Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKorporowicz, Łukasz
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-18T10:15:34Z
dc.date.available2021-10-18T10:15:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationKorporowicz Ł.J., Prawo rzymskie w orzecznictwie Izby Lordów w latach 1876–2009, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, DOI: 10.18778/8088-237-9pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8088-237-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/39397
dc.descriptionObok prawa angielskiego, na Wyspach Brytyjskich powstał inny system prawny – Scots law, którego rozwój aż do XVIII w. pod wieloma względami był niezależny od rozwoju prawa angielskiego. Na prawo szkockie (od XV w.) bardzo silnie oddziaływała kontynentalna tradycja prawa, przede wszystkim tradycja prawa rzymsko-holenderskiego. Dzięki prawnikom prawo szkockie poddane zostało procesowi romanizacji. Szkockich prawników wykorzystujących wzorzec justyniańskich Instytucji zaczęto nazywać instytucjonalistami. Samodzielny byt prawa szkockiego został częściowo zaburzony po zawarciu między Anglią i Szkocją unii realnej. Obecność prawa rzymskiego w Wielkiej Brytanii i jego wpływ na tamtejsze systemy prawne od dawna budzi zainteresowanie naukowców. Zważywszy na fakt, że rozwój prawa angielskiego w znacznym stopniu uzależniony jest od doktryny precedensu, wszelkie próby badania zjawiska recepcji bądź wpływu obcych rozwiązań prawnych dokonywane muszą być przez pryzmat orzecznictwa angielskich sądów. Zgodnie z tym założeniem w oddawanej do rąk czytelników książce określono zakres wykorzystania prawa rzymskiego w orzecznictwie Izby Lordów w latach 1876–2009. Analiza orzeczeń ma za zadanie pomóc w udzieleniu odpowiedzi na następujące pytania: kto przywoływał ius Romanum najczęściej, jakie źródła prawa zostały w tym celu wykorzystane oraz prace których autorów były najchętniej cytowane, i wreszcie, czy dokonanie stosownych odwołań wpływało na ostateczny kształt ferowanych w sprawach wyroków?pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipUdostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectprawo rzymskiepl_PL
dc.subjectIzba Lordówpl_PL
dc.subjectScots lawpl_PL
dc.subjectprawo szkockiepl_PL
dc.subjectprawo angielskiepl_PL
dc.subjectdoktryna precedensupl_PL
dc.titlePrawo rzymskie w orzecznictwie Izby Lordów w latach 1876–2009pl_PL
dc.typeBookpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Łukasz Jan Korporowicz, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016pl_PL
dc.page.number336pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Prawa i Administracji Katedra Prawa Rzymskiego, 90-232 Łódź, ul. Kopcińskiego 8/12pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8088-238-6
dc.referencesAmes J.B., Lectures on Legal History and Miscellaneus Legal Essays, Cambridge, Mass. 1913, s. 149–166pl_PL
dc.referencesAmielańczyk K., Rzymskie prawo karne w reskryptach cesarza Hadriana, Lublin 2006pl_PL
dc.referencesAnderson O., The Wensleydale peerage case and the position of the house of lords in the mid-nineteenth century, EHR 82 (1967), s. 486–502pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker G.F.R., Lushington, Stephan, [w:] DNB, vol. 12, s. 291–293pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker J.H., The Law Merchant and the Common Law Before 1700, CLJ 38 (1979), s. 295–322pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker J.H., English Law and the Renaissance, CLJ 44 (1985), s. 46–61pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker J.H., The History of Quasi-Contract in English Law, [w:] W.R. Cornish, R. Nolan, J. O’Sullivan, G. Virgo (eds.), Restitution. Past, Present and Future. Essays in Honour of Gareth Jones, Oxford 1998, s. 37–56pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker J.H., An Introduction to English Legal History, ed. 4, Oxford 2002pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker J.H., Roman Law at the Third University of England, Current Legal Problems 55 (2002), s. 123–150pl_PL
dc.referencesBaran K., Impeachment a początki odpowiedzialności politycznej ministrów w Anglii, Zeszyty Naukowe UJ. Prace Prawnicze 51 (1971), s. 7–30pl_PL
dc.referencesBaran K., King versus Parliament. Rediscussion of constitutional cases illustrative of the Stuart reign till 1642, Zeszyty Naukowe UJ. Prace Prawnicze 86 (1980), s. 7–32pl_PL
dc.referencesBaran K., Z dziejów prawa karnego Anglii. Między renesansem a oświeceniem XVI–XVIII w., Kraków 1996pl_PL
dc.referencesBaran K., Małek M., Szczurek K., Z dziejów angielskich defences: obrona konieczna i stan wyższej konieczności, [w:] A. Lityński, M. Mikołajczyk (red.), Przez tysiąclecia: państwo – prawo – jednostka, Katowice 2001, s. 53–59pl_PL
dc.referencesBaran K., Past performance jako reminiscencja aequitas w prawie angielskim, [w:] W. Uruszczak, P. Święcicka, A. Kremer (red.), Leges sapere. Studia i prace dedykowane Profesorowi Januszowi Sondlowi w pięćdziesiątą rocznicę pracy naukowej, Kraków 2008, s. 103–106pl_PL
dc.referencesBarrett M., The Law Lords. An Account of the Workings of Britain’s Highest Judicial Body and the Men who Preside Over It, Basingstoke 2001pl_PL
dc.referencesBarton J.L., Bracton as a Civilian, TLR 42 (1968), s. 555–583pl_PL
dc.referencesBarton J.L., Roman Law in England, Mediolani 1971pl_PL
dc.referencesBarton J.L., The Faculty of Law, [w:] HUO, vol. 3, Oxford 1986, s. 257–293pl_PL
dc.referencesBarton J.L., The Mystery of Bracton, JLH 14/3 (1993), s. 1–142pl_PL
dc.referencesBarton J.L., The Authorship of Bracton, JLH 30/2 (2009), s. 117–174pl_PL
dc.referencesBaston K., Charles Areskine’s Library. Lawyers and Their Books at the Dawn of the Scottish Enlightenment, Leiden 2016pl_PL
dc.referencesBeatson J., Zimmermann R., Jurists Uprooted. German-speaking Émigré Lawyers in Twentieth-Century Britain, Oxford 2004pl_PL
dc.referencesBehrends O., Knütel R., Kupisch B., Seiler H.H., Corpus Iuris Civilis. Text und Übersetzung, Bd. 3, Digesten 11–20, Heidelberg 1999pl_PL
dc.referencesBeloff M., The End of the Twentieth Century: The House of Lords 1982–2000, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 232–254pl_PL
dc.referencesBerger A., Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia 1953pl_PL
dc.referencesBeven T., The Appellate Jurisdiction of the House of Lords, LQR 17 (1901), s. 155–170pl_PL
dc.referencesBirks P., McLeod G., The Implied Contract Theory of Quasi-Contract: Civilian Opinion Current in the Century Before Blackstone, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 6 (1986), s. 46–85pl_PL
dc.referencesBirks P.H. (ed.), English Private Law, vol. 1, Oxford 2000pl_PL
dc.referencesBirley E., Law in Roman Britain, [w:] Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II.13, Berlin–New York 1980, s. 609–625pl_PL
dc.referencesBlack R., A historical survey of delictual liability in Scotland for personal injuries and death, Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 8 (1975), s. 52–70pl_PL
dc.referencesBlom-Cooper L., Drewry G., Final Appeal. A Study on the House of Lords in Its Judicial Capacity, Oxford 1972pl_PL
dc.referencesBlom-Cooper L., 1966 and All That: The Story of the Practice Statement, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 128–143pl_PL
dc.referencesBoase G.C., Geldart, James William, [w:] DNB, vol. 7, s. 991–992pl_PL
dc.referencesBoase G.C., Edward Gordon, Baron Gordon of Drumearn, [w:] DNB, vol. 8, s. 177pl_PL
dc.referencesBond H., Possession in the Roman Law, LQR 6 (1890), s. 259–279pl_PL
dc.referencesBoyle L.E., The Beginnings of Legal Studies at Oxford, Viator 13 (1983), s. 107–131pl_PL
dc.referencesBrand P., The Beginning of the Law Reporting, [w:] Ch. Stebbings (ed.), Law Reporting in Britain. Proceedings of the Eleventh British Legal History Conference, London–Rio Grande, OH 1995, s. 1–14pl_PL
dc.referencesBrand P., The Age of Bracton, [w:] J. Hudson (ed.), The History of English Law. Centenary Essays on ‘Pollock and Maitland’, Oxford 1996pl_PL
dc.referencesBrand P., The Date and Authorship of Bracton, JLH 31/3 (2010), s. 217–244pl_PL
dc.referencesBrodie P.H., From Scotland to Ireland (a) Scotland after 1707, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 279–293pl_PL
dc.referencesBuckland W.W., Casus and Frustration in Roman and Common Law, HLR 46/8 (1933), s. 1281–1300pl_PL
dc.referencesBuckland W.W., Praetor and Chancellor, TLR 13 (1939), s. 163–177pl_PL
dc.referencesBuckland W.W., Some Reflections on Jurisprudence, Cambridge 1945pl_PL
dc.referencesBuckland W.W., McNair A.D., Roman Law and Common Law, rev. F.H. Lawson, Cambridge 1952pl_PL
dc.referencesBuckland W.W., A Text-book of Roman Law: From Augustus to Justinian, ed. 2, Cambridge 1932; ed. 3, rev. P. Stein, Cambridge 1963pl_PL
dc.referencesBurrows A., The Law of Restitution, ed. 3, Oxford 2002pl_PL
dc.referencesCaillemer E., Le droit civil dans les provinces Anglo-Normandes au XIIe siècle, Mémoires de l’Académie des Science de Caen 1883, s. 157–226pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., Institutional Writings in Scotland Reconsidered, [w:] A. Kiralfy, H.L. MacQueen (eds.), New Perspectives in Scottish Legal History, London 1984, s. 76–117pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., The Breve Testamentum and Craig’s Jus Feudale, TR 56 (1988), s. 311–332pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., Rhetoric, Language, and Roman Law: Legal Education and Improvement in Eighteenth-Century Scotland, LHR 9 (1991), s. 31–58pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., The Origins of the Glasgow Law School: The Professors of Civil Law, 1714–61, [w:] P. Birks (ed.), The Life of the Law. Proceedings of the Tenth British Legal History Conference, Oxford 1991, London–Rio Grande, OH 1993, s. 152–183pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., Advocates’ Hats, Roman Law and Admission to the Scots Bar, 1580–1812, JLH 20/2 (1999), s. 24–61pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., Historical Introduction, [w:] HPLS, vol. 1, Oxford 2000pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., ‘Ius civile’ in Scotland, ca. 1600, Roman Legal Tradition 2 (2004), s. 136–170pl_PL
dc.referencesCairns J.W., MacQueen H.L., Learning and Law. A Short History of the Edinburgh Law School, Edinburgh 2013 www.law.ed.ac.uk/history/pl_PL
dc.referencesCobban A.B., The Medieval Universities. Their Development and Organization, London–Chatham 1975pl_PL
dc.referencesCollier J.G., Conflict of Laws, ed. 3, Cambridge 2001pl_PL
dc.referencesCoquillette D.R., Legal Ideology and Incorporation 1. The English Civilian Writers, 1523–1607, Boston University Law Review 61 (1981), s. 1–89pl_PL
dc.referencesConstitutional Reform: a Supreme Court for the United Kingdom, London 2003pl_PL
dc.referencesCornioley P., De l’origine de la longi temporis praescriptio, TR 41 (1973), s. 119–130pl_PL
dc.referencesConway R.S., Roby, Henry John, [w:] DNB 1912–1921, s. 473–475pl_PL
dc.referencesCoote H.C., A Neglected Fact in English History, London 1864pl_PL
dc.referencesCooper Th., Men of the Time: A Dictionary of Contemporaries containing Bibliographical Notices of Eminent Characters of Both Sexes, ed. 11, London 1884pl_PL
dc.referencesCourtney W.P., Halifax, Samuel, [w:] DNB, vol. 8, s. 996–998pl_PL
dc.referencesCumming Ch.S., The English High Court of Admiralty, Tulane Maritime Law Review 17 (1993), s. 209–255pl_PL
dc.referencesDaily Hansard Vol. 507 Part 55 – Written Ministerial Statements for 11 March 2010 http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100311/wmstext/100311m0002.htmpl_PL
dc.referencesDębiński A., Kościół i prawo rzymskie, Lublin 2007pl_PL
dc.referencesDębiński A., Prawo rzymskie a systematyka prawa kanonicznego, [w:] W. Uruszczak, P. Święcicka, A. Kremer (red.), Leges Sapere. Studia i prace dedykowane Profesorowi Januszowi Sondlowi w pięćdziesiątą rocznicę pracy naukowej, Kraków 2008, s. 135–142pl_PL
dc.referencesDias R.W.M., Precedents in the House of Lords – Much Needed Reform, CLJ 1966, s. 153–156pl_PL
dc.referencesDickens Ch., Klub Pickwicka, t. 2, tłum. W. Górski, uzup. Z. i W. Popławscy, Warszawa 1987pl_PL
dc.referencesDiósdi G., Contract in Roman Law. From the Twelve Tables to the Glossators, Budapest 1981pl_PL
dc.referencesDonahue Jr. Ch., ‘Ius Commune’, Canon Law, and Common Law in England, TLR 66 (1992), s. 1745–1780pl_PL
dc.referencesDonohoe FitzGerald J., Fitzgerald, John David, Lord Fitzgerald, [w:] DNB, vol. 22, Supp., s. 640–641pl_PL
dc.referencesDrewry G., Towards a System of Administrative Law: The Reid and Wilberforce Era 1945–82, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 209–231pl_PL
dc.referencesDunlop R., O’Connel, Daniel, [w:] DNB, vol. 14, s. 816–864pl_PL
dc.referencesdu Plessis P., Letting and Hiring in Roman Legal Thought: 27 BCE – 284 CE, Leiden 2012pl_PL
dc.referencesDworkin G., Stare Decisis in the House of Lords, MLR 25 (1962), s. 166–174pl_PL
dc.referencesElsyng H., Judicature in Parliament, ed. E.R. Foster, London–Rio Grande, OH 1991pl_PL
dc.referencesEvans-Jones R., Roman Law in Britain, [w:] U. Manthe and C. Krampe (eds.), Quaestiones Iuris. Festschrift für Joseph Georg Wolf zum 70. Geburtstag, Berlin 2000, s. 83–110pl_PL
dc.referencesFeenstra R., Scottish-Dutch Legal Relations in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, [w:] T.C. Smout (ed.), Scotland and Europe 1200–1850, Edinburgh 1986, s. 128–142pl_PL
dc.referencesFoster E.R., The House of Lords 1603–1649. Structure, Procedure, and The Nature of Its Business, Chapel Hill–London 1983pl_PL
dc.referencesFoster J., Men-at-the-Bar, London–Aylesbury 1885pl_PL
dc.referencesFranklin M., Bracton, Para-Bracton(s) and the Vicarage of the Roman Law, TLR 42 (1968), s. 455–518pl_PL
dc.referencesGardiner G., Martin A. (eds.), Law Reform Now, London 1963pl_PL
dc.referencesGibb A.D., The Inter-Relation of the Legal Systems of Scotland and England, LQR 53 (1937), s. 61–79pl_PL
dc.referencesGirard P.F., Manuel élémentaire de droit romain, Paris 1898pl_PL
dc.referencesGodfrey A.M., Ius Commune, Pracktick and Civil Procedure in the Sixteenth-Century Court of Session, TR 72 (2004), s. 283–295pl_PL
dc.referencesGodfrey A.M., Civil Justice in Renaissance Scotland. The Origins of a Central Court, Leiden 2009pl_PL
dc.referencesGordon W.M., Roman Law in Scotland, [w:] R. Evans-Jones (ed.), The Civil Law Tradition in Scotland, Edinburgh 1995, s. 13–40pl_PL
dc.referencesGordon W.M., The Acts of the Scottish Lord of Council in the Late Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries: Records and Reports, [w:] Ch. Stebbings (ed.), Law Reporting in Britain. Proceedings of the Eleventh British Legal History Conference, London–Rio Grande, OH 1995, s. 55–71pl_PL
dc.referencesGordon W.M., Servitutes. Scots Law and Roman Law, [w:] W.M. Gordon, Roman Law, Scots Law and Legal History. Selected Essays, Edinburgh 2007, s. 141–147pl_PL
dc.referencesGoudy H., Two Ancient Brocards, [w:] P. Vinogradoff (ed.), Essays in Legal History, Oxford 1913, s. 215–232pl_PL
dc.referencesGriffith G., Early English Law. An Introduction, Norfolk 2006pl_PL
dc.referencesGrodecki J.K., The Greek Bond Cases, MLR 24/6 (1961), s. 701–714pl_PL
dc.referencesGüterbock C., Bracton and His Relation to the Roman Law, trans. B. Coxe, Philadelphia 1866pl_PL
dc.referencesHackett M.B., The University as a Corporate Body, [w:] HUO, vol. 1, Oxford 1984, s. 39–75pl_PL
dc.referencesHadfield B., Constitutional Law, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 502–505pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Dzieje doktryny actio personalis cum persona moritur w angielskim common law, [w:] W. Uruszczak, D. Malec, M. Mikuła (red.), Krakowskie studia z historii państwa i prawa, t. 3, Kraków 2010, s. 37–49pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Doktryna consideration w angielskim prawie zobowiązań kontraktowych (XVI–XX w.), Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne 63 (2011), s. 261–281pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Impossibility as the Factor in the Total Failure of Consideration, [w:] V. Knool (ed.), Naděje právní vědy. Bykov 2010, Plzeň 2011, s. 46–57pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Środki odwoławcze w średniowiecznym i nowożytnym common law, [w:] S. Grodziski, A. Dziadzio (red.), Regnare – Gubernare − Administrare. Prawo i władza na przestrzeni wieków. Prace dedykowane profesorowi Jerzemu Malcowi z okazji 40-lecia pracy naukowej, Kraków 2012, s. 41–50pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Historia zobowiązań quasi-kontraktowych w common law, Kraków 2012pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Zasada bezpodstawnego wzbogacenia w prawie angielskim, Studia Prawa Prywatnego 2/33 (2014), s. 91–104pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Mistake of law and mistake of fact in English law of restitution, TR 82/3–4 (2014), s. 261–283pl_PL
dc.referencesHalberda J., Fibrosa S.A. v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd (1942). Spółka z Kresów przed Izbą Lordów, Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica 14/1 (2015), s. 197–217pl_PL
dc.referencesHall J.G., Martin D.F., Haldane. Statesman, Lawyer, Philosopher, Chichester 1996pl_PL
dc.referencesHalson R., Contract Law, Harlow 2001pl_PL
dc.referencesHamilton J.A., MacDowall, Andrew, Lord Bankton, [w:] DNB, vol. 12, s. 508pl_PL
dc.referencesHamza G., ¿Existió el derecho internacional privado en el Imperio Romano?, Revista Internacional de Derecho Romano 3 (2009), s. 78–90pl_PL
dc.referencesHanbury H.G., The Vinerian Chair and Legal Education, Oxford 1958pl_PL
dc.referencesHandford P., Lord Campbell and the Fatal Accidents Act, LQR 129 (2013), s. 420–448pl_PL
dc.referencesHandler P., The Court for Crown Cases Reserved, 1848–1908, LHR 29/1 (2011), s. 261–271pl_PL
dc.referencesHart Jr. J.S., Judicial Review in the House of Lords (1640–43), [w:] A. Kiralfy, M. Flatter, R. Virgoe (eds.), Custom, Courts and Counsel. Selected Papers of the 6th British Legal History Conference, Norwich 1983, London 1985, s. 65–78pl_PL
dc.referencesHart J.S., Justice upon Petition. The House of Lords and the Reformation of Justice 1621–1675, London 1991pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., Marriage Litigation in Medieval England, Cambridge 1974pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., The Roman Law of Guardianship in England, 1300–1600, TLR 52 (1978), s. 223–257pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., Canon Law and English Common Law, SS Lecture, London 1983pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., Continental Law and Common Law: Historical Strangers or Companions?, Duke Law Journal 1990, s. 1207–1228pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., Roman Canon Law in Reformation England, Cambridge 1990pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., The Canon Law and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction from 597 to 1640s, OHLE, vol. 1, Oxford–New York 2004pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., Three Civilian Notebooks 1580–1640, SS 127, London 2010pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R.H., University Education and English Ecclesiastical Lawyers 1400–1650, Ecclesiastical Law Journal 13 (2011), s. 132–145pl_PL
dc.referencesHelmholz R., Richard Zouche (1590–1661), Ecclesiastical Law Journal 15 (2013), s. 204–207pl_PL
dc.referencesHoeflich M.H., Roman and Civil Law and the Development of Anglo-American Jurisprudence in the Nineteenth Century, Athens–London 1997pl_PL
dc.referencesHogg T.J., An introductory lecture on the study of the Civil Law, intended to have been read at the University of London, London 1831pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldsworth W.S, The Development of the Law of Merchants and its Court, [w:] Selected Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, vol. 1, Boston, 1907, s. 289–331pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldsworth W.S., The Reception of Roman Law in the Sixteenth Century, 1, LQR 27 (1911), s. 387–398pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldsworth W.S., The Reception of Roman Law in the Sixteenth Century, 4, LQR 28 (1912), s. 236–254pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldsworth W.S., The Origin of the Rule in Baker v. Bolton, LQR 32 (1916), s. 431–437pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldsworth W.S., History of English Law, vol. 3, London 1923pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldsworth W.S., Charles Dickens as a Legal Historian, New Haven 1928pl_PL
dc.referencesHope D., Voices from the Past – The Law Lords’ Contributions to the Legislative Process, LQR 123 (2007), s. 547–570pl_PL
dc.referencesHouse of Lords Judicial Business Statistics 2002pl_PL
dc.referencesHowell P.A., The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, 1833–1876, Cambridge 1979pl_PL
dc.referencesHunter W.A., A Systematic and Historical Exposition of Roman Law in Order of a Code, ed. 3, London 1897, ed. 4, London 1903pl_PL
dc.referencesIbbetson D.J., A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations, Oxford 1999pl_PL
dc.referencesIbbetson D., Common Law and ‘Ius Commune’, SS Lecture, London 2001pl_PL
dc.referencesIbbetson D., English Law and the European ‘Ius Commune’ 1450–1650, Cambridge Year Book of European Legal Studies 8 (2005–2006), s. 115–132pl_PL
dc.referencesJackson R.M., The Machinery of Justice in England, Cambridge 1972pl_PL
dc.referencesJaffey A.J.E., Volenti non fit injuria, CLJ 44 (1985), s. 87–110pl_PL
dc.referencesJenks E., Edward Plantagenet (Edward I). The English Justinian or Making of the Common Law, London 1901pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnston D., Sale and transfer of title in Roman and Scots law, [w:] A.D.E. Lewis, D.J. Ibbetson (eds.), The Roman Law Tradition, Cambridge 1994, s. 182–198pl_PL
dc.referencesJolowicz H.F., Nicholas B., Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, ed. 3, Cambridge 1972pl_PL
dc.referencesJones D.L., The Judicial Role of the House of Lords before 1870, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 3–12pl_PL
dc.referencesJudicial and Court Statistics 2008, Ministry of Justice 2009pl_PL
dc.referencesJurewicz A.R., Problem domniemania w rzymskim ‘ius quod ad personas pertinet’, Olsztyn 2009pl_PL
dc.referencesKacprzak A., La Ratihabitio nel diritto romano classico, Napoli 2002pl_PL
dc.referencesKaczmarczyk A., Wojciechowski R., Robert-Joseph Pothier (1699–1772), Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego 21/1 (2012), s. 5–49pl_PL
dc.referencesKamińska R., Ochrona dróg i rzek publicznych w prawie rzymskim w okresie republiki i pryncypatu, Warszawa 2010pl_PL
dc.referencesKantorowicz H., Bractonian Problems, Glasgow 1941pl_PL
dc.referencesKeane R., From Scotland to Ireland (b) Ireland, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 295–303pl_PL
dc.referencesKennedy A.G., Disputes about bocland: the forum for their adjudication, Anglo-Saxon England 14 (1985), s. 175–196pl_PL
dc.referencesKitchin S.B., The Cambridge School of Law, South African Law Journal 43 (1926), s. 129–139pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Działalność ‘legati iuridici’ w rzymskiej Brytanii, SPE 82 (2010), s. 69–80pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Nieskuteczność prowincjonalnego wymiaru sprawiedliwości na przykładzie rzymskiej Brytanii, [w:] K. Amielańczyk, A. Dębiński, D. Słapek, Ochrona bezpieczeństwa i porządku publicznego w prawie rzymskim, Lublin 2010, s. 129–137pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Prawo rzymskie w wybranych orzeczeniach Izby Lordów w latach 1999–2009, Z Dziejów Prawa 4/12 (2011), s. 283–296pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Spółka akcyjna w prawie angielskim – rozwój konstrukcji, [w:] K. Brzeziński, Prywatnoprawne aspekty działalności gospodarczej w prawie polskim i europejskim, Kraków 2011, s. 99–108pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Roman Law in Roman Britain. An Introductory Survey, JLH 33/2 (2012), s. 133–150pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Buying a Slave in Roman Britain. The Evidence from the Tabulae, Revue Internationale des Droits de l’Antiquite 58 (2011), s. 211–224pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., William Blackstone a prawo rzymskie. Uwagi na temat prawa rzymskiego w ‘On the study of law’, [w:] E. Kozerska, P. Sadowski, A. Szymański (red.), Ze studiów nad tradycją prawa, Warszawa 2012, s. 39–57pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Roman Tax Law in Roman Britain, Revue Internationale des Droits de l’Antiquite 61 (2014), s. 229–251pl_PL
dc.referencesKorporowicz Ł.J., Pacta sunt servanda w prawie kanonicznym, [w:] E. Kozerska, P. Sadowski, A. Szymański (red.), Pacta sunt servanda – nierealny projekt czy gwarancja ładu społecznego i prawnego?, Kraków 2015, s. 113–125pl_PL
dc.referencesKortmann J.S., ‘Ab alio ictu(s)’: Misconceptions about Julian’s View on Causation, JLH 20/2 (1999), s. 95–103pl_PL
dc.referencesKrzynówek J., ‘Volenti non fit iniuria’. Powstanie i historia reguły, [w:] W. Wołodkiewicz, J. Krzynówek (red.), Łacińskie paremie w europejskiej kulturze prawnej i orzecznictwie sądów polskich, Warszawa 2001, s. 267–287pl_PL
dc.referencesKwaśnik M., Kwaśnik Z., Sekurytyzacja, [w:] Z. Kwaśnik, W. Żukow (red.), Współczesne problemy ekonomiczne jako wyzwanie dla zmieniającej się gospodarki, Radom 2010, s. 113–133pl_PL
dc.referencesKunkel W., Römische Rechtsgeschichte, Weimar 1964pl_PL
dc.referencesKupiszewski H., Litis contestatio, Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne 15/1 (1963), s. 243–265pl_PL
dc.referencesKupiszewski H., Prawo rzymskie a współczesność, wyd. 2, opr. i uzup. T. Giaro, F. Longchamps de Bérier, Kraków 2013pl_PL
dc.referencesLambrick G., The Impeachment of the Abbot of Abingdon 1368, EHR 82 (1967), s. 250–276pl_PL
dc.referencesLangbein J.H., Modern Jurisprudence in the House of Lords: The Passing of London Tramways, CLR 53 (1967–1968), s. 807–813pl_PL
dc.referencesLangbein J., Trinity Hall and the Relations of European and English Law from the Fourteenth to the Twenty-First Century, [w:] H. Felter (ed.), Trinity Hall Cambridge. The Milestones Lectures. In celebration of 650 years of education and learning, Cambridge 2001, s. 75–86pl_PL
dc.referencesLawson F.H., A Common Lawyer Looks at the Civil Law, Ann Arbor 1953pl_PL
dc.referencesLeach W.B., Revisionism in the House of Lords: The Bastion of Rigid Stare Decisis Falls, HLR 80 (1966–1967), s. 797–803pl_PL
dc.referencesLee J., Confusio: Reference to Roman Law in the House of Lords and the Development of English Private Law, Roman Legal Tradition 5 (2009), s. 24–66pl_PL
dc.referencesLee S., Budden, John, [w:] DNB, vol. 3, s. 221–222pl_PL
dc.referencesLentin A., The Last Political Law Lord: Lord Sumner (1859-1934), Newcastle upon Tyne 2008pl_PL
dc.referencesLe Sueur A., From Appellate Committee to the Supreme Court: A Narrative, [w:] Jud.HL s. 64–94pl_PL
dc.referencesLewis G., Lord Hailsham. A Life, London 1998pl_PL
dc.referencesLobban M., Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part I, LHR 22 (2004), s. 389–427pl_PL
dc.referencesLeader D.R., HUC, vol. 1, Cambridge 1988pl_PL
dc.referencesLevack B.P., The Civil Lawyers in England 1603–1641. A Political Study, Oxford 1973pl_PL
dc.referencesLevack B.P., Law, [w:] HUO, vol. 4, Oxford 1997, s. 559–568pl_PL
dc.referencesLiere F. van, The Study of Canon Law and the Eclipse of the Lincoln Schools, 1175–1225, [w:] M. Feingold (ed.), History of Universities, Oxford 2003, s. 1–10pl_PL
dc.referencesLongchamps de Bérier F., Zakaz nadużywania własnego prawa – male nostro iure uti non debemus, [w:] W. Wołodkiewicz, J. Krzynówek (red.), Łacińskie paremie w europejskiej kulturze prawnej i orzecznictwie sądów polskich, Warszawa 2001, s. 127–151pl_PL
dc.referencesLord Bingham, A New Supreme Court for the United Kingdom, London 2002pl_PL
dc.referencesLord Cooper, The Dark Age of Scottish Legal History 1350–1650, Glasgow 1952pl_PL
dc.referencesLord Hope of Craighead, Taking the Case to London – Is It All Over?, JR 1998, s. 135–149pl_PL
dc.referencesLuig K., Assignation, [w:] HPLS, vol. 2, s. 399–419pl_PL
dc.referencesLyall A., The Irish House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1783–1800, Irish Jurist 28–30 (1993–1995), s. 314–360pl_PL
dc.referencesMacCormak G., Culpa in the Scots Law of Reparation, JR 1974, s. 13–29pl_PL
dc.referencesMacgregor L.J., Pacta Illicita, [w:] HPLS, vol. 2, s.129–156pl_PL
dc.referencesMackay A.J.G., Craig, Thomas, [w:] DNB, vol. 4, s. 1373–1376pl_PL
dc.referencesMackintosh J., Roman Law in Modern Practice, Edinburgh 1934pl_PL
dc.referencesMacLean A.J, The 1707 Union: Scots Law and the House of Lords, JLH 4/3 (1984), s. 50–75pl_PL
dc.referencesMacLean A.J., The House of Lords and Appeals from the Court of Justiciary, 1707–1887, JR 30 (1985), s. 192–226pl_PL
dc.referencesMacMullen Rigg J., Bell, George Joseph, [w:] DNB, vol. 2, s. 158–159pl_PL
dc.referencesMacMullen Rigg J., Lee, Sir William, [w:] DNB, vol. 11, s. 824–826pl_PL
dc.referencesMacMullen Rigg J., Blackburn, Colin, Baron Blackburn, [w:] DNB, vol. 22, Supp., s. 203–204pl_PL
dc.referencesMacQueen H.L., Scots Law and English Law: The Case of Contract, Current Legal Problems 54 (2001), s. 205–229pl_PL
dc.referencesMacQueen H., Delict, Contract, and the Bill of Rights: A Perspective from the United Kingdom, South African Law Journal 121 (2004), s. 359–394pl_PL
dc.referencesMaddicott J.R., The Origins of the English Parliament, Oxford 2010pl_PL
dc.referencesMaitland F.W., Selected Passages from the Works of Bracton and Azo, SS 8, 1894, London 1895pl_PL
dc.referencesMaitland F.W., Magistri Vacari Summa de Matrimonio, LQR 13 (1897), s. 133–143, 270–287pl_PL
dc.referencesMaitland F.W., Pollock F., History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I, vol. 1, Cambridge 1898pl_PL
dc.referencesMaitland F.W., English Law and the Renaissance, Cambridge 1901pl_PL
dc.referencesManchester A.H., The Reform of the Ecclesiastical Courts, AJLH 10 (1966), s. 51–75pl_PL
dc.referencesManchester A.H., Law Reform in England and Wales 1840–80, [w:] W. de Vos, W.H.B. Dean, I. Leeman (eds.), Essays in Honour of Ben Beinart, vol. 2, Cape Town–Wetton–Johannesburg 1979, s. 189–202pl_PL
dc.referencesMartin E.A., Oxford Dictionary of Law, Oxford 2003pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzec Ł., Kilka uwag o sądownictwie admiralicji w Anglii, ZP UKSW 4/1 (2004), s. 75–89pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzec Ł., Kilka uwag o Sądzie kanclerskim i systemie Equity w Anglii, ZP UKSW 5/1 (2005), s. 195–212pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzec Ł., Artur Duck, De Usu et Authoritate Iuris Civilis Romanorum – podrzędna rozprawa czy dzieło światowej romanistyki?, ZP UKSW 6/1 (2006), s. 145–157pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzec Ł., Prawo rzymskie w dawnej Anglii w świetle poglądów Artura Ducka (wybrane zagadnienia), ZP UKSW 6/2 (2006), s. 117–136pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzec Ł., Fibrosa przeciwko Fairbairn. Polska spółka, Izba Lordów i prawo rzymskie, ZP UKSW 7/1 (2007), s. 113–121pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzec Ł., Wizja powszechnego prawa europejskiego według Arthura Ducka, Studia Prawnoustrojowe 7 (2007), s. 255–261pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzec Ł., Artur Duck, De Usu Authoritate Iuris Civilis Romanorum in Regno Galliarum. Przegląd bazy bibliograficznej, ZP UKSW 8/1 (2008), s. 141–150pl_PL
dc.referencesMay A.N., The Bar and the Old Bailey, 1750–1850, Chapel Hill–London 2003pl_PL
dc.referencesMcElroy R.G., Williams G., Coronation Cases – I, MLR 4/4 (1941), s. 241–260pl_PL
dc.referencesMcElroy R.G., Williams G., Coronation Cases – II, MLR 5/1 (1941), s. 1–20pl_PL
dc.referencesMcK. Norrie K., Intentional Delicts, [w:] HPLS, vol. 2, s. 477–516pl_PL
dc.referencesMcSweeney T., English Judges and Roman Jurists: The Civilian Learning behind England’s First Case Law, Temple Law Review 84 (2012), s. 827–862pl_PL
dc.referencesMcSweeney T.J., Creating a Literature for the King’s Courts in the Later Thirteenth Century: Hengham Magna, Fet Asaver, and Bracton, JLH 37/1 (2016), s. 41–71pl_PL
dc.referencesMichałowska K., Trust i stosunki powiernicze w prawie angielskim, Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego 5/2 (1996), s. 293–341pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller T., Judge-Admiral James Graham of Airth (1702–1746) with Special Reference to His Civil Law Library, JR 49 (1937), s. 390–413pl_PL
dc.referencesMilsom S.F.C., Historical Foundations of the Common Law, ed. 2, Oxford 1981pl_PL
dc.referencesMommsen T., Krueger P., Watson A., The Digest of Justinian, vol. 1, Philadelphia 1985pl_PL
dc.referencesMonro C.H., Digest of Justinian, Cambridge 1904–1909pl_PL
dc.referencesMorgan J.H., Murison, Alexander Falconer, [w:] DNB, 1931–1940, s. 636–637pl_PL
dc.referencesMoyle J.B., The Institutes of Justinian, Oxford 1883pl_PL
dc.referencesMoyle J.B., Imperatoris Iustiniani Institutionum Libri Quattor with Introductions, Commentary and Excurses, Oxford 1883pl_PL
dc.referencesNicholas B., Introduction to Roman Law, Oxford 1962pl_PL
dc.referencesNiczyporuk P., Prywatnoprawna ochrona dziecka poczętego w prawie rzymskim, Białystok 2009pl_PL
dc.referencesNys M.E., Les Manuscripts de Sir Julius Caesar, Revue de droit international et de légistlation comparée 19 (1887), s. 461–471pl_PL
dc.referencesO’Day R., The Professions in Early Modern England, 1450–1800. Servants of the Commonwealth, Harlow 2000pl_PL
dc.referencesOldham J., English Common Law in the Age of Mansfield, Chapel Hill–London 2004pl_PL
dc.referencesOldham J., Lord Mansfield, ‘Stare Decisis’, and the ‘Ratio Decidendi’ 1756 to 1788, [w:] W.H. Bryson, S. Dauchy (eds.), ‘Ratio decidendi’. Guiding Principles of Judicial Decisions, Berlin 2006, s. 137–150pl_PL
dc.referencesOtto C., Schilling B., Sintenis C., Das Corpus Juris Civilis in’s Deutche übersetzt, Bd. 2, Leipzig 1831pl_PL
dc.referencesOuthwaite R.B., The Rise and Fall of the English Ecclesiastical Courts, 1500–1860, Cambridge 2006pl_PL
dc.referencesOwen D.M., The Medieval Canon Law. Teaching, Literature and Transmission, Cambridge 1990pl_PL
dc.referencesPalmirski T., Obligationes quasi ex delicto. Ze studiów nad źródłami zobowiązań w prawie rzymskim, Kraków 2004pl_PL
dc.referencesPaterson A.A., Scottish Lords of Appeal, 1876–1988, JR 33 (1988), s. 235–254pl_PL
dc.referencesPlucknett T.F.T., The Harvard Manuscript of Thornton’s Summa, HLR 51 (1938), s. 1038–1056pl_PL
dc.referencesPlucknett T.F.T., The Relations Between Roman Law and English Common Law Down to the Sixteenth Century: A General Survey, University of Toronto Law Journal 3 (1939–1940), s. 24–50pl_PL
dc.referencesPlucknett T.F.T, The Origin of Impeachment, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (fourth series) 24 (1942), s. 47–71pl_PL
dc.referencesPlucknett T.F.T., The Impeachment of 1376, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (fifth series) 1 (1951), s. 153–164pl_PL
dc.referencesPlucknett T.F.T., A Concise History of the Common Law, ed. 5, Boston–London 1956pl_PL
dc.referencesPlucknett T.F.T., Early English Legal Literature, Cambridge 1958pl_PL
dc.referencesPlucknett T.F.T., Barton J.L., St. German’s Doctor and Student, SS 91, London 1974pl_PL
dc.referencesPłodzień S., ‘Lex Rhodia de Iactu’. Studium historycznoprawne z zakresu rzymskiego prawa handlowomorskiego, Lublin 2010pl_PL
dc.referencesPolden P., History of the County Court, 1846–1971, Cambridge 1999pl_PL
dc.referencesPolden P., The Judicial Roles of the House of Lords and Privy Council, 1820–1914, Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. 11, Oxford 2010, s. 528–568pl_PL
dc.referencesPolden P., The Judicature Acts, OHLE, vol. 11, Oxford 2010, s. 757–784pl_PL
dc.referencesPolden P., The Early Years of the House of Lords, 1876–1914, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 181–197pl_PL
dc.referencesPollitt D.H., The Right of Confrontation: Its History and Modern Dress, Journal of Public Law 8 (1959), s. 381–413pl_PL
dc.referencesPollock F., The History of the Law of Nature: A Preliminary Study, Journal of the Society of Comparative Law 2 (1900), s. 418–433pl_PL
dc.referencesPowell R., Roman Law in Common Law Courts, Current Legal Problems 1958, s. 19–36pl_PL
dc.referencesPrecz I., Iustitia Romanorum in Foederibus, Studia Prawnicze KUL 49 (2012), s. 129–137pl_PL
dc.referencesPugsley D., On the Style of Paul’s and Ulpian’s Commentaries on the Edict, Acta Juridica 1973, s. 185–200pl_PL
dc.referencesPugsley D., London Tramways (1898), JLH 17/2 (1996), s. 172–184pl_PL
dc.referencesRankine J., Law of Landownership in Scotland, ed. 4, Edinburgh 1909pl_PL
dc.referencesRathbone E., Roman Law in the Anglo-Norman Realm, Studia Gratiana 11 (1967), s. 255–271pl_PL
dc.referencesRe E.D., The Roman Contribution to the Common Law, Fordham Law Review 29 (1961), s. 447–449pl_PL
dc.referencesRichardson H.G., Azo, Drogheda and Bracton, EHR 59 (1944), s. 22–47pl_PL
dc.referencesRichardson H.G., Sayles G.O., Fleta. Prologue, Books 1 and 2, SS 72 (1953), London 1955pl_PL
dc.referencesRichardson H.G., Bracton. The Problem of His Text, SS Sup.Ser. 2, London 1965pl_PL
dc.referencesRichardson H.G., Sayles G.O., Fleta, Book 3 and 4, SS 89 (1972), London 1972pl_PL
dc.referencesRichter T., Did Stair Know Pufendorf?, ELR 7 (2003), s. 367–378pl_PL
dc.referencesRobinson R.B., The Two Institutes of Thomas Wood: A Study in Eighteenth Century Legal Scholarship, AJLH 35 (1991), s. 432–458pl_PL
dc.referencesRoby H.J., Private Roman Law in the Times of Cicero and of the Antonines, vol. 2, Cambridge 1902pl_PL
dc.referencesRodger A., Molina, Stair and the Jus Quaesitum Tertio, JR 1969, s. 35–44, 128–151pl_PL
dc.referencesRodger A., Mrs. Donaghue and Alfenus Varus, Current Legal Problems 41 (1988), s. 1–22pl_PL
dc.referencesRodger A., Lord Macmillan’s Speech in Donoghue v. Stevenson, LQR 108 (1992), s. 236–259pl_PL
dc.referencesRodgers J.S., The Early History of the Law of Bills and Notes, Cambridge 1995pl_PL
dc.referencesRumble W.E., Doing Austin Justice. The Reception of John Austin’s Philosophy of Law in Nineteenth-Century England, London–New York 2005pl_PL
dc.referencesRunyan T.J., The Rolls of Oleron and the Admiralty Court in Fourteenth Century England, AJLH 19 (1975), s. 95–111pl_PL
dc.referencesRuszkiewicz B., ‘Longi termporis praescriptio’ jako zarzut długiego okresu posiadania, ZP UKSW 11/1 (2011), s. 235–248pl_PL
dc.referencesSarnecki P., Ustroje konstytucyjne państw współczesnych, wyd. 5, Warszawa 2013pl_PL
dc.referencesSayles G.O., Fleta. Book 5 and 6, SS 99 (1983), London 1984pl_PL
dc.referencesScott H., Killing and Causing Death in Roman Law, LQR 123 (2013), s. 101–122pl_PL
dc.referencesScrutton T.E., The Influence of the Roman Law on the Law of England, Cambridge 1885pl_PL
dc.referencesSeipp D.J., Bracton, the Year Books, and the “Transformation of Elementary Legal Ideas” in the Early Common Law, LHR 7 (1989), s. 179–183pl_PL
dc.referencesSeipp D.J., Roman Legal Categories in the Early Common Law, [w:] T.G. Watkin (ed.), Legal Record and Historical Reality. Proceedings of the Eighth British Legal History Conference, Cardiff 1987, London–Ronceverte 1989, s. 9–36pl_PL
dc.referencesSeipp D.J., The Reception of Canon and Civil Law in the Common Law Courts before 1600, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1993), s. 388–420pl_PL
dc.referencesSeipp D.J., The Concept of Property in the Early Common Law, LHR 12 (1994), s. 29–91pl_PL
dc.referencesSeller W.D.H., Scots Law: Mixed from the Very Beginning? A Tale of Two Receptions, ELR 4 (2000), s. 3–18pl_PL
dc.referencesSenior W., Roman Law in England before Vacarius, LQR 46 (1930), s. 191–206pl_PL
dc.referencesSenior W., Peter della Vigna, LQR 48 (1932), s. 324–327pl_PL
dc.referencesSenior W., Accursius and his son Franciscus, LQR 51 (1935), s. 513–516pl_PL
dc.referencesSearby P., HUC, vol. 3, Cambridge 1997pl_PL
dc.referencesShepard A., Legal Learning and the Cambridge University Courts, c. 1560–1640, JLH 19/1 (1998), s. 62–74pl_PL
dc.referencesShephard J.W., The Rôles d’Oléron: A ‘lex mercatoria’ of the Sea?, [w:] V. Piergiovanni (ed.), From lex mercatoria to commericial law, Berlin 2005, s. 207–217pl_PL
dc.referencesSherman Ch.P., The Romanization of English Law, Yale Law Journal 23 (1914), s. 318–329pl_PL
dc.referencesSimon J., Dr. Cowell, CLJ 26 (1968), s. 260–272pl_PL
dc.referencesSimmonds K.R., The Gentili Manuscripts, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Die Romanistische Abteilung 76 (1959), s. 545–550pl_PL
dc.referencesSimmonds N.E., Reason, History, and Privilege: Blackstone’s Debt to Natural Law, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Die Germanistische Abteilung 105 (1988), s. 200–213pl_PL
dc.referencesSimpson A.W.B., Leading Cases in the Common Law, Oxford 1995pl_PL
dc.referencesSkeel C.A.J., The Influence of the Writtings of Sir John Fortescue, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (Third Series) 10 (1916), s. 77–114pl_PL
dc.referencesSkrzywanek-Jaworska D., Nieważne zobowiązanie ex stipulation. Znaczenie ‘Impossibilium nulla obligation est’ Celsusa (D. 50,17,185) w prawie rzymskim, SPE 83 (2011), s. 205–235pl_PL
dc.referencesSkrzywanek-Jaworska D., Nieważne zobowiązania ex venditione. Nec emptio nec venditio sine re quae veneat potest intellegi (D. 18,1,8, pr.) Pomponiusa a Impossibilium nulla obligation est Celsusa (D. 50,17,185), SPE 84 (2011), s. 209–238pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith T.B., Strange Gods: Crisis of Scots law as Civilian System, [w:] T.B. Smith, Studies Critical and Comparative, Edinburgh 1962, s. 72–88pl_PL
dc.referencesSobczyk M., Siła wyższa w rzymskim prawie prywatnym, Toruń 2005pl_PL
dc.referencesSokala A., Zasada superficies solo cedit w prawie rzymskim, Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Prawo XXV. Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne 172 (1987), s. 143–160pl_PL
dc.referencesSondel J., Artur Duck – niedoceniony poprzednik Savigny’ego i jego poglądy na rolę prawa rzymskiego w Polsce, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego DCXXV. Prace Prawnicze 97 (1982), s. 69–86pl_PL
dc.referencesSondel J., Sądownictwo nad scholarami Akademii Krakowskiej, [w:] D. Janicka, R. Łaszewska (red.), Historia Integra. Księga pamiątkowa ofiarowana Prof. Stanisławowi Salmonowiczowi w siedemdziesięciolecie urodzin, Toruń 2001, s. 249–272pl_PL
dc.referencesSondel J., Słownik łacińsko-polski dla prawników i historyków, Kraków 2006pl_PL
dc.referencesSpencer J.R., Criminal Law, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 594–612pl_PL
dc.referencesSquibb G.D., The High Court of Chivalry. A Study of the Civil Law in England, Oxford 1959pl_PL
dc.referencesSquibb G.D., Doctors’ Commons. A History of the College of Advocates and Doctors of Law, Oxford 1977pl_PL
dc.referencesSteele D., The Judicial House of Lords: Abolition and Restoration 1873–6, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 13–29pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Regulae Iuris. From Juristic Rules to Legal Maxims, Edinburgh 1966pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Roman Law in Scotland, Mediolani 1968pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., The source of Romano-canonical part of Regiam Maiestatem, Scottish Historical Review 48 (1969), s. 107–123pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Logic and Experience in Roman and Common Law, Boston University Law Review 59 (1979), s. 433–451pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., The Character and Influence of the Roman Law. Historical Essays, London–Ronceverte 1988pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Bartolus, the Conflict of Laws and the Roman Law, [w:] idem, The Character and Influence of the Roman Law. Historical Essays, London−Ronceverte 1988, s. 83–90pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Roman Law and English Jurisprudence. Yesterday and Today, [w:] idem, The Character and Influence of the Roman Law. Historical Essays, London−Ronceverte 1988, s. 151–165pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Vacarius and the Civil Law, [w:] idem, The Character and Influence of the Roman Law. Historical Essays, London−Ronceverte 1988, s. 167–185pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Sir Thomas Smith: Renaissance Civilian, [w:] idem, The Character and Influence of the Roman Law. Historical Essays, London−Ronceverte 1988, s. 186–196pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Thomas Legge, a Sixteenth Century English Civilian and his Books, [w:] idem, The Character and Influence of the Roman Law. Historical Essays, London−Ronceverte 1988, s. 197–208pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Continental Influences on English Legal Thought, 1600–1900, [w:] idem, The Character and Influence of the Roman Law. Historical Essays, London−Ronceverte 1988, s. 209–230pl_PL
dc.referencesStein P., Roman Law in European History, Cambridge 1999pl_PL
dc.referencesStevens R, The Final Appeal: Reform of the House of Lords and Privy Council, 1867–1876, LQR 80 (1964), s. 343–369pl_PL
dc.referencesStevens R., Law and Politics. The House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1800–1976, Chapel Hill 1978pl_PL
dc.referencesSteyn J., The Case for a Supreme Court, LQR 118 (2002), s. 382–396pl_PL
dc.referencesStępkowski A., Maksymy prawne na Wyspach Brytyjskich, [w:] W. Wołodkiewicz, J. Krzynówek (red.), Łacińskie paremie w europejskiej kulturze prawnej i orzecznictwie sądów polskich, Warszawa 2001, s. 71–107pl_PL
dc.referencesStępkowski A., Kształtowanie się szkockiego systemu prawa prywatnego do końca XVIII wieku, Studia Iuridica 40 (2002), s. 209–230pl_PL
dc.referencesStępkowski A., Kształtowanie się mieszanego systemu szkockiego prawa prywatnego w XIX i XX wieku, ZP UKSW 2/1 (2002), s. 57–92pl_PL
dc.referencesStępkowski A., L’institution du trust dans le système mixte du droit privé écossais, Warszawa 2005pl_PL
dc.referencesStone R., Modern Law of Contract, Abingdon–New York 2009pl_PL
dc.referencesSupreme court ‘could cost £32m’ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3519083.stmpl_PL
dc.referencesSwadling W., Property. General Principles, [w:] P.H. Birks (ed.), English Private Law, Oxford 2000, s. 203–384pl_PL
dc.referencesSwatland A., The Role of Privy Council in the House of Lords, 1660–1681, [w:] C. Jones (ed.), A Pillar of the Constitution: The House of Lords in British Politics, 1640–1784, London–Ronceverte 1989, s. 51–77pl_PL
dc.referencesSwatland A., The House of Lords in the Reign of Charles II, Cambridge 1996pl_PL
dc.referencesTaggart M., Private Property and Abuse of Rights in Victorian England. The Story of Edward Pickles and the Bradford Water Supply, Oxford 2002pl_PL
dc.referencesTate J.C., Ownership and Possession in the Early Common Law, AJLH 48 (2006), s. 280–313pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Black Book of the Admiralty with the Appendix, ed. T. Twiss, vol. 1–4, London 1871–1876pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Cambridge University Calendar for the year 1804, Cambridge 1804pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Cambridge University Calendar for the year 1833, Cambridge 1833pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Cambridge University Calendar for the year 1837, Cambridge 1837pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Cambridge University Calendar for the Year 1850, Cambridge 1850pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Cambridge University Calendar for the Year 1886, Cambridge 1886pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Cambridge University Calendar for the Year 1900–1901, Cambridge 1900pl_PL
dc.referencesThomas D.A., Origins of the Common Law. Part 1: The Disappearance of Roman Law from Dark Age Britain, Brigham Young University Law Review 1984, s. 563–598pl_PL
dc.referencesThorne S.E., Gilbert de Thornton’s Summa de Legibus, University of Toronto Law Journal 7 (1947), s. 1–26pl_PL
dc.referencesTompson R.S., James Greenhields and the House of Lords: A Reappraisal, [w:] W.M. Gordon, T.D. Fergus (eds.), Legal History in the Making. Proceedings of the Ninth British Legal History Conference Glasgow 1989, London–Rio Grande, OH 1991, s. 109–124pl_PL
dc.referencesTrayner J., Latin Phrases and Maxims: Collected from the Institutional and Other Writers on Scotch Law, Edinburgh 1861pl_PL
dc.referencesTulejski T., Od zasady użyteczności do demokracji. Filozofia polityczna Jeremy Benthama, Łódź 2004pl_PL
dc.referencesTurberville A.S., The House of Lords in the Age of Reform, 1784–1837, London 1958pl_PL
dc.referencesTurner R.V., Roman Law in England Before the Time of Bracton, Journal of British Studies 15 (1975), s. 1–25pl_PL
dc.referencesTurner R.V., Who was the Author of ‘Glanvill’? Reflections on the Education of Henry II’s Common Lawyers, LHR 8 (1990), s. 97–127pl_PL
dc.referencesTwining W.L., Laws, [w:] F.M.L. Thompson (ed.), The University of London and the World of Learning, 1836–1986, London 1990, s. 81–114pl_PL
dc.referencesUnderwood M., The structure and operation of the Oxford Chancellor’s court, from the sixteenth to the early eighteenth century, Journal of the Society of Archivists 6 (1978), s. 18–27pl_PL
dc.referencesVallance White J., The Judicial Office, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 30–47pl_PL
dc.referencesVirgo G., Vindicating vindication: Foskett v. McKeown reviewed, [w:] A. Hudson (ed.), New Perspectives on Property Law, Obligations and Restitution, London 2004, s. 203–222pl_PL
dc.referencesVirgo G., Restitution of Void Loans, CLJ 69/3 (2010), s. 447–449pl_PL
dc.referencesWalker D.M., Solatium, JR 62 (1950), s. 144–168pl_PL
dc.referencesWalker D.M., Viscount Stair, Denning Law Journal 6 (1991), s. 143–156pl_PL
dc.referencesWalton F.P., Actio personalis and the French Law, Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 18 (1936), s. 40–59pl_PL
dc.referencesWatkin T.G., Saints, Seaways and Dispute Settlements, [w:] W.M. Gordon, T.D. Fergus (eds.), Legal History in the Making. Proceedings of the Ninth British Legal History Conference Glasgow 1989, London 1991, s. 1–9pl_PL
dc.referencesWatkin T.G., The Death and Later Life of Legal Symbols. Welsh Legal Symbols after the Union with England, [w:] R. Schulze (ed.), Symbolische Kommunikation vor Gericht in der Frühen Neuzeit, Berlin 2006, s. 213–224pl_PL
dc.referencesWatson A., Some Notes on Mackenzie’s ‘Institutions’ and the European Legal Tradition, Ius Commune 16 (1989), s. 303–313pl_PL
dc.referencesWatt F., Erskine, John, [w:] DNB, vol. 6, s. 849–850pl_PL
dc.referencesWatt G., Equity and Trusts Law, ed. 3, Oxford 2012pl_PL
dc.referencesWęglarz M., Specyfika prawa angielskiego – doktryna precedensu, Studenckie Zeszyty Prawnicze TBSP 4 (2000), s. 55–72pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitty N., Water Law Regimes, [w:] HPLS, vol. 1, s. 420–479pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitty N.R., Rights of Personality, Property Rights and the Human Body in Scots Law, ELR 9 (2004–2005), s. 395–400pl_PL
dc.referencesWijffels A., Law Books at Cambridge, 1500–1640, [w:] P. Birks (ed.), The Life of the Law. Proceedings of the Tenth British Legal History Conference, Oxford 1991, London–Ohio 1993, s. 59–87pl_PL
dc.referencesWijffels A., The civil law, [w:] L. Hellinga, J.B. Trapp (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain. Volume III, 1400–1557, Cambridge 1999, s. 399–410pl_PL
dc.referencesWilliams D.G.T., A Developing Jurisdiction, 1914–1945, [w:] Jud.HL, s. 198–208pl_PL
dc.referencesWilliams G.L., Criminal Law. The General Part, London 1961pl_PL
dc.referencesWillis Clark J., Jowett, Joseph, [w:] DNB, vol. 10, s. 1103pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson A.L.M., Stair and the Inleydinge of Grotius, ELR 14 (2010), s. 259–268pl_PL
dc.referencesWinfield P.H., The Chief Sources of English Legal History, Cambridge, MA, 1925 (reprint z 2000)pl_PL
dc.referencesWinfield P.H., A Textbook of the Law of Tort, ed. 2, London 1943pl_PL
dc.referencesWinkler J.F., Roman Law in Anglo-Saxon England, JLH 13/2 (1992), s. 101–127pl_PL
dc.referencesWołodkiewicz W., Nieznajomość prawa szkodzi. U źródeł zasady ‘ignoratia iuris nocet’, [w:] W. Wołodkiewicz, J. Krzynówek (red.), Łacińskie paremie w europejskiej kulturze prawnej i orzecznictwie sądów polskich, Warszawa 2001, s. 109–126pl_PL
dc.referencesWonnacott M., Possession of Land, Cambridge 2006pl_PL
dc.referencesWoodbine G.E., The Roman Element in Bracton’s De Adquirendo rerum dominio, Yale Law Journal 31/8 (1922), s. 827–847pl_PL
dc.referencesWormald P., ‘Quadripartitus’, [w:] G. Garnett, J. Hudson (eds.), Law and Government in Medieval England and Normandy. Essays in honour of Sir James Holt, Cambridge 1994, s. 111–172pl_PL
dc.referencesWormald P., The First Code of English Law, Canterbury 2005pl_PL
dc.referencesYntema H.E., The Historical Bases of Private International Law, American Journal of Comparative Law 2 (1953), s. 297–317pl_PL
dc.referencesZabieglik S., Historia Szkocji, Gdańsk 2000pl_PL
dc.referencesZabłocki J., Rozważania o procesie rzymskim w ‘Noctes Atticae’ Aulusa Gelliusa, Warszawa 1999pl_PL
dc.referencesZabłocki J., Najstarsze formy testamentu rzymskiego, [w:] M. Mikołajczyk (et al.), O prawie i jego dziejach księgi dwie. Studia ofiarowane Profesorowi Adamowi Lityńskiemu w czterdziestopięciolecie pracy naukowej i siedemdziesięciolecie urodzin, Białystok–Katowice 2010, s. 137–145pl_PL
dc.referencesZimmermann R., Usus Modernus Legis Aquiliae and Delictual Liability Today, Stellenbosch Law Review 1 (1990), s. 67–93pl_PL
dc.referencesZimmermann R., The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundation of the Civilian Tradition, Deventer 1992; ed. 2, Oxford 1996pl_PL
dc.referencesZulueta F. de, William of Drogheda, [w:] Mélanges de droit romain dédiés a Georges Cornil, vol. 2, Gand-Paris 1926, s. 641–657pl_PL
dc.referencesZulueta F. de, The Liber Pauperum of Vacarius, SS 44, London 1927pl_PL
dc.referencesZulueta F. de, Stein P., The Teaching of Roman Law in England around 1200, SS Sup.Ser. 8, London 1990pl_PL
dc.referencesZwalve W.J., ‘Snell v. Beadle’ – The Privy Council on Roman Law, Norman Customary and the ‘Ius Commune’, [w:] L. de Ligt, ‘Viva Vox Iuris Romani’. Essays in Honour of Johannes Emil Spruit, Amsterdam 2002, s. 379–386pl_PL
dc.referencesŻak E., Niedziedziczność pasywna skarg wynikających z deliktów w rzymskim prawie klasycznym, [w:] A. Dębiński, M. Wójcik, Współczesna romanistyka prawnicza w Polsce, Lublin 2004, s. 353–365pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8088-237-9
dc.disciplinehistoriapl_PL
dc.disciplinenauki prawnepl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe