dc.contributor.author | Ulicka, Danuta | |
dc.contributor.editor | Izdebska, Agnieszka | |
dc.contributor.editor | Przybyszewska, Agnieszka | |
dc.contributor.editor | Szajnert, Danuta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-26T10:22:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-26T10:22:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ulicka D., Jak być dobrym historykiem (polskiej nauki o literaturze)?, [w:] Izdebska A., Przybyszewska A, Szajnert D., (red.), Literatura prze-pisana II. Od zapomnianych teorii do kryminału, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, s. [13]-39, doi: 10.18778/8088-214-0.02 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8088-214-0 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22729 | |
dc.description.abstract | It can be established beyond all doubt that the “Polish theory” – on the contrary to the “French” or “Russian theory” – does not function as a medium of international academic literary studies. The starting point of my discussion is the question why. Against all postcolonial logic, I postulate that the core of the problem can be traced to the weak activity of our “small emigration”. It is therefore high time to reconstruct the “Polish theory” as an important part of East-Central literary studies, no less important than its Russian and Czech counterparts. Comparing concepts of a number of Polish authors with authoritative works by, among others, Bakhtin, Shklovsky or Tynianov, this article offers a provisional project of modern Polish literary theory. This project is proposed on the margin of the main methodological problem of this issue – how to write today, in the age of the constructivist movement, the “real” history of scientific cultures. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Izdebska A., Przybyszewska A, Szajnert D., (red.), Literatura prze-pisana II. Od zapomnianych teorii do kryminału, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016; | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | polskie literaturoznawstwo teoretyczne | pl_PL |
dc.subject | historiografia | pl_PL |
dc.subject | teoria pisarstwa historycznego | pl_PL |
dc.subject | teoria i filozofia języka | pl_PL |
dc.title | Jak być dobrym historykiem (polskiej nauki o literaturze)?, | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | How to be a good historian (of Polish literary studies)? | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016, © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016 | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [13]-39 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Warszawski, Instytut Literatury Polskiej | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8088-215-7 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8088-214-0.02 | |