Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBailhache, Patrice
dc.description.abstractThe author tries to give an answer to the question posed in the title of the paper by referring to those analyses and arguments which have been found important by the history of science (laws of Stevin, d'Alembert, Lagrange, arguments of Lazure Carnot, Prony, Ampère, Laplace…). In his opinion the only possible philosophy of mechanics must have the empirical nature. The problem was perceived already by Archimedes, though it was later obscured by numerous metaphysics. Yet, it is only solution of Lagrange which can be said to be approaching the ideal. However, the philosophical part of the arguments still remains unsettled.pl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica;11/1995
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.titleNa jakich podstawach opiera się mechanika klasyczna: odpowiedź historyka naukipl_PL
dc.title.alternativeWhat Are the Grounds of Classical Mechanics? — the Reply of the History of Sciencepl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet w Nantespl_PL

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska