Cicero und Andokides

Pierzak, Damian

dc.contributor.author	Pierzak, Damian
dc.date.accessioned	2023-10-27T18:20:05Z
dc.date.available	2023-10-27T18:20:05Z
dc.date.issued	2023-10-05
dc.identifier.issn	1733-0319
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/48215
dc.description.abstract	Due to the fact that Andocides is nowhere mentioned in Cicero’s oeuvre it is universally assumed that Cicero could not have read, let alone been inspired by, the works of Andocides. By comparing several passages from both orators, this paper argues that this is not necessarily the case. In terms of both language and content, these texts bear so close a resemblance to one another, that a direct inﬂuence does not seem beyond question. If Cicero had indeed, whether deliberately or otherwise, borrowed some ideas and/or phrases from Andocides, the absence of the latter’s name in Cicero’s extant writings can be explained in two diﬀerent ways: (1) either certain expressions that occur in Andocides’ speeches could have been known to Cicero from indirect tradition, (2) or Cicero was simply reluctant to admit to his acquaintance with the least esteemed of the ten Attic orators.	en
dc.language.iso	de
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Collectanea Philologica;26	pl
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subject	Cicero	de
dc.subject	Andokides	de
dc.subject	Rhetorik	de
dc.subject	Imitation	de
dc.subject	Intertextualität	de
dc.subject	Cicero	en
dc.subject	Andocides	en
dc.subject	ancient oratory	en
dc.subject	imitation	en
dc.subject	intertextuality	en
dc.subject	Cyceron	pl
dc.subject	Andokides	pl
dc.subject	retoryka starożytna	pl
dc.subject	naśladownictwo	pl
dc.subject	intertekstualność	pl
dc.title	Cicero und Andokides	de
dc.title.alternative	Cicero and Andocides	en
dc.type	Article
dc.page.number	105-117
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Badacz niezależny	de
dc.identifier.eissn	2353-0901
dc.references	Aeschines. (1997). Orationes. Ed. M.R. Dilts. Stutgardiae, Lipsiae: B.G. Teubner.	de
dc.references	Antipho et Andocides. (2018). Orationes. Rec. M.R. Dilts, D.J. Murphy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	de
dc.references	Cicero M.T. (1905–1911). Orationes. Rec. A.C. Clark, W. Peterson. 6 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.	de
dc.references	Demetrius. (1901). Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de elocutione libellus. Ed. L. Radermacher. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.	de
dc.references	Demosthenes. (2002). Orationes. Rec. M.R. Dilts. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	de
dc.references	Dio Cassius. (1914). Roman History. Vol. III. English Translation by E. Cary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann LTD.	de
dc.references	Achard, G. (1981). Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours “optimates” de Cicéron. Leiden: E.J. Brill.	de
dc.references	Barber, K.A. (2004). Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Balbo. An Interpretation. New York, London: Rout-ledge.	de
dc.references	Benner, H. (1987). Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher. Untersuchungen zur Denaturierung des Clientelwesens in der ausgehenden römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.	de
dc.references	Blom, H. van der (2007). “Graecophile or Graecophobe? Cicero’s Choice between Greek and Roman Exempla”. CO 84.4. 157–162.	de
dc.references	Blom, H. van der (2010). Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	de
dc.references	Boll, T. (2019). Ciceros Rede cum senatui gratias egit. Ein Kommentar. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.	de
dc.references	Bücher, F. (2006). Verargumentierte Geschichte. Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.	de
dc.references	Classen, C.J. (1985). Recht – Rhetorik – Politik. Untersuchungen zu Ciceros rhetorischer Strategie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.	de
dc.references	Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling Laughter. Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.	de
dc.references	Craig, C.P. (1993). Form as Argument in Cicero’s Speeches. A Study of Dilemma, Atlanta: Scholars Press.	de
dc.references	Douglas, A.E. (1956). “Cicero, Quintilian, and the Canon of Ten Attic Orators”. Mnemosyne 9.1. 30–40.	de
dc.references	Douglas, A.E. (1966). M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	de
dc.references	Douglas, A.E. (1973). “The Intellectual Background of Cicero’s Rhetorica: A Study in Method”. ANRW I 3. 95–138.	de
dc.references	Dufallo, B. (2001). “Appius’ Indignation: Gossip, Tradition, and Performance in Republican Rome”. TAPhA 131. 119–142.	de
dc.references	Dufallo, B. (2007). The Ghosts of the Past. Latin Literature, the Dead, and Rome’s Transition to a Principate. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.	de
dc.references	Edwards, M. (2013). Hypokritēs in action: delivery in Greek rhetoric. In: C. Kremmydas, J. Powell, L. Rubinstein (eds.). Profession and Performance: Aspects of Oratory in the Greco-Roman World. London: School of Advanced Study. 15–25.	de
dc.references	Edwards, M. (2016). Greek Political Oratory and the Canon of Ten Attic Orators. In: P. Derron (ed.). La rhétorique du pouvoir. Une exploration de l’art oratoire délibératif grec. Vandœuvres: Fondation Hardt. 15–34.	de
dc.references	Fleck, M. (1993). Cicero als Historiker. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.	de
dc.references	Gaertner, J.F. (2007). The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity. In: J.F. Gaertner (ed.). Writing Exile: The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden, Boston: E. J. Brill. 1–20.	de
dc.references	Gelzer, M. (1969). Cicero. Ein biographischer Versuch. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.	de
dc.references	Habinek, T. (2005). The World of Roman Song. From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.	de
dc.references	Heftner, H. (1995). Plutarch und der Aufstieg des Pompeius. Ein historischer Kommentar zu Plutarchs Pompeiusvita, Teil I: Kap. 1–45. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.	de
dc.references	Heldmann, K. (1982). Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst. München: C. H. Beck.	de
dc.references	Jost, K. (1936). Das Beispiel und Vorbild der Vorfahren bei den attischen Rednern und Geschichtsschreibern bis Demosthenes. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.	de
dc.references	Kaster, R.A. (2005). Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	de
dc.references	Kennedy, G.A. (1963). The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.	de
dc.references	Kenty, J. (2020). Cicero’s Political Personae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	de
dc.references	Kurczyk, S. (2006). Cicero und die Inszenierung der eigenen Vergangenheit. Autobiographisches Schreiben in der späten Römischen Republik. Köln: Böhlau.	de
dc.references	Laughton, E. (1961). “Cicero and the Greek Orators”. AJPh 82.1. 27–49.	de
dc.references	MacDowell, D. (1962). Andokides. On the Mysteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.	de
dc.references	MacKendrick, P. (1995). The Speeches of Cicero. London: Duckworth.	de
dc.references	Maresch, K., Packman, Z.M. (1990). Papyri from the Washington University Collection St. Louis, Missouri. Part II (P. Wash. Univ. II). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.	de
dc.references	May, J.M. (1988). Trials of Character. The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press.	de
dc.references	Mitchell, T.N. (1986). Cicero: Verrines II.1. Warminster: Aris & Phillips LTD.	de
dc.references	Neumeister, C. (1964). Grundsätze der forensischen Rhetorik, gezeigt an Gerichtsreden Ciceros. München: Max Hueber.	de
dc.references	Opelt, I. (1979). “Zur politischen Polemik des Redners Andokides”. Glotta 57.3/4. 210–218.	de
dc.references	Orsini, P. (2005). Manoscritti in maiuscola biblica. Materiali per un aggiornamento. Cassino: Edizioni dell’Università degli Studi di Cassino.	de
dc.references	Pierzak, D. (2019). Ab inferis ad rostra. Przywoływanie zmarłych w retoryce rzymskiej okresu republikańskiego. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.	de
dc.references	Pierzak, D. (2021). Exempla externa in Cicero’s Orations. A Rhetorical Approach. Berlin: Peter Lang.	de
dc.references	Ptaszek, I. (2002). Andokides. Mowy. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.	de
dc.references	Ricchieri, T. (2016). “Un «canone» di oratori romani? Cicerone, il ﬁnale del Brutus e i dieci oratori attici”. Maia 68.3. 665–688.	de
dc.references	Schwyzer, E. (1950). Griechische Grammatik. 2 Bd. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik hrsg. von A. Debrunner. München: C.H. Beck.	de
dc.references	Stroh, W. (1975). Taxis und Taktik. Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.	de
dc.references	Stroh, W. (1982). Die Nachahmung des Demosthenes in Ciceros Philippiken. In: W. Ludwig (ed.). Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron. Vandoeuvres, Genève: Fondation Hardt. 1–31.	de
dc.references	Süss, W. (1910). Ethos. Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik. Leipzig, Berlin: B.G. Teubner (repr. Aalen: Scientia 1975).	de
dc.references	Tatum, W.J. (1999). The Patrician Tribune. Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press.	de
dc.references	Tempest, K.L. (2007). “Cicero and the art of dispositio: the structure of the Verrines”. LICS 6.02. 1–25.	de
dc.references	Tempest, K.L. (2013). “Staging a prosecution: aspects of performance in Cicero’s Verrines”. In: C. Kremmydas, J. Powell, L. Rubinstein (eds.). Profession and Performance: Aspects of Oratory in the Greco-Roman World. London: School of Advanced Study. 41–71.	de
dc.references	Tempest, K.L. (2019). “Meidias and the Mute Witness: Cicero’s Debt to Demosthenes in the Verrines Reconsidered”. GRBS 59. 215–241.	de
dc.references	Usher, S. (1999). Greek Oratory. Tradition and Originality. Oxford: Oxford University Press (repr. 2007).	de
dc.references	Weische, A. (1972). Ciceros Nachahmung der attischen Redner. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.	de
dc.references	Westwood, G. (2017). The Orator and the Ghosts: Performing the Past in Fourth-Century Athens. In: S. Papaioannou, A. Seraﬁm, B. da Vela (eds.). The Theatre of Justice. Aspects of Performance in Greco-Roman Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden, Boston: E.J. Brill. 57–74.	de
dc.references	Wooten, C.W. (1983). Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model. The Rhetoric of Crisis. Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press.	de
dc.references	Worthington, I. (1994). The Canon of the Ten Attic Orators. In: I. Worthington (ed.). Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action. London, New York: Routledge. 244–263.	de
dc.references	Zimmermann, B. (2002). “Exil und Autobiographie”. A&A 48. 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241600.187	de
dc.contributor.authorEmail	d.a.pierzak@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/1733-0319.26.09

Pliki tej pozycji

Nazwa:: 105-117_Pierzak.pdf
Rozmiar:: 532.2KB
Format:: PDF

Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Collectanea Philologica T. 26 (2023) [21]

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0