Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorZaki, Maien
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-20T10:10:19Z
dc.date.available2017-07-20T10:10:19Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-17en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/22285
dc.description.abstractDespite growing interest in the impact of computer-mediated communication on our lives, linguistic studies on such communication conducted in the Arabic language are scarce. Grounded in Relevance Theory, this paper seeks to fill this void by analysing the linguistic structure of Arabic religious posts on Facebook. First, I discuss communication on Facebook, treating it as a relevance-seeking process of writing or sharing posts, with the functions of ‘Like’ and ‘Share’ seen as cues for communicating propositional attitude. Second, I analyse a corpus of around 80 posts, revealing an interesting use of imperatives, interrogatives and conditionals which manipulate the interpretation of such posts between descriptive and interpretive readings. I also argue that a rigorous system of incentives is employed in such posts in order to boost their relevance. Positive, negative and challenging incentives link the textual to the visual message in an attempt to raise more cognitive effects for the readers.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;15en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en
dc.subjectPragmaticsen
dc.subjectrelevance-theoryen
dc.subjectArabicen
dc.subjectFacebooken
dc.subjectCyberpragmaticsen
dc.titleThe Pragmatics of Arabic Religious Posts on Facebook: A Relevance-Theoretic Accounten
dc.page.number37-60en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAmerican University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emiratesen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesAlbirini, Abdulkafi. 2016. Modern Arabic Sociolinguistics: Diglossia, Variation, Codeswitching, Attitudes and Identity. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.en
dc.referencesAl-Rawi, Ahmed. 2016. Facebook as a Virtual Mosque: The Online Protest Against Innocence of Muslims. Culture and Religion 17(1). 19-34 doi: doi: 10.1080/14755610.2016.1159591en
dc.referencesArab Social Media Report. Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government. [Online] Available from: http://www.arabsocialmediareport.com/Facebook/LineChart.aspx [Accessed: 15th June 2016].en
dc.referencesBaron, Naomi S. 2008. Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesBassiouney, Reem. 2009. Arabic Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.en
dc.referencesBouvier, Gwen. 2015. What Is a Discourse Approach to Twitter, Facebook, You Tube and Other Social Media: Connecting with Other Academic Fields? Journal of Multicutural Discourses 102. 149-162. doi: doi: 10.1080/17447143.2015.1042381en
dc.referencesBjornsson, Jan A. 2010. Egyptian Romanized Arabic: A Study of Selected Features from Communication Among Egyptian Youth on Facebook. Unpublished dissertation. University of Oslo.en
dc.referencesBrügger, Niels. 2015. A Brief History of Facebook As a Media Text: The Development of an Empty Structure. First Monday, 20(5). doi: doi: 10.5210/fm.v20i5.5423en
dc.referencesCampbell, Heidi. 2010. When Religion Meets New Media. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesChafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Points of View. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 25-55. New York: Academic Press.en
dc.referencesChandler, Daniel. 2006. Identities Under Construction. In Janet Maybin and Joan Swann (eds.), The Art of English, 303-10. London: Palgrave Macmillan.en
dc.referencesClark, Billy. 1991. Relevance Theory and the Semantics of Non-Declarative Sentences. Unpublished Dissertation. University College London.en
dc.referencesClark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesCrystal, David. 1965. Linguistics, Language, and Religion. London: Hawthorn Books.en
dc.referencesCrystal, David. 2006. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesCrystal, David. 2008. Txtng : The Gr8 Db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesDąbrowska, Marta. 2013. Variation in Language : Faces of Facebook English. Frankfurt am Main Germany: Peter Lang AG.en
dc.referencesEllison Nicole B., Steinfield Charles and Cliff Lampe. 2011. Connection Strategies: Social capital Implications of Facebook-enabled Communication Practices. New Media & Society 13(6). 873-892. doi: doi: 10.1177/1461444810385389en
dc.referencesGordon, Clara. 2011. From Speech to Screen: the Orthography of Colloquial Arabic in Electronically-Mediated Communication. Unpublished dissertation.en
dc.referencesKnaś, Agnieszka. 2010. Review of Carmen Freshener Email - SMS -MMS: The Linguistic Creativity of Asynchronous Discourse in the New Media Age. Language in Society 39 (5). 713-14. doi: doi: 10.1017/S0047404510000813en
dc.referencesMcClure, Paul. 2016. Faith and Facebook in a Pluralistic Age: The Effect of Social Networking Sites on the Religious Beliefs of Emerging Adults. Sociological Perspectives 59. 818-834. doi: doi: 10.1177/0731121416647361en
dc.referencesMiller Brian J., Mundey, Peter and Jonathan P. Hill. 2013. Faith in the Age of Facebook: Exploring the Links Between Religion and Social Network Site Membership and Use. Sociology of Religion 74(2). 227-253. doi: doi: 10.1093/socrel/srs073en
dc.referencesNoh, En-Ju. 1996. A Relevance-Theoretic Account of Metarepresentative Uses in Conditionals. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 1-41.en
dc.referencesPrince, Ellen F. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223- 255. London: Academic Press.en
dc.referencesScott, Kate. 2015. The Pragmatics of Hashtags: Inference and Conversational Style on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 81.8-20. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000355366200002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesSperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.en
dc.referencesSweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.en
dc.referencesTannen, Deborah and Anna Marie Trester. 2013. Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics series. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.en
dc.referencesWilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 1988. Mood and the Analysis of Non-Declarative Sentences. In Jonathan Dancy, J. M. E. Moravczik and C. C. W. Taylor (eds.) Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, 77-101. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en
dc.referencesYus, Francisco. 2001. Ciberpragmatica: El uso del lenguaje en Internet. Barcelona: Ariel.en
dc.referencesYus, Francisco. 2005. In Search of Cognitively Relevant Internet Banners. Image & Narrative 11.en
dc.referencesYus, Francisco. 2008. Weblogs: Web Pages in Search of a Genre? In Santiago Posteguillo, Marı́a José Esteve and M. Lluı̈sa Gea-Valor (eds.), The Texture of Internet, 118-142. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.en
dc.referencesYus, Francisco. 2010. Users’ Relevance on the Web. In Rotimi Taiwo (ed.) Handbook of Research on Discourse Behaviour and Digital Communication, 411-423. Hershey, USA: IGI Global.en
dc.referencesYus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.en
dc.referencesZappavigna, Michele. 2012. The Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. Continuum discourse series. London: Continuum International Pub. Group.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailmzaki@aus.eduen
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/rela-2017-0002en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.