Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorMystkowska-Wiertelak, Annaen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T11:21:41Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T11:21:41Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-02en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9595
dc.description.abstractThe participants of the study are 74 first year students of the English philology who were divided into four groups: 3 treatment groups and a control one. The study results do not mirror those reported in the vast majority of relevant literature and points that although input manipulation appears to have more beneficial effect on the development of the interlanguage than the analysis of output, a combination of the two approaches turns out to be the most beneficial and economical.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;9en
dc.rightsThis content is open access.en
dc.titleThe Effects of a Combined Output and Input-Oriented Approach in Teaching Reported Speechen
dc.page.number111-126en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationZakład Filologii Angielskiej UAM Poznań WPA Kaliszen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesBenati, A. 2001. A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research 5: 95-127. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000288337000002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesBenati, A. 2005. The effect of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research 9: 67-93. doi: 10.1191/1362168805lr154oa ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000254028700004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesBlend, S.K. 2003. Grammar sense 3. Oxford: OUP.en
dc.referencesCadierno, T. 1995. Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal 79: 179-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05430.xen
dc.referencesCarroll, S. 1999. Putting ‘input’ in its proper place. Second Language Research 15: 337-388. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000264354700009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesCarroll, S. 2000. Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.en
dc.referencesChaudron, C. 1985. Intake: On methods and models for discovering learners' processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 1-14.en
dc.referencesCheng, A. 2002. The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar. Hispania 85: 308-323.en
dc.referencesCheng, A. 2004. Processing instruction and Spanish ser and estar: Forms with semantic-aspectual value. In B. VanPatten, (ed.) Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 119-142.en
dc.referencesCorder, S. P. 1967. The significance of learners' errors. IRAL 5: 161-170.en
dc.referencesEllis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesFarley, A. 2001a. The effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. Spanish Applied Linguistics 5: 57-94.en
dc.referencesFarley, A. 2001b. Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania 84: 289-299.en
dc.referencesGass, S. M. 1997. Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum.en
dc.referencesGass, S. and C. Madden,. (eds). 1985. Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.en
dc.referencesGely, A. 2005. Output-Based Instruction versus Processing Instruction on the Acquisition of the French imperfect tense. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Greenwich, London.en
dc.referencesKrashen, S. 1985. The input hypothesis. London: Longman.en
dc.referencesLarsen-Freeman, D. and M.H. Long. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.en
dc.referencesLee, J. 1987. Comprehending the Spanish subjunctive: An information processing perspective. Modern Language Journal 71: 50-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1987.tb01055.xen
dc.referencesLee, J. and A.G Benati,. 2007. Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and in virtual contexts. Research and practice. London: Equinox.en
dc.referencesLee, J. and B. Van Patten. 1995. Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.en
dc.referencesLee, J., Van Patten, B. 2003. Making communicative language teaching happen, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.en
dc.referencesLoCoco, V. 1987. Learner comprehension of oral and written sentences. In B. Van Patten, T.R. Dvorak and J. Lee (eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.en
dc.referencesPaulston, C. B. 1976. Pronouns of Address in Swedish: Social class Semantics and a Changing System, Language in Society 5(3): 359-386.en
dc.referencesSchwarts, B. 1993. On explicit and negative data affecting and effecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 147-164.en
dc.referencesSharwood-Smith, M. 1986. Comprehension vs. acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics 7: 239-256.en
dc.referencesSlobin, D. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In: C. Ferguson D., Slobin (eds.), Studies of child language development. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.en
dc.referencesSun, Y.A. 2008. Input Processing in Second Language Acquisition: A Discussion of Four Input Processing Models. In: Teachers College, Columbia University, Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 8/1. 1-10.en
dc.referencesVanPatten, B. 1996. Input processing and grammar instruction. Norwood, NJ: Albex Publishing Corporation.en
dc.referencesVanPatten, B. 2002. Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning 52: 755-803. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00203en
dc.referencesVanPatten, B. (ed.). 2004a. Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.en
dc.referencesVanPatten, B. (ed.). 2004b. Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 5-31.en
dc.referencesVanPatten, B., Cadierno, T. 1993. "Explicit instruction and input processing". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15. 225-243. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000276485100011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesVanPatten, B. and W. Wong. 2004. Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 97-118.en
dc.referencesWong, W. 2004. The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 33-63.en
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10015-011-0020-2en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord