Show simple item record

PERFORMING ANAPHORA IN MODERN GREEK: A NEO-GRICEAN PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS

dc.contributor.authorChiou, Michaelen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T12:37:07Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T12:37:07Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-13en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9679
dc.description.abstractThe paper addresses the problem of interpreting anaphoric NPs in Modern Greek. It includes a proposal of a novel analysis based on the systematic interaction of the neo- Gricean pragmatic principles of communication, which provides a neat and elegant approach to NP-anaphora resolution. The findings of this study provide evidence for an account of NP-anaphora in terms of the division of labour between syntax and pragmatics and more accurately in terms of the systematic interaction of the neo-Gricean pragmatic principles.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;11en
dc.rightsThis content is open access.en
dc.subjectanaphoraen
dc.subjectpragmaticsen
dc.subjectsyntaxen
dc.subjectGriceen
dc.titlePERFORMING ANAPHORA IN MODERN GREEK: A NEO-GRICEAN PRAGMATIC ANALYSISen
dc.page.number335-358en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationM.A., PhD in Linguistics, University of Reading, UKen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesAnagnostopoulou, Elena and Everaert, Martin. 1999. “Towards a more complete typology of anaphoric expressions.” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 97-119. doi: 10.1162/002438999553977en
dc.referencesArlenga, Peter. 2006. “Scalar (non-) identity and similarity.” In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 25).en
dc.referencesArlenga, Peter. 2007. “Types, tokens and identity.” In Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 38).Edmondson, Jerold and Plank, Frank. 1978. “Great expectations: An intensive self analysis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 373-413.en
dc.referencesBlackwell, Sarah E. 1994. A neo-Gricean approach to Spanish NP-anaphora. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Pittsburgh.en
dc.referencesBlackwell, Sarah E. 2000. “Anaphora interpretations in Spanish utterances and the neo- Gricean pragmatic theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 389-424. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00057-0en
dc.referencesBlackwell, Sarah E. 2001. “Testing the neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora: The influence of consistency constraints on interpretations of coreference in Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 901-941. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80034-5en
dc.referencesBlackwell, Sarah E. 2003. Implicatures in discourse: The case of Spanish NP-anaphora.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.en
dc.referencesChiou, Michael. 2010. NP-anaphora in Modern Greek: A neo-Gricean pragmatic approach. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.en
dc.referencesChomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.en
dc.referencesChomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language, its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.en
dc.referencesChomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.en
dc.referencesCuly, Christopher. 1994. “Aspects of logophoric marking.” Linguistics 32: 1055-1094.en
dc.referencesCuly, Christopher. 1997. “Logophoric pronouns and point of view.” Linguistics 35: 845-859.en
dc.referencesDowty, David. 1980. “Comments on the paper by Bach and Partee.” In Papers from the parasession on pronouns and anaphora, Kreiman, J. & Ojeda, E. A. (eds), 29-40.Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.en
dc.referencesFox, Barbara. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesFrey, Werner. 2005. “Pragmatic properties of certain German and English left peripheral constructions.” Linguistics 43 (1): 89-129.en
dc.referencesGrice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Cole Peter and J. L. Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York: Academic Press.en
dc.referencesGrice, Paul. 1982. “Meaning Revisited.” In Mutual Knowledge, N. V. Smith (eds), 223-243. New York: Academic Press.en
dc.referencesGrice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesGrodzinsky, Yosef and Reinhart, Tanya. 1993. “The innateness of binding and coreference.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 69-101.en
dc.referencesHaspelmath, Martin. 2006. “Against markedness (and what to replace it with).” Journal of Linguistics 42: 25-70. doi: 10.1017/S0022226705003683en
dc.referencesHolton, David, Mackridge, Peter and Philippaki-Warburton, Irene, 1997. Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesHorn, Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesHuang, Yan. 1991. “A neo-Gricean Pragmatic Theory of Anaphora.” Journal of Linguistics 27: 301-333. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012706en
dc.referencesHuang, Yan. 1994. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: A Study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesHuang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A Cross Linguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Huang, Yan, 2004. “Anaphora and the pragmatics - syntax interface.” In Handbook of pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn and George Ward (eds), 288-314. Oxford: Blackwell.en
dc.referencesHuang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesIatridou, Sabine. 1986. “An anaphor not bound in its category.” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 766-772.en
dc.referencesIatridou, Sabine. 1988. “Clitics, anaphors and the problem of co-indexation.” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 698-703.en
dc.referencesIatridou, Sabine, 1993. “On nominative case assignment and a few related things.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19: Papers on Case and Agreement II. 175-195.en
dc.referencesJoseph, Brian D. and Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1987. Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm.en
dc.referencesKaramanis, Nikiforos and Miltsakaki, Eleni. 2006. “Centering theory on Greek Narratives and Newspaper Articles.” In The World of Texts: A Collection of Articles in Honor of G. Babiniotis.en
dc.referencesKaranasios, Giorgos. 1989. “Kenes katigories ke sintaktiko ipokimeno sta Elinika (Empty categories and syntactic subject in Greek).” In Studies in Greek Linguistics.Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the Department of Linguistics: 169-185.University of Thessaloniki.en
dc.referencesKempson, Ruth. 1984. “Pragmatics, anaphora and logical form”. In Meaning, form and use in context: linguistic applications, Schiffrin, D. (ed), 1-10. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.en
dc.referencesKempson, Ruth. 1988a. “Grammar and conversational principle.” In Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, Newmeyer, F.J. (ed), Vol 2, 139-163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesKempson, Ruth. 1988b. “Logical form: the grammar cognition interface.” Journal of Linguistics 24: 393-431. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011841en
dc.referencesKempson, Ruth. (ed.). 1988c. Mental representations: the interface between language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesKiparsky, Paul. 2002. “Disjoint reference and the typology of pronouns.” In More than Words, Ingrid, K. and Stiebels, B. (eds), Studia Grammatica 53: 179-226. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.en
dc.referencesKoopman, Hilda and Sportiche, Dominique. 1989. “Pronouns, logical variables and logophoricity in Abe.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 555-588.en
dc.referencesKordoni, Valia. 1995. “Psychological predicates in Modern Greek.” In Greek linguistics ’95, Drachman, G., Malikouti-Drachman, A., Klidi, C. & Fykias, J. (eds.), 535-544.Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Greek linguistics. Graz: W Neugebauer Verlag.en
dc.referencesKuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesKuno, Susumu and Kaburaki, Etsuko. 1977. “Empathy and syntax.” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 627-672.en
dc.referencesLapata, Maria. 1998. “Anaphoric Binding in Modern Greek”. In Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference, CSLI Publications: The University of Queensland, Brisbane. [on-line] available from: /www.-csli.Stanford.edu/publications/.en
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen C. 1987. “Pragmatics and the grammar of Anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena.” Journal of Linguistics 23: 379-434. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011324en
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen C. 1991. “Pragmatic Reduction of Pragmatic Conditions Revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 27: 107-161. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012433en
dc.referencesLevinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: The MIT Press.en
dc.referencesMackridge, Peter. 1985. The Modern Greek Language: A Descriptive Analysis of Standard Modern Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesMiltsakaki, Eleni. 2002. “Toward an aposynthesis of topic continuity and intrasentential anaphora.” Computational Linguistics 28 (3): 319-355. doi: 10.1162/089120102760276009en
dc.referencesMittwoch, Anita. 1983.” Backward anaphora and discourse structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 7: 129-139. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(83)90048-6en
dc.referencesPhilippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1987. “The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek.” Journal of Linguistics 23: 289-318. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011282en
dc.referencesPhilippaki-Warburton, Irene and Catsimali, Georgia. 1999. “On Control in Greek.” In Studies in Greek Syntax, Alexiadou, A. Horrocks, G. and Stavrou, M. (eds.), 153-168.en
dc.referencesRunner, Jeffrey T, Sussman, Rachel S and Tanenhaus, Michael K. 2003. “Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Evidence from eye movements.” Cognition 89: B1-B13. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00065-9en
dc.referencesReinhart, Tania. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.en
dc.referencesReinhart, Tania. and Reunald, Eric. 1993. “Reflexivity.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720.en
dc.referencesSells, Peter. 1987. “Aspects of logophoricity.” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445-479.en
dc.referencesTerzi, Arhonto. 1991. “PRO and Obviation in Modern Greek Subjunctives.” In Proceedings of WCCFL 10: 471-482en
dc.referencesTerzi, Arhonto. 1993. “PRO and Null Case in Finite Clauses.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Ottawa.en
dc.referencesValiouli, Maria. 1994. “Anaphora, agreement and right dislocations in Greek.” Journal of Semantics 11: 55-82. doi: 10.1093/jos/11.1-2.55en
dc.referencesVarlokosta, Spyridoula. 1993. “Control in Modern Greek.” University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 144-163.en
dc.referencesVarlokosta, Spyridoula. 1994. Issues on Modern Greek sentential complementation.Ph.D. dissertation, University of Meryland, College Park.en
dc.referencesVarlokosta, Spyridoula and Hornstein, Norbert. 1993. “A Bound Pronoun in Modern Greek.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 175-195.en
dc.referencesZribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. “Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse.” Language 65: 695-727. doi: 10.2307/414931en
dc.referencesZribi-Hertz, Anne. 1995. “Emphatic or Reflexive? On the Endophoric character of French lui-même and similar complex pronouns.” Journal of Linguistics 31: 333-374. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700015632en
dc.contributor.authorEmailmchiou1234@gmail.comen
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10015-012-0029-1en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
v10015-012-0029-1.pdf
Size:
436.9Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record