Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCsatlós, Erzsébet
dc.contributor.editorWyrozumska, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-20T09:49:20Z
dc.date.available2018-03-20T09:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCsatlós E., Who is to Give Effects to the ECtHR Decisions? The Vajnai Saga, [in:] Wyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017, p. [481]-503, doi: 10.18778/8088-707-7.12pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8088-707-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24248
dc.description.sponsorshipThe monograph is a result of the project nr 10-ECRP-028 International Law through the National Prism: the Impact of Judicial Dialogue The research is based on laws being in force on 2nd August 2016pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherŁódź University Presspl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofWyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017;
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.titleWho is to Give Effects to the ECtHR Decisions? The Vajnai Sagapl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017pl_PL
dc.page.number[481]-503pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDepartment of Administrative Law and Financial Law. Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Szeged, Hungarypl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8088-708-4
dc.referencesGabcikovo–Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) (1997) Rep 7 [International Court of Justice]pl_PL
dc.referencesVajnai v Hungary, App. no. 33629/06 (8 July 2008) [European Court of Human Rights]pl_PL
dc.referencesFratanoló v Hungary, App. no. 29459/10 (3 November 2011) [European Court of Human Rights]pl_PL
dc.referencesFáber v Hungary, App. no. 40721/08 (24 July 2012) [European Court of Human Rights]pl_PL
dc.referencesHorváth and Vajnai v Hungary, App. nos 55795/11 and 55798/11 (23 September 2014) [European Court of Human Rights]pl_PL
dc.referencesC-328/04 Criminal proceedings against Attila Vajnai (6 October 2005) [Court of Justice of the European Union]pl_PL
dc.references53/1993 (X. 13.) (13 October 1993), summary available in English: <http://www.codices.coe.int/NXT/gateway.dll/CODICES/precis/eng/eur/hun/hun-1993-3-015?fn=document-frameset.htm$f=templates$3.0> (access: 9 July 2014) [Constitutional Court]pl_PL
dc.references30/1998 (VI. 25.) (25 June 1998), available in English: <http://www.alkotmanybirosag.hu/letoltesek/en_0030_1998.pdf> (access: 9 July 2014) [Constitutional Court]pl_PL
dc.references14/2000 (V. 12.) (12 May 2000), available in English: <http://www.alkotmanybirosag.hu/letoltesek/en_0014_2000.pdf> (access: 9 July 2014) [Constitutional Court]pl_PL
dc.references143/2010 (VII. 14.) (14 July 2010), available in English: <http://www.alkotmanybirosag.hu/letoltesek/en_0143_2010.pdf> (access: 9 July 2014) [Constitutional Court]pl_PL
dc.references4/2013 (II. 21.) (21 February 2013), summary available in English: <http://www.codices.coe.int/NXT/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=default.htm> (access: 14 July 2014) [Constitutional Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.VI.38.071/2010/4 (5 September 2011) [Supreme Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.II.38.073/2010/4 (22 June 2011) [Supreme Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.III.38.074/2010/4 (27 June 2011) [Supreme Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.III.38.075/2010/4 (8 June 2011) [Supreme Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesBfv.III.570/2012/2 (10 July 2012) [Curia]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.II.37.807/2013/4 (12 February 2014) [Curia]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.II.37.798/2013/4 (12 February 2014) [Curia]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.II.37.814/2013/3 (12 March 2014) [Curia]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.II.37.800/2013/3 (26 February 2014) [Curia]pl_PL
dc.referencesKfv.II.37.806/2013/3 (26 February 2014) [Curia]pl_PL
dc.references12. B. 1482/2007/10 (Pécs Municipal Court, 2007), not available, it is cited and referred to in case 121/2008/5 (Baranya County Court, 23 September 2008)pl_PL
dc.referencesBf.121/2008/5 (Baranya County Court, 23 September 2008)pl_PL
dc.references24.K.35.639/2006/25 (Budapest Metropolitan Court, 7 April 2009)pl_PL
dc.references27.K.30.848/2010/3 (Budapest Metropolitan Court, 29 June 2010)pl_PL
dc.references17.K.31.995/2013/2 (Budapest Metropolitan Administration and Labour Court, 9 October 2013)pl_PL
dc.references20.K.31.328/2013/3 (Budapest Metropolitan Administration and Labour Court, 9 October 2013)pl_PL
dc.referencesBírósági Határozatok Gyűjteménye (Collection of Judicial Decisions), <http://www.birosag.hu/ugyfelkapcsolati-portal/anonim-hatarozatok-tara> (access: 9 July 2014)pl_PL
dc.references146-105/12/1/2009.P (2009), after case Kfv.VI.38.071/2010/4 (Supreme Court, 5 September 2011)pl_PL
dc.references29000/105/547-56/2012.P (National Police Headquarters, 2012), not available, cited and referred to in case 17.K.31.995/2013/2 (Budapest Metropolitan Administration and Labour Court, 9 October 2013)pl_PL
dc.references29000-105/376-1/2013.RP (National Police Headquarters, 2013), not available, cited and referred to in case 17.K.31.995/2013/2 (Budapest Metropolitan Administration and Labour Court, 9 October 2013)pl_PL
dc.references70/2013 (III. 13.) (Independent Police Complaints Board, 9 September 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesBuyse A., Hamilton M., Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics and Rights (CUP 2011)pl_PL
dc.referencesMolnár T., A nemzetközi jogi eredetű normák beépülése a magyar jogrendszerbe (Dialóg Campus, Budapest-Pécs 2013)pl_PL
dc.referencesBárd K., ‘The Legal Order of Hungary and the European Convention on Human Rights’, [in:] Motoc I., Ziemele I. (eds), The Impact of the ECHR on Democratic Change in Central and Eastern Europe: Judicial Perspectives (CUP 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesChronowski N., Drinóczi T., Ernszt I., ‘Hungary’, [in:] Shelton D. (ed.), International Law and Domestic Legal Systems – Incorporation, Transformation, and Persuasion (OUP 2011)pl_PL
dc.referencesCsatlós E., ‘A Kúria (Legfelsőbb Bíróság) gyakorlata és a nemzetközi jog’, [in:] Blutman L. (ed.), A nemzetközi jog hatása a magyar joggyakorlatra (HVG-ORAC 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesCsatlós E., ‘Alkotmánybírósági határozatok: a nemzetközi jog mint értelmezési tampon’, [in:] Blutman L. (ed.), A nemzetközi jog hatása a magyar joggyakorlatra (HVG-ORAC 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesUitz R., ‘The Illusion of a Constitution in Europe: The Hungarian Constitution Court after the Fifth Amendment of the fundamental Law’, [in:] Bell J., Paris M.L. (eds), Rights-Based Constitutional Review: Constitutional Courts in a Changing Landscape (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesBárd P., Carrera S., Guild E., Kochenov D., ‘An EU Mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights’ (2016) 91 CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security in Europepl_PL
dc.referencesBlutman L., ‘A nemzetközi jog használata az Alkotmány értelmezésénél’ (2009) 64 Jogtudományi Közlöny 301pl_PL
dc.referencesChronowski N., Csatlós E., ‘Judicial Dialogue or National Monologue? The International Law and Hungarian Courts’ (2013) 1 ELTE Law Journal 7pl_PL
dc.referencesDominicé C., ‘The International Responsibility of States for Breach of International Obligations’ (1999) 10 EJIL 2 353pl_PL
dc.referencesDudás D.V., ‘Az Emberi Jogok Európai Bírósága és a hazai közigazgatási bíróságok közötti kölcsönhatás’ (2014) Fundamentum 1-2 103pl_PL
dc.referencesFijalkowski A., ‘The criminalisation of symbols of the past: expression, law and memory’ (2014) 10 International Journal of Law in Context 3 295pl_PL
dc.referencesKoltay A., ‘A Vajnai-ügy. Az Emberi Jogok Európai Bíróságának ítélete a vörös csillag viselésének büntethetőségéről’ (2010) 1 JeMa 77pl_PL
dc.referencesLaffranque J., ‘Who Has the Last Word on the Protection of Human Rights in Europe?’ (2012) Juridica International XIX 117pl_PL
dc.referencesMolnár T., ‘Két kevéssé ismert nemzetközi jogforrás helye a belső jogban: a nemzetközi bíróságok döntései, valamint az egyoldalú állami aktusok esete a Magyar jogrendszerrel’ (2012) 3 Közjogi Szemle 1pl_PL
dc.referencesRoberts A., ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’ (2011) 60 ICLQ 57pl_PL
dc.referencesSlaughter A.M., Burke-White W., ‘The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, The European Way of Law)’ (2006) 47 Harvard International Law Journal 2 327pl_PL
dc.referencesTóth J.Z., ‘Az önkényuralmi jelképek használata mint a véleménynyilvánítási szabadság korlátja? (A 4/2013. AB határozat előzményei, indokai és következményei, valamint az új Btk.-szabályozás pozitívumai és fogyatékosságai)’ (2013) 2 JESZ 1, <http://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/tothj54.pdf> (access: 29 February 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended)pl_PL
dc.references‘Status of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’ (Council of Europe), <http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=005&CM=&DF=&CL=ENG> (access: 19 November 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesAct XX on the Constitution of the Hungarian Republic 1949pl_PL
dc.referencesAct XXXIV on the Police 1994pl_PL
dc.referencesAct IV on Criminal Code 1998pl_PL
dc.referencesAct XIX on criminal proceedings 1998pl_PL
dc.referencesAct L on the procedure related to international agreements 2005pl_PL
dc.referencesAct XC on freedom of electronic information 2005pl_PL
dc.referencesAct XLIII on central state organs and the status of the members of the Government and that of the state secretaries 2010pl_PL
dc.referencesFundamental Law of Hungary 25 April 2011pl_PL
dc.referencesAct CLXI on the organisation and administration of courts 2011pl_PL
dc.referencesAct CXII on informational self-determination and freedom of information 2011pl_PL
dc.referencesAct C on Criminal Code 2012pl_PL
dc.referencesDecision 58/2012 on the acceptance of the report on the issues related to the execution of obligations deriving from the Fratanoló v Hungary judgment of the ECtHR (Parliament, July 2012)pl_PL
dc.referencesReport no. J/6853 on the issues related to the execution of obligations deriving from the Fratanoló v Hungary judgment of the ECtHR (Parliament, 2 July 2012), <http://www.parlament.hu/irom39/06853/06853.pdf > (access: 31 July 2013)pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8088-707-7.12


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska