dc.contributor.author | Czaplińska, Anna | |
dc.contributor.editor | Wyrozumska, Anna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-20T09:27:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-20T09:27:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Czaplińska A., The Preliminary Reference Procedure as an Instrument of Judicial Dialogue in the EU – the CEE Perspective, [in:] Wyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017, p. [297]-332, doi: 10.18778/8088-707-7.06 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8088-707-7 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/24241 | |
dc.description.sponsorship | The monograph is a result of the project nr 10-ECRP-028 International Law through the National Prism: the Impact of Judicial Dialogue The research is based on laws being in force on 2nd August 2016 | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Łódź University Press | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Wyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017; | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.title | The Preliminary Reference Procedure as an Instrument of Judicial Dialogue in the EU – the CEE Perspective | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017 | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [297]-332 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Department of European Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz, Poland. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8088-708-4 | |
dc.references | 283/81 Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health (6 October 1982) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | 160/84 Oryzomyli Kavallas and Others (15 May 1986) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-453/00 Kühne & Heitz NV v Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren (13 January 2004) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-302/04 Ynos kft v János Varga (10 January 2006) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-2/06 Willy Kempter KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (12 February 2008) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-2/06 Willy Kempter KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (Advocate General Y. Bot opinion, 24 April 2007) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-161/06 Skoma-Lux sro v Celní ředitelství Olomouc (11 December 2007) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C‑210/06 Cartesio Oktató és Szolgáltató bt (16 December 2008) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-239/07 Julius Sabatauskas and Others (9 October 2008) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-404/07 Győrgy Katz v István Roland Sós (9 October 2008) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-314/08 Krzysztof Filipiak v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu (19 November 2009) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-344/08 Criminal proceedings against Tomasz Rubach (16 July 2009) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-31/09 Nawras Bolbol v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal (17 June 2010) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-399/09 Marie Landtová v Česká správa socialního zabezpečení (22 June 2011) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-378/10 VALE Építési Kft. (12 July 2012) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-410/09 Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej (12 May 2011) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-254/11 Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Rendőrkapitányság Záhony Határrendészeti Kirendeltsége v Oskar Shomodi (21 March 2013) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-364/11 Mostafa Abed El Karem El Kott and Others v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal (19 December 2012) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-314/13 Užsienio reikalų ministerija and Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba v Vladimir Peftiev and Others (12 June 2014) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | C-536/13 Gazprom OAO v Lietuvos Respublika (13 May 2015) [CJEU] | pl_PL |
dc.references | III. ÚS 252/04 (Czech Constitutional Court, judgment, 25 January 2005) | pl_PL |
dc.references | PI. ÚS 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII (Czech Constitutional Court, judgment, 31 January 2012) | pl_PL |
dc.references | K 18/06 (Polish Constitutional Court, 7 November 2007) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Alter K., Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (Oxford University Press 2001) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Broberg M., Fergen N., Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice (Oxford University Press 2014) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Martinico G., Pollicino O., The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems. Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Edward Elgar Publishing 2012) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Arnull A., ‘Judicial Dialogue in the European Union”, [in:] Dickinson J., Eleftheriadis P. (eds), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 109 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tridimas T., ‘The CJEU and the Specifity of Preliminary Reference Rulings: Some Reflections’, [in:] Besson S., Pichonnaz P. (eds), Les principes de droit européen – Principles in European Law (L.G.D.J. 2011) 331 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Carruba C., Murrah L., ‘Legal Integration and Use of the Preliminary Ruling Process in the European Union’ (2005) 59 International Organization 399 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cartabia M., ‘Taking Dialogue Seriously The Renewed Need for a Judicial Dialogue at the Time of Constitutional Activism in the European Union’ (2007) 12 Jean Monnet Working Papers | pl_PL |
dc.references | Claes M., Visser de M., ‘Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks’ (2012) 8 Utrecht Law Review 100 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cohen J., ‘The European Preliminary Reference and the US Supreme Court Review of State Court Judgments: A Study in Comparative Judicial Federalism’ (1996) 44 AJIL 421 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dyevre A., ‘Domestic Judicial Non-Compliance in the European Union: A Political Economic Approach’ (2013) 2 LSE Law, Society, Economy Working Papers | pl_PL |
dc.references | Farrell Miller A., ‘The Preliminary Reference Procedure of the Court of |Justice of the European Communities: A Model for the ICJ’ (2009) 32 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 669 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fennely N., ‘Preliminary Reference Procedure: A Factual and Legal Review’ (2006) 13 Irish Journal of European Law 55 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Jacobs F., ‘Judicial dialogue and the Cross-Fertilization of Legal Systems: The European Court of Justice’ (2003) 38 Texas International Law Journal 547 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kelemen R.D., ‘The Court of Justice of the European Union in the Twenty-First Century’ (2016) 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 117 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tremblay L., ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 617 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Virzo R., ‘The Preliminary Ruling Procedures at International Regional Courts and Tribunals’ (2011) 10 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 285 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, signed at Schengen on 19 June 1990, O.J. L 239 2000 19 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Council document 11679/07 EU of 9 July 2007 “Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures”, <http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2011679%202007%20INIT> (access: 5 April 2017) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Council Regulation (EC) 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein, O.J. L 61 1997 1 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Council Regulation (EU) No. 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union O.J. L 69 2013 1 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of significant market power under the Community regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, O.J. C 165 2002 6 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Official video records of the international colloquy, ‘La concurrence des juges en Europe – le dialogue en question(s)’ (Tours, 25–27 November 2015), <https://juges-en-europe.sciencesconf.org/resource/page/id/10> (access: 10 June 2016) | pl_PL |
dc.references | Regulation (EC) 1931/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 laying down rules on local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States and amending the provisions of the Schengen Convention, O.J. L 405 2006 1, corrigendum O.J. L 29 2007 3 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Regulation No. 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community, O.J. 17 1958 385, last amended by Council Regulation (EU) 517/2013 of 13 May 2013, O.J. L 158 2013 1 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of 25 September 2012, O.J. L 265 2012 1, as amended on 18 June 2013, O.J. L 173 2013 65 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8088-707-7.06 | |