Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEgorova, Alisa
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Hans-Georg
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T09:39:13Z
dc.date.available2024-01-03T09:39:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-28
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/48999
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the motivation behind denominal conversion of animal nouns to verbs as well as their resultant senses. Upon critical consideration of previous accounts of animal verb senses and their possible sources, the argument is put forward that animal verbs are not uniform in their semantics and cannot therefore be considered a separate conceptual category or analysed as such. Previous findings are then reinterpreted from the point of view of frame-based accounts of denominal conversion. Animal verbs are shown to be generated by the same grammatical generalisations as other denominal verbs of English, with their metaphoricity appearing to be a concomitant rather than a driving factor in the grammatical act of their conversion.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectanimal verben
dc.subjectdenominal conversionen
dc.subjectzero derivationen
dc.subjectframeen
dc.subjectmetaphoren
dc.subjectmetonymyen
dc.subjectzoosemyen
dc.titleWhat’s Dog Got to Do With It? Motivation Behind Denominal (Animal) Verbsen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number129-144
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationEgorova, Alisa - University of Potsdamen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWolf, Hans-Georg - University of Potsdamen
dc.referencesBaeskow, Heike. 2006. Reflections on Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English. Zeitschrift Für Sprachwissenschaft, 25(2), 205–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.008en
dc.referencesClark, Eve V., and Clark, Herbert H. 1979. When Nouns Surface as Verbs. Language, 55(4), 767–811. https://doi.org/10.2307/412745en
dc.referencesDeignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus linguistics. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6en
dc.referencesDirven, René. 1999. Conversion as a Conceptual Metonymy of Event Schemata. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, 275–287. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.16diren
dc.referencesEgorova, Alisa. 2022. Hunting Down Animal Verbs: An Investigation into The Mechanisms of Meaning Transfer Underlying English Verbal Zoosemy [MA thesis]. University of Potsdam. https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/55770en
dc.referencesKiełtyka, Robert. 2016. Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05784-3en
dc.referencesKiparsky, Paul. 1997. Remarks on Denominal Verbs. Complex Predicates, 64, 473–499.en
dc.referencesKleparski, Grzegorz. 2017. The Semantics of Dog Revisited: In Search of Phraseologically Embedded Spectral Zoometaphors. In R. Kiełtyka and A. Uberman (eds.), Evolving Nature of the English Language, 81–92. Peter Lang.en
dc.referencesKleparski, Grzegorz. 2013. Historical Semantics: A Sketch on New Categories and Types of Semantic Change. In J. Fisiak and M. Bator (eds.), Historical English Word-Formation and Semantics, 59–88. Peter Lang.en
dc.referencesKövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001en
dc.referencesKövecses, Zoltán., and Radden, Günter. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37en
dc.referencesMartsa, Sándor. 2013. Conversion in English: A cognitive Semantic Approach. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.en
dc.referencesMichaelis, Laura A., and Hsiao, Allen M. 2021. Verbing and Linguistic Innovation. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 604–763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.604763en
dc.referencesOxford English Dictionary Online [OED]. https://www.oed.com/en
dc.referencesPanther, Klaus-Uwe, and Thornburg, Linda L. (2012). Conceptualizing Humans as Animals in English Verb Particle Constructions. Language Value, 4, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2012.4.4en
dc.contributor.authorEmailEgorova, Alisa - aegorova@uni-potsdam.de
dc.contributor.authorEmailWolf, Hans-Georg - hg-wolf@uni-potsdam.de
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.21.2.02
dc.relation.volume21


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0