Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorSulewski, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-17T14:21:58Z
dc.date.available2017-11-17T14:21:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/23296
dc.description.abstractIn statistical literature there exist many tests to reveal the independence of two qualitative variables in two‑way contingency tables (CTs), in particular in 2×2 CTs. In this paper four independence tests were compared. These are: the chi‑square test, being the most popular type of power divergence statistics; the modular test and the d‑square test, which is a modification of the Pearson’s test; the logarithmic minimum test which is a new proposal. Critical values for the tests listed above were determined with the Monte Carlo method. In order to compare the tests, the measure of untruthfulness of H0 was proposed and the power of the tests was calculated. en_GB
dc.description.abstractW literaturze statystycznej istnieje wiele miar do ujawniania niezależności dwóch zmiennych jakościowych w tabelach kontyngencji, w szczególności w tabelach dwudzielczych 2×2. W niniejszym artykule porównano cztery testy niezależności. Są to: test chi‑kwadrat, jako najbardziej znany przedstawiciel statystyk power divergence, test modułowy oraz test d‑kwadrat, jako modyfikacje testu Pearsona, test logarytmiczno‑minimalny, będący nową propozycją. Wartości krytyczne dla wyżej wymienionych testów zostały wyznaczone metodami Monte Carlo. W celu porównania testów zaproponowano miarę nieprawdziwości H0 i wyznaczono ich moc.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;330
dc.subjectindependence testen_GB
dc.subject2×2 contingency tableen_GB
dc.subjectlogarithmic minimum statisticsen_GB
dc.subjectmodular statisticsen_GB
dc.subjectpower divergence statisticsen_GB
dc.subjectMonte Carlo methoden_GB
dc.subjecttest niezależnościpl_PL
dc.subjecttablica dwudzielcza 2×2pl_PL
dc.subjectstatystyka logarytmiczno‑minimalnapl_PL
dc.subjectstatystyka modułowapl_PL
dc.subjectstatystyki power divergencepl_PL
dc.subjectmetoda Monte Carlopl_PL
dc.titleA New Test for Independence in 2×2 Contingency Tablesen_GB
dc.title.alternativeNowy test niezależności dla tablic dwudzielczych 2×2pl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017en_GB
dc.page.number[55]-75
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPomeranian University in Słupsk, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute of Mathematics
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesAgresti A. (2002), Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley, New Jersey.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlbert J.H. (1990), A Bayesian test for a two‑way contingency table using independence, “Prior. Canadian Journal of Statistics”, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 347–363.pl_PL
dc.referencesAndrés A.M., Tejedor I.H., Mato A.S. (1995), The Wilcoxon, Spearman, Fisher, χ2, Student and Pearson Tests and 2x2 Tables, “The Statistician”, pp. 441–450.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeh E.J., Farver T.B. (2009), An evaluation of non‑iterative methods for estimating the linear‑by‑linear parameter of ordinal log‑linear models, “Australian New Zealand Journal of Statistics”, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 335–352.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerry K.J., Mielke P.W. (1988), Monte Carlo comparisons of the asymptotic chi‑square and likelihood‑ratio tests with the no asymptotic chi‑square tests for sparse r×c tables, “Psychological Bulletin”, vol. 103, no. 2, p. 256.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlitzstein J., Diaconis P. (2011), A sequential importance sampling algorithm for generating random graphs with prescribed degrees, “Internet Mathematics”, vol. 6, pp. 489–522.pl_PL
dc.referencesCampbell I. (2007), Chi‑squared and Fisher‑Irwin tests of two‑by‑two tables with small sample recommendations, “Statistics in Medicine”, vol. 26, no. 19, pp. 3661–3675.pl_PL
dc.referencesCeyhan E. (2010), Directional clustering tests based on nearest neighbor contingency tables, “Journal of nonparametric Statistics”, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 599–616.pl_PL
dc.referencesChang C.H., Lin J.J., Pal N. (2011), Testing the equality of several gamma means: a parametric bootstrap method with applications, “Computational Statistics”, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55–76.pl_PL
dc.referencesChang C.H., Pal N. (2008), A revisit to the Behrens–Fisher problem: comparison of five test methods, “Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation”, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1064–1085.pl_PL
dc.referencesChen Y., Diaconis P., Holmes S.P., Liu J.S. (2005), Sequential Monte Carlo methods for statistical analysis of tables, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, vol. 100, pp. 109–120.pl_PL
dc.referencesChen Y., Dinwoodie I.H., Sullivant S. (2006), Sequential importance sampling for multiway tables, “The Annals of Statistics”, pp. 523–545.pl_PL
dc.referencesClogg C.C., Eliason S.R. (1987), Some common problems in log‑linear analysis, “Sociological Methods Research”, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 8–44.pl_PL
dc.referencesCochran W.G. (1952), The χ2 test of goodness of fit, “The Annals of Mathematical Statistics”, pp. 315–345.pl_PL
dc.referencesCochran W.G. (1954), Some methods for strengthening the common χ2 tests, “Biometrics”, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 417–451.pl_PL
dc.referencesCohen J., Nee J.C. (1990), Robustness of Type I Error and Power in Set Correlation Analysis of Contingency Tables, “Multivariate Behav. Res.”, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 341–350.pl_PL
dc.referencesCressie N., Read T. (1984), Multinomial Goodness‑of‑Fit Tests, “J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.”, vol. 46, pp. 440–464.pl_PL
dc.referencesCressie N., Read T.R. (1989), Pearson’s χ2 and the log likelihood ratio statistics G2: a comparative review, “International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique”, pp. 19–43.pl_PL
dc.referencesCryan M., Dyer M. (2003), A polynomial‑time algorithm to approximately count contingency tables when the number of rows is constant, “Journal of Computer and System Sciences”, vol. 67, pp. 291–310.pl_PL
dc.referencesCryan M., Dyer M., Goldberg L.A., Jerrum M., Martin R. (2006), Rapidly mixing Markov chains for sampling contingency tables with a constant number of rows, “SIAM Journal on Computing”, vol. 36, pp. 247–278.pl_PL
dc.referencesCung C. (2013), Crime and Demographics: An Analysis of LAPD Crime Data, “M. sc. Thesis”, UCLA, Department of Statistics, Los Angeles.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavis C.S. (1993), A new approximation to the distribution of Pearson’s chi‑square, “StatisticaSinica”, pp. 189–196.pl_PL
dc.referencesDesalvo S., Zhao J.Y. (2016), Random Sampling of Contingency Tables via Probabilistic Divide‑and‑Conquer, “ArXiv preprint”, ArXiv, 1507.00070v4.pl_PL
dc.referencesDiaconis P., Efron B. (1985), Testing for independence in a two‑way table: new interpretations of the chi‑square statistics, “The Annals of Statistics”, pp. 845–874.pl_PL
dc.referencesDiaconis P., Sturmfels B. (1998), Algebraic algorithms for sampling from conditional distributions, “The Annals of Statistics”, vol. 26, pp. 363–397.pl_PL
dc.referencesDickhaus T., Straßburger K., Schunk D., Morcillo‑Suarez C., Illig T., Navarro A. (2012), How to analyze many contingency tables simultaneously in genetic association studies, “Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology”, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1544–6115.pl_PL
dc.referencesEgozcue J.J., Pawlowsky‑Glahn V., Templ M., Hron K. (2015), Independence in contingency tables using simplicial geometry, “Communications in Statistics‑Theory and Methods”, vol. 44, no. 18, pp. 3978–3996.pl_PL
dc.referencesEl Galta R., Stijnen T., Houwing‑Duistermaat J.J. (2008), Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test, “Stat Med.”, vol. 27, no. 22, pp. 4596–4609.pl_PL
dc.referencesFisher R.A. (1922), On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, “Journal of the Royal Statistical Society”, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 87–94.pl_PL
dc.referencesFishman G.S. (2012), Counting contingency tables via multistage Markov chain Monte Carlo, “Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics”, vol. 21, pp. 713–738.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarcía J.E., González‑López V.A. (2014), Independence tests for continuous random variables based on the longest increasing subsequence, “Journal of Multivariate Analysis”, vol. 127, pp. 126–146.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarcía J.E., González‑López V.A. (2016), Independence test for sparse data, “International Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics 2015”, AIP Publishing, vol. 1738, no. 1, p. 140002.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarcia‑Perez M.A., Nunez‑Anton V. (2009), Accuracy of the power‑divergence statistics for testing independence and homogeneity in two‑way contingency tables, “Commun. Stat. – Simul. Comput.”, vol. 38, pp. 503–512.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarside G.R., Mack C. (1976), Actual type 1 error probabilities for various tests in the homogeneity case of the 2×2 contingency table, “The American Statistician”, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 18–21.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaber M. (1987), A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for 2x2 contingency tables: A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests, “Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation”, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 999–1013.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaberman S.J. (1981), Tests for independence in two‑way contingency tables based on canonical correlation and on linear‑by‑linear interaction, “The Annals of Statistics”, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1178–1186.pl_PL
dc.referencesHall P., Wilson S.R. (1991), Two guidelines for bootstrap hypothesis testing, “Biometrics”, pp. 757–762.pl_PL
dc.referencesHui‑Qiong L., Guo‑Liang T., Xue‑Jun J., Nian‑Sheng T. (2016), Testing hypothesis for a simple ordering in incomplete contingency tables, “Computational Statistics Data Analysis”, vol. 99, pp. 25–37.pl_PL
dc.referencesIossifova R., Marmolejo‑Ramos F. (2013), When the body is time: spatial and temporal deixis in children with visual impairments and sighted children, “Research in Developmental Disabilities”, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 2173–2184.pl_PL
dc.referencesIrwin J.O. (1935), Tests of significance for differences between percentages based on small numbers, “Metron”, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 84–94.pl_PL
dc.referencesJeong H.C., Jhun M., Kim D. (2005), Bootstrap tests for independence in two‑way ordinal contingency tables, “Computational Statistics Data Analysis”, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 623–631.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoehler K.J., Larntz K. (1980), An empirical investigation of goodness‑of‑fit statistics for sparse multinomials, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, vol. 75, no. 370, pp. 336–344.pl_PL
dc.referencesLawal H.B., Uptong G.J.G. (1984), On the use of χ2 as a test of independence in contingency tables with small cell expectations, “Australian Journal of Statistics”, vol. 26, pp. 75–85.pl_PL
dc.referencesLawal H.B., Uptong G.J.G. (1990), Comparisons of Some Chi‑squared Tests for the Test of Independence in Sparse Two‑Way Contingency Tables, “Biometrical Journal”, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 59–72.pl_PL
dc.referencesLin J.J., Chang C.H., Pal N. (2015), A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi‑Square approximations as well as Fisher’s exact test, “Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics”, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 438–458.pl_PL
dc.referencesLipsitz S.R., Fitzmaurice G.M., Sinha D., Hevelone N., Giovannucci E., Hu J.C. (2015), Testing for independence in J×K contingency tables with complex sample survey data, “Biometrics”, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 832–840.pl_PL
dc.referencesLydersen S., Fagerland M.W., Laake P. (2009), Recommended tests for association in 2×2 tables, “Statistics in Medicine”, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1159–1175.pl_PL
dc.referencesMeng R.C., Chapman D.G. (1966), The power of chi square tests for contingency tables, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, vol. 61, no. 316, pp. 965–975.pl_PL
dc.referencesNandram B., Bhatta D., Bhadra D. (2013), A likelihood ratio test of quasi‑independence for sparse two‑way contingency tables, “Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation”, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 284–304.pl_PL
dc.referencesPearson K. (1904), On the theory of contingency and its relation to association and normal correlation, “K. Pearson, Early Papers”.pl_PL
dc.referencesShan G., Wilding G. (2015), Unconditional tests for association in 2×2 contingency tables in the total sum fixed design, “Statistica Neerlandica”, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 67–83.pl_PL
dc.referencesSulewski P. (2009), Two-by-two Contingency Table as a Goodness-of-Fit Test, “Computational Methods in Science and Technology”, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 203–211.pl_PL
dc.referencesSulewski P. (2013), Modyfikacja testu niezależności [Modification of the independence test], “Statistical News – Central Statistical Office”, vol. 10, pp. 1–19.pl_PL
dc.referencesSulewski P. (2014), Statystyczne badanie współzależności cech typu dyskretne kategorie [The statistical study of features interdependence of discrete categories type], Pomeranian University, Slupsk.pl_PL
dc.referencesSulewski P., Motyka R. (2015), Power analysis of independence testing for contingency tables, “Scientific Journal of Polish Naval Academy”, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 37–46.pl_PL
dc.referencesSulewski P. (2016a), Moc testów niezależności w tablicy dwudzielczej [Power of independence test in the contingency tables], “Statistical News – Central Statistical Office”, vol. 8, pp. 1–17.pl_PL
dc.referencesSulewski P. (2016b), Moc testów niezależności w tablicy dwudzielczej większej niż 2x2 [Power of independence test in the 2´2 contingency tables bigger than 2x2], “Statistical Review”, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 191–209.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaneichi N., Sekiya Y. (2007), Improved transformed statistics for the test of independence in r×s contingency tables, “Journal of Multivariate Analysis”, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 1630–1657.pl_PL
dc.referencesVélez J.I., Marmolejo‑Ramos F., Correa J.C. (2016), A Graphical Diagnostic Test for Two‑Way Contingency Tables, “RevistaColombiana de Estadística”, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 97–108.pl_PL
dc.referencesWickens T.D. (1969), Multiway Contingency Tables Analysis for the Social Sciences, Psychology Press, United States.pl_PL
dc.referencesYenigün C.D., Székely G.J., Rizzo M.L. (2011). A Test of Independence in Two‑Way Contingency Tables Based on Maximal Correlation, “Communications in Statistics‑Theory and Methods”, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2225–2242.pl_PL
dc.referencesYoshida R., Xi J., Wei S., Zhou F., Haws D. (2011), Semigroups and sequential importance sampling for multiway tables, “ArXiv preprint”, ArXiv, 1111, p. 6518.pl_PL
dc.referencesYu Y. (2014), Tests of independence in a single 2×2 contingency table with random margins, Doctoral dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester.pl_PL
dc.referencesZelterman D. (1987). Goodness‑of‑fit tests for large sparse multinomial distributions, “J. Am. Stat. Assoc.”, vol. 82, pp. 624–629.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailpiotr.sulewski@apsl.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.330.04
dc.relation.volume4en_GB
dc.subject.jelC12
dc.subject.jelC14
dc.subject.jelC15
dc.subject.jelC46
dc.subject.jelC63


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord