Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Lost in Transition? Market Failure in the Implementation of the Circular Economy. A Comparative Analysis of the Netherlands and Poland

dc.contributor.authorAdamus, Jagoda
dc.contributor.authorChądzyński, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorTrippner‑Hrabi, Justyna
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T13:28:00Z
dc.date.available2024-09-30T13:28:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-30
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/53265
dc.description.abstractIt is necessary for economies to transition to a circular economy (CE). What particularly inhibits the implementation of the CE in linear economies is market failures, whose theoretical principles are embedded in modern welfare economics and neoclassical economics. Market failures shape the functioning of different areas of the markets, including the allocation of and access to resources, competition, and cooperation, among others. Due to their presence in the market, opportunities for industrial symbiosis based on intersectoral cooperation and the creation of resource-efficient production systems are limited. It is crucial because the functioning of local actors within an industrial symbiosis significantly favours the promotion and development of a CE. The aim of the paper is to identify market failures that limit the implementation of CEs in traditional linear economies.The article is based on focus group interviews (FGI) conducted with four groups of stakeholders in the Netherlands and Poland: academia, society, business and the government. The main findings show that one of the greatest barriers in Poland is stakeholders’ low awareness of the CE, which influences their possibilities of cooperating and networking. Existing laws additionally limit opportunities to develop the CE. In contrast, in the Netherlands, where awareness is deeply embedded in the culture, education system and upbringing, the level of market failure is lower.en
dc.description.abstractObecnie transformacja gospodarek w kierunku obiegu zamkniętego i cyrkularności jest koniecznością. Tym, co szczególnie hamuje wdrażanie gospodarki cyrkularnej w gospodarkach liniowych, są zawodności rynku. Teoretyczne podstawy zawodności rynku są zakorzenione we współczesnej ekonomii dobrobytu i ekonomii neoklasycznej. Zawodności wpływają na funkcjonowanie różnych obszarów rynku, w tym alokację i dostęp do zasobów, konkurencję oraz współpracę między podmiotami. Zawodności rynku ograniczają również możliwość wdrożenia symbiozy przemysłowej opartej na międzysektorowej współpracy i tworzeniu efektywnych systemów produkcji. Jest to istotne, ponieważ funkcjonowanie lokalnych podmiotów w ramach symbiozy przemysłowej znacząco sprzyja promocji i wdrażaniu gospodarki cyrkularnej. Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja zawodności rynku ograniczających wdrożenie gospodarki cyrkularnej w tradycyjnych gospodarkach liniowych. Artykuł powstawał na podstawie zogniskowanych wywiadów grupowych (FGI) przeprowadzonych z reprezentantami czterech grup interesariuszy w Niderlandach i Polsce: środowiskiem akademickim, społeczeństwem, przedsiębiorcami oraz władzami. Przeprowadzone badania wykazały, że jedną z największych barier wdrażania gospodarki cyrkularnej w Polsce jest niska świadomość interesariuszy na jej temat. Wpływa to na ich możliwości współpracy i networkingu. Obowiązujące w Polsce przepisy prawne dodatkowo ograniczają możliwości rozwoju gospodarki cyrkularnej. Inaczej wygląda sytuacja w Niderlandach, gdzie – jak pokazały przeprowadzone badania – świadomość na temat gospodarki cyrkularnej jest głęboko zakorzeniona w kulturze, systemie edukacji i wychowaniu. Skutkuje to niższym poziomem występowania zawodności rynkowych.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;3pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectcircular economyen
dc.subjectlinear economyen
dc.subjecttransition to the CEen
dc.subjectmarket failuresen
dc.subjectgospodarka cyrkularnapl
dc.subjectgospodarka liniowapl
dc.subjecttranzycja w kierunku gospodarki cyrkularnejpl
dc.subjectzawodności rynkupl
dc.titleLost in Transition? Market Failure in the Implementation of the Circular Economy. A Comparative Analysis of the Netherlands and Polanden
dc.title.alternativeZagubieni w okresie przejściowym? Zawodności rynku we wdrażaniu gospodarki cyrkularnej. Analiza porównawcza Niderlandów i Polskipl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number141-165
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAdamus, Jagoda - University of Lodz, Lodz, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationChądzyński, Jacek - University of Lodz, Lodz, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationTrippner‑Hrabi, Justyna - University of Lodz, Lodz, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesAcheson, J.M. (2006), Institutional Failure in Resource Management, “Annual Review of Anthropology”, 35, pp. 117–134, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123238en
dc.referencesAgyemang, M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Khan, S.A., Mani, V., Rehman, S.T., Kusi-Sarpong, H. (2019), Drivers and barriers to circular economy implementation: An explorative study in Pakistan’s automobile industry, “Management Decision”, 57 (4), pp. 971–994, https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2018-1178en
dc.referencesAlvarez, S.A., Barney, J.B., Newman, A.M.B. (2015), The poverty problem and the industrialization solution, “Asia Pacific Journal Management”, 32, pp. 23–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9397-5en
dc.referencesAndrew, B. (2008), Market failure, government failure and externalities in climate change mitigation: The case for a carbon tax. Public administration and development, “The International Journal of Management Research and Practice”, 28 (5), pp. 393–401, https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.517en
dc.referencesArrow, K.J. (1951), An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics, [in:] Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 507–532.en
dc.referencesBarteková, E., Börkey, P. (2022), Digitalisation for the transition to a resource efficient and circular economy, “OECD Environment Working Papers”, 192, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/6f6d18e7-enen
dc.referencesBator, F.M. (1958), The Anatomy of Market Failure, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 72 (3), pp. 351–379, https://doi.org/10.2307/1882231en
dc.referencesBimpizas-Pinis, M., Bozhinovska, E., Genovese, A., Lowe, B., Pansera, M., Pinyol, A.J., Ramezankhani, M.J. (2021), Is efficiency enough for circular economy?, “Resources, Conservation and Recycling”, 167, 105399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105399en
dc.referencesBleda, M., Del Río, P. (2013), The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems, “Research Policy”, 42 (5), pp. 1039–1052, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2013.02.008en
dc.referencesBosman, R., Rotmans, J. (2016), Transition Governance towards a Bioeconomy: A Comparison of Finland and The Netherlands, “Sustainability”, 8 (10), 1017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101017en
dc.referencesCarayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. (2009), Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, “International Journal of Technology Management”, 46 (3/4), pp. 201–234, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374en
dc.referencesChang, H.-J. (2002), Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state, “Cambridge Journal of Economics”, 26 (5), pp. 539–559, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.5.539en
dc.referencesCirculair Friesland (n.d.), https://circulairfriesland.frl/en/ (accessed: 20.08.2022).en
dc.referencesCompagnoni, M., Stadler, M. (2021), Growth in a Circular Economy, “University of Tübingen Working Papers in Business and Economics”, 145, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-56495en
dc.referencesCong, R.-G., Thomsen, M. (2021), Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms, “Ecosystem Services”, 50, 101298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101298en
dc.referencesConrad, Ch.A. (2020), Political Economy: An Institutional and Behavioral Approach, Springer Gabler, Saarbrücken, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30884-1en
dc.referencesCowen, T., Crampton, E. (2002), Market failure or success: The New Debate, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.en
dc.referencesCunningham, S. (2011), Understanding market failures in an economic development context, Mesopartner Monograph 4, Pretoria, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4734.6562en
dc.referencesDe Jesus, A., Mendonça, S. (2018), Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy, “Ecological Economics”, 145, pp. 75–89, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3038887en
dc.referencesDonner, M., Vries, H. de (2021), How to innovate business models for a circular bio‐economy?, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, 30 (4), pp. 1932–1947, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2725en
dc.referencesEwijk, S. van (2018), Resource efficiency and the circular economy: concepts, economic benefits, barriers, and policies, UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, London.en
dc.referencesFrontship (n.d.), Regions, https://frontsh1p.eu/regions/ (accessed: 11.09.2022).en
dc.referencesFullerton, D., He, S. (2022), Do market failures create a ‘durability gap’ in the circular economy?, “NBER Working Paper”, 29073, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.3386/w29073en
dc.referencesGalvão, G.D.A., De Nadae, J., Clemente, D.H., Chinen, G., De Carvalho, M.M. (2018), Circular Economy: Overview of Barriers, “Procedia CIRP”, 73, pp. 79–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.011en
dc.referencesGeng, Y., Doberstein, B. (2008), Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving ‘leapfrog development’, “International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology”, 15 (3), pp. 231–239, https://doi.org/10.3843/susdev.15.3:6en
dc.referencesGhisellini, P., Ulgiati, S. (2020), Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 243, 118360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360en
dc.referencesGhisellini, P., Passaro, R., Ulgiati, S. (2021), Revisiting Keynes in the Light of the Transition to Circular Economy, “Circular Economy and Sustainability”, 1, pp. 143–171, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00016-1en
dc.referencesGrafström, J., Aasma, S. (2021), Breaking circular economy barriers, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 292, 126002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126002en
dc.referencesGrin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J. (2010), Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, Routledge, New York, http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598en
dc.referencesHaas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Heinz, M. (2015), How Circular is the Global Economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005, “Journal of Industrial Ecology”, 19 (5), pp. 765–777, https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12244en
dc.referencesHerwijnen, M. van, Bianchi M., Cordella, M., Menger P. (2022), Policy Brief: A territorial approach to transitioning towards a circular, https://archive.espon.eu/topics-policy/publications/policy-brief-territorial-approach-transitioning-towards-circular-economy (accessed: 15.03.2023).en
dc.referencesInternational Welcome Center North (n.d.), Friesland, https://iwcn.nl/province-of-friesland/ (accessed: 16.08.2022).en
dc.referencesInterreg Europe (2020), Friesland is becoming a circular economy role-model, https://projects2014-2020.interregeurope.eu/colorcircle/news/news-article/8543/friesland-is-becoming-a-circular-economy-role-model/ (accessed: 15.03.2023).en
dc.referencesJackson, E.A., Jabbie, M. (2019), Understanding Market Failure in the Developing Country Context, [in:] W.L. Filho, A.M. Azul, L. Brandli, A.L. Salvia, T. Wall (eds.), Decent Work and Economic Growth: Encyclopedia of Sustainable Development Goals, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, Switzerland pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_44-1en
dc.referencesKinnunen, P.H.M., Kaksonen, A.H. (2019), Towards circular economy in mining: Opportunities and bottlenecks for tailings valorization, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 228, pp. 153–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.171en
dc.referencesKirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2017), Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, “Resources, Conservation and Recycling”, 127, pp. 221–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005en
dc.referencesKirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., Hekkert, M. (2018), Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU), “Ecological Economics”, 150, pp. 264–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028en
dc.referencesKlaassen, G.A., Opschoor, J.B. (1991), Economics of sustainability or the sustainability of economics: Different paradigms, “Ecological Economics”, 4 (2), pp. 93–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(91)90024-9en
dc.referencesLangen, S.K. van, Vassillo, C., Restaino, D., Passaro, R., Ulgiati, S. (2021), Promoting circular economy transition: A study about perceptions and awareness by different stakeholders groups, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 316, 128166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128166en
dc.referencesLedyard, J.O. (1989), Market failure, [in:] J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.), Allocation, Information And Markets, The Macmillan, London, pp. 185–190.en
dc.referencesLines, D., Marcouse, I., Martin, B. (2006), The complete AZ business studies handbook, Hodder Arnold, London.en
dc.referencesMahpour, A. (2018), Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management, “Resources, Conservation and Recycling”, 134, pp. 216–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026en
dc.referencesMangla, S.K., Luthra, S., Mishra, N., Singh, A., Rana, N.P., Dora, M., Dwivedi, Y. (2018), Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context, “Production Planning and Control”, 29 (6), pp. 551–569, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449265en
dc.referencesMasi, D., Kumar, V., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Godsell, J. (2018), Towards a more circular economy: exploring the awareness, practices, and barriers from a focal firm perspective, “Production Planning and Control”, 29 (6), pp. 539–550, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449246en
dc.referencesMoreau, F. (2004), The role of the state in evolutionary economics, “Cambridge Journal of Economics”, 28 (6), pp. 847–874, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beh038en
dc.referencesNelson, R.R. (2008), Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory, “Oxford Development Studies”, 36 (1), pp. 9–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701848037en
dc.referencesNelson, R.R., Winter, S.G. (2002), Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics, “The Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 16 (2), pp. 23–46, https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027247en
dc.referencesNeves, S.A, Marques, A.C. (2022), Drivers and barriers in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 341, 130865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130865en
dc.referencesPearce, D.W. (1986), Market Failure, [in:] D.W. Pearce (ed.), Macmillan Dictionary of Modern Economics, Red Globe Press, London, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18424-8en
dc.referencesPerman, P., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., Common, M. (2003), Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.en
dc.referencesPhelan, C., Rustichini, A. (2018), Pareto efficiency and identity, “Theoretical Economics”, 13 (3), pp. 979–1007, https://doi.org/10.3386/w20883en
dc.referencesPreston, F. (2012), A global redesign?: Shaping the circular economy, Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.en
dc.referencesRandall, A. (1983), The Problem of Market Failure, “Natural Resources Journal”, 23 (1), pp. 131–148.en
dc.referencesRanta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., Mäkinen, S.J. (2018), Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe, “Resources, Conservation and Recycling”, 135, pp. 70–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017en
dc.referencesRedmond, W. (2018), Marketing Systems and Market Failure: A Macromarketing Appraisal, “Journal of Macromarketing”, 38 (4), pp. 415–424, https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146718796913en
dc.referencesRitzén, S., Sandström, G.Ö. (2017), Barriers to the Circular Economy – Integration of Perspectives and Domains, “Procedia CIRP”, 64, pp. 7–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005en
dc.referencesRizos, V., Behrens, A., Kafyeke, T., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Ioannou, A. (2015), The Circular Economy: Barriers and Opportunities for SMEs, CEPS Working Documents, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2664489 (accessed: 15.03.2023).en
dc.referencesSamuelson, P.A., Nordhaus, W.D. (1992), Economics, McGraw-Hill, New York.en
dc.referencesSchmidt, P. (2018), Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? A critique from an evolutionary perspective, “Journal of Evolutionary Economics”, 28, pp. 785–803, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0564-6en
dc.referencesStiglitz, E. (2004), Ekonomia sektora publicznego, PWE, Warszawa.en
dc.referencesTowa, E., Zeller, V., Achten, W.M.J. (2021), Assessing the circularity of regions: Stakes of trade of waste for treatment, “Journal of Industrial Ecology”, 25 (4), pp. 834–847, https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13106en
dc.referencesTura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., Valkokari, P. (2019), Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 212, pp. 90–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202en
dc.referencesVanner, R., Bicket, M., Hudson, C., Withana, S., Brink, P., Razzini, P., Dijl, E. van, Watkins, E., Hestin, M., Tan, A., Guilcher, S. (2014), Scoping study to identify potential circular economy actions, priority sectors, material flows and value chains, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.en
dc.referencesWinston, C. (2006), Government Failure versus Market Failure: Microeconomics Policy Research and Government Performance, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington.en
dc.referencesWojewództwo łódzkie (n.d.), https://strategia.lodzkie.pl/ (accessed: 25.08.2022).en
dc.referencesWysokińska, Z. (2016), The “New” Environmental Policy of the European Union: A Path to Development of a Circular Economy and Mitigation of the Negative Effects of Climate Change, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 19 (2), pp. 57–73, http://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0013en
dc.referencesWysokińska, Z. (2020), A Review of Transnational Regulations in Environmental Protection and the Circular Economy, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 23 (4), pp. 149–168, http://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.32en
dc.referencesZerbe, R.O., McCurdy, H.E. (1999), The failure of market failure, “Journal of Policy Analysis and Management”, 18 (4), pp. 558–578, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199923)18:4%3C558::AID-PAM2%3E3.0.CO;2-Uen
dc.contributor.authorEmailAdamus, Jagoda - jagoda.adamus@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailChądzyński, Jacek - jacek.chandzynski@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailTrippner‑Hrabi, Justyna - justyna.hrabi@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1508-2008.27.25
dc.relation.volume27


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
141-165_Adamus_et_al..pdf
Rozmiar:
860.7KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0