Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNapiwodzka, Karolina
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the paper is to reconsider Habermas’ discourse approach in terms of its usefulness in the realm of public healthcare where, on a microscale, intersubjective communicative situations arise between defined participants, i.e., patients and healthcare providers, patients’ family members, and further eligible contributors to patient-related decision making. A need for more “communicative interaction,” and explicative and practical discourse, is illustrated by two empirical examples of medical decision making which reveal both communicative and discursive deficits (Section I). To empower and enable the patient as a rational and autonomous speaker and discourse participant, a Habermasian emancipatory argument and ‘the power of the better argument’ is recalled (Section III). The possibility of equal communicative and discursive rights in the light of real inequalities is discussed in the context of a ‘competence gap’ between participants (Section IV). Further sections focus on the importance of informed consent on the side of the patient and the communicative competences as an important factor of healthcare system.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica;38pl
dc.subjectpublic healthcareen
dc.subjectcommunicative actionen
dc.subjectJürgen Habermasen
dc.subjectshared decision makingen
dc.subjectrelations between patients and healthcare providersen
dc.titleCommunicative action and practical discourse to empower patients in healthcare-related decision makingen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Faculty of Social Sciencesen
dc.referencesAlexy, R. (1978). Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.en
dc.referencesCarel, H. (2011). Phenomenology and Its Application in Medicine. Theoretical Medical Bioethics, 32 (1), pp. 33–46.en
dc.referencesCelikates, R. (2018). Critique as Social Practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Int.en
dc.referencesElwyn G., Frosch D. L., and Kobrin S. (2016). Implementing Shared Decision-Making: Consider all the Consequences. Implementation Science, 11, pp. 1–12.en
dc.referencesEmanuel, J. E. and Emanuel, L. L. (2004). Vier Modelle der Arzt-Patient Beziehung. In Wiesing U. (ed.), Ethik in der Medizin. Stuttgart: Reclam.en
dc.referencesEngelhardt, H. T., Jr. (1986). The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesFiester, A. (2015). Neglected Ends: Clinical Ethics Consultation and the Prospects for Closure. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15 (1), pp. 29–36.en
dc.referencesGillespie, A. et al. (2013). Beyond Ideal Speech Situations: Adapting to Communication Asymmetries in Health Care. Journal of Health Psychology 19 (1), pp. 72–78.en
dc.referencesGranero-Molina, J. et al. (2015). Habermasian Knowledge Interests: Epistemological Implications for Health Sciences. Nursing philosophy. An International Journal for Healthcare Professionals, 16 (2), pp. 77–86.en
dc.referencesGreenhalgh, T., Robb N., and Scambler G. (2006). Communicative and Strategic Action in Interpreted Consultations in Primary Health Care: A Habermasian Perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 63, pp. 1170–1187.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1970). Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence. Inquiry, 13, pp. 360–375.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1971). Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz. In Habermas J. and Luhmann N., Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 101–114.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1979). Moral Development and Ego Identity. In Habermas J., Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated by T, McCarthy. Toronto: Beacon Press, 1979, pp. 69–94.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (197b). What is Universal Pragmatics. In Habermas J., Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated by T. McCarthy. Toronto: Beacon Press, pp. 1–68.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1983). Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1984). Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1987). Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1998). The Inclusion of the Other. Edited and translated by C. Cronin and P. de Greiff. Boston, MA: MIT Press.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Ch. Lenhardt. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (2003). Truth and Justification. Translated by B. Fultner. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.en
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (2009). Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. Translated by C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesHvidt, E A. et al. (2021). A Colonized General Practice? A Critical Habermasian Analysis of How General Practitioners Experience Defensive Medicine in Their Everyday Working. Health, 25 (2), pp. 141–158.en
dc.referencesJones, I. R. (2001). Health Care Decision Making and the Politics of Health. In Scambler G. (ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health. London: Routledge, pp. 68–85.en
dc.referencesKlieme, E. et al. (2007). Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards. Eine Expertise. Available at [Accessed: 29 July 2021].en
dc.referencesKodeks Etyki Lekarskiej (2003). Available at [Accessed: 29 July 2021].en
dc.referencesLangford A. T, et al. (2019). Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension – Health Equity Implications. Ethnicity & Disease, 29 (Suppl 1), pp. 97–102.en
dc.referencesLeanza, Y., Boive, I., and Rosenberg, E. (2013). The Patient’s Lifeworld: Building Meaningful Clinical Encounters between Patients, Physicians and Interpreters. Comm Med., 10 (1), pp. 13–25.en
dc.referencesLee P. R. and Emmott C. (1978). Health-care System. In Reich W. T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Vol. 2. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers, pp. 610–619.en
dc.referencesNapiwodzka K. (2021). The Shared Decision-Making Model and Practical Discourse to Foster the Appreciation of Patients’ Value Preferences in Polish Healthcare. In Schildmann, J., Buch, Ch, & Zerth, J. (eds.), Defining the Value of Medical Interventions. Normative and Empirical Challenges. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, pp. 135–157.en
dc.referencesNewton-Howes G., Pickering N., and Young G. (2019). Authentic Decision-making Capacity in Hard Medical Cases. Clinical Ethics, 14 (4), pp. 173–177.en
dc.referencesProgram akredytacji podstawowej opieki zdrowotnej. Zestaw standardów akredytacyjnych (2011). Available at [Accessed: 29 July 2021].en
dc.referencesRodrian-Pfennig, M. (2014). Karriere und Kontext des Kompetenzbegriffs. Ein skeptischer Rekurs aus der Sicht der Hochschullehre. In Rodrian-Pfennig, M. et al. (eds.), Reflexive Lehrforschung an der Hochschule. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Budrich UniPress.en
dc.referencesRothman, D. J. (1991). Strangers at the Bedside: History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York: Basic Books.en
dc.referencesScambler, G. (ed.) (2001). Habermas, Critical Theory and Health. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesStefaniak, K. (2011). Władza i tożsamość w komunikacji lekarz-pacjent. Wrocław: ATUT.en
dc.referencesSvenaeus, F. (2003). Hermeneutics of Medicine in the Wake of Gadamer: The Issue of Phronesis. Theoretical Medicine and Bioetehics, 24 (5), pp. 407–431.en
dc.referencesSwales, J. M. (2016). Reflection on the Concept of Discourse Community. ASp le Revue du GERAS^, 69, pp. 1–12.en
dc.referencesSzahaj, A. (ed.) (1990). Krytyka, emancypacja, dialog. Jürgen Habermas w poszukiwaniu nowego paradygmatu teorii krytycznej. Warszawa: Universitas.en
dc.referencesWalker, P. and Lovat T. (2016). Dialogic Consensus in Clinical Decision Making. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 13 (40), pp. 571–580.en
dc.referencesWalseth, L. T., Abildsnes, E., and Schei, E. (2011). Lifestyle, Health and the Ethics of Good Living. Health Behaviour Counselling in General Practice. Patient Education and Counseling 83, pp. 180–184.en

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as