Show simple item record

Skoncentrowana na ludziach transformacja miast w kierunku inteligentnego zrównoważonego rozwoju

dc.contributor.authorPodgórniak-Krzykacz, Aldona
dc.contributor.authorPrzywojska, Justyna
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T12:41:51Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T12:41:51Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/48858
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the technology-driven transition of cities towards sustainability. Its aim is to identify the essence of the city twin transformation and the people-oriented approach to designing sustainable, smart cities using selected urban projects as examples. The paper analyses projects implemented in Kłodzko, Żuromin and Zduńska Wola, financed from the funds of the competition addressed to local government units Human Smart Cities. Smart Cities Co-Created by Citizens. The projects clearly outline and integrate three transition paths: technological, environmental and social, which indicates the realisation of the twin transition principle. Furthermore, the process of planning smart city development and designing urban solutions was citizen-oriented, taking into account residents’ preferences and perceptions and proceeded with their participation. The methods of participation and co-production of smart city solutions used were tailored to the digital competences of the residents.en
dc.description.abstractArtykuł koncentruje uwagę na tranzycji miast do zrównoważonego rozwoju, napędzanej technologicznie. Jego celem jest wskazanie istoty bliźniaczej transformacji miast i podejścia do projektowania zrównoważonych miast inteligentnych skoncentrowanego na ludziach na przykładzie wybranych projektów. W artykule przeprowadzono analizę projektów zrealizowanych w Kłodzku, Żurominie i Zduńskiej Woli, sfinansowanych ze środków konkursu skierowanego do jednostek samorządu terytorialnego Human Smart Cities. Inteligentne Miasta współtworzone przez mieszkańców. W projektach wyraźnie zarysowują się i integrują trzy ścieżki tranzycji: technologiczna, ekologiczna oraz społeczna, co wskazuje na realizację postulatu bliźniaczej transformacji. Ponadto proces planowania rozwoju miasta inteligentnego i projektowania rozwiązań miejskich był zorientowany na mieszkańców, uwzględniał ich preferencje i percepcje oraz przebiegał z ich udziałem. Zastosowane metody partycypacji i koprodukcji inteligentnych miejskich rozwiązań zostały dopasowane do kompetencji cyfrowych mieszkańców.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWładza Sądzenia;25pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectzrównoważony rozwójpl
dc.subjectinteligentne miastopl
dc.subjectbliźniacza tranzycjapl
dc.subjectinteligentne współzarządzaniepl
dc.subjectplanowanie miast inteligentnych skoncentrowane na ludziachpl
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.subjectsmart cityen
dc.subjecttwin transitionen
dc.subjectsmart governanceen
dc.subjectpeople-oriented smart city planningen
dc.titleSkoncentrowana na ludziach transformacja miast w kierunku inteligentnego zrównoważonego rozwojupl
dc.title.alternativePeople-oriented transformation of cities towards smart sustainable developmenten
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number70-87
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPodgórniak-Krzykacz, Aldona - Uniwersytet Łódzkipl
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPrzywojska, Justyna - Uniwersytet Łódzkipl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-1690
dc.referencesAhvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2016.09.009pl
dc.referencesAlbino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092pl
dc.referencesAngelidou, M. (2015). Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities, 47, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004pl
dc.referencesBerntzen, L., & Johannessen, M. R. (2016). The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from Norway. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. A Comprehensive View of the 21st Century City (pp. 299–314). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_16pl
dc.referencesBibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2017.02.016pl
dc.referencesBouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C., & Fava, N. (2019). Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627pl
dc.referencesChadborn, N. H., Blair, K., Creswick, H., Hughes, N., Dowthwaite, L., Adenekan, O., & Vallejos, E. P. (2019). Citizens’ Juries: When Older Adults Deliberate on the Benefits and Risks of Smart Health and Smart Homes. Healthcare, 7(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/HEALTHCARE7020054pl
dc.referencesDameri, R. P., & Ricciardi, F. (2017). Leveraging smart city projects for benefitting citizens: The role of ICTs. In S. T. Rassia, P. M. Pardalos (Eds.), Smart City Networks. Through the Internet of Things (pp. 111–128). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61313-0_7pl
dc.referencesDe Waal, M., & Dignum, M. (2017). The citizen in the smart city. How the smart city could transform citizenship. IT – Information Technology, 59(6), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2017-0012pl
dc.referencesDietz, S., & Neumayer, E. (2007). Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics, 61(4), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007pl
dc.referencesFerrara, R. (2015). The Smart City and the Green Economy in Europe: A Critical Approach. Energies, 8(6), 4724–4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8064724pl
dc.referencesFrantzeskaki, N., Bach, M., Hölscher, K., & Avelino, F. (2018). Introducing Sustainability Transitions’ Thinking in Urban Contexts. In N. Frantzeskaki, K. Hölscher, M. Bach, & F. Avelino (Eds.), Co-creating sustainable urban futures (pp. 63–79). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_3pl
dc.referencesGrin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge.pl
dc.referencesHöjer, M., & Wangel, J. (2014). Smart sustainable cities: Definition and challenges. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 310, 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_20pl
dc.referencesHuang, K., Luo, W., Zhang, W., & Li, J. (2021). Characteristics and Problems of Smart City Development in China. Smart Cities, 4(4), 1403–1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/SMARTCITIES4040074pl
dc.referencesIsmagilova, E., Hughes, L., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Security, Privacy and Risks Within Smart Cities: Literature Review and Development of a Smart City Interaction Framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(2), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10796-020-10044-1pl
dc.referencesJackson, T. (2019). The Post-growth Challenge: Secular Stagnation, Inequality and the Limits to Growth. Ecological Economics, 156, 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.010pl
dc.referencesKhan, Z., Dambruch, J., Peters-Anders, J., Sackl, A., Strasser, A., Fröhlich, P., Templer, S., & Soomro, K. (2017). Developing Knowledge-Based Citizen Participation Platform to Support Smart City Decision Making: The Smarticipate Case Study. Information, 8(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/info8020047pl
dc.referencesKhmara, Y., & Kronenberg, J. (2023). Urban degrowth economics: making cities better places for living, working, and playing. Local Environment, 28(3), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2136638pl
dc.referencesKirkby, J., O’Keefe, P., & Timberlake, L. (1995). Sustainable Development: An Introduction. In J. Kirkby, Phil O’Keefe, & Lloyd Timberlake (Eds.), The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Development (pp. 8–22). London: Routledge.pl
dc.referencesKomninos, N. (2022). Transformation of Industry Ecosystems in Cities and Regions: A Generic Pathway for Smart and Green Transition. Sustainability, 14(15), 9694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159694pl
dc.referencesKopeć, K. (2022). Ekonomia obwarzanka i jej wpływ na potrzebę regeneracji miast. Przykład Amsterdamu. In J. Buzek, H. A. Kretek, M. Staniszewski (Eds.), Zrównoważony rozwój i europejski zielony ład wektorami doskonalenia warsztatu naukowca (pp. 73–81). Racibórz: Wydawnictwo Akademii Nauk Stosowanych w Raciborzu.pl
dc.referencesKumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2020). Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119281. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2018.04.024pl
dc.referencesKummitha, R. K. R., & Crutzen, N. (2017). How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities, 67, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010pl
dc.referencesLi, J., Sun, W., Song, H., Li, R., & Hao, J. (2021). Toward the construction of a circular economy eco-city: An emergy-based sustainability evaluation of Rizhao city in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2021.102956pl
dc.referencesLoorbach, D., van Bakel, J. C., Whiteman, G., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Business strategies for transitions towards sustainable systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.645pl
dc.referencesMarston, H. R., & van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who Doesn’t Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?” A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193525pl
dc.referencesMartin, C. J., Evans, J., & Karvonen, A. (2018). Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2018.01.005pl
dc.referencesMinisterstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej. (2022a). Kłodzko: Smart Kłodzko (SMAK). https://www.popt.gov.pl/strony/o-programie/projekty/projekty-human-smart-cities/projekty-hsc/hsc-wg-wojewodztw/dolnoslaskie/klodzko/ Retrieved: October 20, 2023).pl
dc.referencesMinisterstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej. (2022b). Zduńska Wola: 60+ smart city – innowacje jako efekt współpracy międzypokoleniowej. https://www.popt.gov.pl/strony/o-programie/projekty/projekty-human-smart-cities/projekty-hsc/hsc-wg-wojewodztw/lodzkie/zdunska-wola/ (Retrieved: October 20, 2023).pl
dc.referencesMinisterstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej. (2022c). Żuromin: Zwiększenie udziału mieszkańców Żuromina w procesie zarządzania, monitoringu środowiskowego oraz kreowania wizji rozwoju miasta poprzez pobudzenie geopartycypacji społecznej. https://www.popt.gov.pl/strony/o-programie/projekty/projekty-human-smart-cities/projekty-hsc/hsc-wg-wojewodztw/mazowieckie/zuromin/ (Retrieved: October 20, 2023).pl
dc.referencesMinisterstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej. (2023). Konkurs Human Smart Cities I jego wyniki. https://www.popt.gov.pl/strony/o-programie/projekty/projekty-human-smart-cities/konkurs-i-jego-wyniki/ (Retrieved: October 6, 2023).pl
dc.referencesPodgórniak-Krzykacz, A., Przywojska, J., & Wiktorowicz, J. (2020). Smart and Age-Friendly Communities in Poland. An Analysis of Institutional and Individual Conditions for a New Concept of Smart Development of Ageing Communities. Energies, 13(9), 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092268pl
dc.referencesPraharaj, S., Han, J. H., & Hawken, S. (2018). Urban innovation through policy integration: Critical perspectives from 100 smart cities mission in India. City, Culture and Society, 12, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCS.2017.06.004pl
dc.referencesPrzywojska, J., & Podgórniak-Krzykacz, A. (2020). A comprehensive approach: Inclusive, smart and green urban development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 15(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.1.16pl
dc.referencesRaworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Chelsea, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.pl
dc.referencesRotmans, J. (2011). Societal Innovation: Between Dream and Reality Lies Complexity. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.878564pl
dc.referencesSchneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014pl
dc.referencesSharif, R. Al, & Pokharel, S. (2022). Smart City Dimensions and Associated Risks: Review of literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103542pl
dc.referencesSoomro, K., Bhutta, M. N. M., Khan, Z., & Tahir, M. A. (2019). Smart city big data analytics: An advanced review. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9(5), e1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1319pl
dc.referencesTsolakis, N., & Anthopoulos, L. (2015). Eco-cities: An integrated system dynamics framework and a concise research taxonomy. Sustainable Cities and Society, 17, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2015.03.002pl
dc.referencesVan den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2011). Environment versus growth – A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth”. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.035pl
dc.referencesWang, B., Loo, B. P. Y., & Huang, G. (2022). Becoming Smarter through Smart City Pilot Projects: Experiences and Lessons from China since 2013. Journal of Urban Technology, 29(4), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2021.1962695pl
dc.referencesWarnecke, T. (2023). Operationalizing the Doughnut Economy: An Institutional Perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2202570pl
dc.referencesYigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Foth, M., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E., & Ioppolo, G. (2019). Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 45, 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailPodgórniak-Krzykacz, Aldona - aldona.podgorniak@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailPrzywojska, Justyna - justyna.przywojska@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2300-1690.25.05


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
70-87_Podgorniak-Krzykacz,_Prz ...
Size:
147.8Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0