Abstract
Should we assign Kant’s political philosophy rather to the tradition of liberalism or
to that of republicanism? Prima facie one might think that liberalism must be the right
classification since Kant emphasizes, in his Doctrine of Right, the original, innate right
to freedom. Many interpreters believe that he, thereby, wants to express the primacy
of human rights. In this article, however, I argue that Kant’s political philosophy
should be seen as a combination of elements taken from liberalism as well as from
republicanism. It holds even true that the more fundamental aspects are derived from
the tradition of republicanism. If we look at ancient and early modern forms of republicanism,
we see that the peculiar way in which Kant formulates his normative
individualism mirrors his preference for the republican tradition.