Pokaż uproszczony rekord

A Comparative Analysis of the Semantic Field of ‘deception’: A Case Study Of Russian And American Imageboard Messages

dc.contributor.authorLykova, Olga
dc.contributor.authorGordeev, Denis
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T17:36:27Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T17:36:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-30
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/41085
dc.description.abstractThis article uses the material of anonymous Internet forums to analyse the semantic field of deception by the instrumentality of artificial neural networks. Two major imageboards were investigated: 2ch.hk and 4chan.org, being the most popular Russian and American imageboards. For the experiment an algorithm called Word2vec was used to examine 30 million word usages for either of the languages. This analysis revealed 10 words with the greatest semantic proximity to terms from semantic fields of «deception» for Russian and American English. The results showed the tendency among native Russian imageboard users to link the concept of deception with religion and spiritual sphere, while American forum users associate deception with politics and related concepts.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectartificial neural networksen
dc.subjectdeceptionen
dc.subjectsemantic fielden
dc.subjectanonymityen
dc.subjectword2vecen
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of the Semantic Field of ‘deception’: A Case Study Of Russian And American Imageboard Messagesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number95-106
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationLykova, Olga - National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russiaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGordeev, Denis - RANEPA, Moscow, Russiaen
dc.referencesAkulich, M.M. 2012. Internet-trolling: ponjatie, soderzhanieiformy. Vestnik Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social'no-jekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovanija, pp. 47-52, (8).en
dc.referencesBocharova, M.A. 2012. Semanticheskoe pole kak sposob sistemnogo opisanija leksiki. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Voprosy obrazovanija: jazyki i special'nost', pp. 63-66, (4).en
dc.referencesEkman, P. 2012.Psihologija lzhi. SPb.: Piter, 302 p.en
dc.referencesEkman, P. 2009. Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage (Revised Edition). WW Norton & Company, 368 p.en
dc.referencesFirth, J.R. 1957. "A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955". Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Philological Society: 1–32.en
dc.referencesHarris, Z. S. 1954. Distributional structure. Word, 10(2-3):146–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520en
dc.referencesJurgens DA, Turney PD, Mohammad SM, Holyoak KJ, 2012. Semeval-2012 task 2: Measuring degrees of relational similarity. In Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 356-364.en
dc.referencesKutuzov A., Kuzmenko E. 2017.WebVectors: A Toolkit for Building Web Interfaces for Vector Semantic Models. In: Ignatov D. et al. (eds) Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts. AIST 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 661. Springer, Cham, pp. 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52920-2_15en
dc.referencesLurija, A.R. 1927. Rech' i intellekt v razvitii rebenka. M., 259p.en
dc.referencesMikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J. 2013.Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.en
dc.referencesMikolov, Tomas, et al. 2013."Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality." Advances in neural information processing systems.en
dc.referencesOzhegov, S.I., Shvedova N. 1992. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo jazyka. Az, 944p.en
dc.referencesPotapova, R.K., Potapov, V.V. 2006.Jazyk, rech', lichnost'. M.: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury, 329p.en
dc.referencesPotapova R., Lykova O. 2016. Verbal Representation of Lies in Russian and Anglo-American Cultures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 236, pp. 114-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.12.045en
dc.referencesRehurek R., Sojka P. 2011. Gensim–python framework for vector space modelling //NLP Centre, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. –– Т. 3. – №. 2.en
dc.referencesSolovev, B.S. 1996.Opravdanie dobra. M., Respublika, 479p.en
dc.referencesSmith, D. L. 2004.Why We Lie: The Evolutionary Roots of Deception and the Unconscious Mind, New York: St. Martin's Press, 256 p.en
dc.referencesVrij, A. 2000.Detecting Lies and Deceit, Chichester: Wiley, 276 p.en
dc.referencesZnakov, V.V. 1999. Makiavellizm i fenomen vran'ja. / Voprosy psihologii. SPb.: Aletejja, №6, pp. 59-69.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailLykova, Olga - OVLykova@mephi.ru
dc.contributor.authorEmailGordeev, Denis - ril@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.19.1.06
dc.relation.volume19


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
95-106_Lykova,_Gordeev.pdf
Rozmiar:
320.5KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0