Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorZając, Magdalena
dc.contributor.editorWaniek-Klimczak, Ewa
dc.contributor.editorCichosz, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-12T11:51:18Z
dc.date.available2016-08-12T11:51:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationM. Zając, Variability in L2 English pronunciation examined through the prism of phonetic imitation, [in:] Variability in English across time and space, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak, A. Cichosz, Ser. “Linguistics. Phonetics, Dialectology, Historical Linguistics”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, p. 141–159.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8088-065-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/19269
dc.descriptionSynchronic variability in the area of phonetics, phonology, vocabulary, morphology and syntax is a natural feature of any language, including English. The existence of competing variants is in itself a fascinating phenomenon, but it is also a prerequisite for diachronic changes. This volume is a collection of studies which investigate variability from a contemporary and historical perspective, in both native and non-native varieties of English. The topics include Middle English spelling variation, lexical differences between Middle English dialects, Late Middle and Early Modern English forms of address, Middle English negation patterns, the English used by Polish immigrants living in London, lexical fixedness in native and non-native English used by Polish learners, and the phenomenon of phonetic imitation in Polish learners of English. The book should be of interest to anyone interested in English linguistics, especially English phonetics and phonology as well as history of English, historical dialectology and pragmatics.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThe paper is concerned with the imitation of vowel duration and quality upon exposure to native and non-native English speech. The participants were Polish learners of English recruited at the University of Lodz. The study aimed to determine whether the extent of phonetic imitation may be influenced by the model talker being a native or a non-native speaker of English and whether different imitation strategies may explain some of the variability in L2 speech. The results of the study suggest that phonetic imitation may account for some of the variability in L2 pronunciation and that the native/non-native status of the model talker may have a bearing on the direction of convergence. It was also found that the magnitude of imitation may depend on the degree to which a given L2 feature functions in the learners’ interlanguage.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“Variability in English across time and space”, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak, A. Cichosz, Ser. “Linguistics. Phonetics, Dialectology, Historical Linguistics”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016;
dc.titleVariability in L2 English pronunciation examined through the prism of phonetic imitationpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Magdalena Zając, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016pl_PL
dc.page.number141–159pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz.pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8088-066-5
dc.referencesAnderson, J. 1987. The Markedness Differential Hypothesis and Syllable Structure Difficulty. In Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System. eds. G. Ioup and, S. Weinberger, 279–291. New York: Newbury House / Harper & Row.pl_PL
dc.referencesBabel, M. 2009. Phonetic and Social Selectivity in Speech Accommodation. Unpublished PhD dissertation.pl_PL
dc.referencesBabel, M. 2010. Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society 39: 437–456.pl_PL
dc.referencesBabel, M., G. McGuire, A. Nicholls, and S. Walters. 2012. Variability in imitation based on voice profile. Presentation at the 2nd Annual Workshop on Sound Change. Seeon-Seebruck, Germany.pl_PL
dc.referencesBayley, R. 1996. Competing Constraints on Variation in the Speech of Adult Chinese Learners of English. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation, eds. R. Bayley, and R. Preston, 75–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeebe, L. 1980. Sociolinguistic Variation and Style Shifting in Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning 30: 433–448.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeebe, L. 1981. Social and Situational Factors Affecting the Communicative Strategy of Dialect Code-Switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 32: 139–149.pl_PL
dc.referencesBell, A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.pl_PL
dc.referencesBenson, B. 1988. Universal Preference for the Open Syllables as an Independent Process in Interlanguage Phonology. Language Learning 38: 221–235.pl_PL
dc.referencesBest, C. 1995. A Direct Realist Perspective on Cross-Language Speech Perception. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, ed. W. Strange, 167–200. Timonium, MD: York Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBilous, F., and R. Krauss. 1988. Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- or mixed-gender dyads. Language & Communication 8: 183–194.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2014. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.80. http://www.praat.org/. Accessed July 2014.pl_PL
dc.referencesBourhis, R., and H. Giles. 1977. The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations, ed. H. Giles, 119–136. Waltham: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrouwer, S., H. Mitterer, and F. Huettig. 2010. Shadowing reduced speech and alignment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128: EL32-EL37.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, C. 2000. The Interaction Between Speech Perception and Phonological Acquisition from Infant to Adult. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. ed. J. Archibald, 4–63. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesChiba, R., H. Matsuura, and A. Yamamoto. 1995. Japanese attitudes towards English accents. World Englishes 14: 77–86.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoupland, N. 1984. Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 49–70.pl_PL
dc.referencesDalton-Puffer, C., G. Kaltenboeck, and U. Smit. 1997. Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes 16: 115–128.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidian, D., and J.E. Flege. 1984. Transfer and Developmental Processes in Adult Foreign Language Speech Production. Applied Psycholinguistics 5: 323–347.pl_PL
dc.referencesDelvaux, V., and A. Soquet. 2007. The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica 64: 145–73.pl_PL
dc.referencesDickerson, L., and W. Dickerson. 1977. Interlanguage phonology: current research and future directions. The Notions of Simplification. Interlanguage and Pidgins: Actes du 5ème Colloque de Linguistique Applique de Neufchatel: 18–30.pl_PL
dc.referencesDowd, J. 1984. Phonological Variation in L2 Speech: The Effects of Emotional Questions and Field-dependence/Field-independence on Second Language Performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.pl_PL
dc.referencesElliott, R. 1995. Field Independence/Dependence, Hemispheric Specialization, and Attitude in Relation to Pronunciation Accuracy in Spanish as a Foreign Language. The Modern Language Journal 79: 356–371.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlege, J.E. 1988. Factors Affecting Degree of Perceived Foreign Accent in English Sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 70–79.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlege, J.E. 1993. Production and perception of novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93: 1589–1608.pl_PL
dc.referencesForde, K. 1995. A study of learner attitudes towards accents of English. Hong-Kong Polytechnic University Working Papers in ELT & Applied Linguistics 1: 59–76.pl_PL
dc.referencesFox, R., J.E. Flege, and M. Munro. 1995. The Perception of English and Spanish Vowels by Native English and Spanish Listeners: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 2540–2551.pl_PL
dc.referencesGatbonton, E. 1975. Systematic Variations in Second Language Speech: A Sociolinguistic Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiles, H. 1973. Accent mobility: a model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15: 87–105.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiles, H., M. Taylor, and R. Bourhis. 1973. Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: some Canadian data. Language in Society 2: 177–192.pl_PL
dc.referencesGill, M.M. 1994. Accent and stereotypes: Their effect on perceptions of teachers and lecture comprehension. Journal of Applied Communication Research 22: 349–361.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoldinger, S. 1998. Echoes of Echoes? An Episodic Theory of Lexical Access. Psychological Review 105: 251–279.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoldinger, S., and T. Azuma. 2004. Episodic memory in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11: 716–722.pl_PL
dc.referencesGonet, W., J. Szpyra-Kozłowska, and R. Święciński. 2010. Clashes with ashes. In Issues in Accents of English 2: Variability and Norm, ed. E. Waniek-Klimczak, 213–230. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesGregory, S., and B. Hoyt. 1982. Conversation Partner Mutual Adaptation as Demonstrated by Fourier Series Analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11: 35–46.pl_PL
dc.referencesGregory, S., and S. Webster. 1996. A Nonverbal Signal in Voices of Interview Partners Effectively Predicts Communication Accommodation and Social Status Perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 1231–1240.pl_PL
dc.referencesHartford, B. 1978. Phonological Differences in the English of Adolescent Female and Male Mexican-Americans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 17: 55–64.pl_PL
dc.referencesHogan, J.T., and A.J. Rozsypal. 1980. Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67: 1764–1771.pl_PL
dc.referencesHonorof, D., J. Weihing, and C. Fowler. 2011. Articulatory events are imitated under rapid shadowing. Journal of Phonetics 39: 18–38.pl_PL
dc.referencesIverson, P., P. Kuhl, R. Yamada, E. Diesch, Y. Tohkura, A. Ketterman, and C. Siebert. 2001. A Perceptual Interference Account of Acquisition Difficulties for Non-Native Phonemes. Speech, Hearing and Language: Work in Progress 13: 106–118.pl_PL
dc.referencesJassem, W., and L. Richter. 1989. Neutralization of voicing in Polish obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 17: 205–212.pl_PL
dc.referencesKim, M. 2011. Phonetic convergence after perceptual exposure to native and non-native speech: preliminary findings based on fine-grained acoustic-phonetic measurement. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: 1074–1077.pl_PL
dc.referencesKim, M., W.S. Horton, and A.R. Bradlow. 2011. Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 2: 125–156.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuhl, P. 2000. A New View of Language Acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 97: 11850–11857.pl_PL
dc.referencesLewandowski, N. 2012. Talent in nonnative phonetic convergence. Unpublished PhD dissertation.pl_PL
dc.referencesLivbjerg, I., and I. Mees. 1988. Practical English Phonetics. Ny Kontrastiv Fonetik. Kopenhagen: Schonberg.pl_PL
dc.referencesLippi-Green, R. 1997. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesLlamas, C., D. Watt, and D.E. Johnson. 2009. Linguistic Accommodation and the Salience of National Identity Markers in a Border Town. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28: 381–407.pl_PL
dc.referencesMitterer, H., and M. Ernestus. 2008. The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition 109: 168–173.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoyer, A. 1999. Ultimate Attainment in L2 Phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 81–108.pl_PL
dc.referencesNamy, L., L. Nygaard, and D. Sauerteig. 2002. Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21: 422–432.pl_PL
dc.referencesNatale, M. 1975a. Convergence of Mean Vocal Intensity in Dyadic Communication as a Function of Social Desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 790–804.pl_PL
dc.referencesNatale, M. 1975b. Social desirability as related to convergence of temporal speech patterns. Perceptual and Motor Skills 40: 827–830.pl_PL
dc.referencesNielsen, K. 2011. Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics 39: 132–142.pl_PL
dc.referencesNowacka, M. 2010. The ultimate attainment of English pronunciation by Polish College Students: a longitudinal study. In Issues in Accents of English 2. Variability and Norm, ed. E. Waniek-Klimczak, 233–260. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesOyama, S. 1976. A Sensitive Period for the Acquisition of a Nonnative Phonological System. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5: 261–283.pl_PL
dc.referencesPardo, J. 2006. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119: 2382–2393.pl_PL
dc.referencesPardo, J. 2010. Expressing oneself in conversational interaction. In Expressing Oneself/Expressing One’s Self. Communication, Cognition, Language, and Identity, ed. E. Morsella, 183–196. New York: Psychology Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPardo, J., R. Gibbons, A. Suppes, and R. Krauss. 2012. Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40: 190–197.pl_PL
dc.referencesPardo, J., I.C. Jay, R. Hoshino, S. Hasbun, C. Sowemimo-Coker, and R. Krauss. 2013. The Influence of Role-Switching on Phonetic Convergence in Conversation. Discourse Processes 50: 276–300.pl_PL
dc.referencesPeterson, G.E., and I. Lehiste. 1960. Duration of syllabic nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32: 693–703.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiske, T., I. MacKay, and J.E. Flege. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29: 191–215.pl_PL
dc.referencesPurcell, E., and R. Suter. 1980. Predictors of Pronunciation Accuracy: A Reexamination. Language Learning 30: 271–287.pl_PL
dc.referencesRaphael, L.J. 1972. Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of voicing of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51: 1296–1303.pl_PL
dc.referencesRochet, B. 1995. Perception and Production of L2 Speech Sounds by Adults. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, ed. W. Strange, 379–410. Timonium, MD: York Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRojczyk, A. 2012a. Spontaneous phonetic imitation of L2 vowels in a rapid shadowing task. Poster presented at PSLLT 2012 – Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 24–25 August.pl_PL
dc.referencesRojczyk, A. 2012b. Phonetic and phonological mode in second-language speech: VOT imitation. Paper presented at EuroSLA22 – 22nd Annual Conference of the European Second Language Association, Poznań, Poland, 5–8 September.pl_PL
dc.referencesRojczyk, A., A. Porzuczek, and M. Bergier. 2013. Immediate and distracted imitation in second-language speech: Unreleased plosives in English. Research in Language 11: 3–18.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchweitzer, A., and N. Lewandowski. 2012. Accommodation of Backchannels in Spontaneous Speech. In the booklet of the International Symposium on Imitation and Convergence in Speech.pl_PL
dc.referencesShockley, K., L. Sabadini, and C.A. Fowler. 2004. Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics 66: 422–429.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlowiaczek, L., and D. Dinnsen. 1985. On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 13: 325–341.pl_PL
dc.referencesSobkowiak, W. 2001. English Phonetics for Poles. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.pl_PL
dc.referencesSuter, R. 1976. Predictors of Pronunciation Accuracy in Second Language Learning. Language Learning 26: 233–253.pl_PL
dc.referencesTahta, S., M. Wood, and K. Loewenthal. 1981. Foreign Accents: Factors Relating to Transfer of Accent from the First Language to a Second Language. Language & Speech 24: 265–272.pl_PL
dc.referencesTarone, E. 1982. Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning 32: 69–84.pl_PL
dc.referencesThompson, I. 1991. Foreign Accents Revisited: The English Pronunciation of Russian Immigrants. Language Learning 41: 177–204.pl_PL
dc.referencesThompson, R. 1976. Mexican-American English: Social Correlates of Regional Pronunciation. American Speech 50: 18–24.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeckwerth, J. 2011. English TRAP Vowel in Advanced Polish Learners: Variation and System Typology. City University of Hong Kong, Volume Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 17–21 August 2011. Hong Kong. CD-ROM, Hong Kong, p. 2110–2113 (2011).pl_PL
dc.referencesWelkowitz, J., and S. Feldstein. 1969. Dyadic interaction and induced differences in perceived similarity. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 4: 343–344.pl_PL
dc.referencesWelkowitz, J., and S. Feldstein. 1970. The relation of experimentally manipulated interpersonal perception and psychological differentiation to the temporal patterning of conversation. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 5: 387–388.pl_PL
dc.referencesWelkowitz, J., M. Finklestein, S. Feldstein, and L. Aylesworth. 1972. Changes in vocal intensity as a function of interspeaker influence. Perceptual and Motor Skills 35: 715–718.pl_PL
dc.referencesYu, A.C., C. Abrego-Collier, and M. Sonderegger. 2013. Phonetic Imitation from an Individual-Difference Percpective: Subjective Attitude, Personality and “Autistic” Traits. PLoS ONE 8: 1–13.pl_PL
dc.referencesZając, M. 2013a. [′beɾɚ] or [′betə]? Do Polish Learners of English Accommodate their Pronunciation? A Pilot Study. In Teaching and Researching English Accents in Native and Non-native Speakers, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak, and L.R. Shockey, 229–239. Heidelberg: Springer.pl_PL
dc.referencesZając, M. 2013b. Phonetic imitation of vowel duration in L2 speech. Research in Language 11: 19–29.pl_PL
dc.referencesZuengler, J. 1982. Applying Accommodation Theory to Variable Performance Data in L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 4(2): 181–192.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8088-065-8.08


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord