Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJarosz, Wojciech
dc.contributor.authorGórny, Mikołaj
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-04T16:43:24Z
dc.date.available2025-07-04T16:43:24Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-30
dc.identifier.issn2391-6478
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/55841
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article. Retail investors in capital markets have enhanced accessibility to a broad spectrum of financial instruments via online trading platforms operated by investment firms. However, these instruments are inherently complex and high-risk, making independent analysis and informed decision-making particularly challenging for non-professional investors. Leveraged products amplify both gains and losses, posing heightened risks in volatile markets like cryptocurrencies. This article critically examines the limitations of the current regulatory framework governing contracts for difference (CFDs) in Poland, following regulations introduced (Decision No. DAS.456.2.2019) by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF). This decision established restrictions on the offering, distribution, and sale of CFDs to retail clients.Methodology. This study adopts a regulatory and market analysis approach to identify critical deficiencies and challenges in investor protection within the Polish CFD market. It relies on a review of legal frameworks, supervisory reports, and publicly available data from CFD brokers. Key areas of analysis include supervisory reports from the KNF, assessment of risk disclosures, examination of brokerage models, evaluation of cross-border activities, and review of marketing strategies.Results of the research. The analysis highlights persistent issues such as the circumvention of restrictions by cross-border brokers, the continued use of aggressive marketing strategies, and unresolved conflicts of interest within brokerage models. By reviewing legal frameworks, reports, and CFD broker data highlights regulatory shortcomings in investor protection. The findings suggest that while regulatory interventions have introduced certain protective measures, significant loopholes allow brokers to maintain high-risk practices. The article calls for enhanced regulatory oversight and provides recommendations for strengthening investor protection in the Polish financial market.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Finance and Financial Law;46en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCFDen
dc.subjectESMAen
dc.subjectMIFID IIen
dc.subjectCapital marketsen
dc.titleRegulatory Deficiencies in Investor Protection on the CFD Market in Polanden
dc.title.alternativeBRAKI REGULACYJNE W OCHRONIE INWESTORÓW NA RYNKU CFD W POLSCEpl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number73-96
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJarosz, Wojciech - Krakow University of Economics, Department of Banking and the Global Financial Systemen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGórny, Mikołaj - Jagiellonian Universityen
dc.identifier.eissn2353-5601
dc.referencesAct on Trading. (2005). The Act of 29 July 2005 on Trading in Financial Instruments. Dz.U. 2005, nr 183 poz. 1538. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20051831538en
dc.referencesAmendment of Act on Trading. (2014). The Act of 5 December 2014 amending the Act on trading in financial instruments and certain other acts. Dz.U. 2015, poz. 73. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20150000073/T/D20150073L.pdfen
dc.referencesAMF. (2019). Decision restricting the marketing, distribution, or sale, in France or from France, of contracts for differences to retail investors. https://www.amf-france.org/en/amfs-decision-1-august-2019-restricting-marketing-distribution-or-sale-france-or-france-contractsen
dc.referencesAvaSocial. (n.d.). AvaSocial trading platform. https://www.avatrade.com/trading-platforms/avasocialen
dc.referencesBaFin. (2020). Risks of CFDs – every other provider fails to comply with the requirements. https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Fachartikel/2020/fa_bj_2011_CFD_en.htmlen
dc.referencesBarnes, P. (2018). Recent developments in investment fraud and scams: Contracts for Difference (‘CFD’), spread betting and binary options and foreign exchange (‘Forex’) sometimes collectively known as ‘forbin’ – the UK experience. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No. 85061. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85061/en
dc.referencesBarszczewski, J. (2024, October 13). About copy trading on behalf of UKNF. https://x.com/JMBarszczewski/status/1796550397487731107en
dc.referencesBrown, C., Dark, J., & Davis, K. (2010). Exchange traded contracts for difference: Design, pricing, and effects. Journal of Futures Markets, 30(12), 1108–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20475en
dc.referencesCSIRT KNF. (2023). Annual report CSIRT KNF 2023. KNF. https://cebrf.knf.gov.pl/images/Raport_roczny_CSIRT_KNF.pdfen
dc.referencesCNMV. (2023). Resolution on CFDs (July 11, 2023). https://www.cnmv.es/docportal/aldia/Resolucion_CFD_en.pdfen
dc.referenceseToro. (n.d.). CopyTrader. https://www.etoro.com/en/copytrader/en
dc.referencesEuropean Commission. (2016). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565 of 25 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, L 87/1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0565en
dc.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023). Retail investment strategy. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/retail-investment-strategy_enen
dc.referencesESMA. (2016). Warning on CFDs, binary options, and other speculative products. ESMA/2016/1166. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2016-1166_warning_on_cfds_binary_options_and_other_speculative_products_0.pdfen
dc.referencesESMA. (2018a). Decision (EU) No 2018/796 to temporarily restrict contracts for differences in the Union. Official Journal of the European Union, L 136/50. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018X0601%2802%29en
dc.referencesESMA. (2018b). Press release: ESMA agrees to prohibit binary options and restrict CFDs to protect retail investors. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma71-98-128_press_release_product_intervention.pdfen
dc.referencesESMA. (2018c). Notice of ESMA’s product intervention (first) renewal decision in relation to contracts for differences. https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/cfd-renewal-decision-noticeen
dc.referencesESMA. (2019a). Notice of ESMA’s product intervention (second) renewal decision in relation to contracts for differences. https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/cfd-renewal-decision-2-noticeen
dc.referencesESMA. (2019b). Notice of ESMA’s product intervention (third) renewal decision in relation to contracts for differences. https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/cfd-renewal-3-noticeen
dc.referencesESMA. (2020). Technical advice to the EC on product intervention. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma35-43-2134_technical_advice_to_the_ec_on_product_intervention.pdfen
dc.referencesESMA. (2022a). Peer review on supervision of cross-border activities of investment firms: Peer review report. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma42-111-5534_report_peer_review_cross_border_activities_investment_firms.pdfen
dc.referencesESMA. (2022b). ESMA finds shortcomings in supervision of cross-border investment activities and issues specific recommendations to CySEC. https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-finds-shortcomings-in-supervision-cross-border-investment-activities-anden
dc.referencesESMA. (2023). Supervisory briefing on supervisory expectations in relation to firms offering copy trading services. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-03/ESMA35-42-1428_Supervisory_Briefing_on_Copy_Trading.pdfen
dc.referencesESMA. (2024a). TRV Risk Monitor: ESMA report on trends, risks and vulnerabilities. No. 1, 2024. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/ESMA50-524821-3107_TRV_1-24_risk_monitor.pdfen
dc.referencesESMA. (2024b). TRV Risk Monitor: Statistical annex. No. 1, 2024. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/ESMA50-524821-3106_TRV_1-24_Statistical_annex.pdfen
dc.referencesESMA. (2024c). Requirements when posting investment recommendations on social media. https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/requirements-when-posting-investments-recommendations-social-mediaen
dc.referencesFSMA. (2016). Regulation of the Financial Services and Markets Authority governing the distribution of certain derivative financial instruments to retail clients. https://www.fsma.be/sites/default/files/legacy/sitecore/media%20library/Files/fsmafiles/wetgeving/reglem/en/reglem_26-05-2016.pdfen
dc.referencesForex Forum Navigator. (2015). Discussion form 2015. https://forex-nawigator.biz/forum/dzwignia-t1780-180.htmlen
dc.referencesGołębiowski, P. (2012). Kontrakty na różnice kursowe (CFDs). Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 6, 26–35. https://sip.lex.pl/komentarze-i-publikacje/czasopisma/kontrakty-na-roznice-kursowe-cfds-151144472en
dc.referencesIDM. (2016). Comments of the Chamber of Brokerage Houses on the document “Guidelines on the provision of brokerage services on the OTC derivatives market”. https://idm.com.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2016/02/160210-_Uwagi%20do%20Wytycznych%20KNF%20%20OTC%20instr.%20pochodnych.pdfen
dc.referencesIDM. (2019). Badanie wpływu interwencji produktowej ESMA na inwestorów. https://idm.com.pl/images/2017/aktualnosci/Wyniki%20Badania%20wpywu%20interwencji%20produktowej%20ESMA%20na%20inwestorw.pdfen
dc.referencesKNF. (2016). Guidelines concerning the provision of brokerage services on the OTC derivatives market. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty-/img/wytyczne%20otc_24_43962.05_43962.2016_43962.pdfen
dc.referencesKNF. (2019). Decision No. DAS.456.2.2019. https://dziennikurzedowy.knf.gov.pl/DU_KNF/2019/27/akt.pdfen
dc.referencesMackiewicz, P. (2016). ECN, STP czy MM, czyli czy broker na rynku FOREX może mieć wpływ na osiągane wyniki. https://www.sii.org.pl/9847/analizy/newsroom/ecn-stp-czy-mm-czyli-czy-broker-na-rynku-forex-moze-miec-wplyw-na-osiagane-wyniki.htmlen
dc.referencesMiFID II. (2014). Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments. Official Journal of the European Union, L 173, 349–496. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0065en
dc.referencesMosionek, P. (2020). Rodzaje brokerów FOREX – ECN, STP, MM. https://forexclub.pl/rodzaje-brokerow-ecn-stp-mm/en
dc.referencesMosionek, P. (2024). eToro Opinie i recenzja | Platforma social tardingowa. https://forexclub.pl/etoro-opinie-recenzja-platformy/en
dc.referencesNIK. (2017). Ochrona praw nieprofesjonalnych uczestników rynku walutowego (forex, kantorów internetowych i rynku walut wirtualnych) KBF.430.011.2016. https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,12996,vp,15405.pdfen
dc.referencesPelser, M. (2024). Leverage constraints and investors’ choice of underlying. Journal of Banking & Finance, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107150en
dc.referencesSobol, M., & Szmelter, A. (2022). Nierzeczywiste transakcje terminowe – czynniki rozwoju i struktura rynku. Przegląd Prawa Ekonomicznego, 1, 112–113. https://doi.org/10.31743/ppe.12882en
dc.referencesSolanki, J. (2024). STP Broker vs ECN Broker Explained. https://admiralmarkets.com/education/articles/general-trading/types-of-brokers-ecn-stpen
dc.referencesUKNF. (2013). Position on the conduct of investment firms in the Forex market. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/stanowisko_Forex_35192.pdfen
dc.referencesUKNF. (2020). Position on selected aspects of the provision of investment advisory services by investment firms and banks referred to in Article 70 section 2 of the Act. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Stanowisko_UKNF_ws_doradztwa_inwestycyjnego.pdfen
dc.referencesUKNF. (2023). Position of UKNF on referral programs and partnership programs. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Stanowisko_UKNF_ws_programow_polecen_oraz_programow_partnerskich_84269_84429.pdfen
dc.referencesUKNF. (2024a). Results of clients in the Forex market for 2023. https://www.knf.gov.pl/?articleId=88644&p_id=18en
dc.referencesUKNF. (2024b). Position of UKNF on the use of copy trading. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Stanowisko_UKNF_dot_wykorzystania_copy_tradingu_przy_swiadczeniu_uslug_maklerskich_89502_89507.pdfen
dc.referencesXTB. (2024). Annual report: Report of the XTB Capital Group for Q1 2024. https://ircdn.xtb.com/files/2024/05/08235443/Raport-Q1.2024-PL.pdfen
dc.contributor.authorEmailJarosz, Wojciech - jaroszw@uek.krakow.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailGórny, Mikołaj - s221269@student.uek.krakow.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2391-6478.2.46.05
dc.relation.volume2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/