Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorSzczytko, Emilia
dc.contributor.editorWaniek-Klimczak, Ewa
dc.contributor.editorCichosz, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-12T11:48:46Z
dc.date.available2016-08-12T11:48:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationE. Szczytko, Second-person pronouns and their relation with nominal forms of address in Late Middle English and Early Modern English personal letters, [in:] Variability in English across time and space, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak, A. Cichosz, Ser. “Linguistics. Phonetics, Dialectology, Historical Linguistics”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, p. 121–140.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8088-065-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/19268
dc.descriptionSynchronic variability in the area of phonetics, phonology, vocabulary, morphology and syntax is a natural feature of any language, including English. The existence of competing variants is in itself a fascinating phenomenon, but it is also a prerequisite for diachronic changes. This volume is a collection of studies which investigate variability from a contemporary and historical perspective, in both native and non-native varieties of English. The topics include Middle English spelling variation, lexical differences between Middle English dialects, Late Middle and Early Modern English forms of address, Middle English negation patterns, the English used by Polish immigrants living in London, lexical fixedness in native and non-native English used by Polish learners, and the phenomenon of phonetic imitation in Polish learners of English. The book should be of interest to anyone interested in English linguistics, especially English phonetics and phonology as well as history of English, historical dialectology and pragmatics.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractGenerally, little attention has been given to the role of selected linguistic and extralinguistic factors in the use of forms of address (Walker 2007). Therefore, the major theoretical concern behind this research is to examine quantitatively and qualitatively, based on selected letters from the CEECS corpus (1998), the influence of social stratification and family relations on the usage of pronominal forms of address. Apart from that, it also analyses the interrelation between second-person pronouns and nominal forms of address in Late Middle English and Early Modern English.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“Variability in English across time and space”, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak, A. Cichosz, Ser. “Linguistics. Phonetics, Dialectology, Historical Linguistics”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016;
dc.titleSecond-person pronouns and their relation with nominal forms of address in Late Middle English and Early Modern English personal letterspl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Emilia Szczytko, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016pl_PL
dc.page.number121–140pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz.pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8088-066-5
dc.referencesChosen letters from the Corpus of Early English Correspondence Sampler. text version. 1998. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.pl_PL
dc.referencesAndersen, G. 2010. How to use corpus linguistics in sociolinguistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, eds. A. O’Keeffe, and M. McCarthy. 547–562. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarber, Ch. 1981. You and Thou in Shakespeare’s Richard III. In Leeds Studies in English, New Series XII, 273–289. Reprinted in A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama comp. by Vivian Salmon & Edwina Burness 1987. 163–177. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesBraun, F. 1988. Terms of address: problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, R., and A. Gilman. 1960. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In Style in Language, ed. T.A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBusse, B. 2006. Vocative Constructions in the Language of Shakespeare. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesBusse, U. 2002. Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic Variability of Second Person Pronouns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoulmas, F. 1997. Introduction. In The handbook of sociolinguistics, ed. F. Coulmas, 5–11. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesFullwood, W. 1568. The Enimie of Idlenesse: Teaching a Perfect Platforme how to Indite Epistles and Letters of All Sortes: As Well by Answere As Otherwise: No Lesse Profitable then Pleasaunt. London: Henry Midleton.pl_PL
dc.referencesKerswill, P. 2010. Introduction. In The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, eds. B. Wodak, and P. Kerswill, 1–9. London: Sage publications Ltd.pl_PL
dc.referencesLaslett, P. 1983. The World We Have Lost: Further Explored (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMazzon, G. 2009. Interactive Dialogue Sequences in Middle English Drama. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesMulholland, J. 1967. Thou and You in Shakespeare. A Study in Second Person Pronoun. English Studies 48: 34–43.pl_PL
dc.referencesNevalainen, T., and H. Raumolin-Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: the pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. A. Jucker, 541–601. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesNevalainen, T., and H. Raumolin-Brunberg. 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi.pl_PL
dc.referencesNevalainen, T., and S.K. Tanskanen, 2007. Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesNurmi, A. 1998. Manual for the Corpus of Early English Correspondence Sampler (CEECS). http://www.hit.uib.no/icame/ceecs/index.htm. Last accessed: May 10th, 2014.pl_PL
dc.referencesSaville-Troike, M. 2003. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesSingh, V.P. 2009. Caste, class and democracy: changes in a stratification system. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesSpolsky, B. 1998. Sociolinguistics (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPalander-Collin, M., M. Nevala, and A. Nurmi. 2009. The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesWalker, T. 2007. Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesWardhaugh, R. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8088-065-8.07


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord