Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Building Bridges: Understanding the Interplay between Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Baby Boomers – Characteristics, Organisational Culture, and Organisational Identification in Modern Cities

dc.contributor.authorKam, Aygün
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-30T11:28:34Z
dc.date.available2024-07-30T11:28:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-16
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/52908
dc.description.abstractOver the years, the profile of a modern city dweller has been evolving and diversifying due to the emergence of various generations. Different generations are characterised by distinct expectations and perspectives towards life. Therefore, in today’s highly dynamic environment, city authorities must deeply understand their city dwellers to build an influential organisational culture which will lead them to have city friendly citizens in order to create resilient, sustainable, and inclusive cities. This study aims to define the impact of Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Baby Boomers employees’ characteristics on organisational culture and organisational identification relationships in terms of professional and urban life. From this perspective, a study was carried out on 460 white-collar employees who are city dwellers working stationary in the private sector in Istanbul. The data were obtained in the course of a quantitative study carried out through an interview questionnaire using the CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) technique. The primary conclusions are that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between clan (β = 0.360, p < 0.01) as well as market (β = 0.147, p < 0.05) culture and organisational identification. In addition, there is a statistically significant relationship between employees’ experience levels and their perceptions of adhocracy culture (F = 3.19, p < 0.05), and there is no statistically significant difference between the perceptions of Generation X, Y, and Baby Boomers employees about organisational culture and organisational identification levels.en
dc.description.abstractPrzez lata profil współczesnego mieszkańca miasta ewoluował i różnicował się ze względu na pojawianie się kolejnych pokoleń. Różne pokolenia charakteryzują się odmiennymi oczekiwaniami i perspektywami życiowymi. Dlatego też w dzisiejszym, bardzo dynamicznym środowisku władze miejskie muszą dogłębnie zrozumieć swoich mieszkańców, aby zbudować wpływową kulturę organizacyjną, która doprowadzi do wykształcenia się przyjaznych miastom obywateli w celu stworzenia odpornych, zrównoważonych i sprzyjających włączeniu społecznemu miast. Niniejszy artykuł ma na celu określenie wpływu cech pracowników z pokoleń X, Y i Baby Boomers na kulturę organizacyjną i identyfikację organizacyjną w zakresie życia zawodowego i miejskiego. Z tej perspektywy przeprowadzono badanie na 460 pracownikach umysłowych, którzy są mieszkańcami miasta i pracują stacjonarnie w sektorze prywatnym w Stambule. Dane zostały uzyskane w trakcie badania ilościowego przeprowadzonego za pomocą kwestionariusza wywiadu z wykorzystaniem techniki wywiadu osobistego ze wspomaganiem komputerowym. Główne wnioski prowadzą do konkluzji, iż istnieje statystycznie istotny i pozytywny związek między kulturą klanową (β = 0,360, p < 0,01) oraz rynkową (β = 0,147, p < 0,05) a identyfikacją organizacyjną. Ponadto istnieje statystycznie istotny związek między poziomem doświadczenia pracowników a ich postrzeganiem kultury adhokracji (F = 3,19, p < 0,05), nie ma natomiast statystycznie istotnej różnicy między postrzeganiem kultury organizacyjnej i poziomu identyfikacji organizacyjnej przez pracowników z pokoleń X, Y i Baby Boomers.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;365en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectmodern citiesen
dc.subjecturban workforceen
dc.subjectorganisational cultureen
dc.subjectorganisational identificationen
dc.subjectgenerationsen
dc.subjectnowoczesne miastapl
dc.subjectmiejska siła roboczapl
dc.subjectkultura organizacyjnapl
dc.subjectidentyfikacja organizacyjnapl
dc.subjectpokoleniapl
dc.titleBuilding Bridges: Understanding the Interplay between Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Baby Boomers – Characteristics, Organisational Culture, and Organisational Identification in Modern Citiesen
dc.title.alternativeBudowanie mostów: zrozumienie wzajemnych zależności między pokoleniami X, Y i Baby Boomers – charakterystyka, kultura organizacyjna i identyfikacja organizacyjna we współczesnych miastachpl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number65-99
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Local Government Economics, Lodz, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesAllam Z., Newman P. (2018), Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism and governance, “Smart Cities”, vol. 1(1), pp. 4–25.en
dc.referencesAnholt S. (2007), What is competitive identity?, [in:] S. Anholt, Competitive identity, Springer Nature, London, pp. 1–23.en
dc.referencesAnholt S. (2011), Beyond the Nation Brand: The Role of Image and Identity in International Relations, [in:] A. Pike (ed.), Brands and branding geographies, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 6–12.en
dc.referencesAshforth B.E., Mael F. (1989), Social Identity Theory and The Organization, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 14(1), pp. 20–39.en
dc.referencesAssoratgoon W., Kantabutra S. (2023), Toward a sustainability organizational culture model, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 136666.en
dc.referencesAydıntan B. (2005), Cultural Diversity and Its Effects in Multinational Business, [in:] O.A. Seymen, T. Bolat (eds.), Globalization and Multinational Business, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, pp. 153–178.en
dc.referencesCameron K.S., Quinn R.E. (2006), Diagnosing and Changing Culture Organizational Based on the competing values framework, John Willey & Sons Inc., San Francisco.en
dc.referencesCameron K.S., Freeman S.J., Mishra A.K. (1991), Best practices in white-collar downsizing: Managing contradictions, “Academy of Management Perspectives”, vol. 5(3), pp. 57–73.en
dc.referencesCaragliu A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P. (2011), Smart cities in Europe, “Journal of Urban Technology”, vol. 18(2), pp. 65–82.en
dc.referencesCastells M. (1989), The informational city: Technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.en
dc.referencesDenison D.R., Mishra A.K. (1995), Toward A Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness, “Organization Science”, vol. 6(2), pp. 204–223.en
dc.referencesDeshpandé R., Farley J.U., Webster Jr. F.E. (1993), Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis, “Journal of Marketing”, vol. 57(1), pp. 23–37.en
dc.referencesDoğan B. (2007) Organization culture, Beta Publications, Istanbul.en
dc.referencesGe J., Su X., Zhou Y. (2010), Organizational socialization, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical research of Chinese high‐tech manufacturing enterprises, “Nankai Business Review International”, vol. 1(2), pp. 166–179.en
dc.referencesGürbüz S. (2015), Generational Differences: A Myth or Reality?, “İş ve İnsan Dergisi”, vol. 2(1), pp. 39–57.en
dc.referencesHammill G. (2005), Mixing and Managing Four Generations of Employees, “FDU Magazine Online”, vol. 12(2).en
dc.referencesHu Y., Huang J. (2023), Delineating and comparing local labor market geographies of Millennials, Generation Xers, and Baby Boomers, “Travel Behaviour and Society”, vol. 30, pp. 325–334.en
dc.referencesİŞKUR (n.d.), https://www.iskur.gov.tr/ [accessed: 7.05.2023].en
dc.referencesKam A. (2019), Örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisinde X ve Y kuşağı işgören özelliklerinin etkisi, Master’s thesis, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.en
dc.referencesKam A. (2021), The importance of different generational features for urban management and planning, SKN SPATIUM, Lodz.en
dc.referencesKam A. (2023), Remote work in the public institutions: Theoretical considerations and exploration of its potential benefits, “Polityka Społeczna”, vol. 19(eng (1)), pp. 13–19.en
dc.referencesKam A., Trippner-Hrabi J. (2021), The influence of generation X and Y employees on modern cities, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica”, vol. 1(352), pp. 39–61.en
dc.referencesKnox H. (2010), Cities and organisation: The information city and urban form, “Culture and Organization”, vol. 16(3), pp. 185–195.en
dc.referencesKorkmaz O., Aydemir S., Uysal H.T. (2017), The Impact of the Dominant Institutional Culture on Organizational Identification, “Journal of Balkan Social Sciences”, vol. 6(12), pp. 62–81.en
dc.referencesKöse C.G. (2009), Contribution of Organizational Identification to Continuous Improvement Efforts of Employees: A Study, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.en
dc.referencesKupperschmidt B.R. (2000), Multigeneration Employees: Strategies For Effective Management, “The Health Care Manager”, vol. 19(1), pp. 65–76.en
dc.referencesMael F., Ashforth B.E. (1992), Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, vol. 13(2), pp. 103–123.en
dc.referencesMarkina I., Drogomyretska M. (2014), The role of branding in the sustainable development of tourist destination, “Journal of Research on Trade, Management and Economic Development”, vol. 2, pp. 37–43.en
dc.referencesMendoza Moheno J., Hernández Calzada M.A., Salazar Hernández B.C. (2017), Organizational Challenges for Building Smart Cities, [in:] M. Peris-Ortiz, D.R. Bennett, D. Pérez-Bustamente Yábar (eds.), Sustainable Smart Cities: Creating Spaces for Technological, Social and Business Development, Springer, Switzerland, pp. 89–99.en
dc.referencesMiller V .D., Allen M., Casey M.K., Johnson J.R. (2000), Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire, “Management Communication Quarterly”, vol. 13(4), pp. 626–658.en
dc.referencesMücevher M.H. (2015), Feature and interaction perceptions of generation X and Y against each other: SDU sample, Doctoral dissertation, Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, Isparta.en
dc.referencesOblinger D., Oblinger J. (eds.) (2005), Educating the Net Generation, Educause, Boulder.en
dc.referencesÖzgözgü S. (2016), Kurumsal imaj, örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisi, “Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi”, vol. 25(2), pp. 581–596.en
dc.referencesÖzkalp E., Kırel Ç. (2013), Örgütsel Davranış, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa.en
dc.referencesPieroni A., Scarpato N., Di Nunzio L., Fallucchi F., Raso M. (2018), Smarter city: smart energy grid based on blockchain technology, “International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology”, vol. 8(1), pp. 298–306.en
dc.referencesQuinn R.E. (1988), Beyond rational management: mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.en
dc.referencesSathe V . (1983), Implications of corporate culture: A manager’s guide to action, “Organizational Dynamics”, vol. 12(2), pp. 5–23.en
dc.referencesSchein E.H. (1984), Coming to A New Awareness of Organizational Culture, “Sloan Management Review”, vol. 25(2), pp. 3–16.en
dc.referencesSchein E.H. (2010), Organizational Culture and Leadership, vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.en
dc.referencesSchwarz T. (2008), Brace Yourself Here Comes Generation Y, “Critical Care Nurse”, vol. 28(5), pp. 80–85.en
dc.referencesScott‐Findlay S., Estabrooks C.A. (2006), Mapping the organizational culture research in nursing: a literature review, “Journal of Advanced Nursing”, vol. 56(5), pp. 498–513.en
dc.referencesSekaran U. (2003), Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York.en
dc.referencesSekaran U., Bougie R. (2016), Research methods for business: A skill building approach, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.en
dc.referencesSeymen O.A. (2008), A Research on Organizational Culture Types Affecting Organizational Commitment, Detay Publishing, Ankara.en
dc.referencesŞişman M. (2007), Örgütler ve kültürler: Örgüt kültürü, Pegem A Publising, Ankara.en
dc.referencesSun R., Li J.Y.Q., Lee Y., Tao W. (2023), The role of symmetrical internal communication in improving employee experiences and organizational identification during COVID–19 pandemic-induced organizational change, “International Journal of Business Communication”, vol. 60(4), pp. 1398–1426.en
dc.referencesTajfel H., Turner J.C. (1979), An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, [in:] W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, pp. 33–37.en
dc.referencesTokgöz E., Seymen O.A. ve (2013), Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Devlet Hastanesinde Araştırma, “Öneri Dergisi”, vol. 10(39), pp. 61–76.en
dc.referencesTrippner-Hrabi J., Chądzyński J., Kam A. (2023), Benefits of Remote Work in the Self-Service Model in the Public Utility Sector, [in:] G. Rouet, T. Côme (eds.), Participatory and Digital Democracy at the Local Level: European Discourses and Practices, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 327–346.en
dc.referencesWilliams S. (2010), Welcome to Generation Z, “B and T Magazine”, vol. 60(2731), pp. 1–12.en
dc.referencesYesil S., Kaya A. (2013), The effect of organizational culture on firm financial performance: Evidence from a developing country, “Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences”, no. 81, pp. 428–437.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailaygun.kam@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.365.04
dc.relation.volume4


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
65-98_Kam.pdf
Rozmiar:
1.251MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0