Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Complementarity of Space and Time in Distance Representations.

dc.contributor.authorWaliński, Jacek Tadeusz
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-09T17:53:28Z
dc.date.available2017-11-09T17:53:28Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationWaliński J. T., Complementarity of Space and Time in Distance Representations. Second edition, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2014, doi: 10.18778/7969-441-9pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7969-441-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/23202
dc.descriptionSecond edition. This book presents a cognitive linguistic study of distance representations carried out using the British National Corpus and the National Corpus of Polish. Corpus­based examination of linguistic expressions of spatial expanse in the semantic context of motion events suggests that as language users we are at certain liberty to choose either spatial or temporal conceptualization of distance according to what suits our subjective profiling needs relevant to a particular situation. From the perspective of research presented in this book, the entanglement of time and space in cognition is a rabbit hole phenomenon that runs deep beyond the ties that bind space to time in motion, on the one hand, and the socio-cultural sedimentation of meaning through commonly used phraseology, on the other. It appears to hinge on a higher-order ontological and epistemological distinction between objects and events, which may influence our spatial-temporal reasoning. Additionally, this book demonstrates a cognitive schema of temporaI horizon emergent from the frequency of expressions denoting temporaI distance found in spontaneous informal conversations. Taken together the research presented in this volume indicates that, at least in certain contexts, space and time can act in a complementary manner in cognition.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectspacepl_PL
dc.subjecttimepl_PL
dc.subjectlinguistic perspectivepl_PL
dc.subjectlanguagepl_PL
dc.subjectcognitionpl_PL
dc.subjectdistancepl_PL
dc.titleComplementarity of Space and Time in Distance Representations.pl_PL
dc.typeBookpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by University of Łódź, Łódź 2014pl_PL
dc.page.number298pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódź, Faculty of Philology Institute of English Studies, 90-236 Łódź, Pomorska 171/173pl_PL
dc.referencesAhn, H.-K., Liu, M. W., & Soman, D. (2009). Memory markers: How consumers recall the duration of experiences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 508–516. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.002pl_PL
dc.referencesAlexander, H. G. (Ed.). (1956). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: Together with Extracts from Newton’s Principia and Optiks. Manchester: Manchester University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlexander, S. (1966). Space, time, and Deity, Vols. 1-2) [First published in 1920]. New York: Dover. Retrieved from http://www.giffordlectures.org/pl_PL
dc.referencesAllwood, J. (2002). Language and Time. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics of the University of Tartu, Finland, 3, 1–8.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlverson, H. (1994). Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors for Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi and Sesotho. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle. (335BC/1995a). Poetics [written c. 335BC]. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Vol. 2). Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle. (350BC/1995b). Physics [written c. 350BC]. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Vol. 1). Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle. (350BC/1995c). On the Soul [written c. 350BC]. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Vol. 1). Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAschersleben, G., & Müsseler, J. (2010). On the perceived interdependence of space and time: evidence for spatial priming in the temporal kappa effect. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), Space and Time in Perception and Action (pp. 181–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAske, J. (1989). Path Predicates in English and Spanish: A Closer Look. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesAston, G., & Burnard, L. (1998). The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAugustine, S. (398AD/1978). Confessions: Saint Augustine [First written in Latin in 398AD as Confessiones]. (R. S. Pine-Coffin, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBailey, N., & Areni, C. S. (2006). When a few minutes sound like a lifetime: Does atmospheric music expand or contract perceived time? Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 189–202. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2006.05.003pl_PL
dc.referencesBarnes, J. (1982). The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5-6), 513–562. doi:10.1080/01690960344000026pl_PL
dc.referencesBarsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617– 645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639pl_PL
dc.referencesBarsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281– 1289. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0319pl_PL
dc.referencesBączkowska, A. (2011). Space, Time & Language: A Cognitive Analysis of English Prepositions. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeavers, J., Levin, B., & Wei Tham, S. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(02), 331–377. doi:10.1017/ S0022226709990272pl_PL
dc.referencesBehnke, E. A. (2011). Husserl’s Phenomenology of Embodiment. In (J. Fieser & B. Dowden, Eds.) Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/husspemb/pl_PL
dc.referencesBen-Zvi, P. (2005). Kant on Space. Philosophy Now, 49, 14–16.pl_PL
dc.referencesBender, A., Beller, S., & Bennardo, G. (2010). Temporal Frames of Reference: Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3), 283–307. doi:10.1163/156853710X531195pl_PL
dc.referencesBender, A., Bennardo, G., & Beller, S. (2005). Spatial Frames of Reference for Temporal Relations: A Conceptual Analysis in English, German, and Tongan. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 220–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesBender, A., Rothe-Wulf, A., Hüther, L., & Beller, S. (2012). Moving forward in space and time: how strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 486. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486pl_PL
dc.referencesBennardo, G. (2004). Linguistic untranslatability vs. conceptual nesting of frames of reference. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 102–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesBennett, D. C. (1975). Spatial and Temporal Uses of English Prepositions: An Essay in Stratificational Semantics. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesBergen, B. K. (2012). Louder Than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesBergen, B. K., & Chan Lau, T. T. (2012). Writing direction affects how people map space onto time. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 109. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00109pl_PL
dc.referencesBergen, B. K., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and Linguistic Aspects of Visual Imagery in Sentence Comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 733–764. doi:10.1080/03640210701530748pl_PL
dc.referencesBergson, H. (1889/2001). Time and Free Will, an Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness [First published in 1889 as Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience]. (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). New York: Dover.pl_PL
dc.referencesBergson, H. (1922/1999). Duration and Simultaneity [First published in 1922 as Durée et simultanéité]. (L. Jacobson, Trans.). Manchester: Clinamen Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBergson, H. (1922/1999). Duration and Simultaneity [First published in 1922 as Durée et simultanéité]. (L. Jacobson, Trans.). Manchester: Clinamen Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBergson, H. (2002). Henri Bergson: Key Writings. (K. Ansell-Pearson & J. Mullarkey, Eds.). New York: Continuum.pl_PL
dc.referencesBernard, E., & Griffin, J. (2009). Understanding Lucene’s query syntax. In Hibernate Search in Action (pp. 202–214). Greenwich, CT: Manning.pl_PL
dc.referencesBiber, D. (1993). Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. doi:10.1093/llc/8.4.243pl_PL
dc.referencesBiber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBiber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. N., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesBielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Applying Cognitive Grammar in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teaching English Tense and Aspect. Berlin: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack, M. (1979/1993). More about metaphor [First published in 1979]. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Ed. (pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlock, R. A. (1990). Models of psychological time. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Psychological Time (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlock, R. A., Buggie, S. E., & Matsui, F. (1996). Beliefs About Time: Cross-Cultural Comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(1), 5–22. doi:10.1080/ 00223980.1996.9914984pl_PL
dc.referencesBlock, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 330–343. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006pl_PL
dc.referencesBlock, R. A., & Zakay, D. (2006). Prospective Remembering Involves Time Estimation and Memory Processes. In J. Glicksohn & M. S. Myslobodsky (Eds.), Timing the Future: The Case for a Time-Based Prospective Memory (pp. 25–49). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlock, R. A., & Zakay, D. (2008). Timing and Remembering the Past, the Present, and the Future. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of Time (pp. 367–394). Bingley: Emerald.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlomberg, J., & Zlatev, J. (2013). Actual and non-actual motion: why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, ePub ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9299-xpl_PL
dc.referencesBloom, P., & Keil, F. C. (2001). Thinking Through Language. Mind and Language, 16(4), 351–367. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00175pl_PL
dc.referencesBonato, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(10), 2257–2273. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky, L. (2001). Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0748pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky, L. (2011a). How Language Shapes Thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62– 65. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0211-62pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky, L. (2011b). How Languages Construct Time. In S. Dehaene & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, Time and Number in the Brain (pp. 333–341). London: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118(1), 123–129. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2010.09.010pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky, L., & Gaby, A. (2010). Remembrances of Times East: Absolute Spatial Representations of Time in an Australian Aboriginal Community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–1639. doi:10.1177/0956797610386621pl_PL
dc.referencesBoroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–189. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00434pl_PL
dc.referencesBowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The Career of Metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193pl_PL
dc.referencesBower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247(4938), 44–48. doi:10.1126/science.2403694pl_PL
dc.referencesBoyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1997). Constructing Time After Death: The Transcendental- Future Time Perspective. Time & Society, 6(1), 35–54. doi:10.1177/ 0961463X97006001002pl_PL
dc.referencesBrandt, L., & Brandt, P. A. (2005). Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 216–249. doi:10.1075/arcl.3.12brapl_PL
dc.referencesBrandt, P. A. (2005). Mental spaces and cognitive semantics: A critical comment. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1578–1594. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.019pl_PL
dc.referencesBréal, M. (1897). Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning [French title: Essai de sémantique]. (H. Cust, Trans.). New York: Henry Holt.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrewer, B., & Pears, J. (1993). Frames of Reference. In N. Eilan, R. A. McCarthy, & B. Brewer (Eds.), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 25–30). Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesBroccias, C., & Hollmann, W. B. (2007). Do we need summary and sequential scanning in (Cognitive) grammar? Cognitive Linguistics, 18(4), 487–522. doi:10.1515/COG.2007.026pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, P. (2006). A sketch of the grammar of space in Tzeltal. In S. C. Levinson & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (pp. 230– 272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, P. (2012). Time and Space in Tzeltal: Is the Future Uphill? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 212. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00212pl_PL
dc.referencesBrugman, C. M. (1988). The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon [Originally presented as the author’s MA thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1981]. New York: Garland Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrugman, C. M., & Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 477–508). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.pl_PL
dc.referencesBueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1831–1840. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0028pl_PL
dc.referencesBuhusi, C. V., & Meck, W. H. (2005). What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 755–765. doi:10.1038/nrn1764pl_PL
dc.referencesBurnett, P. (1978). Time Cognition and Urban Travel Behavior. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 60(2), 107. doi:10.2307/490634pl_PL
dc.referencesButler, D. L., & Overshiner, C. (1983). The role of mental computations in judgments of area and volume. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(6), 593–598. doi:10.3758/ BF03205916pl_PL
dc.referencesBybee, J. L. (2006). From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0186pl_PL
dc.referencesBybee, J. L. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBybee, J. L., & Fleischman, S. (Eds.). (1995). Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesCacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119(3), 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004pl_PL
dc.referencesCadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 239–275). New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesCadierno, T. (2010). Motion in Danish as a Second Language: Does the Learner’s L1 Make a Difference? In Z.-H. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking (pp. 1–33). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.pl_PL
dc.referencesCadwallader, M. (1979). Problems in Cognitive Distance: Implications for Cognitive Mapping. Environment and Behavior, 11(4), 559–576. doi:10.1177/ 0013916579114007pl_PL
dc.referencesCann, R. (1993). Formal Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans. Psychological Science, 17(5), 401–406. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01719.xpl_PL
dc.referencesCantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007pl_PL
dc.referencesCarenini, G., Murray, G., & Ng, R. (2011). Methods for Mining and Summarizing Text Conversations. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarlson, L. A. (2010). Encoding Space in Spatial Language. In K. S. Mix, L. B. Smith, & M. Gasser (Eds.), The Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition (pp. 157–183). Oxford: Oxford University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesCarlson, L. A., & Covey, E. S. (2005). How far is near? Inferring distance from spatial descriptions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 617–631. doi:10.1080/ 01690960400023501pl_PL
dc.referencesCasasanto, D. (2008). Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought. Language Learning, 58, 63–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 9922.2008.00462.xpl_PL
dc.referencesCasasanto, D. (2009). When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 127–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesCasasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004pl_PL
dc.referencesCasasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and Time in the Child’s Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 387– 405. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01094.xpl_PL
dc.referencesCasati, R., & Varzi, A. (2010). Events. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/events/pl_PL
dc.referencesCastells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesChen, J.-Y. (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), 427–436. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2006.09.012pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1962). A transformational approach to syntax. In Proceedings of the Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English on May 9-12, 1958 (pp. 124–158). Austin: University of Texaspl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In R. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar (pp. 184–221). Waltham, MA: Ginn.pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1997). Noise: Noam Chomsky interviewed by Fred Branfman. HotWired, (February, 1997). Retrieved from http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/199702--.htmpl_PL
dc.referencesClark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesClayton, K., & Habibi, A. (1991). Contribution of temporal contiguity to the spatial priming effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(2), 263–271. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.263pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen, J. (1967). Relativity of psychological time. In Psychological time in health and disease (pp. 40–57). Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen, J., Hansel, C. E. M., & Sylvester, J. D. (1953). A New Phenomenon in Time Judgment. Nature, 172(4385), 901–901. doi:10.1038/172901a0pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen, J., Hansel, C. E. M., & Sylvester, J. D. (1954). Interdependence of Temporal and Auditory Judgments. Nature, 174(4431), 642–644. doi:10.1038/174642a0pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen, J., Hansel, C. E. M., & Sylvester, J. D. (1955). Interdependence in judgments of space, time and movement. Acta Psychologica, 11, 360–372. doi:10.1016/S0001- 6918(55)80098-4pl_PL
dc.referencesCollyer, C. E. (1977). Discrimination of spatial and temporal intervals defined by three light flashes: Effects of spacing on temporal judgments and of timing on spatial judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(4), 357–364. doi:10.3758/ BF03199487pl_PL
dc.referencesComrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesComrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCorballis, M. C. (2013a). Mental time travel: a case for evolutionary continuity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 5–6. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.009pl_PL
dc.referencesCorballis, M. C. (2013b). The wandering rat: response to Suddendorf. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.012pl_PL
dc.referencesCottle, T. J. (1967). The Circles Test: An Investigation of Perceptions of Temporal Relatedness and Dominance. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 31(5), 58–71. doi:10.1080/0091651X.1967.10120417pl_PL
dc.referencesCottle, T. J. (1968). The location of experience: A manifest time orientation. Acta Psychologica, 28, 129–149. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(68)90009-7pl_PL
dc.referencesCottle, T. J., & Pleck, J. H. (1969). Linear Estimations of Temporal Extension: The Effect of Age, Sex, and Social Class. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 33(1), 81–93. doi:10.1080/0091651X.1969.10120563pl_PL
dc.referencesCoulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoulson, S., & Matlock, T. (2001). Metaphor and the Space Structuring Model. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3-4), 295–316. doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.9678899pl_PL
dc.referencesCoulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3-4), 175–196. doi:10.1515/cogl.2001.014pl_PL
dc.referencesCoulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2005). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1510–1536. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.010pl_PL
dc.referencesCrawley, S. E., & Pring, L. (2000). When did Mrs Thatcher resign? The effects of ageing on the dating of public events. Memory, 8(2), 111–121. doi:10.1080/ 096582100387650pl_PL
dc.referencesCroft, W. (1998). The Structure of Events and the Structure of Language. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 1 (pp. 67–92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesCroft, W. (2006). On explaining metonymy: Comment on Peirsman and Geeraerts, “Metonymy as a prototypical category.” Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 317–326. doi:10.1515/COG.2006.008pl_PL
dc.referencesCroft, W. (2009). Aspectual and Causal Structure in Event Representations. In V. C. Mueller-Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to Language: Studies in Honor of Melissa Bowerman (pp. 139–166). New York: Psychology Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCroft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCrowder, R. G., & Neath, I. (1994). The Influence of Pitch on Time Perception in Short Melodies. Music Perception, 12(4), 379–386.pl_PL
dc.referencesCruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCuriel, J. M., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Mental organization of maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 202–214. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.202pl_PL
dc.referencesCytowic, R. E., & Eagleman, D. M. (2009). Wednesday Is Indigo Blue: Discovering the Brain of Synesthesia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesD’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’s Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI) - Short Form: An Italian Study. Time & Society, 12(2), 333–347. doi:10.1177/0961463X030122010pl_PL
dc.referencesDainton, B. (2010a). Temporal Consciousness. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/consciousness-temporal/pl_PL
dc.referencesDainton, B. (2010b). Supplement to Temporal Consciousness: Some Relevant Empirical Findings (Psychology, Psychophysics, Neuroscience). In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-temporal/empirical-findings.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesDancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, D. (1967/2001). The Logical Form of Action Sentences [First published in 1967]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd Ed. (pp. 105–122). Oxford: Clarendon Presspl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, D. (1978). What Metaphors Mean. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 31–47. doi:10.1086/447971pl_PL
dc.referencesDe Hevia, M.-D., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Number-Space Mapping in Human Infants. Psychological Science, 21(5), 653–660. doi:10.1177/0956797610366091pl_PL
dc.referencesDe Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011). The role of material culture in human time representation: Calendrical systems as extensions of mental time travel. Adaptive Behavior, 19(1), 63–76. doi:10.1177/1059712310396382pl_PL
dc.referencesDe Sousa, H. (2012). Generational Differences in the Orientation of Time in Cantonese Speakers as a Function of Changes in the Direction of Chinese Writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 255. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00255pl_PL
dc.referencesDehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371pl_PL
dc.referencesDehaene, S., & Brannon, E. M. (Eds.). (2011). Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought. London: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeignan, A. (2008). Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 280–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDenis, M. (1997). The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 16(4), 409–458.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeutsch, K. W., & Isard, W. (1961). A note on a generalized concept of effective distance. Behavioral Science, 6(4), 308–311. doi:10.1002/bs.3830060406pl_PL
dc.referencesDewell, R. B. (1994). Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5(4), 351–380. doi:10.1515/cogl.1994.5.4.351pl_PL
dc.referencesDewell, R. B. (2005). Dynamic patterns of CONTAINMENT. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 369–393). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesDiSalle, R. (2006). Understanding Space-time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDiSalle, R. (2009). Space and Time: Inertial Frames. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/spacetime-iframes/pl_PL
dc.referencesDoob, L. W. (1971). Patterning of Time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDraaisma, D. (2004). Why Life Speeds up as You Get Older: How Memory Shapes Our Past. (A. Pomerans & E. Pomerans, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDrake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time Perspective and Correlates of Wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61. doi:10.1177/0961463X07086304pl_PL
dc.referencesDroege, P. (2009). Now or never: How consciousness represents time. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 78–90. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.006pl_PL
dc.referencesDroit-Volet, S., Bigand, E., Ramos, D., & Bueno, J. L. O. (2010). Time flies with music whatever its emotional valence. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 226–232. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.003pl_PL
dc.referencesDroit-Volet, S., & Meck, W. H. (2007). How emotions colour our perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 504–513. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.008pl_PL
dc.referencesEinstein, A. (1916/1952a). The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity. [First published in 1916 as Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Annalen der Physik, 354, 769-822]. In W. Perrett & G. B. Jeffery (Trans.), The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Papers on the Special and General Theory of Relativity (pp. 109–164). New York: Dover.pl_PL
dc.referencesEinstein, A. (1905/1952b). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies [First published in 1905 as Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 322, 891–921]. In W. Perrett & G. B. Jeffery (Trans.), The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Papers on the Special and General Theory of Relativity (pp. 35–65). New York: Dover.pl_PL
dc.referencesEmmorey, K. (2001). Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought (pp. 147–174). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEngberg-Pedersen, E. (1999). Space and Time. In J. Allwood & P. Gärdenfors (Eds.), Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and Cognition (pp. 131–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesEngelbert, M., & Carruthers, P. (2010). Introspection. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(2), 245–253. doi:10.1002/wcs.4pl_PL
dc.referencesEriksen, T. H. (2001). Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2003). The Structure of Time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2005). The meaning of time: polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41(1), 33–75. doi:10.1017/S0022226704003056pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2006). Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491–534. doi:10.1515/COG.2006.016pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2009). How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2010). From the spatial to the non-spatial: The “state” lexical concepts of in, on and at. In V. Evans & P. A. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions (pp. 215–248). London: Equinox.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(2), 129–141. doi:10.1002/wcs.1163pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2013a). Temporal frames of reference. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(3), 393–435. doi:10.1515/cog-2013-0016pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V. (2013b). Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V., & Chilton, P. A. (Eds.). (2010). Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox.pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesEverett, D. L. (2005). Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646.pl_PL
dc.referencesEysenck, H. J. (1959). Personality and the estimation of time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 9(3), 405–406. doi:10.2466/pms.1959.9.3.405pl_PL
dc.referencesFabiszak, M. (2008). Corpus frequency as a guide to metaphor labelling. In Z. Wąsik & T. Komendziński (Eds.), Metaphor and Cognition (pp. 149–162). Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [First published in 1985 by MIT Press]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G. (2007). Mental Spaces. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 351–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G. (2009). Generalized integration networks. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 147–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G., & Lakoff, G. (2010). On Metaphor and Blending [Announced as forthcoming in Cognitive Semiotics]. Retrieved from http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu /~coulson/spaces/GG-final-1.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (1996). Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1994). Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces (Report No. 9401). San Diego, CA: Department of Cognitive Science, University of California.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3-4), 283–304. doi:10.1515/cogl.2001.017pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesFauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 53–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeldman, J. A. (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFellbaum, C. (Ed.). (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFellbaum, C. (2006). WordNet(s). In (K. Brown, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Second Edition. Oxford: Elsevier.pl_PL
dc.referencesFias, W., van Dijck, J.-P., & Gevers, W. (2011). How is Number Associated with Space? The Role of Working Memory. In S. Dehaene & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, Time and Number in the Brain (pp. 133–148). London: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFilipović, L. (2007). Talking About Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, C. J. (1971/1997). Lectures on Deixis [First published in 1971 as Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis]. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976. tb25467.xpl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, C. J. (1982/2007). Frame semantics [First published in 1982]. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader (pp. 238–262). London: Equinox.pl_PL
dc.referencesFingerman, K. L., & Perlmutter, M. (1995). Future Time Perspective and Life Events across Adulthood. The Journal of General Psychology, 122(1), 95–111. doi:10.1080/00221309.1995.9921225pl_PL
dc.referencesFischer, K. (2010). Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches (pp. 43–59). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.pl_PL
dc.referencesFisiak, J., Lipińska-Grzegorek, M., & Zabrocki, T. (1987). An introductory English-Polish contrastive grammar, 2nd Ed. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.pl_PL
dc.referencesFitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179–210. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2005.02.005pl_PL
dc.referencesFlaherty, M. G. (1993). Conceptualizing Variation in the Experience of Time. Sociological Inquiry, 63(4), 394–405. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1993.tb00320.xpl_PL
dc.referencesFlaherty, M. G. (1999). A Watched Pot: How We Experience Time. New York: New York University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFodor, J. A. (2008). LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesForceville, C. (2004). Review of “The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities.” Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 83–89. doi:10.1207/ S15327868MS1901_5pl_PL
dc.referencesFraisse, P. (1963). The Psychology of Time. New York: Harper & Row.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of Perception, Vol. 8: Perceptual Coding (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraisse, P. (1984). Perception and Estimation of Time. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), 1–36. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000245pl_PL
dc.referencesFraisse, P. (1994). Rhythm. In (R. J. Corsini, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Psychology. New York: John Wiley.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrank, L. K. (1939). Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293–312.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrankish, K., & Ramsey, W. (Eds.). (2012). The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFreundschuh, S. M., & Egenhofer, M. J. (1997). Human conceptions of spaces: Implications for GIS. Transactions in GIS, 2(4), 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.1997.tb00063.xpl_PL
dc.referencesFriedman, A., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Global-scale location and distance estimates: Common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 333–346. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.333pl_PL
dc.referencesFriedman, W. J. (2003). The Development of a Differentiated Sense of the Past and the Future. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 31, pp. 229–269). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFriedman, W. J., & Janssen, S. M. J. (2010). Aging and the speed of time. Acta Psychologica, 134(2), 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.01.004pl_PL
dc.referencesFuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1430–1451. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.xpl_PL
dc.referencesFuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time: English and Mandarin Time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1305–1328. doi:10.1111/j.1551- 6709.2011.01193.xpl_PL
dc.referencesFujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events. Psychological Science, 17(4), 278–282. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01698.xpl_PL
dc.referencesGaby, A. (2012). The Thaayorre think of time like they talk of space. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 300. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00300pl_PL
dc.referencesGalton, A. (2011). Time flies but space does not: Limits to the spatialisation of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 695–703. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.002pl_PL
dc.referencesGarside, R., Leech, G. N., & McEnery, T. (1997). Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarside, R., Leech, G. N., & Sampson, G. (1987). The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-Based Approach. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesGeeraerts, D. (2006). Methodology in Cognitive Linguistics. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 21–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesGeeraerts, D. (2009). Prisms and blends: Digging one’s grave from two perspectives. In W. Oleksy & P. Stalmaszczyk (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data: Studies of Honor of Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (pp. 87–104). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesGeeraerts, D. (2010). The doctor and the semantician. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches (pp. 63– 78). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.pl_PL
dc.referencesGell, A. (1992). The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Oxford: Berg.pl_PL
dc.referencesGennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83(1), 49–79. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00166-4pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner, D. (2001). Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space—time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537– 565. doi:10.1080/01690960143000317pl_PL
dc.referencesGentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 447–480). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87(3), B87–B95. doi:10.1016/S0010- 0277(02)00234-2pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar Timing in Memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423(Timing and Time Perception), 52–77. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.xpl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, R. W. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language, 31(4), 485–506. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90025-Spl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, R. W. (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3-4), 347–358. doi:10.1515/cogl.2001.020pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, R. W. (2007). Idioms and Formulaic Language. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 697–725). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, R. W. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibbs, R. W., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGibson, J. J. (1975). Events are Perceivable But Time Is Not. In J. T. Fraser & N. Lawrence (Eds.), The Study of Time II: Proceedings of the Second Conference of the International Society for the Study of Time (pp. 295–301). Berlin: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesGilquin, G., & Gries, S. T. (2009). Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–26. doi:10.1515/ CLLT.2009.001pl_PL
dc.referencesGlebkin, V. V. (2013). A Critical View on Conceptual Blending Theory. In M. Knauff, N. Sebanz, M. Pauen, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2404–2409). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesGleick, J. (2000). Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York: Vintage Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesGleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2012). New Perspectives on Language and Thought. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 543–568). Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 1–55.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. doi:10.3758/BF03196313pl_PL
dc.referencesGlucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1541–1558. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00003-Xpl_PL
dc.referencesGlynn, D. (in press). Polysemy and synonymy: Cognitive theory and corpus method. In D. Glynn & J. Robinson (Eds.), Polysemy and Synonymy: Corpus Methods and Applications in Cognitive Semantics (pp. 205–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlynn, D. (2010). Corpus-driven Cognitive Semantics: Introduction to the field. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus- Driven Approaches (pp. 1–41). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlynn, D., & Fischer, K. (Eds.). (2010). Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlynn, D., & Robinson, J. (Eds.). (in press). Polysemy and Synonymy: Corpus Methods and Applications in Cognitive Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2009). Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: “Cutting” and “chopping” in English, Polish, and Japanese. Language Sciences, 31(1), 60–96. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.002pl_PL
dc.referencesGoffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9pl_PL
dc.referencesGoldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoldberg, A. E., & Suttle, L. (2010). Construction grammar. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 468–477. doi:10.1002/wcs.22pl_PL
dc.referencesGoldreich, D. (2007). A Bayesian Perceptual Model Replicates the Cutaneous Rabbit and Other Tactile Spatiotemporal Illusions. PLoS ONE, 2(3), e333. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0000333pl_PL
dc.referencesGórska, E. (2009). On the Diversity of Linguistic Evidence for Conceptual Metaphor. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 45(2), 81–106. doi:10.2478/v10121-009-0017-2pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady, J. E. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady, J. E. (2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrady, J. E., Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrant, E. (1981). Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T. (2003). Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 1–27. doi:10.1075/arcl.1.02gripl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T. (2006). Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many meanings of to run. In S. T. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 57–99). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T. (2009). What is Corpus Linguistics? Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1225–1241. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00149.xpl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T. (2011). Studying syntactic priming in corpora: Implications of different levels of granularity. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research (pp. 143–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T. (2012). Corpus linguistics, theoretical linguistics, and cognitive/ psycholinguistics: Towards more and more fruitful exchanges. In J. Mukherjee & M. Huber (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description (pp. 41–63). Amsterdam: Rodopi.pl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T. (2013). Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction, Second Revised Edition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.pl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T., & Divjak, D. (2009). Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 57–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T., & Divjak, D. (2010). Quantitative approaches in usage-based Cognitive Semantics: Myths, erroneous assumptions, and a proposal. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches (pp. 333–353). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.pl_PL
dc.referencesGries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (Eds.). (2006). Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus- Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrondelaers, S., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D. (2007). A case for a Cognitive corpus linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 149–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrondin, S. (Ed.). (2008). Psychology of Time. Bingley: Emerald.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 561–582. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.561pl_PL
dc.referencesGrothe, B. (2003). Sensory systems: New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(7), 540–550. doi:10.1038/nrn1136pl_PL
dc.referencesGruber, R. P., Wagner, L. F., & Block, R. A. (2004). Relationships between subjective time and information processed (reduction of uncertainty). In P. Harris & M. Crawford (Eds.), Time and Uncertainty (pp. 188–203). Boston: Brill.pl_PL
dc.referencesGumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHampe, B. (Ed.). (2005). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesHancock, P. A., & Block, R. A. (2012). The Psychology of Time: A View Backward and Forward. American Journal of Psychology, 125(3), 267–274.pl_PL
dc.referencesHancock, P. A., & Rausch, R. (2010). The effects of sex, age, and interval duration on the perception of time. Acta Psychologica, 133(2), 170–179. doi:10.1016/ j.actpsy.2009.11.005pl_PL
dc.referencesHancock, P. A., & Weaver, J. L. (2005). On time distortion under stress. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(2), 193–211. doi:10.1080/14639220512331325747pl_PL
dc.referencesHarber, K. D., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2003). Participant Self-Selection Biases as a Function of Individual Differences in Time Perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 255–264. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_08pl_PL
dc.referencesHarder, P. (2003). Mental spaces: Exactly when do we need them? Cognitive Linguistics, 14(1), 91–96. doi:10.1515/cogl.2003.004pl_PL
dc.referencesHarre, R. (1994). Newton, Isaac (1642–1727). In (S. L. Macey, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Time. New York: Garland.pl_PL
dc.referencesHasko, V. (2010). The Role of Thinking for Speaking in Adult L2 Speech: The Case of (Non)unidirectionality Encoding by American Learners of Russian. In Z.-H. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking (pp. 34–58). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.pl_PL
dc.referencesHasko, V., & Perelmutter, R. (Eds.). (2010). New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaspelmath, M. (1997). From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. Munich: LINCOM Europa.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaspelmath, M. (2003). The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-Linguistic Comparison. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2 (pp. 211–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesHauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569pl_PL
dc.referencesHawking, S. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. New York: Bantam Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeidegger, M. (1927/2002). Being and Time [First published in 1927 as Sein und Zeit]. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper.pl_PL
dc.referencesHelson, H. (1930). The tau effect – an example of psychological relativity. Science, 71(1847), 536–537. doi:10.1126/science.71.1847.536pl_PL
dc.referencesHelson, H., & King, S. M. (1931). The tau effect: an example of psychological relativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(3), 202–217. doi:10.1037/h0071164pl_PL
dc.referencesHenderson, M. D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Transcending the “Here”: The Effect of Spatial Distance on Social Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 845–856. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.845pl_PL
dc.referencesHendricks, J. (2001). It’s About Time. In S. H. McFadden & R. C. Atchley (Eds.), Aging and the Meaning of Time a Multidisciplinary Exploration (pp. 21–50). New York: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesHenry, M. J., McAuley, J. D., & Zaleha, M. (2009). Evaluation of an imputed pitch velocity model of the auditory tau effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(6), 1399– 1413. doi:10.3758/APP.71.6.1399pl_PL
dc.referencesHerskovits, A. (1985). Semantics and Pragmatics of Locative Expressions. Cognitive Science, 9(3), 341–378. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0903_3pl_PL
dc.referencesHerskovits, A. (1986). Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English [Republished digitally in 2009]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeylen, K., Tummers, J., & Geeraerts, D. (2008). Methodological issues in corpus-based Cognitive Linguistics. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems (pp. 91–128). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesHigginbotham, J., Pianesi, F., & Varzi, A. (2000). Speaking of Events. New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHill, O. W., Buggie, S. E., & Block, R. A. (2000). Culture and Beliefs About Time: Comparisons Among Black Americans, Black Africans, and White Americans. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 443–461. doi:10.1080/00223980009598228pl_PL
dc.referencesHills, D. (2012). Metaphor. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/win2012/entries/metaphor/pl_PL
dc.referencesHuddleston, R. D., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuddleston, R. D., & Pullum, G. K. (2005). A Student’s Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuggett, N., & Hoefer, C. (2009). Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Motion. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/spacetimetheories/pl_PL
dc.referencesHusserl, E. (1917/1991). On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893-1917) [Original title Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins]. (J. B. Brough, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesHusserl, E. (1928/1964). The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness [First published in 1928 as Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins]. (M. Heidegger, Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHusserl, E. (1939/1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy [First published in 1939]. (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008pl_PL
dc.referencesIdström, A. (2010). What Inari Saami idioms reveal about the time concept of the indigenous people of Inari. Yearbook of Phraseology, 2010, 159–178. doi:10.1515/9783110222623.1.159pl_PL
dc.referencesIttelson, W. H. (1973). Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory. In W. H. Ittelson (Ed.), Environment and Cognition (pp. 1–19). New York: Seminar Presspl_PL
dc.referencesIvry, R. B., & Schlerf, J. E. (2008). Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(7), 273–280. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.002pl_PL
dc.referencesIwata, S. (1996). Motion and Extent: Two Sides of the Same Coin. Studia Linguistica, 50(3), 256–282. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9582.1996.tb00351.xpl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R. (1996). The Architecture of the Linguistic-Spatial Interface. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 1–30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R. (2007). Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R. (2012). Language as a source of evidence for theories of spatial representation. Perception, 41(9), 1128–1152. doi:10.1068/p7271pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R., & Aaron, D. (1991). Review of “More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor.” Language, 67(2), 320–338. doi:10.2307/415109pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R., & Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97(2), 211–225. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006pl_PL
dc.referencesJames, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology (Vols. 1-2). New York: Henry Holt.pl_PL
dc.referencesJanda, L. A. (2004). A metaphor in search of a source domain: The categories of Slavic aspect. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(4). doi:10.1515/cogl.2004.15.4.471pl_PL
dc.referencesJanda, L. A. (2009). What is the role of semantic maps in cognitive linguistics? In W. Oleksy & P. Stalmaszczyk (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data: Studies of Honor of Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (pp. 105–123). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesJanssen, S. M. J., Naka, M., & Friedman, W. J. (2013). Why does life appear to speed up as people get older? Time & Society, 22(2), 274–290. doi:10.1177/ 0961463X13478052pl_PL
dc.referencesJanuary, D., & Kako, E. (2007). Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), 417–426. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006. 07.008pl_PL
dc.referencesJaszczolt, K. M. (2009). Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJaszczolt, K. M. (2011). Time as Degress of Epistemic Commitment. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Turning Points in the Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (pp. 19–34). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesJaszczolt, K. M. (2012). Cross-linguistic differences in expressing time and universal principles of utterance interpretation. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Linguistic Diversity (pp. 95–121). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesJensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Free Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJi, L.-J., Guo, T., Zhang, Z., & Messervey, D. (2009). Looking into the past: Cultural differences in perception and representation of past information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 761–769. doi:10.1037/a0014498pl_PL
dc.referencesJiga-Boy, G. M., Clark, A. E., & Semin, G. R. (2010). So Much to Do and So Little Time: Effort and Perceived Temporal Distance. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1811–1817. doi:10.1177/0956797610388043pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJones, B., & Huang, Y. L. (1982). Space-time dependencies in psychophysical judgment of extent and duration: Algebraic models of the tau and kappa effects. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 128–142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.128pl_PL
dc.referencesKadosh, R. C., & Gertner, L. (2011). Synesthesia: Gluing Together Time, Number, and Space. In S. Dehaene & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, Time and Number in the Brain (pp. 123–132). London: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.pl_PL
dc.referencesKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11(2), 123–141. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(82)90022-1pl_PL
dc.referencesKalisz, R. (2001). Językoznawstwo kognitywne w świetle językoznawstwa funkcjonalnego. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesKalkavage, P. (1994). Descartes, Rene (1596–1650). In (S. L. Macey, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Time. New York: Garland.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1768/1968). Concerning the Ultimate Foundation of the Differentiation of Regions in Space [First published in 1768]. In G. B. Kerferd & D. E. Walford (Trans.), Selected Pre-Critical Writings and Correspondence with Beck (pp. 36–43). Manchester: Manchester University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1787/2003). Critique of Pure Reason [First published in 1787 as Kritik der reinen Vernunft]. (N. Kemp Smith, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesKardela, H. (1992). Gramatyka kognitywna jako globalna teoria języka. In I. Nowakowska- Kempna (Ed.), Podstawy metodologiczne semantyki współczesnej (pp. 9–22). Wrocław: Wiedza o Kulturze.pl_PL
dc.referencesKardela, H. (2006a). Koncepcja umysłu ucieleśnionego w kognitywizmie. In W. Dziarnowska & A. Klawiter (Eds.), Mózg i jego umysły (pp. 217–243). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.pl_PL
dc.referencesKardela, H. (2006b). Metodologia językoznawstwa kognitywnego. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Metodologie językoznawstwa współczesnego: Podstawy teoretyczne (pp. 196– 233). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesKardela, H. (2007). Event Structure: A Force Dynamics/Absolute Construal Account. In W. Chłopicki, A. Pawelec, & A. Pokojska (Eds.), Cognition in Language: Volume in Honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska (pp. 150–167). Kraków: Tertium.pl_PL
dc.referencesKaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M. E., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94(3), B79–B89. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.005pl_PL
dc.referencesKastenbaum, R. (1961). The Dimensions of Future Time Perspective, an Experimental Analysis. The Journal of General Psychology, 65(2), 203–218. doi:10.1080/ 00221309.1961.9920473pl_PL
dc.referencesKastenbaum, R. (1963). Cognitive and personal futurity in later life. Journal of Individual Psychology, 19(2), 216–222.pl_PL
dc.referencesKastenbaum, R. (1964). The structure and function of time perspective. Journal of Psychological Researches (India), 8, 1–11.pl_PL
dc.referencesKastenbaum, R. (1994). Time perspective. In (R. J. Corsini, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Psychology. New York: John Wiley.pl_PL
dc.referencesKay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What Is the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86(1), 65–79. doi:10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050pl_PL
dc.referencesKeefe, R. (2000). Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKelly, M. R. (2008, August). Phenomenology and Time-Consciousness. In (J. Fieser & B. Dowden, Eds.) Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/phe-time/pl_PL
dc.referencesKelly, S. D. (2005). The Puzzle of Temporal Experience. In A. Brook & K. Akins (Eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement (pp. 208–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKemmerer, D. (2005). The spatial and temporal meanings of English prepositions can be independently impaired. Neuropsychologia, 43(5), 797–806. doi:10.1016/ j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.025pl_PL
dc.referencesKeough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 149–164.pl_PL
dc.referencesKeysar, B., & Bly, B. M. (1999). Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1559–1578. doi:10.1016/S0378- 2166(99)00004-1pl_PL
dc.referencesKeysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, W. S. (2000). Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It? Journal of Memory and Language, 43(4), 576–593. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2711pl_PL
dc.referencesKimmel, M. (2004). Metaphor Variation in Cultural Context: Perspectives from Anthropology. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 275–294. doi:10.1080/ 1382557042000277395pl_PL
dc.referencesKlatzky, R. L., Colledge, R. G., Loomis, J. M., Cicinelli, J. G., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1995). Performance of blind and sighted persons on spatial tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89(1), 70–82.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoerner, E. F. K. (1992). The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: A Preliminary History and a Bibliographical Essay. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2(2), 173–198. doi:10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.173pl_PL
dc.referencesKopecka, A. (2010). Motion events in Polish: Lexicalization patterns and the description of Manner. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion (pp. 225–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesKosecki, K. (2001). Some Remarks on Benjamin Lee Whorf’s Analysis of the Hopian Notion of Time. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis: Folia Linguistica Anglica, 3, 99–105.pl_PL
dc.referencesKosecki, K. (2005). Metafory i metonimie czasoprzestrzeni. In J. Adamowski (Ed.), Przestrzeń w jezyku i w kulturze: problemy teoretyczne: interpretacje tekstów religijnych (pp. 91–99). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie- Sklodowskiej.pl_PL
dc.referencesKosecki, K. (Ed.). (2007). Perspectives on Metonymy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesKosecki, K. (2008). Language, Time, and Biology: A Cognitive Perspective. Włocławek: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.pl_PL
dc.referencesKotarbiński, T. (1929/1990a). Elementy teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk [First published in 1929]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.pl_PL
dc.referencesKotarbiński, T. (1990b). Philosophical Self-Portrait. In J. Woleński (Ed.), Kotarbiński: Logic, Semantics and Ontology (pp. 1–6). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.pl_PL
dc.referencesKozanecka-Dymek, A. (2012). On Kinds of Temporal Logic and Some of Its Applications. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 28(41), 73–81.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of Anger, Pride and Love: A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövecses, Z. (2006). Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesKövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKranjec, A. (2006). Extending Spatial Frames of Reference to Temporal Concepts. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 447–452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesKranjec, A., Cardillo, E. R., Schmidt, G. L., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Prescribed spatial prepositions influence how we think about time. Cognition, 114(1), 111–116. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.008pl_PL
dc.referencesKreitzer, A. (1997). Multiple levels of schematization: A study in the conceptualization of space. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 291–326. doi:10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.291pl_PL
dc.referencesKrzeszowski, T. P. (1990). The Axiological Aspect of Idealized Cognitive Models. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Meaning and Lexicography (pp. 135–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrzeszowski, T. P. (1997). Angels and Devils in Hell: Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warszawa: Energeia.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrzeszowski, T. P. (2002). From target to source: Metaphors made real. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Turewicz (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics Today (pp. 139–158). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrzeszowski, T. P. (2013, September 17). Meaninglessness of “meaning”? A multidimensional view of the meta-concept. Plenary Lecture presented at the Cognitive Linguistics in the Year 2013 Conference, Warszawa, Społeczna Akademia Nauk.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Ed. (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G. (2008). The Neural Theory of Metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes from: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96(1), 1–33. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009pl_PL
dc.referencesLakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2012). Language and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 517–544. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.xpl_PL
dc.referencesLandau, B., Dessalegn, B., & Goldberg, A. M. (2010). Language and space: Momentary interactions. In V. Evans & P. A. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions (pp. 51–78). London: Equinox.pl_PL
dc.referencesLandau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(02), 217–265. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00029733pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract Motion. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 455–471). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (1987a). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (1987b). Nouns and Verbs. Language, 63(1), 53–94. doi:10.2307/415384pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (1992). Prepositions as grammatical(izing) elements. Leuvenese Bijdragen, 81, 287–309.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (1993). Grammatical traces of some “invisible” semantic constructs. Language Sciences, 15(4), 323–355. doi:10.1016/0388-0001(93)90008-Gpl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (2002). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 2nd Ed. [First edition published in 1991]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (2005). Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking (pp. 164–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (2008a). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (2008b). Sequential and summary scanning: A reply. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–607. doi:10.1515/COGL.2008.022pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (2008c). Cognitive Grammar as a basis for language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 66–88). New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangacker, R. W. (2012). Linguistic manifestations of the space-time (dis)analogy. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture, and cognition (pp. 191–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangston, W. (2002). Violating Orientational Metaphors Slows Reading. Discourse Processes, 34(3), 281–310. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3403_3pl_PL
dc.referencesLarge, E. W. (2008). Resonating to Musical Rhythm: Theory and Experiment. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of Time (pp. 189–232). Bingley: Emerald.pl_PL
dc.referencesLe Poidevin, R. (2003). Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLe Poidevin, R. (2004). A Puzzle Concerning Time Perception. Synthese, 142(1), 109–142. doi:10.1023/B:SYNT.0000047710.71824.b1pl_PL
dc.referencesLe Poidevin, R. (2007). The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLe Poidevin, R. (2011). The Experience and Perception of Time. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/time-experience/pl_PL
dc.referencesLe Poidevin, R., & MacBeath, M. (Eds.). (1993). The Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLee, D. (2000). Learning of spatial and temporal patterns in sequential hand movements. Cognitive Brain Research, 9(1), 35–39. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00040-3pl_PL
dc.referencesLeech, G. N. (2005). Adding Linguistic Annotation. In W. Martin (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice (pp. 17–29). Oxford: Oxbow Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesLehrer, A. (2009). Wine & Conversation, 2nd Ed. [First published 1983 by Indiana University Press]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeibowitz, H. W., Guzy, L. T., Peterson, E., & Blake, P. T. (1993). Quantitative perceptual estimates: verbal versus nonverbal retrieval techniques. Perception, 22(9), 1051–1060. doi:10.1068/p221051pl_PL
dc.referencesLevelt, W. J. M. (1982). Linearization in Describing Spatial Networks. In S. Peters & E. Saarinen (Eds.), Processes, Beliefs, and Questions (pp. 199–220). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevelt, W. J. M. (1996). Perspective Taking and Ellipsis in Spatial Descriptions. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 77–108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223–232. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01319-4pl_PL
dc.referencesLevin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, S. C. (1996). Language and Space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25(1), 353– 382. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (Eds.). (2006). Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2004). The PELCRA Project – state of the art. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics, Computers Tools, and Applications – State of the Art (pp. 9–25). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2007). Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial Categories. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 139–169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Ed.). (2008a). Asymmetric Events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2008b). Czym jest język? Dzisiejsze kontrowersje w paradygmatach generatywnych i kognitywnych. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Metodologie językoznawstwa: współczesne tendencje i kontrowersje (pp. 9–26). Kraków: Lexis.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2008c). PALC 2007: Where are we now? In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics, Computer Tools, and Applications - State of the Art PALC 2007 (pp. 33–48). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2011). Events as They Are. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Turning Points in the Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (pp. 35–64). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2014). Time and Time Experience in Language. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Kosecki (Eds.), Time and Temporality in Language and Human Experience (pp. 19–44). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Dziwirek, K. (Eds.). (2009). Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewin, K. (1939). Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896. doi:10.1086/218177pl_PL
dc.referencesLewin, K. (1948). Time Perspective and Morale [First published in 1942]. In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics (pp. 103–124). New York: Harper.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in the Social Sciences: Selected Theoretical Papers. (D. Cartwright, Ed.). New York: Harper.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (1981). The Structures and Meanings of Social Time. Social Forces, 60(2), 432–462. doi:10.1093/sf/60.2.432pl_PL
dc.referencesLi, P., Abarbanell, L., Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2011). Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition, 120(1), 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.012pl_PL
dc.referencesLiberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8pl_PL
dc.referencesLinde, C., & Labov, W. (1975). Spatial Networks as a Site for the Study of Language and Thought. Language, 51(4), 924. doi:10.2307/412701pl_PL
dc.referencesLloyd, D. (2010, February 23). Neural correlates of temporality: Default mode variability and state-dependent temporal awareness. Consciousness Online. Retrieved from http://consciousnessonline.com/2010/02/19/neural-correlates-of-temporality-defaultmode- variability-and-state-dependent-temporal-awarenesspl_PL
dc.referencesLocke, J. (1689/1995). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [First published in 1689]. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesLogan, G. D., & Sadler, D. D. (1996). A Computational Analysis of the Apprehension of Spatial Relations. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 493–529). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLos, B. (2005). The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2010). General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants. Psychological Science, 21(6), 873–881. doi:10.1177/0956797610370158pl_PL
dc.referencesLucy, J. A. (1992a). Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLucy, J. A. (1997). Linguistic Relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 291–312. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.291pl_PL
dc.referencesLynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLyngfelt, B., & Solstad, T. (Eds.). (2006). Demoting the Agent: Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesLyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vols. 1-2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacEachren, A. M. (1980). Travel Time as the Basis of Cognitive Distance. The Professional Geographer, 32(1), 30–36. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1980.00030.xpl_PL
dc.referencesMach, E. (1897). Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations [First published in 1886 as Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen]. (C. M. Williams, Trans.). Chicago: Open Court.pl_PL
dc.referencesMagurshak, D. (1979). Heidegger and Edwards on “Sein-zum-Tode.” The Monist, 62(1), 107–118.pl_PL
dc.referencesMaines, D. R. (1989). Culture and Temporality. Cultural Dynamics, 2(1), 107–123. doi:10.1177/092137408900200107pl_PL
dc.referencesMajid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 108–114. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003pl_PL
dc.referencesMalt, B. C., & Wolff, P. (Eds.). (2010). Words and the Mind: How Words Capture Human Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMani, I., Pustejovsky, J., & Gaizauskas, R. (Eds.). (2005). The Language of Time: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarchetti, G. (2009). Studies on time: a proposal on how to get out of circularity. Cognitive Processing, 10(1), 7–40. doi:10.1007/s10339-008-0215-1pl_PL
dc.referencesMari, A. (2006). What do the notions of instrumentality and of manner have in common? In P. Saint-Dizier (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions (pp. 263–287). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.pl_PL
dc.referencesMari, A., & Saint-Dizier, P. (2006). A Conceptual Semantics for Prepositions denoting Instrumentality. In P. Saint-Dizier (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions (pp. 289–305). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkosian, N. (2013). Time. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2013/entriesime/pl_PL
dc.referencesMatell, M. S., & Meck, W. H. (2004). Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 21(2), 139–170. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.012pl_PL
dc.referencesMatlock, T. (2001). How real is fictive motion? (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, Santa Cruz.pl_PL
dc.referencesMatlock, T. (2004a). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (pp. 221–248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesMatlock, T. (2004b). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400. doi:10.3758/BF03206329pl_PL
dc.referencesMatlock, T. (2006). Depicting fictive motion in drawings. In J. Luchjenbroers (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics Investigations (pp. 67–85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesMatlock, T., Ramscar, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2005). On the Experiential Link Between Spatial and Temporal Language. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 655–664. doi:10.1207/ s15516709cog0000_17pl_PL
dc.referencesMatlock, T., & Richardson, D. C. (2004). Do eye movements go with fictive motion? In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 909–914). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesMatsumoto, Y. (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 183–226. doi:10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.183pl_PL
dc.referencesMay, R., Angel, E., & Ellenberger, H. F. (Eds.). (1994). Existence [First published in 1958]. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction, 2nd Ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGlone, M. S. (2001). Concepts as Metaphors. In S. Glucksberg (Ed.), Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms (pp. 90–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, 27(2), 109–126. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.016pl_PL
dc.referencesMcGlone, M. S., & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perscpective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1211–1223. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.24.5.1211pl_PL
dc.referencesMcnamara, T. P., & Diwadkar, V. A. (1997). Symmetry and Asymmetry of Human Spatial Memory. Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 160–190. doi:10.1006/cogp. 1997.0669pl_PL
dc.referencesMcTaggart, J. E. (1908). The Unreality of Time. Mind, XVII(4), 457–474. doi:10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457pl_PL
dc.referencesMeck, W. H. (1996). Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(3-4), 227–242. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(96)00009-2pl_PL
dc.referencesMerleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of Perception [First published in 1945 as Phénoménologie de la perception]. (C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.pl_PL
dc.referencesMerritt, D. J., Casasanto, D., & Brannon, E. M. (2010). Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition, 117(2), 191– 202. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011pl_PL
dc.referencesMiles, L. K., Tan, L., Noble, G. D., Lumsden, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Can a mind have two time lines? Exploring space–time mapping in Mandarin and English speakers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 598–604. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0068-ypl_PL
dc.referencesMillar, S. (2008). Space and Sense. Hove: Psychology Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41. doi:10.1145/219717.219748pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller, G. A., & Fellbaum, C. (2007). WordNet then and now. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(2), 209–214. doi:10.1007/s10579-007-9044-6pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMinkowski, H. (1908/1964). Space and Time. [A translation of an address delivered at the 80th Assembly of German Natural Scientists and Physicians, at Cologne, September 21, 1908]. In J. J. C. Smart (Ed.), Problems of Space and Time. (pp. 297–312). New York: Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesMix, K. S., Smith, L. B., & Gasser, M. (2010). The Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMontague, R. (1974). Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. (R. H. Thomason, Ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMontello, D. R. (1991). The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(2), 101–122. doi:10.1016/ S0272-4944(05)80071-4pl_PL
dc.referencesMontello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS: European Conference COSIT’93 Proceedings (pp. 312–321). Berlin: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesMontello, D. R. (1997). The perception and cognition of environmental distance: Direct sources of information. In S. C. Hirtle & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS: International Conference COSIT’97 Proceedings (pp. 297–311). Berlin: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesMontello, D. R. (1998). A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments. In M. J. Egenhofer & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems (pp. 143–154). New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMontello, D. R. (2009). A Conceptual Model of the Cognitive Processing of Environmental Distance Information. In K. S. Hornsby, C. Claramunt, M. Denis, & G. Ligozat (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: International Conference COSIT 2009 Proceedings (Vol. 5756, pp. 1–17). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore, K. E. (2000). Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping and linguistic practice. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244. doi:10.1515/COG.2006.005pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore, K. E. (2011). Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 759–776. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.003pl_PL
dc.referencesMorrow, D. G. (1985). Prominent characters and events organize narrative understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(3), 304–319. doi:10.1016/0749- 596X(85)90030-0pl_PL
dc.referencesMorrow, D. G. (1990). Spatial models, prepositions, and verb-aspect markers. Discourse Processes, 13(4), 441–469. doi:10.1080/01638539009544769pl_PL
dc.referencesMorrow, D. G., & Clark, H. H. (1988). Interpreting words in spatial descriptions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(4), 275–291. doi:10.1080/ 01690968808402091pl_PL
dc.referencesMurphy, G. L. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60(2), 173–204. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1pl_PL
dc.referencesMurphy, G. L. (1997). Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition, 62(1), 99–108. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00725-1pl_PL
dc.referencesNaylor-Emlen, S. J., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). Contributing Factors to Temporal and Spatial Associations in Mental Representations of Maps. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 9(4), 262–286. doi:10.1080/13875860903033472pl_PL
dc.referencesNewton, I. (1687/1995). The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy [First published in 1687 as Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica]. (A. Motte, Trans.). Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesNoordzij, M. L., Zuidhoek, S., & Postma, A. (2006). The influence of visual experience on the ability to form spatial mental models based on route and survey descriptions. Cognition, 100(2), 321–342. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.006pl_PL
dc.referencesNúñez, R. E., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 220–229. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008pl_PL
dc.referencesNúñez, R. E., Cooperrider, K., Doan, D., & Wassmann, J. (2012). Contours of time: Topographic construals of past, present, and future in the Yupno valley of Papua New Guinea. Cognition, 124(1), 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.007pl_PL
dc.referencesNúñez, R. E., & Cornejo, C. (2012). Facing the Sunrise: Cultural Worldview Underlying Intrinsic-Based Encoding of Absolute Frames of Reference in Aymara. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 965–991. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01237.xpl_PL
dc.referencesNúñez, R. E., Motz, B. A., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time After Time: The Psychological Reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point Distinction in Metaphorical Construals of Time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(3), 133–146. doi:10.1207/ s15327868ms2103_1pl_PL
dc.referencesNúñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62pl_PL
dc.referencesNuttin, J. R. (1964). The future time perspective in human motivation and learning. Acta Psychologica, 23, 60–82. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(64)90075-7pl_PL
dc.referencesNuttin, J. R. (1985). Future Time Perspective and Motivation: Theory and Research Method. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesNyaupane, G. P., Graefe, A. R., & Burns, R. C. (2003). Does Distance Matter? Differences in Characteristics, Behaviors and Attitudes of Visitors Based on Travel Distance. In J. J. Murdy (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium (pp. 74–81). New York: United States Department of Agriculture.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrnstein, R. E. (1969). On the Experience of Time. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrnstein, R. E. (1972). The Psychology of Consciousness. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesOuellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z., & Gabay, S. (2010). Is the Future the Right Time? Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 308–314. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000036pl_PL
dc.referencesPalmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality, 2nd Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPapafragou, A. (2010). Source-Goal Asymmetries in Motion Representation: Implications for Language Production and Comprehension. Cognitive Science, 34(6), 1064–1092. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.xpl_PL
dc.referencesPapafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108(1), 155–184. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007pl_PL
dc.referencesPapafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, “n” roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84(2), 189–219. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00046-Xpl_PL
dc.referencesPapafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2006). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98(3), B75– B87. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005pl_PL
dc.referencesPapafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2010). Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 224–260. doi:10.1080/01690960903017000pl_PL
dc.referencesPawelec, A. (2006). The death of metaphor. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 123, 117–121.pl_PL
dc.referencesPecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.). (2005). Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPeirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D. (2006). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 269–316. doi:10.1515/COG.2006.007pl_PL
dc.referencesPęzik, P. (2011). Providing corpus feedback for translators with the PELCRA search engine for NKJP. In S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (Ed.), Explorations Across Languages and Corpora: PALC 2009. (pp. 135–144). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesPęzik, P. (2012a). Język mówiony w NKJP. In A. Przepiórkowski, M. Bańko, R. L. Górski, & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), Narodowy Korpus Jezyka Polskiego (pp. 37– 47). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesPęzik, P. (2012b). Wyszukiwarka PELCRA dla danych NKJP. In A. Przepiórkowski, M. Bańko, R. L. Górski, & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), Narodowy Korpus Jezyka Polskiego (pp. 253–279). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiaget, J. (1946/1969). The Child’s Conception of Time [First published in 1946 as Le développement de la notion de temps chez l’enfant]. (A. J. Pomerans, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiaget, J. (1946/1970). The Child’s Conception of Movement and Speed [First published in 1946 as Les notions de mouvement et de vitesse chez l’enfant]. (G. E. T. Holloway & M. J. Mackenzie, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiaget, J. (1979). Relations Between Psychology and Other Sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 30(1), 1–9. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.000245pl_PL
dc.referencesPiaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1948/1956). The Child’s Conception of Space [First published in 1948 as La représentation de l’espace chez l’enfant]. (F. J. Langdon & J. L. Lunzer, Trans.). New York: Humanities Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1948/1960). The Child’s Conception of Geometry [First published in 1948 as La géométrie spontanée de l’enfant]. (E. A. Lunzer, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiasecki, M., Broda, B., & Szpakowicz, S. (2009). A Wordnet from the Ground Up. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing (pp. 73–126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker, S. (2007a). The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. New York: Viking.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker, S. (2007b). The Discover interview Steven Pinker. DiscoverMagazine, (September, 2007), 48–52.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201–236. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004pl_PL
dc.referencesPöppel, E. (2004). Lost in time: a historical frame, elementary processing units and the 3- second window. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis, 64(3), 295–301.pl_PL
dc.referencesPöppel, E. (2009). Pre-semantically defined temporal windows for cognitive processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1887–1896. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0015pl_PL
dc.referencesPortugali, J. (1993). Implicate Relations: Society and Space in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesPrice-Williams, D. R. (1954). The Kappa Effect. Nature, 173(4399), 363–364. doi:10.1038/173363a0pl_PL
dc.referencesPrior, A. N. (1958). Time After Time. Mind, LXVII(266), 244–246. doi:10.1093/ mind/LXVII.266.244pl_PL
dc.referencesPrzepiórkowski, A., Bańko, M., Górski, R. L., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Eds.). (2012). Narodowy Korpus Jezyka Polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesPullum, G. K. (1991). The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax, and Other Irreverent Essays on the Study of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesQuine, W. V. O. (1960/2013). Word and Object [First published in 1960]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesQuirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. N., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesRadden, G. (2004). The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In N. Baumarten, C. Böttger, M. Motz, & J. Probst (Eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen: Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 225–238). Bochum: AKS-Verlag.pl_PL
dc.referencesRadden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesRadvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Event perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 608–620. doi:10.1002/wcs.133pl_PL
dc.referencesRakowski, W. (1986). Future Time Perspective: Applications to the Health Context of Later Adulthood. American Behavioral Scientist, 29(6), 730–745. doi:10.1177/000276486029006007pl_PL
dc.referencesRamachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1986). The Perception of Apparent Motion. Scientific American, 254(6), 102–109. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0686-102pl_PL
dc.referencesRammsayer, T. H. (1997). On the relationship between personality and time estimation. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 739–744. doi:10.1016/S0191- 8869(97)00117-7pl_PL
dc.referencesRamscar, M., Matlock, T., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Time, Motion, and Meaning: The Experiential Basis of Abstract Thought. In K. S. Mix, L. B. Smith, & M. Gasser (Eds.), The Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition (pp. 67–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRappaport Hovav, M., Doron, E., & Sichel, I. (Eds.). (2010). Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRasmussen, J. E. (Ed.). (1973/2007). Man in Isolation and Confinement [First published in 1973]. Piscataway, NJ: AldineTransaction.pl_PL
dc.referencesRauh, G. (Ed.). (1983). Essays on deixis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.pl_PL
dc.referencesReddy, M. J. (1979/1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language [First published in 1979]. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Ed. (pp. 164–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesReines, M. F., & Prinz, J. (2009). Reviving Whorf: The Return of Linguistic Relativity. Philosophy Compass, 4(6), 1022–1032. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00260.xpl_PL
dc.referencesRichards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRichards, M. M., & Hawpe, L. S. (1981). Contrasting patterns in the acquisition of spatial/temporal terms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32(3), 485–512. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(81)90110-7pl_PL
dc.referencesRichardson, D., & Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition, 102(1), 129–138. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.004pl_PL
dc.referencesRinck, M. (2005). Spatial Situation Models. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 334–382). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (2000). Temporal and spatial distance in situation models. Memory & Cognition, 28(8), 1310–1320. doi:10.3758/BF03211832pl_PL
dc.referencesRiso, L. P., & McBride, C. (2007). Introduction: A Return to a Focus on Cognitive Schemas. In L. P. Riso, P. L. du Toit, D. J. Stein, & J. E. Young (Eds.), Cognitive Schemas and Core Beliefs in Psychological Problems: A Scientist-Practitioner Guide. (pp. 3–9). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.pl_PL
dc.referencesRitchie, L. D. (2004). Lost in “Conceptual Space”: Metaphors of Conceptual Integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 31–50. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1901_2pl_PL
dc.referencesRoeckelein, J. E. (2000). The Concept of Time in Psychology: A Resource Book and Annotated Bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoeckelein, J. E. (2008). History of Conceptions and Accounts of Time and Early Time Perception Research. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of Time (pp. 1–50). Bingley: Emerald.pl_PL
dc.referencesRohrer, T. (2007). Embodiment and Experientialism. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRojo, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2009). Fictive Motion in Spanish: Travellable, non-travellable and path-related manner information. In J. Valenzuela, A. Rojo, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Trends in Cognitive Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Models (pp. 244–260). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoos, P., & Albers, R. (1965). Performance of alcoholics and normals on a measure of temporal orientation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(1), 34–36.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosch, E. (1975a). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90021-3pl_PL
dc.referencesRosch, E. (1975b). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. doi:10.1037/0096- 3445.104.3.192pl_PL
dc.referencesRosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorisation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorisation (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoussel, M.-È., Grondin, S., & Killeen, P. (2009). Spatial effects on temporal categorisation. Perception, 38(5), 748–762. doi:10.1068/p6165pl_PL
dc.referencesRuiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L. (2011). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 161–185. doi:10.1080/10926488.2011.583189pl_PL
dc.referencesRynasiewicz, R. (2012). Newton’s Views on Space, Time, and Motion. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/newton-stm/pl_PL
dc.referencesSadalla, E. K., Burroughs, J. W., & Staplin, L. J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(5), 516–528. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.516pl_PL
dc.referencesSandra, D., & Rice, S. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind—the linguist’s or the language user’s? Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 89–130. doi:10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.89pl_PL
dc.referencesSantiago, J., Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512–516. doi:10.3758/BF03194099pl_PL
dc.referencesSarrazin, J.-C., Giraudo, M.-D., Pailhous, J., & Bootsma, R. J. (2004). Dynamics of Balancing Space and Time in Memory: Tau and Kappa Effects Revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 411–430. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.411pl_PL
dc.referencesSarrazin, J.-C., Tonnelier, A., & Alexandre, F. (2005). A model of contextual effect on reproduced extents in recall tasks: the issue of the imputed motion hypothesis. Biological Cybernetics, 92(5), 303–315. doi:10.1007/s00422-005-0553-3pl_PL
dc.referencesSattig, T. (2006). The Language and Reality of Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSaygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Modulation of BOLD Response in Motion-sensitive Lateral Temporal Cortex by Real and Fictive Motion Sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2480–2490. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21388pl_PL
dc.referencesSeligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.pl_PL
dc.referencesSheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The Primacy of Movement, Expanded 2nd Ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesShigeno, S. (1986). The auditory tau and kappa effects for speech and nonspeech stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(1), 9–19. doi:10.3758/BF03207588pl_PL
dc.referencesSimner, J. (2007). Beyond perception: synaesthesia as a psycholinguistic phenomenon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 23–29. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.010pl_PL
dc.referencesSinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSinclair, J. (1996). Preliminary recommendations on Corpus Typology. (EAGLES Guidelines 1996 No. EAG—TCWG—CTYP/P). Istituto di Linguistica Computazionale, Pisa: Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards. Retrieved from http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES/corpustyp/corpustyp.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesSinclair, J. (2003a). Reading Concordances: An Introduction. London: Pearson Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesSinclair, J. (2003b). Corpus processing. In P. van Sterkenburg (Ed.), A Practical Guide to Lexicography (pp. 179–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesSinclair, J. (2004). Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesSinclair, J. (2005). Corpus and Text — Basic Principles. In W. Martin (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxbow Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesSinha, C., Sinha, V. D. S., Zinken, J., & Sampaio, W. (2011). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169. doi:10.1515/ langcog.2011.006pl_PL
dc.referencesSkow, B. (2010). On the meaning of the question “How fast does time pass?” Philosophical Studies, 155(3), 325–344. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9575-3pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for Speaking. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 435–445). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I. (1996a). From “though and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I. (1996b). Two Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I. (1997). Mind, Code, and Text. In J. L. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I. (2004). The Many Ways to Search for a Frog: Linguistic Typology and the Expression of Motion Events. In S. Strömqvist & L. T. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to Movement in Spoken and Signed Languages. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore (pp. 487–505). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmart, J. J. C. (1949). The River of Time. Mind, LVIII(232), 483–494. doi:10.1093/mind/LVIII.232.483pl_PL
dc.referencesSmart, J. J. C. (1955). Spatialising Time. Mind, LXIV(254), 239–241. doi:10.1093/mind/LXIV.254.239pl_PL
dc.referencesSmart, J. J. C. (2008). The Tenseless Theory of Time. In T. Sider, J. Hawthorne, & D. W. Zimmerman (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics (pp. 226–238). Malden, MA: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmilek, D., Callejas, A., Dixon, M. J., & Merikle, P. M. (2007). Ovals of time: Time-space associations in synaesthesia. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 507–519. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.013pl_PL
dc.referencesSomov, P. G. (2000). Time perception as a measure of pain intensity and pain type. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 14(3), 111–121.pl_PL
dc.referencesSorabji, R. (1988). Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. London: Duckworth.pl_PL
dc.referencesSpence, C., & Driver, J. (Eds.). (2004). Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSpence, I. (2004). The Apparent and Effective Dimensionality of Representations of Objects. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(4), 738–747. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.4.738.56809pl_PL
dc.referencesSrinivasan, M., & Carey, S. (2010). The long and the short of it: On the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time. Cognition, 116(2), 217– 241. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.005pl_PL
dc.referencesStefanowitsch, A., & Rohde, A. (2004). The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (pp. 249–267). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesSteinman, R. M., Pizlo, Z., & Pizlo, F. J. (2000). Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer’s discovery launched the Gestalt revolution. Vision Research, 40(17), 2257–2264. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00086-9pl_PL
dc.referencesStevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64(3), 153–181. doi:10.1037/h0046162pl_PL
dc.referencesStevens, S. S. (1969). On predicting exponents for cross-modality matches. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(4), 251–256. doi:10.3758/BF03207028pl_PL
dc.referencesStevens, S. S. (1986). Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects [First published in 1975]. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesStrathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.66.4.742pl_PL
dc.referencesStubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language, 2(1), 23–55. doi:10.1075/fol.2.1.03stupl_PL
dc.referencesSuddendorf, T. (2013). Mental time travel: continuities and discontinuities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 151–152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.011pl_PL
dc.referencesSuddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3). doi:10.1017/S0140525X07001975pl_PL
dc.referencesSullivan, J. L., & Barth, H. C. (2012). Active (not passive) spatial imagery primes temporal judgements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1101–1109. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.641025pl_PL
dc.referencesSzeląg, E., & Pöppel, E. (Eds.). (2004). Time, Cognition, Thinking. [Special Issue]. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis, 64(3).pl_PL
dc.referencesSzwedek, A. (2002). Objectification: From object perception to metaphor creation. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Turewicz (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics Today (pp. 159–175). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzwedek, A. (2007). An alternative theory of metaphorization. In M. Fabiszak (Ed.), Language and Meaning: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives (pp. 313–327). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzwedek, A. (2008). Ontological sources of structural and orientational metaphors. In Z. Wąsik & T. Komendziński (Eds.), Metaphor and Cognition (pp. 9–16). Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzwedek, A. (2009a). Conceptualization of space and time. In P. Łobacz, W. Zabrocki, & P. Nowak (Eds.), Language, Science and Culture: Essays in Honor of Professor Jerzy Bańczerowski on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday (pp. 317–333). Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzwedek, A. (2009b). Are prepositions metaphorical? In W. Oleksy & P. Stalmaszczyk (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data: Studies of Honor of Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (pp. 171–180). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzwedek, A. (2011). The ultimate source domain. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 341–366. doi:10.1075/rcl.9.2.01szwpl_PL
dc.referencesTabakowska, E. (2003). Space and Time in Polish: The Preposition za and the Verbal Prefix za-. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in Honor of Günter Radden (pp. 153–177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1975). Figure and Ground in Complex Sentences. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 419–430). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 225–282). New York: Plenum Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1988a). Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49–100. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1988b/2007). The relation of grammar to cognition [First published in 1988]. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader (pp. 481–544). London: Equinox.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1991). Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Structure (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1996). Fictive Motion in Language and “Ception.” In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2005a). The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 199–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2005b). Leonard Talmy. A windowing to conceptual structure and language, Part 1: Lexicalisation and typology [Interview by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano]. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 325–347. doi:10.1075/arcl.3.17ibapl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2007). Foreword [comparing introspection with other methodologies]. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. xi–xxi). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2009). Main Verb Properties and Equipollent Framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 389–402). New York: Psychology Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2010, October). The Mind and the Strangest of Languages. Ciencia Hoje [Science Today, Brazil], 46(275), 88–10.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2011). Cognitive Semantics: An overview. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Vol. 1, pp. 622–642). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesTarski, A. (1944). The Semantic Conception of Truth: And the Foundations of Semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4(3), 341–376. doi:10.2307/2102968pl_PL
dc.referencesTatarkiewicz, W. (2005). Historia filozofii. T. 1: Filozofia starożytna i średniowieczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992a). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 261–292. doi:10.1016/0749- 596X(92)90014-Opl_PL
dc.referencesTaylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992b). Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 483–496. doi:10.3758/BF03199581pl_PL
dc.referencesTaylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1996). Perspective in Spatial Descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(3), 371–391. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0021pl_PL
dc.referencesTenbrink, T. (2007). Space, Time, and the Use of Language: An Investigation of Relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesTenbrink, T. (2011). Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 704–722. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.020pl_PL
dc.referencesTenny, C., & Pustejovsky, J. (2000). A History of Events in Linguistic Theory. In C. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax (pp. 3–37). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.pl_PL
dc.referencesTer Meulen, A. G. B. (1995). Representing Time in Natural Language: The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTeubert, W. (2005). My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 1–13. doi:10.1075/ijcl.10.1.01teupl_PL
dc.referencesTeuscher, U., McQuire, M., Collins, J., & Coulson, S. (2008). Congruity Effects in Time and Space: Behavioral and ERP Measures. Cognitive Science, 32(3), 563–578. doi:10.1080/03640210802035084pl_PL
dc.referencesThelen, E. (1995). Motor Development: A New Synthesis. American Psychologist, 50(2), 79–95. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.2.79pl_PL
dc.referencesTeuscher, U., McQuire, M., Collins, J., & Coulson, S. (2008). Congruity Effects in Time and Space: Behavioral and ERP Measures. Cognitive Science, 32(3), 563–578. doi:10.1080/03640210802035084pl_PL
dc.referencesThelen, E. (1995). Motor Development: A New Synthesis. American Psychologist, 50(2), 79–95. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.2.79pl_PL
dc.referencesTherriault, D. J., & Rinck, M. (2007). Multidimensional situation models. In F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher Level Language Processes in the Brain: Inference and Comprehension Processes (pp. 311–327). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesThompson, P. (2005). Spoken Language Corpora. In W. Martin (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice (pp. 59–70). Oxford: Oxbow Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesThorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 560–589. doi:10.1016/0010- 0285(82)90019-6pl_PL
dc.referencesToda, M. (1978). The boundaries of the notion of time. In J. T. Fraser, N. Lawrence, & D. Park (Eds.), The Study of Time III: Proceedings of the Third Conference of the International Society for the Study of Time (pp. 370–388). Berlin: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesTognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesTolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189– 208. doi:10.1037/h0061626pl_PL
dc.referencesTommasi, L., & Laeng, B. (2012). Psychology of spatial cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(6), 565–580. doi:10.1002/wcs.1198pl_PL
dc.referencesTorralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible Conceptual Projection of Time Onto Spatial Frames of Reference. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 745–757. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67pl_PL
dc.referencesTraugott, E. C. (1975). Spatial Expressions of Tense and Temporal Sequencing: A Contribution to the Study of Semantic Felds. Semiotica, 15(3). doi:10.1515/ semi.1975.15.3.207pl_PL
dc.referencesTraugott, E. C. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure. (pp. 369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTreisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 77(13), 1–31. doi:10.1037/h0093864pl_PL
dc.referencesTrenga, B. (2010, October 7). “Think Different” or “Think Differently”: Can Emmy-awardwinning advertisement be ungrammatical? Grammar Girl. Retrieved from http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/think-different-or-thinkdifferentlypl_PL
dc.referencesTrope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403– 421. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403pl_PL
dc.referencesTrope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963pl_PL
dc.referencesTuggy, D. (1993). Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(3), 273– 290. doi:10.1515/cogl.1993.4.3.273pl_PL
dc.referencesTulving, E. (2002). Chronesthesia: Conscious Awareness of Subjective Time. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of Frontal Lobe Function (pp. 311–325). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTummers, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2005). Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(2), 225–261. doi:10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.225pl_PL
dc.referencesTurewicz, K. (2005). Understanding prepositions through Cognitive Grammar: A case of in. In K. Turewicz (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: A User-Friendly Approach (pp. 103– 122). Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurner, F., & Pöppel, E. (1983). The Neural Lyre: Poetic Meter, the Brain, and Time. Poetry, 142, 277–309.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurner, M. (2007). Conceptual Integration. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 377–393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTutton, M. (2012). Granularity, space, and motion-framed location. In M. Vulchanova & E. van der Zee (Eds.), Motion Encoding in Language and Space (pp. 149–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (1993). Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS: European Conference, COSIT’93 Proceedings (pp. 14–24). Berlin: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (2000). Remembering Spaces. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (2003). Structures Of Mental Spaces: How People Think About Space. Environment & Behavior, 35(1), 66–80. doi:10.1177/0013916502238865pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (2004). Narratives of Space, Time, and Life. Mind and Language, 19(4), 380– 392. doi:10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00264.xpl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (2005a). Visuospatial Reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 209–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (2005b). How to get around by mind and body: spatial thought, spatial action. In A. Zilhão (Ed.), Evolution, Rationality, and Cognition: A Cognitive Science for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 135–147). London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (2009). Spatial Cognition: Embodied and Situated. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 201–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B. (2011). Visualizing Thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 499–535. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.xpl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110(1), 124–129. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 515–557. doi:10.1016/0010- 0285(91)90005-9pl_PL
