Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorMiłkowski, Marcin
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-22T09:13:31Z
dc.date.available2018-02-22T09:13:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1689-4286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24140
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I show how semantic factors constrain the understanding of the computational phenomena to be explained so that they help build better mechanistic models. In particular, understanding what cognitive systems may refer to is important in building better models of cognitive processes. For that purpose, a recent study of some phenomena in rats that are capable of ‘entertaining’ future paths (Pfeiffer and Foster 2013) is analyzed. The case shows that the mechanistic account of physical computation may be complemented with semantic considerations, and in many cases, it actually should.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipPublikacja została sfinansowana ze środków Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego w ramach programu Narodowego Programu Rozwoju Humanistyki przyznanych na podstawie decyzji 0014/NPRH4/H3b/83/2016 - projekt „Przygotowanie i publikacja dwóch anglojęzycznych numerów monograficznych Internetowego Magazynu Filozoficznego HYBRIS” (3bH 15 0014 83).pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherInstytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris;38
dc.subjectphysical computation; semantic account of computation; mechanistic account of computation; mechanistic explanation; causal realizationpl_PL
dc.titleThe False Dichotomy Between Causal Realization and Semantic Computationpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number1-21pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationInstytut Filozofii i Socjologii Polskiej Akademii Naukpl_PL
dc.referencesAlme, Charlotte B., Chenglin Miao, Karel Jezek, Alessandro Treves, Edvard I. Moser, and May-Britt Moser. 2014. “Place Cells in the Hippocampus: Eleven Maps for Eleven Rooms.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (52):18428–35. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421056111.pl_PL
dc.referencesBechtel, William. 2008. Mental Mechanisms. New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).pl_PL
dc.referencesBechtel, William.2009. “Looking Down, Around, and up: Mechanistic Explanation in Psychology.” Philosophical Psychology 2pl_PL
dc.referencesBechtel, William.2016. “Investigating Neural Representations: The Tale of Place Cells.” Synthese 193 (5):1287–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0480-8.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerger, Alan. 1980. “Quine on ‘Alternative Logics’ and Verdict Tables.” The Journal of Philosophy 77 (5):259–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025755.pl_PL
dc.referencesChalmers, David J. 2011. “A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition.” Journal of Cognitive Science, no. 12:325–59.pl_PL
dc.referencesConklin, John, and Chris Eliasmith. 2005. “A Controlled Attractor Network Model of Path Integration in the Rat.” Journal of Computational Neuroscience 18 (2):183–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-005-6558-zpl_PL
dc.referencesCraver, Carl F. 2001. “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy.” Philosophy of Science 68 (1):53–74.pl_PL
dc.referencesCraver, Carl F.2007. Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesCraver, Carl F. 2013. “Functions and Mechanisms: A Perspectivalist View.” In Functions: Selection and Mechanisms, edited by Philippe Hunemann, 133–58. Dordrecht: Springerpl_PL
dc.referencesCummins, Robert. 1975. “Functional Analysis.” The Journal of Philosophy 72 (20):741–65.pl_PL
dc.referencesCummins, Robert. 1996. Representations, Targets, and Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeisseroth, Karl, Guoping Feng, Ania K Majewska, Gero Miesenböck, Alice Ting, and Mark J Schnitzer. 2006. “Next-Generation Optical Technologies for Illuminating Genetically Targeted Brain Circuits.” The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 26 (41):10380–86. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3863-06.2006.pl_PL
dc.referencesDretske, Fred I. 1982. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. 2nded. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlatt, Matthew, Anton van Straaten, Robby Findler, and Jacob Matthews. 2009. Revised6 Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme. Edited by Michael Sperber. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. http://www.r6rs.orgpl_PL
dc.referencesFloridi, Luciano. 2010. Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFloridi, Luciano. 2010. Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFresco, Nir. 2010. “Explaining Computation Without Semantics: Keeping It Simple.” Minds and Machines 20 (2):165–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9199-6pl_PL
dc.referencesFresco, Nir, and Marty J. Wolf. 2013. “The Instructional Information Processing Account of Digital Computation.” Synthese 191 (7):1469–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0338-5pl_PL
dc.referencesGarson, Justin. 2013. “The Functional Sense of Mechanism.” Philosophy of Science 80 (3):317–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/671173pl_PL
dc.referencesHarnad, Stevan. 1990. “The Symbol Grounding Problem.” Physica D 42:335–46pl_PL
dc.referencesKrohs, Ulrich. 2004. “Der Begriff Des Designs.” In Eine Theorie Biologischer Theorien. Status Und Gehalt von Funktionsaussagen Und Informationstheoretischen Modellen, 59:70–119. Berlin: Springerpl_PL
dc.referencesKrohs, Ulrich. 2004. “Der Begriff Des Designs.” In Eine Theorie Biologischer Theorien. Status Und Gehalt von Funktionsaussagen Und Informationstheoretischen Modellen, 59:70–119. Berlin: Springerpl_PL
dc.referencesKrohs, Ulrich. 2004. “Der Begriff Des Designs.” In Eine Theorie Biologischer Theorien. Status Und Gehalt von Funktionsaussagen Und Informationstheoretischen Modellen, 59:70–119. Berlin: Springerpl_PL
dc.referencesMacKay, Donald MacCrimmon. 1969. Information, Mechanism and Meaning. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcNaughton, Bruce L, Francesco P Battaglia, Ole Jensen, Edvard I Moser, and May-Britt Moser. 2006. “Path Integration and the Neural Basis of the ‘Cognitive Map’.” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 7 (8):663–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1932.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiłkowski, Marcin. 2013. Explaining the Computational Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiłkowski, Marcin. 2015. “Satisfaction Conditions in Anticipatory Mechanisms.” Biology & Philosophy 30 (5):709–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9481-3.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiłkowski, Marcin. 2016. “Unification Strategies in Cognitive Science.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 48 (1):13–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0053.pl_PL
dc.referencesMillikan, Ruth Garrett. 2002. “Biofunctions: Two Paradigms.” In Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, edited by Andrew Ariew, Robert Cummins, and Mark Perlman. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.pl_PL
dc.referencesPfeiffer, Brad E, and David J Foster. 2013. “Hippocampal Place-Cell Sequences Depict Future Paths to Remembered Goals.” Nature 497 (7447). Nature Publishing Group:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12112pl_PL
dc.referencesPiccinini, Gualtiero. 2008. “Computation without Representation.” Philosophical Studies 137 (2):205–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-5385-4.pl_PL
dc.referencesPiccinini, Gualtiero. 2015. Physical Computation: A Mechanistic Account. Oxford: Oxford University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesPlebe, Alessio, and Vivian M. De La Cruz. 2016. Neurosemantics. Vol. 10. Studies in Brain and Mind. Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319- 28552-8.pl_PL
dc.referencesRescorla, Michael. 2009. “Cognitive Maps and the Language of Thought.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):377–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp012pl_PL
dc.referencesRescorla, Michael.2013. “Against Structuralist Theories of Computational Implementation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):681–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs017.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmidt, Brandy, and A. David Redish. 2013. “Neuroscience: Navigation with a Cognitive Map.” Nature 497 (7447):42–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12095.pl_PL
dc.referencesShagrir, Oron. 2001. “Content, Computation and Externalism.” Mind 110 (438):369–400.pl_PL
dc.referencesShagrir, Oron.2006. “Why We View the Brain as a Computer.” Synthese 153 (3):393–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9099-8.pl_PL
dc.referencesShagrir, Oron.2010. “Brains as Analog-Model Computers.” Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3). Elsevier Ltd:271–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.007pl_PL
dc.referencesTolman, Edward Chace. 1948. “Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men.” Psychological Review 55 (4):189–208.pl_PL
dc.referencesVermaas, Pieter E., and Wybo Houkes. 2006. “Technical Functions: A Drawbridge between the Intentional and Structural Natures of Technical Artefacts.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, The dual nature of technical artefacts, 37 (1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.002.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord