Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorPorzuczek, Andrzejen
dc.contributor.authorRojczyk, Arkadiuszen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T12:38:22Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T12:38:22Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-15en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9707
dc.description.abstractPolish is a language where true geminates appear and the occurrence of a double consonant letter in spelling corresponds with double or at least prolonged consonant articulation regardless of the morphological structure of the word. The above principle also concerns most borrowings, such as the English word ‘hobby’, for instance. In English, true geminates do not occur and a morpheme-internal double consonant letter is only a fairly reliable indication of the way the preceding vowel should be pronounced. This discrepancy may lead to negative transfer in Polish learners of English. Our recent research of native Polish speech (Rojczyk and Porzuczek, in press) generally confirmed the results reported by Ladefoged and Maddieson (1996), among others, who found geminates to be 1.5-3 times longer than singletons. In our study we investigate the influence of double consonant letters on L1 and English pronunciation of Polish learners. They read trochaic family names containing intervocalic <nn>. Each name is preceded by a first name suggesting the nationality (Polish, English, German or Italian) of the person mentioned. By placing each tested item in a Polish and an English semantically and rhythmically equivalent sentences (This is .../To jest...), we measure the level of consonant length variation with respect to the language in which the potential geminates appear, the language context and the learning experience of the students. In this way we collect evidence and formulate observations concerning the learners’ awareness of the status of geminates in various languages and the probability of transfer in EFL learning.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;12en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en
dc.titleGemination Strategies in L1 And English Pronunciation of Polish Learnersen
dc.page.number291-300en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPorzuczek Andrzej - University of Silesia, Katowiceen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationRojczyk Arkadiusz - University of Silesia, Katowiceen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesBoersma, P. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 10: 341-345.en
dc.referencesKawahara, S. (in press). The phonetics of obstruent geminates, sokuon. In S. Shibatani and K. Taro (eds.), Handbook of Japanese Language and Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton Gruyter.en
dc.referencesKozyra, A. 2008. Geminaty w językach słowiańskich. LingVaria 1(5): 257-266.en
dc.referencesLadefoged, P. and Maddieson, I. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.en
dc.referencesMalisz, Z. 2013. Speech rhythm variability in Polish and English: A study of interaction between rhythmic levels. Ph.D. Diss., Poznań: University of Adam Mickiewicz.en
dc.referencesPająk, B. 2009. Contextual constraints on geminates: The case of Polish. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of Berkley Linguistic Society 35.en
dc.referencesRojczyk, A. and Porzuczek, A. (in press). Acoustic features of nasal geminates in Polish. Paper presented at the APAP conference, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin.en
dc.referencesRubach, J. 1986. Does the obligatory contour principle operate in Polish? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 16: 133-147.en
dc.referencesRubach, J. and G. E. Booij. 1990. Edge of constituent effects in Polish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(3): 427-463.en
dc.referencesSawicka, I. 1995. Fonologia. In H. Wróbel (ed.), Gramatyka Współczesna Języka Polskiego. Fonetyka i Fonologia. Kraków: Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN: 105-195.en
dc.referencesThurgood, E. 2001. The phonetic realization of phonologically geminate affricates in Polish: The long and short of it. Speech and Language Technology 5: 9-19.en
dc.referencesThurgood, E. 2002. The recognition of geminates in ambiguous contexts in Polish. Speech Prosody 2002: 659-662.en
dc.referencesThurgood, E. 2003. Affricate gemination in the English of Polish speakers. A study in second language variability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113: 2330.en
dc.referencesThurgood, E. and G. Demenko. 2003. Phonetic realization of Polish geminate affricates. In M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, and J. Romero (eds.), Papers in Honor of Frederick H. Brengelman on the Occasion of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Department of Linguistics, CSU Fresno. Fresno: Department of Linguistic, California State University: 129-139.en
dc.referencesZajda, A. 1977. Some problems of Polish pronunciation in the Dictionary of Polish Pronunciation. In M. Karaś and M. Madejowa (eds.), Słownik Wymowy Polskiej / The Dictionary of Polish Pronunciation, L-LXII, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailPorzuczek Andrzej - andrzej.porzuczek@us.edu.plen
dc.contributor.authorEmailRojczyk Arkadiusz - arkadiusz.rojczyk@us.edu.plen
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/rela-2014-0020en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.