dc.contributor.author | Wojtczuk-Turek, Agnieszka | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-26T06:31:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-26T06:31:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0208-6018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/10212 | |
dc.description.abstract | Leadership belongs to significant determinants of innovation in the workplace. In the context
of innovative behavior stimulation, both the specific competences and the behaviors of the leader,
and the quality of this relationship are important. The purpose of this article is an empirical analysis
of the relationship between leader-subordinate relation and innovative behaviors
in the workplace. The results show that the key for the initiation of employees’ creative activity
is the affective relation, while in the case of idea generation and implementation the key role
is played by the dimension of the relationship of leader-member exchange defined as the contribution
and loyalty relation. | pl_PL |
dc.description.abstract | Wśród istotnych determinant innowacyjności w miejscu pracy wymieniane jest przywództwo.
W kontekście stymulowania zachowań innowacyjnych pracowników ważne są zarówno określone
kompetencje i zachowania lidera, jak te też jakość relacji. Celem artykułu jest empiryczna analiza
związku pomiędzy wymiarami relacji lider – podwładny a zachowaniami innowacyjnymi w miejscu
pracy. Wyniki badań wskazują, że kluczowa w inicjowaniu aktywności twórczej pracowników
jest relacja emocjonalna, zaś dla generowania i wdrażania pomysłów – wymiar relacji wymiany
„lider-podwładny” określany jako relacja uczestnictwa oraz lojalności. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;283 | |
dc.title | Jakość relacji lider - podwładny a kreowanie innowacyjnności pracowników – empiryczna analiza zależności | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Quality of Leader-Subordinate Relationship Versus Employee Innovativeness Creation – Empirical Analysis of the Relation | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [221]-231 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, Kolegium Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, Katedra Rozwoju Kapitału Ludzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.references | Avolio B. J., Bass B. M., Jung, D. I., Re-examining the Components of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, „Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology”, 1999, 72 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dansereau F., Graen G., Haga W. J., A Vertical Dyad Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process, „Organizational Behavior and Human Performance”, 1975, No. 13 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Denti L., Hemlin S., Leadership and Innovation in Organizations: A Systematic Review of Factors that Mediate or Moderate the Relationship, „International Journal of Innovation Management”, 2012, Vol. 16, No. 3 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dewett T., Employee Creativity and the role of Risk, „European Journal of Innovation Management”, 2004, Vol. 7, No. 4 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dorenbosch L., van Engen, Verhagen M., On-the-job Innovation: The Impact of Job Design and Human Resource Management through Production Ownership, „Creativity and Innovation Management”, 2005, Vol. 14, No. 2 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Henderson D. J., Liden R. C., Glibkowski B. C., Chaudhry A., LMX differentiation: A multilevel review of its antecedents and outcomes, „The Leadership Quarterly”, 2009, 20(4) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Janssen O., The Joint Impact of Perceived Influence and Supervisor Supportiveness on Employee Innovative Behaviour, „Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology”, 2005, No. 78 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kleysen R. F., Street Ch. T., Toward a Multi-dimensional Measure of Individual Innovative Behavior, „Journal of Intellectual Capital”, 2001, Vol. 2, No. 3 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Liden R. C., Maslyn J. M., Multidimensionality of Leader-member Exchange: an Empirical Assessment through Scale Development, „Journal of Management”, 1998, 24 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mumford M. D., Licuanan B., Leading for Innovation: Conclusions, Issues, and Directions, „Leadership Quarterly”, 2004, No. 15 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Muñoz-Doyague M. F., Nieto M., Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships, „Industrial Management & Data Systems”, 2012, 112(1) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Reuvers M., van Engel M. L., Vinkenburg C. J., Wilson-Evered E., Transformational Leadership and Innovative Behaviour: Exploring the Relevance of Gender Differences, „Creativity and Innovation Management”, 2008, Vol. 17, No. 2 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Riggio R. E., Reichard R. J., The Emotional and Social Intelligences of Effective leadership: An Emotional and Social Skill Approach, „Journal of Managerial Psychology”, 2008, 23(2) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Scott S. G., Bruce R. A., Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, „Academy of Management Journal”, 1994, Vol. 37, No. 3 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wojciszke B., Sprawczość i wspólnotowość. Podstawowe wymiary spostrzegania społecznego, GWP, Gdańsk 2010 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wojtczuk-Turek A., Zachowania innowacyjne w pracy. Wybrane zagadnienia teoretyczne i praktyczne, Difin, Warszawa 2012 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Yukl G., O’Donnell M., Taber T., Influence of Leader Behaviors on the Leader – Member Exchange Relationship, „Journal of Managerial Psychology”, 2009, 24(4) | pl_PL |