Show simple item record

Wirtualna rzeczywistość jako narzędzie badacza społecznego

dc.contributor.authorWalas, Aleksander
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-24T09:54:21Z
dc.date.available2023-11-24T09:54:21Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/48446
dc.description.abstractThe article focuses on the growing role of Virtual Reality (VR) technology in the field of social sciences. Various aspects of the use of VR technology in experimental research are discussed, focusing on the control of research conditions, environmental realism, monitoring and recording of participants’ behavior. The study presents examples of research that used VR to analyze social behavior, such as social facilitation and inhibition, psychosis, or participants’ reactions to extreme situations, such as the Milgram experiment. The value of the high level of ecological validity of experimental research conducted in the virtual reality environment was emphasized. The paper draws attention to the potential of VR technology as a social researcher’s tool in various contexts, while highlighting the challenges related to the characteristics of VR technology and its limitations that should be taken into account when designing a study. The presented arguments emphasize the importance of continuing research on the use of VR in the social sciences.en
dc.description.abstractArtykuł skupia się na rosnącej roli, jaką pełni technologia wirtualnej rzeczywistości (Virtual Reality – VR) w dziedzinie nauk społecznych. Omówiono różnorodne aspekty wykorzystania technologii VR w badaniach eksperymentalnych, skupiając się na kontroli warunków badawczych, realizmie środowiska, monitorowaniu i rejestracji zachowań uczestników. Przedstawiono przykłady badań, które wykorzystały VR do analizy zachowań społecznych, jak facylitacja i hamowanie społeczne, psychoza, czy reakcji uczestników na sytuacje ekstremalne, takie jak eksperyment Milgrama. Podkreślony został walor wysokiego poziomu trafności ekologicznej badań eksperymentalnych wykonywanych w środowisku rzeczywistości wirtualnej. Praca zwraca uwagę na potencjał, jaki niesie technologia VR jako narzędzie badacza społecznego w różnych kontekstach, jednocześnie podkreślając wyzwania związane z charakterystyką technologii VR oraz jej ograniczeniami, które należy brać pod uwagą przy projektowaniu badania. Przedstawione argumenty podkreślają znaczenie kontynuowania badań nad wykorzystaniem VR w naukach społecznych.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWładza Sądzenia;24pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectrzeczywistość wirtualnapl
dc.subjectVRpl
dc.subjectimmersyjna rzeczywistość wirtualnapl
dc.subjectbadania społecznepl
dc.subjectucieleśniony agentpl
dc.subjectvirtual realityen
dc.subjectVRen
dc.subjectimmersive virtual realityen
dc.subjectsocial researchen
dc.subjectembodied agenten
dc.titleWirtualna rzeczywistość jako narzędzie badacza społecznegopl
dc.title.alternativeVirtual reality as a tool for social researchersen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number145-160
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSzkoła Doktorska Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-1690
dc.referencesAnderson-Hanley, C., Arciero, P. J. (2011). Seniors cybercycling for cognitive health. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, S21–S22.pl
dc.referencesBailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. W: W. S. Bainbridge (red.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (ss. 64–68). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group.pl
dc.referencesBaños, R. M, Botella, C., Perpiñá, C. (1999). Virtual reality and psychopathology. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.283pl
dc.referencesBiocca, F. (1992a). Communication within virtual reality. Creating a space for research. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00810.xpl
dc.referencesBiocca, F. (1992b). Virtual reality technology. A tutorial. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 23–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00811.xpl
dc.referencesBiocca, F., Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. W: F. Biocca, M. R. Levy (red.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (ss. 57–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.pl
dc.referencesBiocca, F., Kim, T., Levy, M. R. (1995). The vision of virtual reality. W: F. Biocca, M. R. Levy (red.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (ss. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.pl
dc.referencesBotella, C., Baños, R. M., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S. (2017). Virtual reality and other realities. W: S. G. Hofmann, G. J. G. Asmundson (red.), The science of cognitive behavioral therapy (ss. 551–590). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.pl
dc.referencesCipresso, P., Giglioli, I. A. C., Raya, M. A., Riva, G. (2018). The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: A network and cluster analysis of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086pl
dc.referencesDe Borst, A. W., de Gelder, B. (2015). Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: An affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(576). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00576pl
dc.referencesDonath, J. (2007). Virtually trustworthy. Science, 317, 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142770pl
dc.referencesDoolani, S., Wessels, C., Kanal, V., Sevastopoulos, C., Jaiswal, A., Nambiappan, H. R., Makedon, F. (2020). A Review of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies for Manufacturing Training. Technologies, 8(4), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies8040077pl
dc.referencesDunsmoor, J. E., Ahs, F., Zielinski, D. J., LaBar, K. S. (2014). Extinction in multiple virtual reality contexts diminishes fear reinstatement in humans. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 113, 157–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.02.010pl
dc.referencesForbes, P. A. G., Pan, X., Hamilton, A. F. de. C. (2016). Reduced mimicry to virtual reality avatars in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 3788–3797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2930-2pl
dc.referencesFox, J., Arena, D., Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95pl
dc.referencesFreeman, D., Pugh, K., Vorontsova, N. (2010). Testing the Continuum of Delusional Beliefs: An Experimental Study Using Virtual Reality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017514pl
dc.referencesGibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group.pl
dc.referencesHale, J., Hamilton, A. F. de. C. (2016). Testing the relationship between mimicry, trust and rapport in virtual reality conversations. Scientific Reports, 6, 35295. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35295pl
dc.referencesHuguet, P., Galvaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., Dumas, F. (1999). Social Presence Effects in the Stroop Task: Further Evidence for an Attentional View of Social Facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1011–1025. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1011pl
dc.referencesLanier, J., Biocca, F. (1992). An insider’s view of the future of virtual reality. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00816.xpl
dc.referencesLewczuk, J. (2007). Rozpoznawanie mimicznej ekspresji emocji. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 3, 5–32.pl
dc.referencesLoomis, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 113–119.pl
dc.referencesMacDorman, K. (2006). Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. ICCS/CogSci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward social mechanisms of android science. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241217609_Subjective_Ratings_of_Robot_Video_Clips_for_Human_Likeness_Familiarity_and_Eeriness_An_Exploration_of_the_Uncanny_Valleypl
dc.referencesMareschal, I., Calder, A. J., Clifford, C. W. G. (2013). Humans have an expectation that gaze is directed toward them. Current Biology, 23(8), 717–721. Pobrane z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918857/pl
dc.referencesMilgram, P., Kishino, F. (1994) A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D(12), 1321–1329. DOI: 10.1.1.102.4646pl
dc.referencesMiller, M. R., Jun, H., Herrera, F., Villa, J. Y., Welch, G., Bailenson, J. N. (2019. Social interaction in augmented reality. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216290. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216290pl
dc.referencesMori, M., MacDorman, K., Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811pl
dc.referencesNieradka, P. (2021) Wzbogacona rzeczywistość a nierówności społeczne. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 66(2), 80–93.pl
dc.referencesOh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., Welch, G. F. (2018). A Systematic Review of Social Presence: Definition, Antecedents, and Implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(114). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114pl
dc.referencesOkita, S. Y., Bailenson, J. N., Schwartz, D. L. (2008). The mere belief in social interaction improves learning. W: S. Barab, K. Hay, D. Hickey (red.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.pl
dc.referencesOkruszek, Ł., Rutkowska, A. (2013). Badanie kontroli wykonawczej za pomocą testu interferencji Stroopa u chorych na schizofrenię i osób z uszkodzeniami płatów czołowych. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 18(2), 215–255.pl
dc.referencesPan, X., Gillies, M., Barker, C., Clark, D. M., Slater, M. (2012). Socially anxious and confident men interact with a forward virtual woman: An experimental study. PLoS One, 7(4), e32931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032931pl
dc.referencesPan, X., Hamilton, A. F. d. C. (2018). Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 395–417 . https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12315pl
dc.referencesPiwek, L., McKay, L. S., Pollick, F. E. (2014). Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion. Cognition, 130(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cognition.2013.11.001pl
dc.referencesReeves, B., Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.referencesSaygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., Frith, C. D. (2012). The thing that should not be: Predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr025pl
dc.referencesShiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Pauli P, Mühlberger, A. (2015). Effect of combined multiple contexts and multiple stimuli exposure in spider phobia: A randomized clinical trial in virtual reality. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 71, 45–53. DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.014pl
dc.referencesSlater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., et al. (2006). A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments. PLoS One, 1(1), e39. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000039pl
dc.referencesStephenson, N. (2009). Zamieć, tłum. J. Polak, Warszawa: ISApl
dc.referencesSztejnberg, A., Jasiński, T. (2007). Proksemika w komunikacji społecznej. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Novum.pl
dc.referencesTodorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faceson social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001pl
dc.referencestom Dieck, D., tom Dieck, M. C., Jung, T., Moorhouse, N. (2018) Tourists’ virtual reality adoption: an exploratory study from Lake District National Park. Leisure Studies, 37(4), 371–383. DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2018.1466905pl
dc.referencesVakil, E., Manovich, R., Ramati, E., Blachstein, H. (1996). The Stroop Color-Word task as a measure of selective attention: Efficiency in the elderly. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649609540655pl
dc.referencesWalas, A. (2023). Immersive virtual reality as a social research environment. The impact of the presence of an embodied agent on the Stroop task performance. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, 86.pl
dc.referencesWilk, A. K. (2018). Virtual reality – support or security threat? Journal of Modern Science, 39(4), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/85645pl
dc.referencesWojciszke, B. (2002). Człowiek wśród ludzi. Zarys psychologii społecznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.pl
dc.referencesZając, J., Wojciszke, B. (2016). W poszukiwaniu substytutu fizycznej obecności człowieka: wpływ wirtualnego asystenta na skuteczność wykonania zadań. Psychologia Społeczna, 4(39), 440–457.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailaleksander.walas@edu.uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2300-1690.24.08


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
145-160_Walas.pdf
Size:
166.4Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0