dc.contributor.author | Janicki, Jędrzej | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-15T11:22:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-15T11:22:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-4286 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/31164 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this article is to assess critically and compare Morris Weitz’s
anti-essentialist theory of art to George Dickie’s institutional one. The
comparison is based on a so-called Auschwitz incydent. The article
shows both differences and similarities in described theories. The scope
of interest is limited to the XXth Century art, since works from this
period question traditionally understood meaning of art. In the article
are also briefly mentioned other concepts of art (e.g. Clive Bell’s) and
the idea of artworld proposed by Arthur C. Danto, which served later as
basis for other theories. The article shows that the two described
theories are rather complementary than contradictory to each other. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris;44 | |
dc.subject | antyesencjalizm | pl_PL |
dc.subject | instytucjonalna teoria sztuki | pl_PL |
dc.subject | estetyka | pl_PL |
dc.subject | filozofia sztuki | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Morris Weitz | pl_PL |
dc.subject | anti-essentialism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | institutional theory of art | pl_PL |
dc.subject | George Dickie | pl_PL |
dc.subject | aesthetics | pl_PL |
dc.title | Analiza porównawcza antyesencjalistycznej i Instytucjonalnej teorii sztuki | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Comparative Analysis of Anti-essentialist and Institutional Theories of Art | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS 2019 | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 153-167 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Łódzki | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bieczyński, M. (2016). Biuletyn 36. edycji Konkursu im. Marii Dokowicz, „Instytucja sztuki”. Poznań: Silva Rerum. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Danto, A. C. (1964). The Artworld. The Journal of Philosophy, 61, 571- 584. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Danto, A. C. (2016). Czym jest sztuka. przeł. A. Kunicka. Warszawa: Aletheia. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dickie, G. (1969). Defining Art. American Philosophical Quarterly, 6, 253- 256. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Diffey, T. J. (2005/2006). Wittgenstein, antyesencjalizm i definicja sztuki. przeł. L. Sosnowski. Estetyka i Krytyka, 9/10, 76-92. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Marzec, S. (2018). Sztuka jako farmakon. Format, 78, 7-8. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sawicka, A. (2007). O ambiwalentnej funkcji świata sztuki. Sztuka i Filozofia, 31, 46-66. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sułkowska, M. (2000). Definicje i pojęcia w estetyce. Folia Philosophica, 18, 275-286. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tatarkiewicz, W. (1989). Historia estetyki. Estetyka średniowieczna. Warszawa: Arkady. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Weitz, M. (1956). The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15, 27-35. | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 1 | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | filozofia | pl_PL |