Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKarbowski, Adam
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-03T08:57:02Z
dc.date.available2019-04-03T08:57:02Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/27304
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the controversies over the moral justification for patent protection in biotechnology. Special emphasis has been put on the controversy over the moral justification for patent protection of stem cells. By referring to arguments for (1) human dignity and (2) patentability criteria, the moral justifiability of patent protection of stem cells is in serious doubt. A whole section of the paper is devoted to the moral issues linked to patent protection in biotechnology and their political and economic significance. An attempt is made to solve some of the discussed problems, i.e., the introduction of decision criteria based on the system of values shared by the members of a given society.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPublication of English-language versions of the volumes of the "Annales. Ethics in Economic Life" financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Ethics in Economic Life; 5
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectmoral justificationen_GB
dc.subjectpatentsen_GB
dc.subjectbiotechnologyen_GB
dc.titleControversies over the moral justification for patent protection in biotechnologyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number57-66
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWarsaw School of Economics, Chair of Business Economics
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4869
dc.referencesAlison, M. R., Poulsom, R., Forbes, S., & Wright N. A. (2002). An introduction to stem cells. Review, Journal of Pathology, 197, 419–423.en_GB
dc.referencesAndorno, R. (2009). Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34, 223–240.en_GB
dc.referencesBahadur, G., & Morrison, M. (2010). Patenting human pluripotent cells: Balancing commercial, academic and ethical interests. Human Reproduction, 25, 14–21.en_GB
dc.referencesBishop, A. E., Lee, D. K., & Polak, J. M. (2002). Embryonic stem cells. Review. Journal of Pathology, 197, 424–429.en_GB
dc.referencesBlau, H. M., Brazelton, T. R., & Weissman, J. M. (2001). The evolving concept of stem cell: entity or function. Cell, 105, 829–841.en_GB
dc.referencesBoldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2013). The case against patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 3–22.en_GB
dc.referencesChakma, J., Sammut, S. M., & Agrawal, A. (2013). Life sciences venture capital in emerging markets. Nature Biotechnology, 31, 195–201.en_GB
dc.referencesCogle, C. R., Guthrie, S. M., Sanders, R. C., Allen, W. L., Scott, E. W., & Petersen, B. E. (2003). An overview of stem cell research and regulatory issues. Mayo Clin. Proc., 8, 993–1003.en_GB
dc.referencesDevaiah, V. H. (2010). Impact of bioethics on patentability of inventions. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 7, 14–17.en_GB
dc.referencesDrahos, P. (1999). Biotechnology patents, markets and morality. E.I.P.R., 21, 441–449.en_GB
dc.referencesGrubb, P. W. (2004). Patents for chemicals, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology: Fundamentals of global law, practice and strategy. Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHabermas, J. (2003). Przyszłość natury ludzkiej. Czy zmierzamy do eugeniki liberalnej? Warszawa: Scholar.en_GB
dc.referencesHolland, S., Lebacqz, K., & Zoloth, L. (2001). The human embryonic stem cel debate: Science, ethics, and public policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.en_GB
dc.referencesInoue, H., Nagata, N., Kurokawa, H., & Yamanaka, S. (2014). iPS cells: a game changer for future medicine. EMBO Journal, 33, 409–417.en_GB
dc.referencesKamieniarz, K., Nawrot, R., Grajek, K., & Goździcka-Józefiak, A. (2006). Biotechnologia w medycynie regeneracyjnej i reprodukcyjnej. Biotechnologia, 73, 31–48.en_GB
dc.referencesKant, I. (2014). Uzasadnienie metafizyki moralności. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki.en_GB
dc.referencesKarbowski, A. (2017). Kontrowersje związane z moralnym uzasadnieniem ochrony patentowej w biotechnologii. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 20(1), 83–94.en_GB
dc.referencesKarbowski, A., & Prokop, J. (2013). Controversy over the economic justifications for patent protection. Procedia – Economics and Finance, 5, 393–402.en_GB
dc.referencesKhachiauri, S. (2012). Human embryonic stem cell controversy (Patents involving ethical and human rights concern). Lund University.en_GB
dc.referencesKrueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64, 291–303.en_GB
dc.referencesLemke, T. (2010). Biopolityka (T. Dominiak, Trans.). Warszawa: Sic!en_GB
dc.referencesLiberda, Z. B. (2008). Patenty w skali światowej i w poszczególnych krajach. In A. Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, & E. Okoń-Horodyńska (Eds.), Tendencje innowacyjnego rozwoju polskich przedsiębiorstw. Warszawa: Instytut Wiedzy i Innowacji.en_GB
dc.referencesLooney, B. (1994). Should genes be patented? Law and Policy in International Business, 26, 231–272.en_GB
dc.referencesMachlup, F. (1958). An economic review of the patent system. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.en_GB
dc.referencesOman, R. (1995). Biotech patenting issues raise ethical concerns. National Law Journal, 17, C42.en_GB
dc.referencesPuri, M. C., & Nagy, A. (2012). Concise review: Embryonic stem cells versus induced pluripotent stem cells: The game is on. Stem Cells, 30, 10–14.en_GB
dc.referencesResnik, D. B. (2004). Owning the genome: A moral analysis of DNA patenting. New York: State University of New York Press.en_GB
dc.referencesResnik, D. B. (2007). Embryonic stem cell patents and human dignity. Health Care Analysis, 15, 211–222.en_GB
dc.referencesRothhaar, M. (2010). Human dignity and human rights in bioethics: The Kantian approach. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 13, 251–257.en_GB
dc.referencesSenser, O. (2009). Kant’s conception of human dignity. Kant Studien, 100, 309–331.en_GB
dc.referencesSikora, M., & Olszewski, W. (2004). Komórki macierzyste – biologia i zastosowanie terapeutyczne. Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej, 58, 202–208.en_GB
dc.referencesSterckx, S. (2006). The moral justifiability of patents. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 13, 249–265.en_GB
dc.referencesWarrington, A. M. (1964). Private and public morality. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 90, 1326.en_GB
dc.referencesWiśniewska, J. (2008). Motywy podejmowania bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych. Przegląd Organizacji, 12, 19–23.en_GB
dc.referencesWojciszke, B. (2011). Psychologia społeczna. Warszawa: Scholar.en_GB
dc.referencesYamanaka, S. (2012). Induced pluripotent stem cells: Past, present and future. Cell Stem Cell, 10, 678–684.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailadam.karbowski@sgh.waw.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.21.5.05
dc.relation.volume21en_GB
dc.subject.jelK11


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.