Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorAdams-Tukiendorf, Małgorzata
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-17T10:47:32Z
dc.date.available2015-12-17T10:47:32Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationM. Adams-Tukiendorf, Why do less creative student writers write longer texts?, [in:] FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011, p. 125–143.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7525-564-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/15691
dc.description.abstractWhen teaching academic writing in English the issue of creativity understood as experimenting, exploring and transforming language and ideas within the required writing task while keeping the audience and purpose in mind is rarely, if ever, considered. Still, there seems to be a relationship between the creative potential of a writer and the quality and quantity of their writing. The main aim of this article is to ponder upon the results of a small scale study on the relationship between students’ creativity as measured by KANH questionnaire and their lexical fluency in academic writing. The results seem to suggest that student writers who appear less creative write longer texts. The author discusses possible reasons for such a case, finding answers in research on creativity as such and creativity in writing specifically.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing”, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011;
dc.titleWhy do less creative student writers write longer texts?pl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011pl_PL
dc.page.number[125]-143pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Opole.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteDr Małgorzata Adams-Tukiendorf is an academic teacher at the Department of English at University of Opole as well as a methodology teacher and a teacher trainer at two regional teacher training colleges. She specializes in teaching general writing and academic writing to students of English as a foreign language. Her recent research interests circle around the notions of creativity, intelligence and cognitive processes involved in learning as such and in learning to write specifically. She is a co-author of a handbook for students on how to learn to write in English.pl_PL
dc.referencesAik Kwang, Ng. 2003, “April. A Cultural Model of Creative and Conforming Behavior.” Creativity Research Journal, 15(2/3). 223-233.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllison, D. and W. Siew Mei. 2001. „Academic writing. Whose expectations?” RELC Journal 32(1). 52-72.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoden, M. 1990. The creative mind. New York: Basic.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrown, G. and G. Yule. 1983. Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrzeziński, J. 1984. Elementy metodologii badań psychologicznych. [Basic methodology for psychological research]. Warszawa: PWN.pl_PL
dc.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperParrenial.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavidson, J. E. and R. J. Sternberg. 1984. The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly 28. 58-64.pl_PL
dc.referencesEmig, J. 1971. The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana: Ill. NTCE.pl_PL
dc.referencesElbow, P. 1973. Writing without teachers. New York: The Oxford Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeldman, D. H. 1999. “The development of creativity.” In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity, 169-186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGardner, H. 1993. Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic.pl_PL
dc.referencesGradwohl-Nash, J., Schumacher, G. M. and B. W. Carlson. 1993. “Writing from sources. A structure-mapping model.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85(1). 159-170.pl_PL
dc.referencesGroborz, M. and E. Nęcka. 2003. “Creativity and cognitive control. Explorations of generation and evaluation skills.” Creativity Research Journal 15 (2 and 3). 183-197.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore, M. 1983. The Relationship between the Originality of Essays and Variables in the Problem-Discovery Process: A Study of Creative and Noncreative Middle School Students. Retrieved from ERIC database. (10 October, 2009).pl_PL
dc.referencesNystrand, M. 1974. “EJ Workshop. Can creativity be taught?” English Journal 63. 65-68.pl_PL
dc.referencesO’Hara, L. A. and R. J. Sternberg. 2000. “It doesn’t hurt to ask. Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students thinking styles.” Creativity Research Journal 13(2). 197-210.pl_PL
dc.referencesPerl, S. 1981. “Creativity and the Composing Process: Making Thought Visible.” Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (Dallas, TX). Retrieved from ERIC database. (10 October, 2009).pl_PL
dc.referencesPerry, D. 1974. Creativity in Writing: A Sequence of Readings for Secondary English Teachers and Departments. Retrieved from ERIC database. (10 October, 2009).pl_PL
dc.referencesPolicastro, E. and H. Gardner. 1999. “From case studies to robust generalizations. An approach to the study of creativity.” In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity. 213-225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPopek, S. 2008. Kwestionariusz twórczego zachowania KANH. [Creative behaviour questionnaire KANH]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.pl_PL
dc.referencesRunco, M. A. 1991. Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.pl_PL
dc.referencesSwales, J. M. 1990. Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTorrance, P. 1962. Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall.pl_PL
dc.referencesTorrance, P. 1974. Torrance test of creative thinking. Lexington, Mass.: Ginn.pl_PL
dc.referencesWard, T. B., Smith, S. M. and R. A. Finke. 1999. “Creative cognition.” In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity. 189-212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. and Hae-Young Kim. 1998. Second language development in writing: measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Technical Report 17. Manoa, Hawaii: University of Hawaii.pl_PL
dc.referencesWoolfolk, A. 1998. Educational psychology (7th edn.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.pl_PL
dc.referencesAPA research style crib sheet. http://www.docstyles.com/apacrib.htm.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailmaadtu@gmail.compl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord