Show simple item record

The Good, the Bad and the Right: Formal Reductions among Deontic Concepts

dc.contributor.authorGlavaničová, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorPascucci, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-20T06:25:58Z
dc.date.available2021-08-20T06:25:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-30
dc.identifier.issn0138-0680
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38699
dc.description.abstractThe present article provides a taxonomic analysis of bimodal logics of normative ideality and normative awfulness, two notions whose meaning is here explained in terms of the moral values pursued by a given community. Furthermore, the article addresses the traditional problem of a reduction among deontic concepts: we explore the possibility of defining other relevant normative notions, such as obligation, explicit permission and Hohfeldian relations, in terms of ideality and awfulness. Some proposals in this respect, which have been formulated in the literature over the years, are here improved and discussed with reference to the various logics that we will introduce.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBulletin of the Section of Logic;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
dc.subjectawfulnessen
dc.subjectexplicit permissionen
dc.subjectHohfeldian relationsen
dc.subjectidealityen
dc.subjectmoral valuesen
dc.subjectobligationen
dc.titleThe Good, the Bad and the Right: Formal Reductions among Deontic Conceptsen
dc.typeOther
dc.page.number151-176
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGlavaničová, Daniela - Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Arts Department of Logic and Methodology of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic; Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Department of Analytic Philosophy, Bratislava, Slovak Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPascucci, Matteo - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Department of Analytic Philosophy, Bratislava, Slovak Republicen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-836X
dc.references[1] A. Anderson, The formal analysis of normative systems, [in:] N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press (1967), pp. 147-213.en
dc.references[2] L. Aqvist, Deontic logic, [in:] Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 8, Springer Netherlands (2002), pp. 147-264, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0387-2_3en
dc.references[3] P. Cane, Responsibility in Law and Morality, Hart Publishing (2002).en
dc.references[4] W. Carnielli, C. Pizzi, Modalities and Multimodalities, Springer (2008), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8590-1en
dc.references[5] M. de Boer, D. M. Gabbay, X. Parent, M. Slavkovic, Two dimensional Standard Deontic Logic [including a detailed analysis of the 1985 Jones-Pörn deontic logic system], Synthese, vol. 187 (2012), pp. 623-660, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9866-4en
dc.references[6] S. Hansson, The varieties of permission, [in:] D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, L. van der Torre (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications (2013), pp. 195-240.en
dc.references[7] H. Herrestad, C. Krogh, Obligations directed from bearers to counterparties, [in:] Proceedings of ICAIL 1995 (1995), pp. 210-218, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222243en
dc.references[8] R. Hilpinen, P. McNamara, Deontic logic: a historical survey and introduction, [in:] D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, L. van der Torre (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications (2013), pp. 3-136.en
dc.references[9] W. N. Hohfeld, Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in legal reasoning, Yale Law Journal, vol. 23 (1913), pp. 16-59.en
dc.references[10] W. N. Hohfeld, Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning, Yale Law Journal, vol. 26 (1917), pp. 710-770.en
dc.references[11] A. Jones, I. Pörn, Ideality, sub-ideality and deontic logic, Synthese, vol. 65 (1985), pp. 275-290, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869304en
dc.references[12] J. Jorgensen, Imperative and logic, Erkenntnis, vol. 7 (1937{1938), pp. 288-296.en
dc.references[13] T. Libal, M. Pascucci, Automated reasoning in normative detachment structures with ideal conditions, [in:] Proceedings of ICAIL 2019 (2019), pp. 63-72, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326707en
dc.references[14] H. Prakken, M. Sergot, Contrary to duty obligations, Studia Logica, vol. 57 (1996), pp. 91-105, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370671en
dc.references[15] W. V. O. Quine, On the nature of moral values, [in:] A. I. Goldman, J. Kim (eds.), Values and morals, Springer, Dordrecht (1978), pp. 37-45, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7634-5_3en
dc.references[16] J. Raz, R. J. Wallace, The Practice of Value, Oxford University Press (2005), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278466.001.0001en
dc.references[17] M. S. Schwartz, Universal moral values for corporate codes of ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 59 (2005), pp. 27-44, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3403-2en
dc.references[18] M. Sergot, Normative positions, [in:] D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, L. van der Torre (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications (2013), pp. 353-406.en
dc.references[19] J. Sullins, Information Technology and Moral Values, [in:] E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2021 ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2021), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/it-moral-values/en
dc.contributor.authorEmailGlavaničová, Daniela - daniela.glavanicova@gmail.com
dc.contributor.authorEmailPascucci, Matteo - matteopascucci.academia@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0138-0680.2021.05
dc.relation.volume50


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8509-Article_Text-24933-3-10-2 ...
Size:
507.8Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0