dc.referencesTversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1998). How Space Structures Language. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge (pp. 157–175). Berlin: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesTyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). Reconsidering Prepositional Polysemy Networks: The Case of over. Language, 77(4), 724–765. doi:10.1353/lan.2001.0250pl_PL
dc.referencesTyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVandeloise, C. (1990). Representation, prototypes and centrality. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization (pp. 403–437). London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesVandeloise, C. (1991). Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French. (A. R. K. Bosch, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVandeloise, C. (1994). Methodology and analyses of the preposition in. Cognitive Linguistics, 5(2), 157–184. doi:10.1515/cogl.1994.5.2.157pl_PL
dc.referencesVerkuyl, H. J. (1993). A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction Between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVon Wright, G. H. (1969). Time, Change and Contradiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVossen, P. (2002). EuroWordNet: General Document (Final Report Version 3). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://vossen.info/ docs/2002/EWNGeneral.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWackermann, J. (2007). Inner and Outer Horizons of Time Experience. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 20–32.pl_PL
dc.referencesWagner, M. (2006). The Geometries of Visual Space. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (in press). Warunek instrumentu dla wyrażeń ruchu fiktywnego. In ZBLIŻENIA: językoznawstwo - translatoryka - literaturoznawstwo. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ w Koninie.pl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2005a). Typologia korpusów oraz warsztat informatyczny lingwistyki korpusowej. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Podstawy jezykoznawstwa korpusowego (pp. 27–41). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2005b). Korpusy wielojęzyczne - równoległe i porównywalne. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Podstawy jezykoznawstwa korpusowego (pp. 42– 60). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2012a). Spatial and temporal representations of topographical distance in the British National Corpus (COST TIMELY Research Report No. 03/2012). Lodz: University of Lodz. Retrieved from http://anglistyka.uni.lodz.pl/userfiles/ timely/BNC-Away.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2012b). Spatial and temporal representations of distance in contexts paralel to “away” in the National Corpus of Polish (COST TIMELY Research Report No. 04/2012). Lodz: University of Lodz. Retrieved from http://anglistyka.uni.lodz.pl/userfiles/timely/NCP-Away.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2012c). References to temporal perspective in the PELCRA Spoken Conversational Corpus (COST TIMELY Research Report No. 02/2012). Lodz: University of Lodz. Retrieved from http://anglistyka.uni.lodz.pl/userfiles/ timely/PELCRA-SCCP-TemporalPerspective.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2013a). Representations of motion-framed distance in spatial and temporal terms in the British National Corpus (COST TIMELY Research Report No. 02/2013). Lodz: University of Lodz. Retrieved from http://anglistyka.uni.lodz.pl/ userfiles/timely/BNC-MotionFramedDistance.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2013b). Representations of motion-framed distance in spatial and temporal terms in the National Corpus of Polish (COST TIMELY Research Report No. 03/2013). Lodz: University of Lodz. Retrieved from http://anglistyka.uni.lodz.pl/ userfiles/timely/NCP-MotionFramedDistance.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2013c). Temporality of coextension path expressions in the British National Corpus (COST TIMELY Research Report No. 04/2013). Lodz: University of Lodz. Retrieved from http://anglistyka.uni.lodz.pl/userfiles/ timely/BNC-CoextensionPathTemporality.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2013d). Temporality of coextension path expressions in the National Corpus of Polish (COST TIMELY Research Report No. 05/2013). Lodz: University of Lodz. Retrieved from http://anglistyka.uni.lodz.pl/userfiles/ timely/NCP-CoextensionPathTemporality.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T., & Pęzik, P. (2007). Web access interface to the PELCRA referential corpus of Polish. In J. T. Waliński, K. Kredens, & S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (Eds.), Corpora and ICT in language studies: PALC 2005 (pp. 65–86). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl_PL
dc.referencesWallace, M. (1956). Future time perspective in schizophrenia. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(2), 240–245. doi:10.1037/h0039899pl_PL
dc.referencesWallentin, M., Ostergaard, S., Lund, T., Ostergaard, L., & Roepstorff, A. (2005). Concrete spatial language: See what I mean? Brain and Language, 92(3), 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.106pl_PL
dc.referencesWalsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483–488. doi:10.1016/ j.tics.2003.09.002pl_PL
dc.referencesWalsh, W. H. (1967). Kant on the Perception of Time. The Monist, 51(3), 376–396. doi:10.5840/monist196751323pl_PL
dc.referencesWarren, H. C. (Ed.). (1934). Dictionary of Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.pl_PL
dc.referencesWearden, J. H., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (1995). Feeling the Heat: Body Temperature and the Rate of Subjective Time, Revisited. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B, 48(2), 129–141. doi:10.1080/14640749508401443pl_PL
dc.referencesWertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experimental Studies in the Perception of Movement]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161–265.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhite, K. (1994). Aquinas, St. Thomas (1224/25–1274). In (S. L. Macey, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Time. New York: Garland.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhorf, B. L. (1939/1956a). The Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to Language [Written in 1939]. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 134–159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhorf, B. L. (1940/1956b). Science and Linguistics [Written in 1940]. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 207–219). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilliams, J. M. (1976). Synaesthetic Adjectives: A Possible Law of Semantic Change. Language, 52(2), 461–478. doi:10.2307/412571pl_PL
dc.referencesWilliams, R. F. (2004). Making meaning from a clock: Material artifacts and conceptual blending in time-telling instruction. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, San Diego.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson, R. A., & Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. In (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/pl_PL
dc.referencesWittgenstein, L. (1938/2003). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief [First published in 1938]. (C. Barrett, Ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesWittmann, M. (2011). Moments in Time. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 5, 66. doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00066pl_PL
dc.referencesWittmann, M. (2013). The inner sense of time: how the brain creates a representation of duration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(3), 217–223. doi:10.1038/nrn3452pl_PL
dc.referencesWittmann, M., & Paulus, M. P. (2009). Temporal horizons in decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 2(1), 1–11. doi:10.1037/a0015460pl_PL
dc.referencesWittmann, M., & Pöppel, E. (2000). Temporal Mechanisms of the Brain as Fundamentals of Communication — With Special Reference to Music Perception and Performance. Musicae Scientiae, 3(1 suppl), 13–28. doi:10.1177/10298649000030S103pl_PL
dc.referencesWittmann, M., & van Wassenhove, V. (Eds.). (2009). The experience of time: neural mechanisms and the interplay of emotion, cognition and embodiment [Theme Issue]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525).pl_PL
dc.referencesWoelert, P. (2011). Human cognition, space, and the sedimentation of meaning. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 113–137. doi:10.1007/s11097-010- 9153-3pl_PL
dc.referencesWohlford, P. (1966). Extension of personal time, affective states, and expectation of personal death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 559–566. doi:10.1037/h0023208pl_PL
dc.referencesWolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure-Mapping in Metaphor Comprehension. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1456–1488. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01194.xpl_PL
dc.referencesWolff, P., & Holmes, K. J. (2011). Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 253–265. doi:10.1002/wcs.104pl_PL
dc.referencesXiao, R. (2008). Well-known and influential corpora. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: an international handbook (pp. 383–457). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesYeh, W., & Barsalou, L. W. (2006). The Situated Nature of Concepts. The American Journal of Psychology, 119(3), 349. doi:10.2307/20445349pl_PL
dc.referencesZacks, J. M., Levy, E., Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. J. (1998). Reading bar graphs: Effects of extraneous depth cues and graphical context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(2), 119–138. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.119pl_PL
dc.referencesZacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2012). Granularity in taxonomy, time, and space. In M. Vulchanova & E. van der Zee (Eds.), Motion Encoding in Language and Space (pp. 123–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesZakay, D., & Block, R. A. (1997). Temporal Cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(1), 12–16. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512604pl_PL
dc.referencesZaleski, Z. (1996). Future Anxiety: concept, measurement, and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 165–174. doi:10.1016/0191- 8869(96)00070-0pl_PL
dc.referencesZimbardo, P. G. (2002). Time to Take out Time. Psychology Today, 35, 62.pl_PL
dc.referencesZimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271pl_PL
dc.referencesZimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time That Will Change Your Life. New York: Free Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesZimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 1007–1023. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-Xpl_PL
dc.referencesZinken, J. (2010). Temporal frames of reference. In V. Evans & P. A. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions (pp. 479– 498). London: Equinox.pl_PL
dc.referencesZlatev, J. (2007). Spatial Semantics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesZlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U. (2012). Metaphor and subjective experience: A study of motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian, and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language. (pp. 423–450). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesZlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. (2004). A Third Way to Travel: The Place of Thai in Motion- Event Typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. T. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 159–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesZuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 44 (pp. 35–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A. (2009). Time in Language, Situation Models, and Mental Simulations. In P. Indefrey & M. Gullberg (Eds.), Time to Speak: Cognitive and Neural Prerequisites for Time in Language (pp. 13–26). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., & Stanfield, R. A. (2001). Time in narrative comprehension: A cognitive perspective. In D. H. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The Psychology and Sociology of Literature: In Honor of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 71–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28(4), 611– 619. doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.03.004pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting Mental Simulation in Language Comprehension: Six Replication Attempts. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51382. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051382pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033- 2909.123.2.162pl_PL
dc.referencesZwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, Acting, Understanding: Motor Resonance in Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1– 11. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1pl_PL
dc.referencesBryson, B. (2006). The Life and Times of the Thunderbolt Kid: A Memoir. New York: Broadway Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesEco, U. (1984). The Name of the Rose. (W. Weaver, Trans.). New York: Warner Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesJones, J. (1951). From Here to Eternity. New York: Scribner.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarvell, A. (1999). To His Coy Mistress [Poem first published in 1681, anthology first published in 1939]. In A. Quiller-Couch (Ed.), The Oxford Book of English Verse, 1250–1918 (p. 357). Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSand, G. (1991). Story of My Life: The Autobiography of George Sand. (Group Trans., T. Jurgrau, Ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesThe British National Corpus (2001). [World Edition] Available from OUCS at: www.natcorp.ox.ac.ukpl_PL
dc.referencesThe National Corpus of Polish (2010). Available at: www.nkjp.plpl_PL
dc.referencesThe PELCRA Spoken Conversational Corpus of Polish (2010). Available at: www.nkjp.uni.lodz.pl/spoken.jsppl_PL
dc.referencesAmerican Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition. (2006). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.pl_PL
dc.referencesOxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, Version 4.0 (2009). [CD-ROM]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesThe PWN-Oxford English-Polish and Polish-English Dictionary (2004). [CD-ROM]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesR. (2012). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available for download at: www.R-project.orgpl_PL
dc.referencesPELCRA web-based interface to the National Corpus of Polish (2010). A concordancer with support for proximity queries for the National Corpus of Polish. [Developed by Piotr Pęzik]. Łódź: University of Łódź. Available at: www.nkjp.uni.lodz.plpl_PL
dc.referencesSlopeQ. (2012). A part-of-speech-sensitive concordancer with support for proximity queries for the British National Corpus. [Developed by Piotr Pęzik]. Łódź: University of Łódź.pl_PL
dc.referencesSłowoSieć Online Search 2.1. (2012). A lexical database for Polish with mappings between Polish WordNet and English [Princeton] WordNet. Wrocław: Wrocław University of Technology. Available at: plwordnet.pwr.wroc.plpl_PL
dc.referencesWordNet Online Search 3.1. (2012). A lexical database for English. Princeton: Princeton University. Available at: wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwnpl_PL
dc.referencesIshihara, M., Keller, P., Rossetti, Y., & Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44(4), 454–461. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.010
dc.referencesLucy, J. A. (1992b). Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/7969-441-9


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Walinski_Complementarity.pdf
Rozmiar:
5.244MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Walinski okladka.jpg
Rozmiar:
397.3KB
Format:
Obraz JPEG
Opis:
okładka
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
license_rdf
Rozmiar:
1.203KB
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska