Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorTatarczak, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-08T13:33:23Z
dc.date.available2018-10-08T13:33:23Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/25927
dc.description.abstractThe growing diversity of programmes concerning the solutions associated with the fourth party supply chain operations, the increasing pressure to optimise all resources and capabilities, as well as the continually increasing integration of different types of technologies are the driving force in the establishment of fourth party logistics supply chain coalition. Choosing the most rational and practical cost allocation mechanism in the fourth party logistics supply chain coalition, with the aim of reducing the overall operating costs, is the main condition ensuring companies’ motivation to participate in collaboration. This paper addresses the concepts from the game theory combined with multi‑criteria problems in order to introduce a realisable profit distribution mechanism, with the potential to establish practical collaborations among companies. The aim is to achieve the best conditions for collaboration. Case studies are used to demonstrate the utility of the framework.en_GB
dc.description.abstractOperator logistyczny 4PL (Fourth Party Logistics Provider) oferuje nowe i innowacyjne rozwiązania, mające na celu obniżenie kosztów, udostępnienie usług i usprawnienia w zarządzaniu złożonymi łańcuchami dostaw. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie najlepszych warunków do współpracy między wyspecjalizowanymi podmiotami zajmującymi się zarządzaniem łańcuchem dostaw – operatorami 4PL. Rozważania dotyczące czynników wpływających na tworzenie koalicji przez ope­ratorów 4PL, a także konkluzje z zakresu trwałości współpracy stały się podstawą do zaprojektowania dwustopniowej procedury, zbudowanej w oparciu o pojęcia z teorii gier. Celem przedstawionej procedury jest wybór metody alokacji kosztów/zysków przez koalicjantów. Analizy przeprowadzono na podstawie danych pochodzących z literatury.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;338; 338
dc.subjectFourth Party Logisticsen_GB
dc.subjectgame theoryen_GB
dc.subjectShapley valueen_GB
dc.subjectinnovationen_GB
dc.subjectsupply chainen_GB
dc.subjectoperator 4PLpl_PL
dc.subjectteoria gier koalicyjnychpl_PL
dc.subjectwartość Shapleyapl_PL
dc.subjectinnowacjepl_PL
dc.subjectłańcuch dostawpl_PL
dc.titleA Framework to Support Coalition Formation in the Fourth Party Logistics Supply Chain Coalitionen_GB
dc.title.alternativeTworzenie koalicji między operatorami 4PLpl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2018; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2018en_GB
dc.page.number195-212
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Maria Curie‑Skłodowska in Lublin, Faculty of Economics, Department of Marketing Research
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesAudy J.F., D’Amours S. (2008), Impact of benefit sharing among companies in the implantation of a collaborative transportation system – an application in the furniture industry, “Pervasive Collaborative Networks”, pp. 519–532.pl_PL
dc.referencesBauknight D.N., Miller J.R. (1999), Fourth party logistics: The evolution of supply chain outsourcing, “CALM Supply Chain Logistics Journal”.pl_PL
dc.referencesBhatnagar R., Viswanathan S. (2000), Re‑engineering global supply chains: alliances between manufacturing firms and global logistics services providers, “International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management”, vol. 30(1), pp. 13–34.pl_PL
dc.referencesBüyüközkan G., Feyzioğlu O., Ersoy M.Ş. (2009), Evaluation of 4PL operating models: A decision making approach based on 2‑additive Choquet integral, “International Journal of Production Economics”, vol. 121(1), pp. 112–120.pl_PL
dc.referencesChen K.H., Su C.T. (2010), Activity assigning of fourth party logistics by particle swarm optimiza­tion‑based preemptive fuzzy integer goal programming, “Expert Systems with Applications”, vol. 37(5), pp. 3630–3637.pl_PL
dc.referencesDai B., Chen H. (2012), Profit allocation mechanisms for carrier collaboration in pickup and delivery service, “Computers Industrial Engineering”, vol. 62(2), pp. 633–643.pl_PL
dc.referencesDefryn C., Vanovermeire C., Sörensen K. (2016), Gain sharing in horizontal logistic co‑operation: a case study in the fresh fruit and vegetables sector, [in:] Sustainable logistics and supply chains, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 75–89.pl_PL
dc.referencesDrechsel J., Kimms A. (2011), Cooperative lot sizing with transshipments and scarce capacities: solutions and fair cost allocations, “International Journal of Production Research”, vol. 49(9), pp. 2643–2668.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrisk M., Göthe‑Lundgren M., Jörnsten K., Rönnqvist M. (2010), Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation, “European Journal of Operational Research”, vol. 205(2), pp. 448–458.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuang M., Tong W., Wang Q., Xu X., Wang X. (2006), Immune algorithm based routing optimization in fourth‑party logistics, [in:] Evolutionary Computation, 2006. CEC 2006. IEEE Con­gress on, IEEE, pp. 3029–3034.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrajewska M.A., Kopfer H., Laporte G., Ropke S., Zaccour G. (2008), Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing, “Journal of the Operational Research Society”, vol. 59(11), pp. 1483–1491.pl_PL
dc.referencesLi J., Rong G., Feng Y. (2015), Request selection and exchange approach for carrier collaboration based on auction of a single request, “Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review”, vol. 84, pp. 23–39.pl_PL
dc.referencesLi X., Ying W., Liu W., Chen J., Huang B. (2003), The decision optimization model of 4PL, [in:] Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003. IEEE International Conference on, vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 1241–1245.pl_PL
dc.referencesLiu P., Wu Y., Xu N. (2010), Allocating collaborative profit in less‑than‑truckload carrier alliance, “Journal of Service Science and Management”, vol. 3(01), p. 143.pl_PL
dc.referencesLozano S., Moreno P., Adenso‑Díaz B., Algaba E. (2013), Cooperative game theory approach to al­locating benefits of horizontal cooperation, “European Journal of Operational Research”, vol. 229(2), pp. 444–452.pl_PL
dc.referencesNissen V., Bothe M. (2002), Fourth party logistics – ein Überblick, “Logistik Management”, vol. 4(1), pp. 16–26.pl_PL
dc.referencesÖzener O.Ö., Ergun Ö. (2008), Allocating costs in a collaborative transportation procurement net­work, “Transportation Science”, vol. 42(2), pp. 146–165.pl_PL
dc.referencesSaglietto L., Cezanne C. (2015), A bibliometric analysis of research on 4PL, “International Journal of Transport Economics”, vol. 42(3), pp. 461–486.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmeidler D. (1969), The nucleolus of a characteristic function game, “SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics”, vol. 17(6), pp. 1163–1170.pl_PL
dc.referencesShapley L.S. (1953), A value for n‑person games, “Contributions to the Theory of Games”, vol. 2(28), pp. 307–317.pl_PL
dc.referencesSimatupang T. M., Sridharan R. (2002), The collaborative supply chain, “The International Journal of Logistics Management”, vol. 13(1), pp. 15–30.pl_PL
dc.referencesTijs S.H., Driessen T.S. (1986), Game theory and cost allocation problems, “Management Science”, vol. 32(8), pp. 1015–1028.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanovermeire C., Sörensen K., Van Breedam A., Vannieuwenhuyse B., Verstrepen S. (2014), Hori­zontal logistics collaboration: decreasing costs through flexibility and an adequate cost allocation strategy, “International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications”, vol. 17(4), pp. 339–355.pl_PL
dc.referencesWang X., Kopfer H. (2014), Collaborative transportation planning of less‑than‑truckload freight, “OR Spectrum”, vol. 36(2), pp. 357–380.pl_PL
dc.referencesXu N. (2013), Improved weighted Shapley value model for the fourth party logistics supply chain coalition, “Journal of Control Science and Engineering”, vol. 2013, p. 1.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailanna.tatarczak@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.338.12
dc.relation.volume5en_GB
dc.subject.jelC71
dc.subject.jelO31
dc.subject.jelD85


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord