Editorial: Relevance Theory and Intercultural Communication Problems

Piskorska, Agnieszka

dc.contributor.author	Piskorska, Agnieszka	en
dc.date.accessioned	2017-07-20T10:10:25Z
dc.date.available	2017-07-20T10:10:25Z
dc.date.issued	2017-05-17	en
dc.identifier.issn	1731-7533	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22288
dc.description.abstract	This editorial to the special issue of RiL dedicated to relevance theory and problems of intercultural communication addresses the general requirements that a theory of communication must meet to be applicable to the analysis of intercultural communication. Then it discusses criticism levelled against Grice’s theory of conversational implicature and Brown and Levinson’s theory of politeness on the grounds that these theories were not universal enough to be applied to all data. Finally, it offers some remarks on the applicability of relevance theory to intercultural pragmatics.	en
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Research in Language;15	en
dc.rights	This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0	en
dc.subject	relevance theory	en
dc.subject	intercultural communication	en
dc.subject	Grice	en
dc.subject	Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory	en
dc.title	Editorial: Relevance Theory and Intercultural Communication Problems	en
dc.page.number	1-9	en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland	en
dc.identifier.eissn	2083-4616
dc.references	Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	en
dc.references	Escandell-Vidal, Victoria M. 1996. Towards a Cognitive Approach to Politeness . In K. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.), Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics, Vol. II: Discourse Strategies, 621-650. Oxford: Pergamon Press.	en
dc.references	Escandell-Vidal, Victoria M. 1998. Politeness. A Relevant Issue for Relevance Theory. In J. M. Martínez and F. Yus (eds.), Special Issue devoted to Relevance Theory, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11. 45-57.	en
dc.references	Escandell-Vidal, Victoria M. 2004. Norms and Principles. Putting Social and Cognitive Pragmatics Together. In R. Márquez-Reiter and M. E. Placencia (eds.), Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, 347-371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.	en
dc.references	Fukada, Atsushi and Noriko Asato 2004. Universal Politeness Theory: Application to the Use of Japanese Honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1991-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.006	en
dc.references	Goldsmith, Daena J. 2006. Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. In B. Whaley and W. Samter (eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars, 219-236. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.	en
dc.references	Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.	en
dc.references	Grice, Herbert P. 1989a [1975]. Logic and Conversation. In H. P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words, 22-40. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.	en
dc.references	Grice, Herbert P. 1989b. Retrospective Epilogue. In H. P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the way of Words, 339-85. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.	en
dc.references	Ide, Sachiko 1989. Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness. Multilingua 8(2/3). 223-248. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223	en
dc.references	Jary, Mark. 1998. Relevance Theory and the Communication of Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 30. 1-19. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)80005-2	en
dc.references	Keenan Ochs, Elinor. 1976. The Universality of Conversational Postulates. Language in Society 5/1. 67-80.	en
dc.references	Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12. 403-426. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3	en
dc.references	Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995 [1986]. Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.	en
dc.references	Trosborg, Anna. 1994. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.	en
dc.references	Van der Henst, Jan-Baptiste, Carles, L. and D. Sperber. 2002. Truthfulness and Relevance in Telling the Time. Mind and Language 17. 457-66.	en
dc.references	Van der Henst, Jan-Baptiste and Dan Sperber. 2004. Testing the Cognitive and Communicative Principles of Relevance. In I. Noveck and D. Sperber (eds.), Experimental Pragmatics, 229-280. Palgrave.	en
dc.references	Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste, Sperber, Dan and Guy Politzer. 2002. When is a Conclusion Worth Deriving? A Relevance-based Analysis of Determinate Relational Problems. Thinking and Reasoning 8. 1-20.	en
dc.references	Wilson, Deirdre. 2015. Does Intercultural Communication Challenge the Principles/mechanisms of Relevance Theory? Plenary talk at ICA Workshop, University of Łódź.	en
dc.contributor.authorEmail	a.piskorska@uw.edu.pl	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1515/rela-2017-0005	en

Pliki tej pozycji

Nazwa:: rela-2017-0005.pdf
Rozmiar:: 147.7KB
Format:: PDF

Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Research in Language (2017) vol.15 nr 1 [6]

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.