researcher at the Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz. His postdoc project (2008–2010) applied Gärdenfors’ Conceptual Spaces and Olsson’s model of Agenda-Driven Change to theory-dynamical processes in the empirical sciences. He works in Social Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. He is author of Ceteris Paribus in Conservative Epistemic Change, Peter Lang 2009.	pl_PL
dc.references	Adams, B., Raubal, M. (2009). A metric conceptual space algebra. In: S. Hornsby, K.C. Claramunt, M. Denis, G. Ligozat (eds). Spatial Information Theory (Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, COSIT 2009, in Aber Wrac’h, France, September 2009), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5756 (pp. 51–68). Berlin: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.references	Aisbett, J., Gibbon, G. (2001). A general formulation of conceptual spaces as a meso level representation. Artificial Intelligence 133: 189–232.	pl_PL
dc.references	Andersen, H., Nersessian N. (2000). Nomic concepts, frames, and conceptual change. Philosophy of Science 67: S224–S241.	pl_PL
dc.references	Andersen, H., Barker, P., Chen, X. (1996). Kuhn’s mature philosophy of science and cognitive psychology. Philosophical Psychology 9: 347–364.	pl_PL
dc.references	Andersen, H., Barker, P., Chen, X. (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Barker, P., Chen, X., Andersen, H. (2003). Kuhn on concepts and categorization. In: T. Nickles (ed.). Thomas Kuhn (pp. 212–245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Barsalou, L. (1992). Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In: A.Lehrer, E.F. Kittay (eds). Frames, Fields, and Contrast (pp. 21–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.	pl_PL
dc.references	Barsalou, L., Hale, C.R. (1993). Components of conceptual representation: From feature list to recursive frames. In: I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, P. Theuns (eds). Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis (pp. 97–144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Batterman, R.W. (2003). The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Berka, K. (1983). Measurement: Its Concepts, Theories, Problems. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 72. Dordrecht: Reidel.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bird, A. (2012). What can cognitive science tell us about scientific revolutions? Theoria 75: 293–321.	pl_PL
dc.references	Botteril, G. (2007). Review of H. Andersen, P. Barker, and X. Chen (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/25236-the-cognitive-structure-of-scientific-revolutions (accessed: 05.2014).	pl_PL
dc.references	Chen, X. (1997). Thomas Kuhn’s Latest Notion of Incommensurability. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28: 257−273.	pl_PL
dc.references	Chen, X. (2002). The ‘platforms’ for comparing incommensurable taxonomies: A cognitive- historical analysis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1): 1–22.	pl_PL
dc.references	Chen, X. (2003). Object and event concepts: A cognitive mechanism of incommensurability. Philosophy of Science 70: 962–974.	pl_PL
dc.references	Chen, X. (2005). Transforming temporal knowledge: Conceptual change between event concepts. Perspectives on Science 13: 49–73.	pl_PL
dc.references	Chen, X., Barker, P. (2000). Continuity through revolutions: A frame-based account of conceptual change during scientific revolutions. Philosophy of Science 67: S208–S223.	pl_PL
dc.references	Chen, X., Andersen, H., Barker, P. (1998). Kuhn’s Theory of Scientific Revolutions and Cognitive Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 11: 5–28.	pl_PL
dc.references	Decock, L. (2006). A physicalist reinterpretation of ‘phenomenal’ spaces. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 197–225.	pl_PL
dc.references	Diez, J.A. (1997a). A hundred years of numbers. A historical introduction to measurement theory 1887–1990. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28: 167–185.	pl_PL
dc.references	Diez, J.A. (1997b). A hundred years of numbers. A historical introduction to measurement theory 1887–1990. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28: 237–265.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dorato, M. (2005). Why are most laws of nature mathematical? In: J. Faye, P. Needham, U. Scheffler, M. Urchs (eds). Nature’s Principles (pp. 55−75). Amsterdam: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.references	Friedman, M. (2001). Dynamics of Reason. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces. The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gärdenfors, P., Zenker, F. (2010). Using conceptual spaces to model the dynamics of empirical theories. In: E.J. Olsson, S. Enqvist (eds.). Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science (pp. 137–153). Berlin: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gärdenfors, P., Zenker, F. (2013). Theory change as dimensional change: Conceptual spaces applied to the dynamics of empirical theories. Synthese 190: 1039–1058.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gauker, C. (2007). A critique of the similarity space theory of concepts. Mind and Language 22 (4): 317–345.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hand, D.J. (2004). Measurement Theory and Practice. London: Arnold.	pl_PL
dc.references	Helmholtz, H.V. (1887). Zahlen und Messen erkenntnistheoretisch betrachtet. In: H.V. Helmholtz (1920). Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie (pp. 70–109). Berlin: Springer (transl. in: H.V. Helmholtz (1930). Counting and Measuring (pp. 72–114). Princeton, NJ: Van Noestrand).	pl_PL
dc.references	Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Howard, D. (2009). “Let me briefly indicate why I do not find this standpoint natural”. Einstein, General Relativity and the Contingent Apriori. In: M. Domski, M. Dickson (eds). Discourse on a New Method. Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 333– 355). Chicago and La Salle, ILL: Open Court.	pl_PL
dc.references	Jaeger, G. (2010). Natural color categorization are convex sets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6042: 11−20.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kaipainen, M., Hautamaki, A. (2015). A perspectivist approach to conceptual spaces. In: F. Zenker, P. Gärdenfors (eds.). Applications of Geometric Knowledge Representation, Synthese Library, vol. X. Dordrecht: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.references	Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., Tversky, A. (1971, 1989, 1990). Foundations of Measurement, vol. I–III. New York: Academic Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kuhn, T.S. (1983). Commensurability, comparability, and communicability. In: P. Asquith, T. Nickles (eds.). PSA 1982, vol. II (pp. 669–688). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kuhn, T.S. (1993). Afterwords. In: P. Horwich (ed.). World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science (pp. 311–341). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kuukkanen, J.-M. (2006). Meaning Change in the Context of Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1259 (accessed: 07.2011).	pl_PL
dc.references	Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In: C.J. Bailey, W.W. Shuy (eds.). New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English (pp. 340–373). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	McCann, H.G. (1978). Chemistry Transformed: The Paradigm Shift from Phlogiston to Oxygen. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.	pl_PL
dc.references	Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In: P. Winston (ed.). The Psychology of Computer Vision (pp. 211–277). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.	pl_PL
dc.references	Munsell, A.H. (1915). Atlas of the Munsell Color System. Boston, MA: Wadsworth-Howland.	pl_PL
dc.references	Nersessian, N.J. (1995). Opening the black box: Cognitive science and history of science. Osiris 10: 195–211.	pl_PL
dc.references	Raubal, M. (2004). Formalizing conceptual spaces. In: A. Varzi, L. Vieu (eds). Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004), vol. 114 (pp. 153–164). Amsterdam: IOS Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rosch, E., Merris, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8, 382–439.	pl_PL
dc.references	Stanford, P.K. (2008). Review of H. Andersen, P. Barker, and X. Chen (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. British Journal for the History of Science 41: 116–117.	pl_PL
dc.references	Stevens, S.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677–680.	pl_PL
dc.references	Thagard, P. (1999). How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Thagard, P. (2009). Review of H. Andersen, P. Barker, and X. Chen (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 843–847.	pl_PL
dc.references	Taylor, J.R. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tversky, B., Hemenway K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 169−193.	pl_PL
dc.references	Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism. Dialectica 43: 99−124.	pl_PL
dc.references	Zenker, F. (2014). From feature lists via frames to spaces. In: T. Gamerschlag, D. Gerland, R. Osswald, W. Petersen (eds.). Frames and Concept Types: Applications in Language and Philosophy (pp. 69−89). Dordrecht: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.references	Zenker, F., Gärdenfors, P. (2014). Modeling diachronic changes in structuralism and in conceptual spaces. Erkenntnis 79 (8): 1547–1561.	pl_PL
dc.references	Zenker, F, Gärdenfors, P. (2015). Communication, rationality, and conceptual changes in scientific theories. In: F. Zenker, P. Gärdenfors, (eds.). Applications of Geometric Knowledge Representation, Synthese Library, vol. X. Dordrecht: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.references	Zenker, F., Petersen, G. (2014). From Euler to Navier-Stokes: A spatial analysis of conceptual changes in 19th-century fluid dynamics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (3): 1–19.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/7969-759-5.05