Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Michał
dc.contributor.editorWyrozumska, Anna
dc.identifier.citationKowalski M., International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue from the Polish Perspective, [in:] Wyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017, p. [365]-397, doi: 10.18778/8088-707-7.08pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipThe monograph is a result of the project nr 10-ECRP-028 International Law through the National Prism: the Impact of Judicial Dialogue The research is based on laws being in force on 2nd August 2016pl_PL
dc.publisherŁódź University Presspl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofWyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017;
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.titleInternational Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue from the Polish Perspectivepl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017pl_PL[365]-397pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland.pl_PL
dc.referencesChahal v the UK, App. no. 22414/93 (15 November 1996) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesD. v the UK, App. no. 30240/96 (2 May 1997) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesSoering v the UK, App. no. 14038/88 (7 July 1989) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesF. v the UK, App. no. 17341/03 (inadmissibility decision, 22 June 2004) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesI.I.N. v the Netherlands, App. no. 2035/04 (inadmissibility decision, 9 December 2004) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesSalah Sheekh v the Netherlands, App. no. 1948/04 (11 January 2007) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesN. v the UK, App. no. 26565/05 (27 May 2008) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesT.I. v the UK, App. no. 43844/98 (inadmissibility decision, 7 March 2000) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesYoh-Ekale Mwanje v Belgium, App. no. 10486/10 (20 December 2011) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesTarakhel v Switzerland, App. no. 29217/12 (4 November 2012) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesMamilov v Poland, App. no. 18358/07 (inadmissibility decision/striking out of the list of cases, 20 October 2010) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesSufi and Elmi v the UK, App. nos 8319/07 and 11449/07 (28 June 2011) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesM.S.S. v Belgium and Greece, App. no. 30696/09 (21 January 2012) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesK.A.B. v Sweden, App. no. 886/11 (5 September 2013) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesS.J. v Belgium, App. no. 70055/10 (Chamber, 27 February 2014) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesM.E. v Sweden, App. no. 713398/12 (Chamber, 26 June 2014) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesS.J. v Belgium, App. no. 70055/10 (Grand Chamber, 15 March 2015) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesM.E. v Sweden, App. no. 713398/12 (Grand Chamber, 8 April 2015) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesR.H. v Sweden, App. no. 4601/14 (10 September 2015) [ECtHR]pl_PL
dc.referencesC-465/07 Meki Elgafaji, Noor Elgafaji v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (17 February 2009) [CJEU]pl_PL
dc.referencesC‑199/12–C‑201/127, X, Y and Z v Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel (7 November 2013) [CJEU]pl_PL
dc.referencesC‑148/13–C‑150/13, A, B, C v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (2 December 2014) [CJEU]pl_PL
dc.referencesC-542/13 Mohamed M’Bodj v État belge (18 December 2014) [CJEU]pl_PL
dc.referencesC-562/13 Centre public d’action sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve v Moussa Abdida (18 December 2014) [CJEU]pl_PL
dc.referencesC‑472/13 Andre Lawrence Shepherd v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (26 February 2015) [CJEU]pl_PL
dc.referencesV SA 1494/02 (29 January 2003) [Supreme Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesII OSK 237/07 (8 May 2008) [Supreme Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesV SA/Wa 874/10 (4 December 2009) [Warsaw Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesIV SA/Wa 1387/13 (15 October 2013) [Warsaw Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesIV SA/Wa 1557/14 (29 October 2014) [Warsaw Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesIV SA/Wa 2152/14 (22 January 2015) [Warsaw Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesIV SA/Wa 681/15 (22 September 2015) [Warsaw Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesIV SA/Wa 694/15 (24 September 2015) [Warsaw Administrative Court]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-129-4/S/07 (3 April 2009) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-908-1/S/09 (23 October 2009) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-1182-1/S/09 (14 January 2010) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-161-1/S/12 (28 May 2012) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-178-1/S/12 (25 July 2012) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-246-1/S/13 (29 August 2013) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-72-5/S/08 (14 October 2013) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-93-1/S/14 (29 May 2014) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-560-2/S/15 (4 December 2015) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-588-2/S/15 (17 March 2016) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-1109-1/S/15 (7 April 2016) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-956-1/S/15 (22 April 2016) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-550-3/S/14 (22 April 2016) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesRdU-705-2/S/15 (27 April 2016) [Refugee Board]pl_PL
dc.referencesIslam v Secretary of State for the Home department; R. V. Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex p. Shah (1999) 2 AC 629 (HL)pl_PL
dc.referencesThe UK Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Omoruyi v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (2001) Imm AR 175pl_PL
dc.referencesAguirre Cervantes v INS of 21 March 2001 accessed via (2001) 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 586pl_PL
dc.referencesE. M. v Ministry of Interior 4 Azs 99/2007-93 (Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic – Nejvyšší správní soud, 24 January 2008)pl_PL
dc.referencesRefugee Appeal No. 76456 (New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 15 March 2010)pl_PL
dc.referencesHJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, UKSC 31 (7 July 2010)pl_PL
dc.referencesJoly D., Heaven or Hell?: Asylum Policies and Refugees in Europe (Macmillan Press 1996)pl_PL
dc.referencesGoodwin-Gill G.S., McAdam J., The Refugee in International Law (3rd ed., Oxford University Press 2007)pl_PL
dc.referencesKowalski M., ‘Sexuelle Orientierung im Flüchtlingsrecht und im allgemeinen Migrationsrecht Polens unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Verifizierungsproblematik im Verfahren’, [in:] Classen C.D., Richter D., Łukańko B. (eds), ‘Sexuelle Orientierung’ als Diskriminierungsgrund. Regelungsbedarf in Deutschland und Polen? (Mohr Siebeck 2016) 316pl_PL
dc.referencesKowalski M., ‘Konflikt na Ukrainie a praktyka udzielania ochrony cudzoziemcom na terytorium Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej’ [Ukrainian Conflict and the Practice of Granting Protection to Foreigners on the Territory of the Republic of Poland], [in:] Pudzianowska D. (ed.), Status cudzoziemca w Polsce w świetle współczesnych wyzwań międzynarodowych [The Foreigner’s Status in Poland in Light of the Contemporary International Challenges] (Wolters Kluwer 2016) 96pl_PL
dc.referencesTzanakopoulos A., ‘Judicial Dialogue as Means of Interpretation’, [in:] Aust H., Nolte G. (eds), The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Uniformity, Diversity, Convergence (Oxford University Press 2016) 72pl_PL
dc.referencesEinarsen T., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Notion of an Implied Right to de facto Asylum’ (1990) 2 International Journal of Refugee Law 361pl_PL
dc.referencesBenvenisti E., ‘Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 241pl_PL
dc.referencesLambert H., ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 519pl_PL
dc.referencesWeßels J., ‘HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) – Reflections on a new test for sexuality-based asylum claims in Britain’ (2012) 24 International Journal of Refugee Law 815pl_PL
dc.referencesFrishman O., ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue as an Organisation Field’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 739pl_PL
dc.referencesBank R., ‘The Potential and Limitations of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Shaping International Refugee Law’ (2015) 27 International Journal of Refugee Law 213pl_PL
dc.referencesAldenhoff L., Clayton G., McDonough P., Actors of Protection and the Application of the Internal Protection Alternative. European Comparative Report (European Council on Refugees and Exiles 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesCafaggi F. et al., Judicial Interactions Techniques – Their Potential and Use in European Fundamental Rights Adjudication (European University Institute 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesPeers S., ‘Could EU law save Paddington Bear? The CJEU develops a new type of protection’ (EU Law Analysis, 21 December 2014), <> (access: 30 April 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesUNHCR, Guidelines on International Protection No 4: “Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative” within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, HCR/GIP/03/04, 23 July 2003pl_PL
dc.referencesUNHCR, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (Geneva 1992, reedited)pl_PL

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska