Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBąkała, Anna
dc.contributor.authorBąkała, Marcin
dc.description.abstractOnline exams have become a common tool in the academic didactic process, as well as in most online courses in business. Taking exams in a remote location like home, using ICT tools, brings many challenges to both sides, the learner and the examiner. The aim of this article is to show the challenges in the context of ethical attitudes, trust, and respect for one another. Some results of a broader survey in the form of Computer Aided Web Interviews are presented to highlight students’ opinions and expectations, along with the results of personal interviews with academic teachers. In the final part of the article, recommendations are given. The importance of trust and systematic assessment of learners’ progress is emphasized.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym;3pl
dc.subjectonline examsen
dc.subjectcheating preventionen
dc.titleEnhancing ethical behavior in online examsen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBąkała, Anna - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Computer Science in Economicsen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBąkała, Marcin - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Computer Science in Economicsen
dc.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Harvard Business School Background Note 396–239.en
dc.referencesAnderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.en
dc.referencesBąkała, A. (2018). E-learning Project Management Based on IPMA Methodology. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 19(5), 253–267.en
dc.referencesBloom, B. S. (ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.en
dc.referencesBucciol, A., Cicognani, S., & Montinari, N. (2020). Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors. International Review of Economics, 67(3), 319–338.
dc.referencesDavis, G. (2017). Cybersecurity 101: Top Takeaways from Our Back to School Study. (accessed: 10.12.2020).en
dc.referencesFontanillas, R. T., Carbonell, R. M., & Catasús, G. M. (2016). E-assessment process: Giving a voice to online learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–14.
dc.referencesGino, F., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2014). Evil Genius? How Dishonesty Can Lead to Greater Creativity. Psychological Science, 25(4), 973–981.
dc.referencesHarper, R., Bretag, T., & Rundle, K. (2020). Detecting contract cheating: examining the role of assessment type. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(2), 263–278.
dc.referencesKayışoğlu, N., & Temel, C. (2017). An Examination of Attitudes towards Cheating in Exams by Physical Education and Sports High School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(8), 1396–1402.
dc.referencesKoc, E. W., Kahn, J., Koncz, A. J., Salvadge, A., & Longenberger, A. (2019). Job Outlook 2019. Bethlehem: National Association of Colleges and Employers.en
dc.referencesLieberman, M. (2018). Exam Proctoring for Online Students Hasn’t Yet Transformed. Inside Higher Ed, October 10. (accessed: 10.12.2020).en
dc.referencesLoseby, D. (2018). Critical Thinking Skills. In: D. Loseby, Soft skills for Hard Business. Cambridge Academic Publishers.en
dc.referencesMercer, Mettl Report “Soup for corporate souls: Psychometric assessments”. (2020). (accessed: 10.12.2020).en
dc.referencesPapaleontiou-Louca, E., Varnava-Marouchou, D., Mihai, S., & Konis, E. (2014). Teaching for Creativity in Universities. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4), 131–154.
dc.referencesThe Future of Jobs Report. (2020). World Economic Forum. (accessed: 10.12. 2020).en
dc.referencesSchwab, K., & Samans, R. (2016). Global Challenge Insight Report: The Future of Jobs. World Economic Forum, pp. 1–167.
dc.referencesSuryani, A. (2020). Individualized Excel-Based Exams to Prevent Students from Cheating. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 5(1), 14–24.
dc.referencesWhitley, B. E., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic Dishonesty: An Educator’s Guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en
dc.referencesWilson, M. S., Krause, M. J., & Xiang, T. (2010). A Redemption Strategy for Students Caught Cheating. Business Education Innovation Journal, 2(2), 80–85.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailBąkała, Anna -
dc.contributor.authorEmailBąkała, Marcin -

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as