O co chodzi w paradoksie Protagorasa?

dc.contributor.author	Łukowski, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned	2014-06-04T21:04:48Z
dc.date.available	2014-06-04T21:04:48Z
dc.date.issued	2005
dc.identifier.issn	0208-6107
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4838
dc.description.abstract	The ancient paradox of Protagoras had the opinion of an unsolved problem. The two solutions proposed in the 20th century by W. Lenzen and L. Aqvist are considered to be the best. In fact none of them may be treated as proper. In the paper we show that both of authors avoid contradiction solely by means of mere neglect. However quite a simple solution seems to be feasible when the paradox is approached as an amphibolic construction, thus an ambiguity.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica;17/2005
dc.rights	Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/	*
dc.title	O co chodzi w paradoksie Protagorasa?	pl_PL
dc.title.alternative	What Is a Problem of the Paradox of Protagoras?	pl_PL
dc.type	Article	pl_PL
dc.page.number	17-38	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Łódzki	pl_PL

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska