Pokaż uproszczony rekord

The Dialogue between Selected CEE Courts and the ECtHR

dc.contributor.authorGórski, Marcin
dc.contributor.editorWyrozumska, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-20T09:25:13Z
dc.date.available2018-03-20T09:25:13Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationGórski M., The Dialogue between Selected CEE Courts and the ECtHR, [in:] Wyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017, p. [233]-296, doi: 10.18778/8088-707-7.05pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8088-707-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24240
dc.description.sponsorshipThe monograph is a result of the project nr 10-ECRP-028 International Law through the National Prism: the Impact of Judicial Dialogue The research is based on laws being in force on 2nd August 2016pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherŁódź University Presspl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofWyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017;
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.titleThe Dialogue between Selected CEE Courts and the ECtHRpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017pl_PL
dc.page.number[233]-296pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDepartment of European Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8088-708-4
dc.referencesWemhoff v Germany, App. no. 2122/64 (27 June 1968) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesAirey v Ireland, App. no. 6289/73 (9 October 1979) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesSchiesser v the Netherlands, App. no. 7710/76 (4 December 1979) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesLe Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v Belgium (23 June 1981) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesAlbert and Le Compte v Belgium (decision on admissibility, 10 February 1983) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesDe Jong, Mr. Baljet and Mr. van den Brink v the Netherlands, App. nos 8805/79, 8806/79 and 9242/81 (22 May 1984) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesW. v Federal Republic of Germany, App. no. 11564/85 (European Commission of Human Rights, decision, 4 December 1985) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesW. v Germany, App. no. 11564/85 (4 December 1985) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesWiner v United Kingdom, App. no. 10871/84 (10 July 1986) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesWiner v United Kingdom, App. no. 10871/84 (10 July 1986) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesSimón v Spain, App. no. 16685/90 (decision on admissibility, 8 July 1992) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesSteward-Brady v United Kingdom, App. no. 27436/95 (2 July 1997) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesStewart-Brady v United Kingdom, App. no. 28406/95 (European Commission of Human Rights, decision, 2 July 1997) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesPhilis v Greece (No. 2), App. no. 19773/92 (27 June 1997) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesOberschlick v Austria, App. no. 20834/92 (1 July 1997) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesChassagnou and others v France, App. nos 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95 (29 April 1999) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesNiedbała v Poland, App. no. 27915/95 (4 July 2000) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesElsholz v Germany, App. no. 25735/94 (13 July 2000) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesKudła v Poland, App. no. 30210/96 (26 October 2000) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesRingvold v Norway, App. no. 34964/97 (11 February 2003) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesPosokhov v Russia, App. no. 63486/00 (4 March 2003) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesPopov and others, Vakarelova, Markov and Bankov v Bulgaria, App. nos 48047/99, 48961/99, 50786/99, and 50792/99 (6 November 2003) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBroniowski v Poland, App. no. 31443/96 (22 June 2004) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBota v Romania, App. no. 24057/03 (decision on admissibility, 12 October 2004) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBeller v Poland, App. no. 51837/99 (1 February 2005) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesKyprianou v Cyprus, App. no. 73797/01 (15 December 2005) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesScordino v Italy, App. no. 36813/97 (29 March 2006) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesHutten-Czapska v Poland, App. no. 35014/97 (19 June 2006) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesTysiąc v Poland Judgment, App. no. 5410/03 (20 March 2007) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBączkowski v Poland, App. no. 1543/06 (3 May 2007) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesO’Halloran and Francis v United Kindgom, App. nos 15809/02 and 25624/02 (29 June 2007) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesTur v Poland, App. no. 21695/05 (23 October 2007) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBugajny v Poland, App. no. 22531/05 (6 November 2007) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesZwoźniak v Poland, App. no. 25728/05 (13 November 2007) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesVajnai v Hungary, App. no. 33629/06 (8 July 2008) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesChoumakov v Poland, App. no. 33868/05 (29 July 2008) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesE. G. v Poland and 175 other applications, App. no. 50425/99 (decision, 23 September 2008) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesVerein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v Switzerland, App. no. 32772/02 (30 June 2009) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesVerein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v Switzerland, App. no. 32772/02 (30 June 2009) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBock v Germany, App. no. 22051/07 (admissibility decision, 19 January 2010) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesS.H. and others v Austria, App. no. 57813/00 (1 April 2010) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesKorolev v Russia, App. no. 25551/05 (decision as to the admissibility, 1 July 2010) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesSchalk and Kopf v Austria, App. no. 30141/04 (22 November 2010) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesHenryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v Poland, App. no. 23614/08 (30 November 2010) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesKryvitska and Kryvitskyy v Ukraine, App. no. 30856/03 (2 December 2010) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesChoumakov v Poland, App. no. 55777/08 (1 February 2011) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Association of Real Property Owners in Łódź v Poland, decision, App. no. 3485/02 (8 March 2011) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesOtegi Mondragon v Spain, App. no. 2034/07 (15 March 2011) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesPotomska and Potomski v Poland, App. no. 33949/05 (29 March 2011) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesMirosław Garlicki v Poland, App. no. 36921/07 (14 June 2011) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesWizerkaniuk v Poland, App. no. 18990/05 (5 July 2011) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesGagliano Giorgi v Italy, App. no. 23563/07 (5 March 2012) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesGas and Dubois v France, App. no. 25951/07 (15 June 2012) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesFáber v Hungary, App. no. 40721/08 (24 July 2012) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesVeselov and Others v Russia, App. nos 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10 (2 October 2012) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesVolkov v Ukraine, App. no. 21722/11 (9 January 2013) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesHorváth and Kiss v Hungary, App. no. 11146/11 (29 January 2013) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesX and Others v Austria, App. no. 19010/07 (19 February 2013) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesTymoshenko v Ukraine, App. no. 49872/11 (30 April 2013) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesAnchugov and Gladkov v Russia, App. nos 11157/04 and 16162/05 (4 July 2013) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBrosa v Germany, App. no. 5709/09 (17 April 2014) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesMcKee v Hungary, App. no. 22840/07 (3 June 2014) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesMladina D.D. Ljubljana v Slovenia, App. no. 20981/10 (17 April 2014) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBochan v Ukraine, App. no. 22251/08 (5 February 2015) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesBouchan v Ukraine, App. no. 22251/08 (5 February 2015) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesCojocaru v Romania, App. no. 32104/06 (10 February 2015) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesMelnichuk and Others v Romania, App. nos 35279/10 and 34782/1 (5 May 2015) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.referencesRutkowski and others v Poland, App. nos 72287/10, 13927/11 and 46187/11 (7 July 2015) [ECtHR].pl_PL
dc.references5/88 Hubert Wachauf v Bundesamt für Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft (13 July 1989) [CJEU].pl_PL
dc.referencesC-168/06 Ceramika Paradyż (CJEU, 6 March 2007)pl_PL
dc.referencesC-571/10 Servet Kamberaj v Istituto per l’Edilizia sociale della Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (24 April 2012) [CJEU].pl_PL
dc.referencesOpinion 2/13 (CJEU, 18 December 2014) on the draft agreement providing for the accession of the European Union to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedomspl_PL
dc.referencesK 6/94 (21 November 1994) [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesK 21/05 (18 January 2006) [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesSK 51/05 (23 May 2006) [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesP 14/06 (11 September 2006) [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesSK 7/06 (24 October 2007) [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesK 44/12 (18 September 2014) [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII ARN 75/94 (order, 11 January 1995) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesII KKN 295/98 (9 November 1999) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesV CSK 271/08 (28 November 2008) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII CZP 16/10 (resolution of the panel of 7 judges) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII CZP 16/10 (resolution of 7 judges, 30 November 2010) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII UK 101/11 (22 May 2012) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI CSK 577/11 (14 June 2012) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI BU 14/12 (3 April 2013) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.references14/14 (Supreme Court, resolution of 7 judges, 26 June 2014) [Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII Ko 337/11 (Provincial Court in Opole, 16 September 2011) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesII Aka 17/12 (Court of Appeal in Wrocław, 16 February 2012) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesII Aka 17/12 (Court of Appeal in Wrocław, 16 February 2012) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesXII C 242/11 (Provincial Court in Gliwice, 29 March 2012) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesXIII W 1838/12 (District Court in Białystok, 14 March 2013) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII AUa 413/13 (Court of Appeal in Poznań, 1 August 2013) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesVIII Ka 499/13 (Provincial Court in Białystok, 3 October 2013) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII AUz 476/13 (Court of Appeal in Szczecin, order, 16 December 2013) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesV ACa 535/12 (Court of Appeal in Katowice, 13 February 2014) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII Ca 727/14 (Provincial Court in Gliwice, 1 October 2014) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesII Ka 71/15 (Provincial Court in Sieradz, 22 April 2015) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI OSK 1116/07 (Supreme Administrative Court, 2 September 2008) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI OSK 2139/13 (Supreme Administrative Court, 1 October 2013) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI OSK 2538/13 (Supreme Administrative Court, 10 January 2014) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesII OSK 1298/13 (Supreme Administrative Court, 17 December 2014) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI OPS 3/15 (Supreme Administrative Court, order, 21 March 2016) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI OZ 419/15, I OZ 420/15 and I OZ 421/15 (decisions, 6 May 2015) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI OSK 1992/14 (Supreme Administrative Court, order, 16 October 2015) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesI GSK 2071/15 (Supreme Administrative Court, order, 20 November 2015) [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesIII SA/Łd 1100/12 (Regional Administrative Court in Łódź, 14 February 2013)pl_PL
dc.referencesII SA/Sz 241/14 (Regional Administrative Court in Szczecin, 3 July 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesII SA/Wr 311/14 (Regional Administrative Court in Wrocław, 23 July 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesI SA/Wa 1745/14 (Regional Administrative Court in Warsaw, 1 August 2014)pl_PL
dc.referencesII FNP 1/14 (Polish Supreme Administrative Court, 1 June 2015)pl_PL
dc.references3 To 12/2004 (Krajský soud v Českých Budějovicích, 9 January 2004)pl_PL
dc.references8 To 163/2004 (Krajský soud v Plzni, 17 May 2004)pl_PL
dc.referencesÚS 367/03 (Czech Constitutional Court, 15 March 2005)pl_PL
dc.references18 Co 420/2010 (Krajský soud v Hradci Králové, 20 September 2010)pl_PL
dc.references1 To 35/2011 (Vrchní soud v Olomouci, 18 August 2011)pl_PL
dc.references7/2014 (Constitutional Court of Hungary, 3 March 2014)pl_PL
dc.references3 K-7-90/2009 (Supreme Court of Lithuania, 23 April 2009)pl_PL
dc.references3 K-3-358/2009 (Supreme Court of Lithuania, 29 September 2009)pl_PL
dc.references2 K-123/2010 (Supreme Court of Lithuania, 30 March 2010)pl_PL
dc.references2 SA-209-623/2010 (Supreme Court of Lithuania, 20 September 2010)pl_PL
dc.references2 SA-137-262/2011 (Supreme Court of Lithuania, 9 September 2011)pl_PL
dc.references21/2008 (Lithuanian Constitutional Court, 28 September 2011)pl_PL
dc.references21/2008 (Lithuanian Constitutional Court, 28 September 2011)pl_PL
dc.references8/2010-132/2010 (Lithuanian Constitutional Court, 12 April 2013)pl_PL
dc.referencesRuling of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation no. 21 on Application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950 and Protocols thereto by the Courts of General Jurisdictionpl_PL
dc.references21-P (Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation 14 July 2015) 12-П/2016 Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, 19 April 2016 “по делу о разрешении вопроса о возможности исполнения в соответствии с Конституцией Российской Федерации постановления Европейского Суда по правам человека от 4 июля 2013 года по делу «Анчугов и Гладков против России» в связи с запросом Министерства юстиции Российской Федерации”, <http://www.supcourt.ru/catalog.php?c1=English&c2=Documents&c3=&id=9155> (access: 22 March 2015)pl_PL
dc.references4-P (Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, 26 February 2010)pl_PL
dc.referencesAppeal of the Trade Union of Personnel of the Militia of the City of Moscow v Ministry of Internal Affairs (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 16 November 2000)pl_PL
dc.referencesKolotkov v Government of the Russian Federation (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 13 March 2003)pl_PL
dc.referencesNew York Times v Sullivan 376 U.S. 254 (US Supreme Court, 1966)pl_PL
dc.referencesBalcerzak M., Jasudowicz T., Kapelańska-Pręgowska J. (eds), Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka i jej system kontrolny (Katedra Praw Człowieka, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika 2011)pl_PL
dc.referencesBiuro Analiz Sejmowych, Wykonywanie wyroków Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka przez Sejm (Warszawa 2012)pl_PL
dc.referencesBobek M., Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (OUP 2013)pl_PL
dc.referencesBurkov A.L., The Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on Russian Law. Legislation and Application in 1996–2006 (ibidem-Verlag 2007)pl_PL
dc.referencesCafaggi F. (ed.), ‘Judicial interaction techniques – their potential and use in European fundamental rights adjudication. Final handbook, Centre for Judicial Cooperation’, <www.nsa.gov.pl/download.php?id=165> (access: 15 December 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesIchim O., Just Satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge 2015)pl_PL
dc.referencesKlecatsky H., Marcic R., Schambeck H. (eds), Die Wiener Rechtstheoretische Schule (1968)pl_PL
dc.referencesPospíšil I., Comments on Reopening Proceedings in the Civil Matters after the ECtHR Judgments before the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic (Strasbourg 2015)pl_PL
dc.referencesShelton D., Remedies in International Human Rights Law (OUP 2015)pl_PL
dc.referencesHofmański P., [in:] Garlicki L. (ed.), Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Tom I. Komentarz do artykułów 1–18 (Wydawnictwo CH Beck 2010)pl_PL
dc.referencesHofmański P., Wróbel A., ‘Komentarz do art. 6 EKPC’, [in:] Wróbel A. (ed.), Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Komentarz. Tom I (Wydawnictwo CH Beck 2010)pl_PL
dc.referencesKamiński I.C., Kownacki R., Wierczyńska K., ‘Wykonywanie orzeczeń Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w polskim systemie prawnym’, [in:] Wróbel A. (ed.), Zapewnienie efektywności orzeczeń sądów międzynarodowych w polskim porządku prawnym (Wolters Kluwer 2011)pl_PL
dc.referencesNussberger A., ‘The Reception Process in Russia and Ukraine’, [in:] Keller H., Stone Sweet A., A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (OUP 2008)pl_PL
dc.referencesPeters B., ‘The Rule of Law Dimensions of Dialogues Between National Courts and Strasbourg’, [in:] Kanetake M., Nollkaemper A. (eds), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels (OUP 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesStępień M., ‘Nadużycie prawa do sądu – czy sądy są bezsilne względem pieniaczy sądowych?’, [in:] Balcerzak M., Jasudowicz T., Kapelańska-Pręgowska J. (eds), Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka i jej system kontrolny – perspektywa systemowa i orzecznicza (Katedra Praw Człowieka, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika 2011)pl_PL
dc.referencesAkoglu K.S., ‘Removing Arbitrary Handicaps: Protecting the Right to Education in Horváth and Kiss v Hungary’ (2014) 37 Boston College International and Comparative Law Reviewpl_PL
dc.referencesBishop J., ‘The effect of de-individuation of the Internet Troller on Criminal Procedure implementation: An interview with a Hater’ (2013) 7 International Journal of Cyber Criminology 1pl_PL
dc.referencesBurke-White W.W., ‘ International Legal Pluralism’ (2004) 961 Faculty Scholarship Paperspl_PL
dc.referencesBurkov A.L., ‘Implementation of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in Russian Courts’ (2006) 1 Russian Law: Theory and Practicepl_PL
dc.referencesBurkov A.L., ‘Применение Европейской конвенции о защите прав человека в судах России’ (2006) 6 Международная защита прав человекаpl_PL
dc.referencesChronowski N., Csatlós E., ‘Judicial Dialogue or National Monologue? The International Law and Hungarian Courts’ (2013) 1 ELTE Law Journalpl_PL
dc.referencesCsatlós E., ‘The Red Star Story and the ECtHR in the Hungarian Legal Practice’ (2014) 4 ELTE Law Journal, <http://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/2014_4.pdf> (access: 1 July 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesDorsen N., ‘The relevance of foreign legal materials in U.S. constitutional cases: A conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Lawpl_PL
dc.referencesGórski M., ‘Уже лучше, но все еще недостаточно хорошо: опыт применения Европейской конвенции в практике Конституционного Трибунала Республики Польша, Сравнительное конституционное обозрение’ (2013) 4 Institute of Law and Public Policypl_PL
dc.referencesGrzegorczyk P., ‘Naruszenie art. 6 ust. 1 Europejskiej Konwencji o Ochronie Praw Człowieka jako podstawa wznowienia postępowania cywilnego z powodu nieważności’ (2011) 3 Radca Prawny 83pl_PL
dc.referencesIssaeva M., Sergeeva I., Suchkova M., ‘Enforcement of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Russia: Recent Developments and Current Challenges’ (2011) 15 International Journal of Human Rights, <http://www.surjournal.org/eng/conteudos/getArtigo15.php?artigo=15,artigo_04.htm> (access: 15 March 2015)pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw D.S., Chang W.-C., ‘The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue’ (2011) 86 Washington Law Reviewpl_PL
dc.referencesLaw D.S., ‘Judicial Comparativism and Judicial Diplomacy’ (2015) 164 4 University of Pennsylvania Law Reviewpl_PL
dc.referencesMartinico G., ‘Is the European Convention Going to Be “Supreme”? A Comparative-Constitutional Overview of ECHR and EU Law before National Courts’ (2012) 2 European Journal of International Lawpl_PL
dc.referencesNesterenko P., ‘Some Issues Concerning Application of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights in Ukraine’ (2012) 6 European Integration Studiespl_PL
dc.referencesOellers-Frahm K., ‘Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdictions – Problems and Possible Solutions’ (2001) 5 Max Planck UNYBpl_PL
dc.referencesPaprocka A., ‘Glosa do uchwały SN z dnia 30 listopada 2010 r., III CZP 16/10’ (2011) 7 Państwo i Prawopl_PL
dc.referencesPetrov R., Kalinichenko P., ‘The Europeanization of Third Country Judiciaries through the Application of the EU Acquis: The Cases of Russian and Ukraine’ (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterlypl_PL
dc.referencesThe Steering Committee for Human Rights, National implementation of the Interlaken Declaration, 23 October 2012, DH-GDR(2012)009pl_PL
dc.referencesTremblay L., ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Lawpl_PL
dc.referencesTrochev A., ‘All Appeals Lead to Strasbourg? Unpacking the Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on Russia’ (2009) 2 Demokratizatsiyapl_PL
dc.referencesVaypan G., ‘Acquiescence affirmed, its limits left undefined: The Markin judgment and the pragmatism of the Russian Constitutional Court vis-à-vis the European Court of Human Rights’ (2014) II Russian Law Journalpl_PL
dc.referencesWójtowicz K., ‘Glosa do wyroku SN z dnia 14 czerwca 2012 r., I CSK 577/11’ (2013) 1 Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnegopl_PL
dc.referencesConstitution of the Republic of Polandpl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 6 June 1997 – Code of Criminal Procedure, O.J. 1997 No. 89, item 555 [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 24 August 2001 on the procedure concerning petty offences, O.J. 2001 No. 106, item 1149 as amended [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 30 August 2002 on the Procedure before Administrative Courts, O.J. 2002 No. 153, item 1270 [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 17 June 2004 on the complaint available in case of the violation of the right of the party to have the case heard in reasonable time by the prosecutor in preliminary proceedings and by the court in judicial proceedings, O.J. 2004 No. 179, item 1843 as amended [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 8 July 2005 on the implementation of the right to compensation for property left outside of present borders of the Republic of Poland, O.J. 2014, item 1090 [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 6 November 2008 on patients’ rights and Ombudsman for patients’ rights, O.J. 2016, item 186 [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 21 November 2008 on supporting thermo-modernisation and renovation, O.J. 2014, item 712 [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 24 July 2015 on Assemblies, O.J. 2015, item 1485 [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesLaw of 24 July 2015 on Assembly, O.J. 2015, item 1485 [Poland].pl_PL
dc.referencesConstitution of Czech Republic of 16 December 1992pl_PL
dc.referencesConstitutional Court Act [Czech Republic].pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Constitution of Hungarypl_PL
dc.referencesCriminal Procedure Code [Hungary].pl_PL
dc.referencesCivil Procedure Code [Hungary].pl_PL
dc.referencesConstitution of the Republic of Lithuaniapl_PL
dc.referencesConstitution of the Russian Federationpl_PL
dc.referencesFederal Constitutional Law of 14 December 2015, N. 7-FKZ, on Amendments to the Federal Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (Rus.: Федеральный конституционный закон от 14.12.2015 N. 7-ФКЗ О внесении изменений в Федеральный конституционный закон “О Конституционном Суде Российской Федерации”)pl_PL
dc.referencesRussian Civil Procedural Code, ‘Civil Procedural Code’, <http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru081en.pdf> (access: 22 March 2015)pl_PL
dc.referencesConstitution of Ukrainepl_PL
dc.referencesLaw No. 3477-IV of 23 February 2006 [Ukraine].pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker Mckenzie, ‘Dispute Resolution Around the World, Ukraine 2011’, <http://www.bakermckenzie.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Global%20Dispute%20Resolution/Dispute%20Resolution%20Around%20the%20World/dratw_ukraine_2011.pdf> (access: 25 December 2015)pl_PL
dc.referencesBuquicchio G., Dürr S.R., ‘Volkov v Ukraine and the Venice Commission’s Approach to Structural Independence of the Judiciary’, <http://www.venice.coe.int/CoCentre/Buquicchio_Durr_Volkov.pdf> (access: 28 February 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesCouncil of Europe, ‘Reports’, <http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/Reports/pending-Cases_en.asp?CaseTitleOrNumber=Potomski&StateCode=&SectionCode=> (access: 28 February 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesCouncil of Europe, ‘Violations by Article and by State – 1959–2014’, <http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Stats_violation_1959_2014_ENG.pdf> (access: 28 February 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesCouncil of Europe, ‘Violations by Article and respondent State 1959–2015’, <http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Stats_violation_1959_2015_ENG.pdf> (access: 28 February 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Foundation Judges for Judges, Letter of 29 August 2013 pointing out that the vacancies were available in order to implement the ECtHR judgment already in July 2013, <http://www.mdx.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/58240/brief-case-Volkov.COM290813def.doc.pdf> (access: 1 January 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesHandbook on commercial dispute resolution in the Russian Federation, <http://www.ita.doc.gov/goodgovernance/adobe/Chapter%201/1-A%20Arbitrazh%20Courts.pdf> (access: 5 February 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesNational Report of Lithuania for the XVI Congress of the Conference of European Constitutional Courtspl_PL
dc.referencesScourt, ‘Mr Oleksandr Volkov Was Reinstated to his Post of a Judge of the Supreme Court of Ukraine’, <http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsuen.nsf/(documents)/40758947BA3FE9EAC2257DE00054D6B5?OpenDocument&year=2015&month=02&> (access: 1 January 2016)pl_PL
dc.referencesSupreme Court of Ukraine, ‘About the Supreme Court of Ukraine’, <http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsuen.nsf/(documents)/183E20947C3F5F67C2257ADB0031F80A> (access: 25 December 2015)pl_PL
dc.referencesVenice Commission, Interim opinion no. 832/2015 on the amendments to the Federal Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106 Plenary Session, 11–12 March 2016; CDL-AD(2016)005pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8088-707-7.05


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
[233]-296_Górski M..pdf
Rozmiar:
359.3KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Transnational Judicial Dialogu ...
Rozmiar:
144.2KB
Format:
Obraz JPEG
Opis:
Okładka
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
license_rdf
Rozmiar:
1.203KB
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska