dc.contributor.author | Szczytko, Emilia | |
dc.contributor.editor | Waniek-Klimczak, Ewa | |
dc.contributor.editor | Cichosz, Anna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-12T11:48:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-12T11:48:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | E. Szczytko, Second-person pronouns and their relation with nominal forms of address in Late Middle English and Early Modern English personal letters, [in:] Variability in English across time and space, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak, A. Cichosz, Ser. “Linguistics. Phonetics, Dialectology, Historical Linguistics”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, p. 121–140. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8088-065-8 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/19268 | |
dc.description | Synchronic variability in the area of phonetics, phonology, vocabulary, morphology and syntax is a natural feature of any language, including English. The existence of competing variants is in itself a fascinating phenomenon, but it is also a prerequisite for diachronic changes. This volume is a collection of studies which investigate variability from a contemporary and historical perspective, in both native and non-native varieties of English. The topics include Middle English spelling variation, lexical differences between Middle English dialects, Late Middle and Early Modern English forms of address, Middle English negation patterns, the English used by Polish immigrants living in London, lexical fixedness in native and non-native English used by Polish learners, and the phenomenon of phonetic imitation in Polish learners of English. The book should be of interest to anyone interested in English linguistics, especially English phonetics and phonology as well as history of English, historical dialectology and pragmatics. | pl_PL |
dc.description.abstract | Generally, little attention has been given to the role of selected linguistic and extralinguistic factors in the use of forms of address (Walker 2007). Therefore, the major theoretical concern behind this research is to examine quantitatively and qualitatively, based on selected letters from the CEECS corpus (1998), the influence of social stratification and family relations on the usage of pronominal forms of address. Apart from that, it also analyses the interrelation between second-person pronouns and nominal forms of address in Late Middle English and Early Modern English. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | “Variability in English across time and space”, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak, A. Cichosz, Ser. “Linguistics. Phonetics, Dialectology, Historical Linguistics”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016; | |
dc.title | Second-person pronouns and their relation with nominal forms of address in Late Middle English and Early Modern English personal letters | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Emilia Szczytko, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016 | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 121–140 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Lodz. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8088-066-5 | |
dc.references | Chosen letters from the Corpus of Early English Correspondence Sampler. text version. 1998. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Andersen, G. 2010. How to use corpus linguistics in sociolinguistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, eds. A. O’Keeffe, and M. McCarthy. 547–562. New York: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Barber, Ch. 1981. You and Thou in Shakespeare’s Richard III. In Leeds Studies in English, New Series XII, 273–289. Reprinted in A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama comp. by Vivian Salmon & Edwina Burness 1987. 163–177. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Braun, F. 1988. Terms of address: problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Brown, R., and A. Gilman. 1960. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In Style in Language, ed. T.A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge: MIT Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Busse, B. 2006. Vocative Constructions in the Language of Shakespeare. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Busse, U. 2002. Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic Variability of Second Person Pronouns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Coulmas, F. 1997. Introduction. In The handbook of sociolinguistics, ed. F. Coulmas, 5–11. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fullwood, W. 1568. The Enimie of Idlenesse: Teaching a Perfect Platforme how to Indite Epistles and Letters of All Sortes: As Well by Answere As Otherwise: No Lesse Profitable then Pleasaunt. London: Henry Midleton. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kerswill, P. 2010. Introduction. In The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, eds. B. Wodak, and P. Kerswill, 1–9. London: Sage publications Ltd. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Laslett, P. 1983. The World We Have Lost: Further Explored (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mazzon, G. 2009. Interactive Dialogue Sequences in Middle English Drama. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mulholland, J. 1967. Thou and You in Shakespeare. A Study in Second Person Pronoun. English Studies 48: 34–43. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nevalainen, T., and H. Raumolin-Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: the pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. A. Jucker, 541–601. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nevalainen, T., and H. Raumolin-Brunberg. 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nevalainen, T., and S.K. Tanskanen, 2007. Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nurmi, A. 1998. Manual for the Corpus of Early English Correspondence Sampler (CEECS). http://www.hit.uib.no/icame/ceecs/index.htm. Last accessed: May 10th, 2014. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Saville-Troike, M. 2003. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Singh, V.P. 2009. Caste, class and democracy: changes in a stratification system. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Spolsky, B. 1998. Sociolinguistics (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Palander-Collin, M., M. Nevala, and A. Nurmi. 2009. The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Walker, T. 2007. Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wardhaugh, R. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8088-065-8.07 | |