Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCiszewski, Tomaszen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T12:35:33Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T12:35:33Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-21en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9645
dc.description.abstractAs far as phonemic length contrast is concerned, we observe a high degree of durational overlap between phonemically long and short vowels in monosyllabic CVC words (which is enforced by a greater pitch excursion), whereas in polysyllables the differences seem to be perceptually non-salient (>40 ms, cf. Lehiste 1970). This suggests that the differences in vowel duration are not significant enough to underlie phonological length contrastsen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;10en
dc.rightsThis content is open access.en
dc.titleStressed vowel duration and phonemic length contrasten
dc.page.number215-223en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Gdańsken
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesBolinger, Dwight. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109-149.en
dc.referencesCutler, Anne, Dahan Delphine and van Donsellar, Wilma. 1997. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Language and Speech 40: 141-202.en
dc.referencesFry, Denis B. 1955. Duration and intensity as acoustic correlates of linguistic stress. JASA 27: 765-768.en
dc.referencesFry, Denis B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1: 126-152.en
dc.referencesGussenhoven, Carlos. 2007. A vowel height split explained. Compensatory listening and Speaker Control. In J. Cole and J. I. Hualde (eds.) Laboratory Phonology 9: Mouton de Gruyter: 145-172.en
dc.referencesKim, Heejin and Jennifer Cole. 2005. The stress foot as a unit of planned timing: evidence from shortening in the prosodic phrase. Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, Lisbon, Portugal: 2365-2368.en
dc.referencesKingston, John and Randy Diehl. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70(3): 419-454.en
dc.referencesKlatt, Dennis H. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59: 1208-1221.en
dc.referencesLehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.en
dc.referencesLieberman, Philip. 1960. Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. JASA 32: 451-454.en
dc.referencesMarslen-Wilson. William D. and Loraine K. Tyler. 1980. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding Cognition 8: 1-71.en
dc.referencesMorton, John and Wiktor Jassem 1965. Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech 8: 159-181. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000311305900004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10015-011-0049-2en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record