dc.contributor.author | Brenda, Maria | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-03T09:39:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-03T09:39:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-12-28 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1731-7533 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/48998 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although prepositions are relational linguistic units of modest sizes, they can contribute a variety of different meanings to the constructions they are found in. The paper looks into the notion of e-site, which allows for conceptual elaboration of more schematic entities along the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the human conceptual representation. It argues that e-sites are useful for prepositional meaning description. First, e-sites come into play when schematic TRs and LMs of the preposition are elaborated by more specific conceptual structures, thereby, forming a vertical schematic-specific hierarchy of conceptual structures. Along the horizontal dimension, e-sites are responsible for the integration of the conceptual content of expressions which come together to form constructions. This type of elaboration finds its expression in the typology of languages (satellite- or verb-framed) proposed by Talmy (2000) and elaborated by Slobin (2005). | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Research in Language;2 | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
dc.subject | cognitive linguistics | en |
dc.subject | semantics | en |
dc.subject | preposition | en |
dc.subject | meaning construction | en |
dc.title | Elaboration sites and prepositional meaning construction in English and Polish | en |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.page.number | 117-128 | |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Szczecin | en |
dc.references | Brenda, Maria and Jolanta Mazurkiewicz-Sokołowska. 2022. A Cognitive Perspective on Spatial Prepositions. Intertwining networks. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.74 | en |
dc.references | Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 | en |
dc.references | Duffley, Patrick. 2003. The gerund and the to‐infinitive as subject. Journal of English Linguistics, 31-4, 324-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424203257833 | en |
dc.references | Duffley, Patrick. 2004. Verbs of liking with the infinitive and the gerund. English Studies 4, 358-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138380412331339158 | en |
dc.references | Duffley, Patrick. 2007. A natural-language semantics approach to infinitival and gerund-participial complementation in English. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Studies 22, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.775 | en |
dc.references | Evans, Vyvyan. 2010. The perceptual basis of spatial representation. In V. Evans and P. Chilton (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, 21-48. Equinox. | en |
dc.references | Fischer, Olga, Van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem and Wim Van Der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612312 | en |
dc.references | Hanks, Patrick. 2000. Do word meanings exist? Computers and the Humanities 34, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002471322828 | en |
dc.references | Langacker, Ronald, W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites, vol. I. Stanford University Press. | en |
dc.references | Langacker, Ronald, W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Descriptive Application, vol. II. Stanford University Press. | en |
dc.references | Langacker, Ronald, W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 | en |
dc.references | Lee, David. 2001. Cognitive Linguistic: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 | en |
dc.references | Lindstromberg, Seth. 2010. English prepositions explained. Revised edition. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.157 | en |
dc.references | Łaziński, Marek. 2020. Wykłady o Aspekcie Polskiego Czasownika. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323542346 | en |
dc.references | Łozińska, Joanna. 2019. The Expression of Path in Three Satellite-framed Languages. A Cognitive Study of Polish, Russian, and English. Jezikoslovlje, 20.1, 31-61. https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2019.2 | en |
dc.references | Murray, James A. H., Bradley, Henry, Craigie, William A. and C. T. Onions (Eds.). 1989. The Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed.). Clarendon Press. | en |
dc.references | Przybylska, Renata. 2006. Schematy wyobrażeniowe a semantyka Polskich Prefiksów Czasownikowych do-, od-, prze-, roz-, u-. TAiWPN UNIVERSITAS. | en |
dc.references | Slobin, Dan, I. 1997. The Universal, the Typological, and the Particular in Acquisition. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Volume 5: Expanding the Contexts. Psychology Press. | en |
dc.references | Slobin, Dan, I. 2006. What Makes Manner of Motion Salient? Explorations in Linguistic Typology, Discourse, and Cognition. In M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, 59-82. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo | en |
dc.references | Slobin, Dan, I. 2017. Typology and language use. Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and applications. Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.17slo | en |
dc.references | Talmy, Leonard. [1985] 2007. Lexical typologies. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 66-168. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.002 | en |
dc.references | Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol.2. Typology and process in concept structuring. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001 | en |
dc.references | Tyler, Andrea and Vyvyan Evans. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 | en |
dc.references | Wierzbicka-Piotrowska, Elżbieta. 2020. Wpływ Prefiksacji na Walencję Polskich Czasowników. Prace Filologiczne, LXXV.1, 479-500. https://doi.org/10.32798/pf.669 | en |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | maria.brenda@usz.edu.pl | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1731-7533.21.2.01 | |
dc.relation.volume | 21 | |