dc.contributor.author | Horn, Christoph | |
dc.contributor.editor | Gensler, Marek | |
dc.contributor.editor | Gralińska-Toborek, Agnieszka | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kazimierska-Jerzyk, Wioletta | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kędziora, Krzysztof | |
dc.contributor.editor | Miksa, Joanna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-28T10:34:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-28T10:34:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Horn Ch., Liberalismus oder Republikanismus bei Kant?, [w:] M. Gensler, A. Gralińska-Toborek, W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk, K. Kędziora, J. Miksa (red.), współpr. M. Mansfeld, Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski, WUŁ, Łódź 2022, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-570-1.15 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8220-570-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42282 | |
dc.description.abstract | Should we assign Kant’s political philosophy rather to the tradition of liberalism or
to that of republicanism? Prima facie one might think that liberalism must be the right
classification since Kant emphasizes, in his Doctrine of Right, the original, innate right
to freedom. Many interpreters believe that he, thereby, wants to express the primacy
of human rights. In this article, however, I argue that Kant’s political philosophy
should be seen as a combination of elements taken from liberalism as well as from
republicanism. It holds even true that the more fundamental aspects are derived from
the tradition of republicanism. If we look at ancient and early modern forms of republicanism,
we see that the peculiar way in which Kant formulates his normative
individualism mirrors his preference for the republican tradition. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | de | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski; | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Kant’s political philosophy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | liberalism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | republicanism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | human rights | pl_PL |
dc.subject | indivualism | pl_PL |
dc.title | Liberalismus oder Republikanismus bei Kant? | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 283-300 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Universität Bonn | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8220-571-8 | |
dc.references | Brandt, R. (2000). „Der Contrat social bei Kant“. In: Brandt, K., und Herb, R. (Hrsgg.), Jean- Jacques Rousseau. Vom Gesellschaftsvertrag oder Prinzipien des Staatsrechts. Berlin: Klassiker Auslegen, 271–294. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Herb, K. und Ludwig, B. (1993). „Naturzustand, Eigentum und Staat – Immanuel Kants Relativierung des‚ Ideal des Hobbes“. Kant-Studien, 83, 283–316. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hodgson, L. P. (2010). „Kant on the Right to Freedom. A Defense“. Ethics, 120, 791–819. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Höffe, O. (1999). Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. München: Verlag C. H. Beck. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hölzing, Ph. (2009). „Kants Theorie des republikanischen Friedens und die republikanische Tradition“. Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 116/1, 4–21. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Horn, Ch. (2014). Nichtideale Normativität. Ein neuer Blick auf Kants politische Philosophie. Berlin: Verlag C. H. Beck. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Horn, Ch. (2016). „Rousseau und Kant über Gemeinwille und Gesellschaftsvertrag“. In: Guyer, P., Ladenthin, V. und Redecker, A. (Hrsgg.), Rousseau über Rousseau. Beiträge zum 300. Geburtstag. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 31–46. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1900-). Gesammelte Schriften (Hrsg.): Bd. 1–22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Niesen, P. (2008). Kants Theorie der Redefreiheit. BadenBaden: Nomos. | pl_PL |
dc.references | O’Neill, O. (2012). „Kant and the Social Contract Tradition“. In: Ellis, E. (Hrsg.), Kant’s Political Theory. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 25–41. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pettit, Ph. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pettit, Ph. (2001). A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pettit, Ph. (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pocock, J. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton Classics. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rawls, J. (1998, engl. Orig. 1993). Politischer Liberalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Springer. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8220-570-1.15 | |